SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,928
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
There’s been a lot of talk about children’s mental health during this crisis. From what I understand there’s absolutely no indication that students have been reporting increased levels of anxiety. As a matter of fact, at my wife’s school the overriding feeling is kids are doing better than ever. Ask most 16 year olds what their biggest stress would be and it would inevitably be the relentless pursuit of GCSEs which is doing harm to our youngsters but this has been alleviated by the crisis. If I was a teenager now who had video lessons provided to learn and could see my mates at night I’d be fecking buzzing.
I think they’re ok now they can see their friends at night, as you say. But I have friends with teenage kids who ended up acting almost as though they were depressed during the weeks when they were prohibited from socialising. At that age it’s a nightmare when your parents are your only company.

It’s all been very age dependent. The pre-teens generally enjoy their parents company, so they coped well. Although it would have been tough without siblings. And I know parents of very young kids got worried about the effect it might have on their development to not interact with peers over a long period of time. Then you have missing out on a season of team sports, or milestones like finishing primary/secondary school with your peers. Not the end of the world but a real shame all the same.

I think most of the anxiety for parents/kids was around the potential for staying in lockdown for a very long period of time. With hindsight - knowing that it was only a couple of months - it doesn’t seem to me that anyone was asked to make any huge sacrifices. It’s obviously been a bit shit but a price worth paying.

The biggest killer for kids/parents will be school’s not opening again in September. Taking the disruption into another academic year. Which is, slightly ironically, more likely to happen the more teens make the most of their freedom right now.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,510
Supports
Everton
I wouldn't be surprised if there is a spike in depression/anxiety in 21-25ish year olds. That group is just finishing University at BA/MA (or whatever equivalent) where you are socialising with people consistently and are relatively comfortable to suddenly being thrust into a world where your job options are limited, socialising is limited and you need to start worrying about your student debt/what will I now do with that degree etc.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,928
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/14848

https://www.theguardian.com/educati...k-have-done-almost-no-school-work-in-lockdown

These are two very sobering reads regarding the effect this is having on education in this country.
That doesn’t surprise me at all. My kids go to a state primary school but it’s in a well off area, with parents generally pretty motivated/involved in their education. And there’s been huge variation in the amount of education they’ve been getting. I know for a fact that a bunch of their peers basically missed out on schoolwork altogether. And I can confirm that my own kids sure as shit spent a lot more time dossing about than usual! I also know that kids at fee paying schools were getting several hours of zoom tutorials every day. While we just got a list of stuff to do at the beginning of each week.

In the grand scheme of things, I don’t think going a few months without any education will do lasting harm. So long as they all miss out to the same extent. But the huge variation in approach could have a fairly profound effect on the educational divide between rich and poor.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,928
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I wouldn't be surprised if there is a spike in depression/anxiety in 21-25ish year olds. That group is just finishing University at BA/MA (or whatever equivalent) where you are socialising with people consistently and are relatively comfortable to suddenly being thrust into a world where your job options are limited, socialising is limited and you need to start worrying about your student debt/what will I now do with that degree etc.
That’s another cohort who have been properly screwed by all of this.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,902
Location
Somewhere out there
There’s been a lot of talk about children’s mental health during this crisis. From what I understand there’s absolutely no indication that students have been reporting increased levels of anxiety.
Well except a new international study from Karolinska Institute of 10 countries during the pandemic like.

Where’s your study? I mean it’s pretty common sense to realise that no school and no sport, not seeing friends etc is affecting kids negativity and the kids from poorer families much worse than rich ones.

That’s before we even get into mental health issues from being isolated at home, many in terrible home environments where school and sport is an escape.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,312
Hong Kong moving back towards lockdown again. There have been a bunch of new local cases and rules are being tightened.


