youngrell
Full Member
Brazil had Ronaldo (and a few other starts) but France had a solid team all over the pitch. It was a shock how easily France turned them over but not so much the result.
Even though the Netherlands outplayed them for long periods in the semi-final. They just weren't that good. Sure, they played sexy football when they turned it on but that was a vulnerable team.Everybody's tripping over themselves to make excuses for Brazil.
Zanetti's goal against England
I always feel Ronaldos goal in the semi is so under appreciated. He takes a perfect first touch and finish on his weaker foot, on the run, with a defender applying pressure on him.This was my first ever WC and I think my favourite. So many good moments I still remember clearly.
- Beckham's freekick v Columbia
- Nigeria's shock victory over Spain
- Owens goal v argies, then becks getting sent off for kicking out at simeone
- Berkamps wonderful touch and goal v argies
- Croatia trouncing Germany in the quater final 3-0
- Zidane's red card in the group stages, thuram scoring twice in the sf and of course zizou's 2 goals in the final
I barely remember that game to be honest but despite Brazil winning the next WC, could 98 be a passing of the torch when it comes to the hotbed of footballing talent? France is absolutely overflowing with footballing quality now and I imagine I started with that generation. I read some incredible stat about the huge relresentation of French origin footballers at the WC (of various nationalities).Even though the Netherlands outplayed them for long periods in the semi-final. They just weren't that good. Sure, they played sexy football when they turned it on but that was a vulnerable team.
Ferdinand and Vidic gave Messi a free header in a Champions League finalThose goals look very iffy to me. The 2nd one nobody near Zidane in the box. He was left with a free header. Not buying it!
One of the greatest World Cup games. Combined high quality and intensity, and marked by some moments of sheer brilliance, including the goals such as Ronaldo's exploding run through the Dutch defence from the half way line and Davids last-ditch challenge on Ronaldo to save his defence,The semi-final verses a Great Holland team is one of my favorite games ever. I don’t how we won that match. Kluivert missed some great chances.
FixFerdinand and Vidic gave Messi a free header in a Champions League final
Despite all this theory involving Ronaldo and Nike's sponsorship, it was claimed some times Ronaldo really felt funny some hours ago (convulsion) and told everyone he wouldn't play that match. Naturally, Edmundo would start on the teamsheet (it was even announced in the WC official line-up) but Dr.Toledo gave Ronaldo "carte blanche" and Ronaldo pressed Zagallo to put him in the line-up. It was pretty clear he was in no condition to play and affected his teammates psychologically - look at when he bumped into Barthez and how his teammates looked like shocked in worry for Ronaldo's safety. He recognized his own mistake some days after that match, admitting he shouldn't have asked Zagallo to play that final. Too late, though.We will probably never know if anything underhand went on to cause Ronaldos seizure but I'm pretty sure had he been fit and the rest of the team weren't shellshocked from it all, they would have beaten that French team comfortably. They were a brilliant side and Ronaldo was on fire at that time.
Don't you know the own Brazilian football history, dude?France always beat us
You're right... they weren't. They had a pretty solid defense and weak attack in contrast to that Brazilian team. Not as talented as some squads like Netherlands, Brazil and Argentina. France 2000, on the other hand, was that great IMO.France weren’t that great during the tournament from what I recall. Extra time win over Paraguay? Penalties against Italy? They didn’t sweep teams aside until the final.
We won because Netherlands got shattered in extra-time and lost every guts and stamina they still had. I judge they were a better and more balanced team overall but I cannot say it was an unfair match in the end taking into account Brazil played more heartily as time passed whilst Holland became more and more frail after they scored.As a Brazil fan, we had no business in the final honestly. We had a past there prime taffarel who zagallo beg to come out of retirement. Bebeto and Dunga also we’re past it. There was internal problems within the team over Bebeto starting, I believe at the time. Junior Baiano was a disaster of a central defender. We had conceded a goal in every game except the game against Morocco. Finish with 10 goals conceded in total.
The semi-final verses a Great Holland team is one of my favorite games ever. I don’t how we won that match. Kluivert missed some great chances.
Thanks, dude!Nice to have another Brazilian fan on here.
Yeahh... even though everyone remembers "Brazil vs Netherlands" as one of the greatest WC classics ever, I totally agree "Brazil vs Denmark" was an astonishing match as well and deserves honourable mentions. I remember my heart jumped when one of your shots kissed the goalpost in the very end. A very tough match and great Danish performance.Counter balance would be if Schmeichel had been a few years younger and so more agile he might've tipped one of those long range Rivaldo shots round the post. Denmark-Brazil was one of my favourite matches in that WC, Denmark I thought played a brilliant match and on another night could've beaten Brazil (Norway did in group stages). Still remember that Laudrup celebration.
Zé Carlos, São Paulo's right back. If I recall correctly, he just played one single match for Brazil's NT (a friendly) and just for some minutes. It looks like Guus Hiddink tried to take advantage of his inexperience and it worked. I'm under the impression that, if Brazil had lost that match, he'd have been a sort of "black sheep" like Felipe Melo during WC'2010.As an aside I also randomly remember Cafu I think was suspended for semi final and Brazil played some guy with hardly any caps or much reputation in Brazil and he was great although his career continued to go under the radar after the tournament. His name escapes me atm.
