I thought we had all learned by now it doesn't matter one jot whether you are rich or poor. It's not a class specific virus, it is being spread by all, but primarily by families and close friends in group gatherings, no matter what their income status. Travelling, events, supermarket trips etc. are all minor sources of transmission.
If you're talking about vulnerability it certainly does matter if you're rich or poor, because if you're poor you are far more likely to be forced by circumstances to put yourselves at risk (e.g - you're a key worker, your job involves interaction with members of the public, you live with other key workers, you have dependent family members living elsewhere, you live in close proximity to and/or share communal spaces with other households, your home is to small to practice social distancing in the event one of you gets sick). You're also much more likely to have underlying health conditions/poor health. If you're talking about how we got into this situation - mobile, affluent people have indisputably played the greatest role in helping the virus spread between population centres.
Stanley Roads post was blaming the continued spread of the disease on 'the underclass' - my point was that, generally speaking, it's the actions of affluent people which have helped spread the virus.
So 1 province in NL had over 50pc of all cases in the Netherlands, Brabant. Why? They had a Carnival there 6 to 8 weeks ago, look it up and look through pictures to see how many wealthy people you can spot amongst the thousands of losers
Good luck
Have you heard of the Cheltenham festival?