They've come such a long way. Bergamo and Brescia have suffered greatly during this crisis.
They're still posting the highest case numbers but it's a couple of dozen a day instead of the hundreds or thousands it was at one point. There are only 34 ICU cases left in the whole region out of about 2,000 available beds.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,021
Location
Centreback
Would you say its fair to say that if Wibble has taken a position which is one end of the spectrum (essentially perpetual lockdown until caseload is 0, almost regardless of geographical location or the country's circumstances), you have taken a view which is generally more towards the other end? While lockdown may be tolerated, you've felt that people are perhaps a bit too scared of the virus and that it may be balanced out by the negative effects of lockdown?
I take my position based on the evidence combined with valuing life over money (take that theists ;) ).

The available evidence suggests that we will get a vaccine fairly soon, possibly the first before the end of the year. 2021 will most likely see multiole vaccines and a degree of manufacturing and distribution chaos but if we are good and a bit lucky that by the end of the year herd immunity will be within sight.

We know proper lockdowns (not the piss weak UK version) save lives especially if you suppress almost to the point of eradication. The cost benefit in lives is massive. There are of course an economic and other costs with knock on effects, but personally I side with the NZ PM on if the economic price is worth it to save lives.

Many countries have decided to say feck people and show me the money (US) with added incompetence and some have just been incompetent (UK). Harder road back for those countries but the moral choice is the same.
 
Last edited:

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,950
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
Well except a new international study from Karolinska Institute of 10 countries during the pandemic like.

Where’s your study? I mean it’s pretty common sense to realise that no school and no sport, not seeing friends etc is affecting kids negativity and the kids from poorer families much worse than rich ones.

That’s before we even get into mental health issues from being isolated at home, many in terrible home environments where school and sport is an escape.
As of now - neither of us have posted a study. I also don’t think that no sport for two months will have a massive impact on children’s long term mental health.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,928
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I take my position based on the evidence combined with valuing life over money (take that theists ;) ).

The available evidence suggests that we will get a vaccine fairly soon, possibly the first before the end of the year. 2021 will most likely see multiole vaccines and a degree of manufacturing and distribution chaos but if we are good and a bit lucky that by the end of the year herd immunity will be within sight.

We know proper lockdowns (not the piss weak UK version) save lives especially if you suppress almost to the point of eradication. The cost benefit in lives is massive. There are of course an economic and other costs with knock on effects, but personally I side with the NZ PM on if the economic price is worth it to save lives.

Many countries have decided to say feck people and show me the money (US) with added incompetence and some have just been incompetent (UK). Harder road back for those countries but the moral choice is the same.
Just on the herd immunity thing, I’ve heard a few virologists say that eradication is off the table for any virus that has human and animal hosts. No matter how high you get immunity in people, the virus can hang out amongst animals before making a comeback when human immunity declines. Then we have the idiots who refuse to get vaccinated, which seems to be a bigger problem now than ever before in the history of vaccines.

I’m getting more and more certain this virus will never go away. The best possible outcome for me is we get a decent vaccine (although I think this will most likely be waiting at least another couple of years before it’s rolled out) to protect the most vulnerable and the virus becomes less virulent (this is more in hope than expectation, as it seems to be fairly stable) Otherwise it’s just a case of learning to live with it for the forseeable future. Which sucks but there you go. I definitely think outbreaks will get easier and easier to manage, as more and more people get infected. So that’s another positive, I guess.
 

africanspur

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
9,148
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
I take my position based on the evidence combined with valuing life over money (take that theists ;) ).

The available evidence suggests that we will get a vaccine fairly soon, possibly the first before the end of the year. 2021 will most likely see multiole vaccines and a degree of manufacturing and distribution chaos but if we are good and a bit lucky that by the end of the year herd immunity will be within sight.

We know proper lockdowns (not the piss weak UK version) save lives especially if you suppress almost to the point of eradication. The cost benefit in lives is massive. There are of course an economic and other costs with knock on effects, but personally I side with the NZ PM on if the economic price is worth it to save lives.

