Berbaclass
Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
I’m okay with that decision.
+1 - happy who it hurt but objectively it is garbage.First of all
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Now that's out of the way, Liverpool got done there. Noway was that offside.
Also, LOLOLOLOL!!!!!
Agree but it's shit non the less. It's only funny because it's Liverpool but dear me this is a shit system.Why some don't understand, thats their job to do excactly this and as long this is the rule for close offsides, they have to do this.
Otherwise they would just manipulate the game.
No idea at all? On a Man Utd forum? Really?No idea why people find this funny.
It's not funny, it's depressing.No idea at all? On a Man Utd forum? Really?
I second the opinions that objectively it was a(nother) shite call, but also HAHAHAHAHA
Got no idea why this might be funny on a united forum?No idea why people find this funny.
Look at the bigger picture, it's completely shit and making a mockery of the game.
Surely something has to happen?
If that's how you want to watch the game then yes - the offside calls alongside goal line tech are the only ones not subjective.The only time VAR is working properly is in these offside situations. 1 millimeter offside is offside.
I like football mate.Got no idea why this might be funny on a united forum?
As I remember it the issue with the Mings one was that the offside player actively interfered with Mings' ability to play the ball by tackling him almost as soon as he had controlled it. So IFAB clarified that in situations like that, the offside should be given.So can anyone explain why they looked at whether cash touched that?
I thought have after the mings City incident they clarified the rule so that a mis control incident like that or mings didn't count, but only like a poor back pass was what the rule was meant to encompass?
Or is that not the case?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Everyone here likes football here you're not special. It's quite obvious why people on a Manchester United forum would find that decision funny.I like football mate.
Don't patronise me with this 'how can you not find it funny' nonsense. I'm not 15, I love seeing Liverpool get beat, but properly.
It's not comparable, anyway yes Liverpool got fecked over by a rule that will slowly kill football as a live event.Everyone here likes football here you're not special. It's quite obvious why people on a Manchester United forum would find that decision funny.
You're telling me you didn't giggle when they lost to Sunderland via a beach ball years ago? Because they weren't beat "properly" then.
Thanks for that explanation.As I remember it the issue with the Mings one was that the offside player actively interfered with Mings' ability to play the ball by tackling him almost as soon as he had controlled it. So IFAB clarified that in situations like that, the offside should be given.
In this case Jota wasn't interfering with Cash's ability to play the ball, so it's a different scenario. More like this goal, which was rightly given:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If Cash had touched it, offside would similarly have been reset.
You can disagree with rule, be completely against it, and still laugh at Liverpool's misfortune. The two aren't mutually exclusive believe it or not. You've honestly got no point here.It's not comparable, anyway yes Liverpool got fecked over by a rule that will slowly kill football as a live event.
loooooooool PMSL.
My point was about VAR! You and the other chap jumped on the laughing at Liverpool point!You can disagree with rule, be completely against it, and still laugh and Liverpool's misfortune. The two aren't mutually exclusive believe it or not. You've honestly got no point here.
Imagine that in PL with those incompetent clownsJust watching Rugby League and why can't the PL emulate how they do things? Refs micd so you can understand their decision making and when they go to the video referee they talk you through their thought process and why and what they are giving.
It's the same in cricket actually and is utterly transparent.
It's no wonder people end up with all these conspiracy and corruption thoughts about football as there's a clear reluctance to be transparent and copy sports which do this so well, and have done for a long time.
The biggest issue is probably the players disrespect towards the refs which rarely happens in those sports.Just watching Rugby League and why can't the PL emulate how they do things? Refs micd so you can understand their decision making and when they go to the video referee they talk you through their thought process and why and what they are giving.
It's the same in cricket actually and is utterly transparent.
It's no wonder people end up with all these conspiracy and corruption thoughts about football as there's a clear reluctance to be transparent and copy sports which do this so well, and have done for a long time.
Again though, just bring it in and players would soon adjust and it would make the game better. The foul mouthed gobshites would wilt.The biggest issue is probably the players disrespect towards the refs which rarely happens in those sports.
I wonder could you have an on off switch.