Physiocrat
Has No Mates
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 8,977
20 years of football goneSo that effectively rules out half the players available
20 years of football goneSo that effectively rules out half the players available
I've got a few general ideas but am just waiting to see who goes as a couple hours research could just go puffGot to be so careful picking some players. Just had my first look at this properly and decided I should just play it off the cuff as it's impossible to plan.
Yeah that's why I'm not researching anything. I've got a couple players that I don't think people will target but you never know due to the constraintsI've got a few general ideas but am just waiting to see who goes as a couple hours research could just go puff
Wow... Maldini is a huge call there. Ronaldo less so, but both distinctly more problematic than the other two.
Yeah I was surprised at Maldini - Ronaldo I think is always a great pick, though as you say he rules out a lot of players.
Hah, It was 3am and I completely spaced out on the no mates rule. Wasn't even thinking of repercussions later but as a (really awful) left back growing up, Ill never be unhappy with MaldiniSo that effectively rules out half the players available
i dont blame you. I love maldini myself.Hah, It was 3am and I completely spaced out on the no mates rule. Wasn't even thinking of repercussions later but as a (really awful) left back growing up, Ill never be unhappy with Maldini
Nice theme. This book is for you
I actually own that edition.Nice theme. This book is for you
It's the first pick FFS!Sorry guys it's just because of the Billy no mates aspect of the draft I really don't want to make this pick
Without any input from Invictus.
Freddy Adu is a safe pickSorry guys it's just because of the Billy no mates aspect of the draft I really don't want to make this pick
Without any input from Invictus.
Freddy Adu is a safe pick
Yup, perfect pick in that regard even though he at the same time is a libero which can be challenging in its own right in this draft.Great pick @bleezy
He was high on my list since he blocks relatively few players and also being awesome.
True but I did consider whether he could work as a defensive box-to-box midfielderYup, perfect pick in that regard even though he at the same time is a libero which can be challenging in its own right in this draft.
Damn you man. I was hoping he'd last down to me. A worthy player to build a team around, and very useful in the context of the Billy No Mates rule.
Has been tried out a few times before but never to much acclaimTrue but I did consider whether he could work as a defensive box-to-box midfielder
I don't remember him being tried much as a proper box to box midfielder next to a DM, though, which in my opinion is his second best incarnation after a libero and he was great in that. If he isn't a libero he's used as a defensive midfielder as an anchor which isn't that great for him.Has been tried out a few times before but never to much acclaim
That was how I was thinking of using him alongside a DLP who can play in a midfield two. That said with lots of attacking full-backs available creating a back 5 shouldn't be too difficult hereI don't remember him being tried much as a proper box to box midfielder next to a DM, though, which in my opinion is his second best incarnation after a libero and he was great in that. If he isn't a libero he's used as a defensive midfielder as an anchor which isn't that great for him.
Anto used him next to -- in a strange but nicely looking formation, I don't think that he was an anchorman in this teamI don't remember him being tried much as a proper box to box midfielder next to a DM, though, which in my opinion is his second best incarnation after a libero and he was great in that. If he isn't a libero he's used as a defensive midfielder as an anchor which isn't that great for him.
That's still restricting him a bit. You want him in a midfield role with full attacking freedom for him to be at his best. He was great going forward at his peak.Anto used him next to Effenberg in a strange but nicely looking formation, I don't think that he was an anchorman in this team
FW - FW
LW - AM - RW
Sammer - B2B
LCB - CB - RCB
GK
This. He's a great midfielder and a great sweeper, but what made him truly exceptional was the ability to join attacks and overload the opposition defensive unit. In drafts it's not necessarily his use as a midfielder that can be the problem, but more that he is instructed to drop back when his team is moving forward - which he can do well, very competently in fact, but doesn't properly maximise his strengths.I don't remember him being tried much as a proper box to box midfielder next to a DM, though, which in my opinion is his second best incarnation after a libero and he was great in that. If he isn't a libero he's used as a defensive midfielder as an anchor which isn't that great for him.
Aye, if he has to carry out a disciplined and a positionally reserved role, it simply has to be in defense. His defensive display against Juve in the CL final was nothing short of sensational. Just about snuffed out any offensive threat from Juve whilst barely, if ever, venturing forward.This. He's a great midfielder and a great sweeper, but what made him truly exceptional was the ability to join attacks and overload the opposition defensive unit. In drafts it's not necessarily his use as a midfielder that can be the problem, but more that he is instructed to drop back when his team is moving forward - which he can do well, very competently in fact, but doesn't properly maximise his strengths.
Yep, edited, sorry!Oh and unpicked players mate!
Thanks for the reminder- accidentally breaking my own rules!Oh and unpicked players mate!