Many countries have decided to say feck people and show me the money (US) with added incompetence and some have just been incompetent (UK). Harder road back for those countries but the moral choice is the same.
With respect Wibble, discussing this particular topic with you is a bit like discussing Brexit with Paul. We are agreed on almost everything but some positions taken are so extreme (in my own view of course) that it is difficult to reconcile.

The 'evidence' that we will get a vaccine that actually works well, is not particularly of that much interest to me until it can show a genuine positive impact in phase 3 and 4 trials. I'm also quite concerned that we'll end up rushing through vaccines that don't work properly to get a 'win', in the same way we pushed tamiflu in the last pandemic or are pushing remdesevir now.

My main issue is that you have also said that Europe for instance should take an approach similar to NZ and Australia. This is of course totally impossible, in a landmass which is only about 1/3 bigger than Australia's but with approximately 20 times the population (or 40 times NZ's landmass, with 100 times their population) and infinitely more inter-connected with each other than those countries could ever be.

The NZ PM, as great as she is, and as amazing a job as she has done so far, doesn't know what the long term economic impacts of the various different approaches taken and the reality is, as much as we can model and estimate, nobody anywhere knows with any certainty what they will be.

Hence my own issue when people talk in such absolutes in a situation which is still very novel to us.
 

africanspur

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
9,148
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
That doesn’t surprise me at all. My kids go to a state primary school but it’s in a well off area, with parents generally pretty motivated/involved in their education. And there’s been huge variation in the amount of education they’ve been getting. I know for a fact that a bunch of their peers basically missed out on schoolwork altogether. And I can confirm that my own kids sure as shit spent a lot more time dossing about than usual! I also know that kids at fee paying schools were getting several hours of zoom tutorials every day. While we just got a list of stuff to do at the beginning of each week.

In the grand scheme of things, I don’t think going a few months without any education will do lasting harm. So long as they all miss out to the same extent. But the huge variation in approach could have a fairly profound effect on the educational divide between rich and poor.
Agreed. If kids were missing out equally, and just for a few months, it wouldn't be quite so bad.

Of course, this isn't a fault of the virus, or lockdown itself but, at least in part, due to how we've built our societies. Even at the best of times, the educational opportunities are vastly different.

But I at least wish the people who bang the hardest lockdown drum so perpetually, and shout down those who may, for whatever reasons, have varying levels of agreement with that opinion, would at least acknowledge that not everyone is living their cushy work from home, saving money, kids continuing to receive a pretty reasonable education, lockdown lives.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,342
Location
Flagg
I think this has been part of what @noodlehair for instance has been at pains to emphasise, though at times perhaps more forcefully than he intends to.

I feel like lockdown has been lived in a very different manner by different groups. For instance, within my circles of friends (who are obviously all distinguished people...though I think I've butchered that particular joke :D), most of them are doctors or nurses, with cast-iron job security or professionals who have jobs they can do quite competently from home. They're people who may go on holidays, eat out yada yada and for them, lockdown has been actually quite easy on their finances, especially those who can work from home. Their salaries are the same, just no longer spending as much so they're actually saving more money than usual currently. Their kids are spending time with their families, watching online lessons on good laptops with good internet connections. Generally, they're in supportive home environments. Etc etc. I suspect that many of the people advocating for the strictest, most indefinite lockdowns etc on here tend to be in this camp themselves.

There are of course many many others in the UK though who aren't living that lifestyle. They may have been let go or furloughed, with severe worry as to whether their job will still exist in a few months time. They may have been worrying about how to feed their children without school vouchers. How they will feed their kids after furlough ends. What if there aren't enough devices to go round for the family for online lessons? What if they have limited internet speeds? What if they don't have their own space to study in and have to share it with 2-3 other loud kids?

There's already evidence that, even moving away from these stark extremes, kids from richer households are doing much more education per day currently than poorer kids.

