Zoo
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2010
- Messages
- 30,597
Someone called GiggsWe are trying to close the gap to City.
I don't see how a kid helps us.
We are trying to close the gap to City.
I don't see how a kid helps us.
Someone called Giggs
RS doesn’t play a conventional LB role though. He’s very much a wing back and potentially a world class one.I want us to sign Sessegnon, but we also need an established LB that can perform at the top right now, like Sandro. I can't see us signing both though.
I agree with this.We should always be in for the top domestic talent.
25mill is a steal for that type of talentI agree with this.
Got to laugh at some of the logic here
"he's young so sign him"
"25mil is peanuts"
"sign him and sandro"
From what I can see, LB is no priority for us as Shaw is getting game time, he's good enough.
So there - I've saved us 100million as we don't actually need sandro or this kid.
At this point, sessegnon is raw, young, unproven and one for the future - we already have that with Mitchell.
Too much money on a 17yr old, and a position we are not desperate for right now.
What about our lack of depth in midfield or the fact we have NO natural RW?
There's a chasm is quality between Sessegnon and Mitchell.Got to laugh at some of the logic here
"he's young so sign him"
"25mil is peanuts"
"sign him and sandro"
From what I can see, LB is no priority for us as Shaw is getting game time, he's good enough.
So there - I've saved us 100million as we don't actually need sandro or this kid.
At this point, sessegnon is raw, young, unproven and one for the future - we already have that with Mitchell.
Too much money on a 17yr old, and a position we are not desperate for right now.
What about our lack of depth in midfield or the fact we have NO natural RW?
Aye, let's ignore another talented homegrown player, and then in a few years when he's in the first team of Spurs and we can't sign him, we'll ask why we never bothered to buy him when he was attainable.Got to laugh at some of the logic here
"he's young so sign him"
"25mil is peanuts"
"sign him and sandro"
From what I can see, LB is no priority for us as Shaw is getting game time, he's good enough.
So there - I've saved us 100million as we don't actually need sandro or this kid.
At this point, sessegnon is raw, young, unproven and one for the future - we already have that with Mitchell.
Too much money on a 17yr old, and a position we are not desperate for right now.
What about our lack of depth in midfield or the fact we have NO natural RW?
£25m for him is a snip I'm today's market. I'm sure if we did sign him it wouldn't affect our other potential targets.Got to laugh at some of the logic here
"he's young so sign him"
"25mil is peanuts"
"sign him and sandro"
From what I can see, LB is no priority for us as Shaw is getting game time, he's good enough.
So there - I've saved us 100million as we don't actually need sandro or this kid.
At this point, sessegnon is raw, young, unproven and one for the future - we already have that with Mitchell.
Too much money on a 17yr old, and a position we are not desperate for right now.
What about our lack of depth in midfield or the fact we have NO natural RW?
Aye, let's ignore another talented homegrown player, and then in a few years when he's in the first team of Spurs and we can't sign him, we'll ask why we never bothered to buy him when he was attainable.
I think if we sign him, he'll surprise and will be closer to the first team than many think.He's only 17 so if we do this I hope the plan is to loan him out for a couple of seasons and prepare him properly for the PL, I can't see Jose using a kid as his first choice LB.
Even if Shaw comes good we still need two good full backs on each side.We signed Shaw, the most promising home grown LB there was at the time, now 3 seasons on people cant wait to slate him every 2 seconds instead of utilising his talent.
Read my post, we have this position covered, where other areas need improving.
Sessegnon may well turn out to be a great player, but we don't sign players for the sake of it. 25mil for a 17yr old is absurd, especially for one who will come in and not get regular game time for years, at which point either Shaw will be well established or Jose would have signed someone established, meaning Sessegnon wont break through anyway.
Or we blow a fortune on a 17yr old, then when we has 2 or 3 poor games, we slate him and bemoan his lack of ability on here like we do with lindelof?
Good points, although I don't agree with your point that LB is not a priority. Anyway, I don't think we need a 25m 17 year old LB especially when we have Mitchell and don't have an established LB. Spending 25m on a kid LB seems kind of pointless right now.Got to laugh at some of the logic here
"he's young so sign him"
"25mil is peanuts"
"sign him and sandro"
From what I can see, LB is no priority for us as Shaw is getting game time, he's good enough.
So there - I've saved us 100million as we don't actually need sandro or this kid.
At this point, sessegnon is raw, young, unproven and one for the future - we already have that with Mitchell.
Too much money on a 17yr old, and a position we are not desperate for right now.
What about our lack of depth in midfield or the fact we have NO natural RW?
Haven't seen him play at all, but have heard about the hype. Establishing himself as a first team player in a Championship side at age 16/17 is very, very impressive.
I've never properly seen Sessegnon play, so I'll take your word on it. From the videos I have seen, he looks way too raw as of now and is not even close to Shaw's current level. Obviously at 17, he has huge potential and I'd love to sign him up along with a top tier LB. Darmian would be first full back I'd sell, with Young covering as a RB and perhaps moving Blind on in the summer.RS doesn’t play a conventional LB role though. He’s very much a wing back and potentially a world class one.
Sandro is already a world class LB, I don’t see why we can’t accommodate both in our side,however the pragmatist in me says we’ll only sign one for that position. I can see Blind going possibly Shaw. Young can’t have too long left playing there which leaves us a player short.