No, you're just repeating the same thing over and over ad nauseam while still not providing a single argument to your case. Spectator was also said by Mack, I just reiterated that it doesn't matter the word used, all that matters is that everyone here has a right to be dismayed at various things about the club, including players who are paid obscene amount of money while taking vacations in the middle of the season.
You're taking this quite literally, don't you? The original post was whether devilish had a say in airing his grievances that Sancho is paid a heck of a lot by the club, yet has contributed virtually nothing. And he has the right to do that, especially if he actually gives money to the club. Again, it doesn't matter if literally the Glazers are the ones that pay him the money, that money doesn't come out from the Glazers pockets but from the fans and sponsorships that are directly tied to the fans anyway. That is the reason why I used "technically" in my original post and not "literally".