Then of course we may have the kids who are in abusive households, without their usual outlet from this.

I think it is very important to not forget about these latter groups.

Also, surely if you're supposed to be taking your GCSEs and you're not sure when they'll happen or how months without proper education will impact on your ability to take them, that's quite a big stressor?
This is exactly the thing I've been trying to emphasise and very well put.

There is a lot of ignorance about where people just presume it's as easy for them as it is for everyone else, and the reason I'm forceful about is because it is potentially very dangerous.

@Wumminator 's post for example (without meaning to target or criticise him as I don't think anyone is being ignorant on purpose). When I was a teenager I was looking after my sick mum as well as my younger brother and sister and struggling to fit education around that as it was. I wouldn't have been "buzzing" at the idea of learning from home during a global pandemic. Half the time our internet had been cut off because we couldn't pay the bill. I wouldn't have had a laptop or my own computer to study on anyway, and in anycase the main worry would have been that my brother and sister wouldn't be getting meals during the day. My education would have just gone by the wayside completely and there'd have been no one to help with my brother or sister's either.

There's a lot of families who are in this situation right now, and by a lot, we're talking a lot more people than have died of corona virus. Literally millions (ask Marcus Rashford). An open school or being able to earn some money working in a shop is a lifeline when you're in this situation. It can literally be life and death in some cases. It doesn't mean we should just pretend corona virus doesn't exist but it does mean we shouldn't pretend the virus itself is the only thing putting people at risk or into hardship.
 
Last edited:

buchansleftleg

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
3,720
Location
Dublin, formerly Manchester
Here in NZ our lockdown happened during our Autumn but it was a strangely warm and sunny Autumn that stayed sunny for longer than usual. You have me wondering if thats another factor where we got lucky and it helped us.
Who was it who said "the harder I work the luckier I get" - Even if the NZ government has been lucky it seems to have done some work rather than just try and set up mates with juicy contracts like the corrupt charlatans running England.
 

ThierryHenry

wishes he could watch Arsenal games with KM
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
13,717
Location
London Town
I think this has been part of what @noodlehair for instance has been at pains to emphasise, though at times perhaps more forcefully than he intends to.

I feel like lockdown has been lived in a very different manner by different groups. For instance, within my circles of friends (who are obviously all distinguished people...though I think I've butchered that particular joke :D), most of them are doctors or nurses, with cast-iron job security or professionals who have jobs they can do quite competently from home. They're people who may go on holidays, eat out yada yada and for them, lockdown has been actually quite easy on their finances, especially those who can work from home. Their salaries are the same, just no longer spending as much so they're actually saving more money than usual currently. Their kids are spending time with their families, watching online lessons on good laptops with good internet connections. Generally, they're in supportive home environments. Etc etc. I suspect that many of the people advocating for the strictest, most indefinite lockdowns etc on here tend to be in this camp themselves.

There are of course many many others in the UK though who aren't living that lifestyle. They may have been let go or furloughed, with severe worry as to whether their job will still exist in a few months time. They may have been worrying about how to feed their children without school vouchers. How they will feed their kids after furlough ends. What if there aren't enough devices to go round for the family for online lessons? What if they have limited internet speeds? What if they don't have their own space to study in and have to share it with 2-3 other loud kids?

There's already evidence that, even moving away from these stark extremes, kids from richer households are doing much more education per day currently than poorer kids.

Then of course we may have the kids who are in abusive households, without their usual outlet from this.

I think it is very important to not forget about these latter groups.

Also, surely if you're supposed to be taking your GCSEs and you're not sure when they'll happen or how months without proper education will impact on your ability to take them, that's quite a big stressor?
Excellent post.

I do think the attitude on here has been bizarre to those who are going to be struggling from lockdown, or for whom, lockdown is a disaster for their mental health/ job security/ ongoing development. The dividing lines between rich and poor families to that end is huge, and I think that if you're on the 'right' side of that divide, then you're unlikely to know many people who have been put on furlough, who work in 'at risk' industries, are BAME, or have families where the children don't have the space, money or resources to study or socialise at home, in what is a critical period for their development.

Obviously COVID is the bigger threat, but the longer that lockdown lasts, the worse the subsequent economic damage will be, the more families whose lives will be ruined, and the more children from deprived backgrounds who will fall so far behind their peers that they're unlikely to ever catch up.

@Wumminator - in terms of studies or data:
https://www.ft.com/content/50fcc605-674d-4630-9718-d3890eccffbf
With almost half of students receiving the “pupil premium” for less well-off children — Darwen Vale in Lancashire is in the 14th most deprived borough in England — there were fears that already disadvantaged students would fall further behind. Sure enough, the data showed that only 45 per cent of those with the pupil premium had attended the class, compared with 72 per cent of their peers — a 27 percentage point gap that the school is now trying to shrink.
Becky Francis, the EEF’s chief executive, said research was ongoing but estimated that the pandemic would cause “at least a reversal of the progress we’ve made in closing the disadvantage gap over the last 10 years for GCSE students”.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0907568218779130
Summer learning loss and the attainment gap
Research on summer learning loss shows that during the school holidays, children’s learning is not only at risk of stagnating but regressing, and that this decline may be more pronounced in children from low-income families, as well as for children with learning disabilities and children for whom English is a second language (Graham et al., 2012; Kerry and Davies, 1998). Some have argued that summer learning loss is the main factor behind the attainment gap between the richest and poorest students and that this is predominately driven by the inequalities experienced during the summer holidays (Alexander et al., 2016; Blazer, 2011).
I'm sure there's much more to find but I'll stop there.
 

ThierryHenry

wishes he could watch Arsenal games with KM
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
13,717
Location
London Town
This is exactly the thing I've been trying to emphasise and very well put.

There is a lot of ignorance about where people just presume it's as easy for them as it is for everyone else, and the reason I'm forceful about is because it is potentially very dangerous.

@Wumminator 's post for example (without meaning to target or criticise him as I don't think anyone is being ignorant on purpose). When I was a teenager I was looking after my sick mum as well as my younger brother and sister and struggling to fit education around that as it was. I wouldn't have been "buzzing" at the idea of learning from home during a global pandemic. Half the time our internet had been cut off because we couldn't pay the bill. I wouldn't have had a laptop or my own computer to study on anyway, and in anycase the main worry would have been that my brother and sister wouldn't be getting meals during the day. My education would have just gone by the wayside completely and there'd have been no one to help with my brother or sister's either.

There's a lot of families who are in this situation right now, and by a lot, we're talking a lot more people than have died of corona virus. Literally millions (ask Marcus Rashford). An open school or being able to earn some money working in a shop is a lifeline when you're in this situation. It can literally be life and death in some cases.
Again, excellent post.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,950
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
@noodlehair I don’t think many people could grown up in a more deprived area than me. If anyone knows anything about Longton in Stoke, you would know what I mean.

However whilst I definitely agree that there will be some hindrance to the education of the most vulnerable.. this has been happening for ages anyway. I mean, yeah, private schools are doing more than state schools. That’s an issue with private schools in general though isn’t it. Those students will always have access to more education.



These are issues in society and not issues in lockdown. Indeed, more affluent parents are more likely to send their kids back to school now. Causing even more of a gap.

The EEF study posted above says that the lockdown could reverse gains made in closing the education gap. Enough to go back a decade... but this gap has widened over the last five years anyway.

I just think that concerns over kid’s mental health is overstated. Has there been any link to issues with suicides and the like? I’m actually hoping the teenagers would have benefited from this somewhat. Not everyone, but a lot of them might have gained new skills.

If we are that concerned about kid’s mental health.. let’s change the curriculum and focus on having access to facilities. Simply getting back in school and ending lockdown won’t do that.

Edit- very anecdotal, but look at this thread for example
 
Last edited:

Stack

Leave Women's Football Alone!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
13,331
Location
Auckland New Zealand
Who was it who said "the harder I work the luckier I get" - Even if the NZ government has been lucky it seems to have done some work rather than just try and set up mates with juicy contracts like the corrupt charlatans running England.
I got the impression when all this started that Boris had decided to head down the herd immunity path and then changed his mind after about 2 weeks and that contributed to Englands difficulties. I may have this wrong but from afar it seemed to have been part of a muddled response. btw Martin Buchan was a hero of mine, captain at a young age of the town I was born in.
 

Tibs

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
13,768
Location
UK
ONS now estimating that 1 in 3900 people has Corona, down from 1 in 2200 LW
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
Covid19 knock on effects into UK unemployment really starting to kick in, It's going to be a jobs massacre.

 

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,700
UK 85 deaths 642 cases

Two weeks ago was 809 deaths Mon-Sun, last week 670 and so far it's 382.
 
Last edited:

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,342
Location
Flagg
@noodlehair I don’t think many people could grown up in a more deprived area than me. If anyone knows anything about Longton in Stoke, you would know what I mean.

However whilst I definitely agree that there will be some hindrance to the education of the most vulnerable.. this has been happening for ages anyway. I mean, yeah, private schools are doing more than state schools. That’s an issue with private schools in general though isn’t it. Those students will always have access to more education.



These are issues in society and not issues in lockdown. Indeed, more affluent parents are more likely to send their kids back to school now. Causing even more of a gap.

The EEF study posted above says that the lockdown could reverse gains made in closing the education gap. Enough to go back a decade... but this gap has widened over the last five years anyway.

I just think that concerns over kid’s mental health is overstated. Has there been any link to issues with suicides and the like? I’m actually hoping the teenagers would have benefited from this somewhat. Not everyone, but a lot of them might have gained new skills.

If we are that concerned about kid’s mental health.. let’s change the curriculum and focus on having access to facilities. Simply getting back in school and ending lockdown won’t do that.

Edit- very anecdotal, but look at this thread for example
It's been happening and will continue to happen. I agree the issues stem from existing issues within society, but what we are dealing with is an extreme situation being placed on top of that.

Before covid 19 there were plenty of families who struggled. Now due to the virus we are taking jobs away from those families. Income, social support, freedoms, etc. It's a lot for an already struggling person or family to cope with.

I kind of think you're missing where the danger is with the mental health thing...it's not the lack of sitting in a classroom that's going to push a lot of kids into the danger one. It's the ones where they're single parent can't cope and becomes depressed, who have to share less than the average person has between four of them. Who's parents fail to look after them properly due to the strain the situation has placed on them, who's mum or dad resorts to alcoholism and becomes abusive, etc. I've been through it. It stays with you for life and it affects where you end up in life...and it's naive to think the current situation doesn't risk placing a lot more young people into these predicaments. School is a lifeline in these situations as it's almost an escape and it gives a parent room to breathe.

I don't think teachers are who you ask to get an accurate reflection on this to be honest. I don't remember any of my teachers noticing that I was near suicidal for almost the entire last two years I was in secondary school. There's no reason why they would have because I didn't tell them and they didn't follow me home every night to find out.

It's one problem in a big web of problems and while I think our government has got an awful lot wrong over this pandemic, I do think people get too caught up over one issue, or over political bashing and point scoring, to really see how complicated the picture is.

I mean extreme and not really related example but we got so caught up in worrying only about running out of hospital beds/NHS capacity that we were sending people with covid 19 back INTO care homes just to get them out of the way. I guarantee there'd have been someone in the middle saying "guys, we definitely shouldn't be doing that" and almost no one listening to them.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
I know some people here are fans of baldie, in my opinion, one of the best English language travel vloggers.
Very interesting story from him catching covid19 in Serbia. basically, young-ish man, thought he was covid19 invincible, took stupid risks, nearly dies.
Watch some of his previous video's and you'll visibly see just how much weaker he is now.

 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,902
Location
Somewhere out there
As of now - neither of us have posted a study. I also don’t think that no sport for two months will have a massive impact on children’s long term mental health.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890856720303373

2 months? You haven't had sport or school in the UK since mid March right mate?

You're completely underestimating the situations many kids will find themselves in, it's not just the school or the sport, or even the isolation from friends, it's the escape.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,950
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890856720303373

2 months? You haven't had sport or school in the UK since mid March right mate?

You're completely underestimating the situations many kids will find themselves in, it's not just the school or the sport, or even the isolation from friends, it's the escape.
That was really interesting and a very good read. I am certainly now thinking there will be issues. Yet reading that rapid meta study, there are definitely questions that arise from the results. For example, “The rapid review suggests that loneliness that may result from disease containment measures in the COVID-19 context could be associated with subsequent mental health problems in young people. Strategies to prevent the development of such problems should be an international priority.” There is a lot of “May” and “could” in this situation because there hasn’t been anything on this scale before. Loneliness is definitely a precursor for mental health issues, i am just not sure how lonely your average teen in isolation has been.
 

Jacko21

Full Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
4,578
Location
Manchester
I know some people here are fans of baldie, in my opinion, one of the best English language travel vloggers.
Very interesting story from him catching covid19 in Serbia. basically, young-ish man, thought he was covid19 invincible, took stupid risks, nearly dies.
Watch some of his previous video's and you'll visibly see just how much weaker he is now.

Was just about to post this.

Sobering to see him discuss his ordeal. But I remember thinking at the time how careless/daft/selfish he was being when I watched the videos he posted before he obviously fell ill.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,016
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Was talking to my GP earlier today and she said that at the peak, the area I live in was number 2 in the country for number of infections.
 

gormless

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
8,543
Location
comfortable and settled in my rut
Was speaking to NHS nurses who had previously worked on a COVID ward today. One had suffered difficulty breathing, and the other had lost taste and smell. Both requested tests but were denied due to not having a temperature.

Both have done an antibody test in the months since and have the antibodies. I am still pretty annoyed, and I had this conversation hours ago
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,530
That was really interesting and a very good read. I am certainly now thinking there will be issues. Yet reading that rapid meta study, there are definitely questions that arise from the results. For example, “The rapid review suggests that loneliness that may result from disease containment measures in the COVID-19 context could be associated with subsequent mental health problems in young people. Strategies to prevent the development of such problems should be an international priority.” There is a lot of “May” and “could” in this situation because there hasn’t been anything on this scale before. Loneliness is definitely a precursor for mental health issues, i am just not sure how lonely your average teen in isolation has been.
To be honest you all seem to be speaking at cross purposes. Looking at the impact across all children and to just those who are vulnerable is very different, dismissing one isn't dismissing the other. As is the mental health impact of lockdown compared to the impact of the covid situation across the board.

Some people will have found lockdown changes to be beneficial, Japan for instance had early reports of lowered suicides due to better work balance.

Unfortunately as a society especially in the UK we fail the vulnerable. The government did feck all to mitigate those impacts and i imagine they'll continue to do feck all. I choose to blame them rather than a necessary measure some don't like because they can't go to the pub.
 

Wolverine

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
2,448
Location
UK
I think this has been part of what @noodlehair for instance has been at pains to emphasise, though at times perhaps more forcefully than he intends to.

I feel like lockdown has been lived in a very different manner by different groups. For instance, within my circles of friends (who are obviously all distinguished people...though I think I've butchered that particular joke :D), most of them are doctors or nurses, with cast-iron job security or professionals who have jobs they can do quite competently from home. They're people who may go on holidays, eat out yada yada and for them, lockdown has been actually quite easy on their finances, especially those who can work from home. Their salaries are the same, just no longer spending as much so they're actually saving more money than usual currently. Their kids are spending time with their families, watching online lessons on good laptops with good internet connections. Generally, they're in supportive home environments. Etc etc. I suspect that many of the people advocating for the strictest, most indefinite lockdowns etc on here tend to be in this camp themselves.

There are of course many many others in the UK though who aren't living that lifestyle. They may have been let go or furloughed, with severe worry as to whether their job will still exist in a few months time. They may have been worrying about how to feed their children without school vouchers. How they will feed their kids after furlough ends. What if there aren't enough devices to go round for the family for online lessons? What if they have limited internet speeds? What if they don't have their own space to study in and have to share it with 2-3 other loud kids?

There's already evidence that, even moving away from these stark extremes, kids from richer households are doing much more education per day currently than poorer kids.

Then of course we may have the kids who are in abusive households, without their usual outlet from this.

I think it is very important to not forget about these latter groups.

Also, surely if you're supposed to be taking your GCSEs and you're not sure when they'll happen or how months without proper education will impact on your ability to take them, that's quite a big stressor?
I'm a doctor. I don't have cast iron job security, nor do a lot of other doctors, especially middle grade ones on training schemes with fixed end-date contracts. What its meant for locum GPs that I know is they've not been able to get jobs with telephone triages now taking up bulk of work in GP which the sessional GPs have been able to cover.

But I understand that there are people who are worse of. I don't think there's anybody who has said we want lockdown but we don't want financial protection for those hit hardest.
A little bit of it is self-preservation, I'm more likely to die from this disease if the hospital was overflowing with covid patients because of inadequate PPE which happened when we hit our peak. I don't want my patients to die either. I don't want my family member or friends who are clinically vulnerable to die either.
But I'm financially ok, I have a child so I'm well aware of educational issues. I'm also well aware and cognisant of safeguarding issues. And psychiatric and psychological impact that lockdown has on those socially shielding.

The fact is that a more widespread covid pandemic in my opinion would in the short and long term be worse for furloughing, worse for patients, worse for the economy, worse in every aspect. You won't need government to have a lockdown or legislate, not any would venture outside. That is not hyperbole. That is what would have happened without lockdown with rationing of ventilators, of oxygen. And this is still what can happen.

We should have locked down earlier and more severe measures before community spread got out of hand, during the delay phase doctors were literally begging CCGs, MPs to take what was happening in Italy more seriously. For mass testing etc. Groups like EveryDoctor, Doctor's Association UK, BMA have been behind a lot of what we've seen in our daily briefings. We then got told by government advisors that herd immunity was the strategy and behavioural science dictated lockdown would not be accept, more lobbying to MPs happened but it was too late by then.

There may be those for whom being able to work from home and being on 80% because of what they earn is ok for them. But I've not got to have that, I've been working in hell every day. And I'm cautious because frankly I know what this disease is and what it'll do if it goes unchecked.
 

Wolverine

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
2,448
Location
UK
Was speaking to NHS nurses who had previously worked on a COVID ward today. One had suffered difficulty breathing, and the other had lost taste and smell. Both requested tests but were denied due to not having a temperature.

Both have done an antibody test in the months since and have the antibodies. I am still pretty annoyed, and I had this conversation hours ago
Yeah the taste and smell are relatively new additions despite being talked about by clinicians for ages as being virtually diagnostic of the disease, many missed out on testing due to tight criteria, I think made because capacity to mass test just wasn't there.
 
Last edited:

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,321
Location
bin
"Work out to help out" is the latest in a long line of pointless, vapid, shitty soundbites from this pack of imbeciles. Is there anyone in government who doesn't sound like a fecking marketing graduate?! They're the human equivalent of the OptaSports Twitter with their smarmy "oh I'm so clever" single word statements at the end of their tweets. cnuts.