Taffarel was Brazil main goalkeeper in WC 1994.Taffarel, Junior Biano, Cesar Sampaio, Giovanni, Carlos Germano, Ze Carlos, Goncalves, Andre Cruz, Ze Roberto, Doriva, Edmundo and Emerson all missed out of World Cup medals in their career,
I was copying and pasting from wikipedia and accidently left the keeper in. My badTaffarel was Brazil main goalkeeper in WC 1994.
The general view in the Netherlands still is that we lost because Van Hooijdonk was denied a penalty in extra time...We won because Netherlands got shattered in extra-time and lost every guts and stamina they still had. I judge they were a better and more balanced team overall but I cannot say it was an unfair match in the end taking into account Brazil played more heartily as time passed whilst Holland became more and more frail after they scored.
What's the point of starting a thread and mentioning that you believe in a certain theory and then not even saying what this theory is?
Changes might be because Ronaldo's condition got leaked?It was definitely fixed. I remember losing $500 and the betting odds massive swing from Brazil Asian handicap -0.5 to France -1.0 in a matters of minutes before kickoff.
Half of those didn't actually start the 98 world cup final.There were a lot of conspiracy theory back then. But after a few good years watching the French dominate the world football, I mean, just take a look of the French squad at that time: Zidane, Henry, Trezeguet, Pires, Vieira, Desaily, Thuram, Deschamps, Blanc... it was a fecking all star team.
That was Mijatovic. Remember that still, smashed it with full powerWorth remembering Holland got lucky in the last 16, they were 1-1 with Yugoslavia and Mjiatovic or Mihilojovic smashed a penalty off underside of the bar with VDS diving the other way. Then Davids scored last minute.
Holland did have a very good squad as all the top teams bar Germany seemed to do in that World cupm Bergkamp wonder goal v Argentina is another iconic moment.
Germany did seem to be starting to build up their usual knockout stages momentum against Croatia. They were well in control of that game until Worns got himself sent off and Jarni scored against the run of play with a great goal. Then Vogts panicked when they had not found the equaliser by 70 minutes and took off Hassler and then Hamann which left them with no midfield. Croatia predictably finished them off with counters after that. Vogts was a terrible manager.Worth remembering Holland got lucky in the last 16, they were 1-1 with Yugoslavia and Mjiatovic or Mihilojovic smashed a penalty off underside of the bar with VDS diving the other way. Then Davids scored last minute.
Holland did have a very good squad as all the top teams bar Germany seemed to do in that World cupm Bergkamp wonder goal v Argentina is another iconic moment.
Was an old squad that really should've been refreshed after winning euro 96. Guess Vogts thought they could get through one more tournament.Germany did seem to be starting to build up their usual knockout stages momentum against Croatia. They were well in control of that game until Worns got himself sent off and Jarni scored against the run of play with a great goal. Then Vogts panicked when they had not found the equaliser by 70 minutes and took off Hassler and then Hamann which left them with no midfield. Croatia predictably finished them off with counters after that. Vogts was a terrible manager.
If you're talking about that move where Van Hooijdonk and Junior Baiano fought for the ball in the last minute of second time (not in extra time), I don't think that was a clear penalty. To be fair, Kaká was denied a much clearer penalty during Brazil vs Netherlands rematch in 2010 IMO, when Brazil was already leading the score. By the way, it doesn't change the fact Brazil created much more chances during ET and was closer to make it through.The general view in the Netherlands still is that we lost because Van Hooijdonk was denied a penalty in extra time...
I was agreeing with you until I read Ronaldo was the one man band in that team. No, he was not. Although he was the superstar, in retrospect, Rivaldo and Cafu were as important as him in that World Cup. It's a blunt mistake when some people claim that team was Ronaldo and other 10. They got broken mentally more because of their concern about their teammate's health than relying too much on Ronaldo's individuality to solve out a game on his own.Brazil lost the final before the match begun. The momment Ronaldo was gravely ill they were shattered mentally and morale wise. They were already a one man band. Yet still had to fight lions in their den, without the man who made the band play.
Let's be fair: Cesar Sampaio did a great World Cup. I can understand, due to the fact he's off the European radar screen, people tend to undermine his importance for the team but he played his role very well.Rather than conspiracies, just take a look at Brazil's squad specially in defense. Junior Baiano, Sampaio, and really old Dunga and Aldair (who were great in their primes, mind you).
That’s like saying Italy is lucky to have 4 stars, of which 2 were in the past with the ugliest game ever. The reality is that it wins the World Cup too.With the football you were playing during your two WC, two stars is really well paid.
Fair enough, G.....I
was agreeing with you until I read Ronaldo was the one man band in that team. No, he was not. Although he was the superstar, in retrospect, Rivaldo and Cafu were as important as him in that World Cup. It's a blunt mistake when some people claim that team was Ronaldo and other 10. They got broken mentally more because of their concern about their teammate's health than relying too much on Ronaldo's individuality to solve out a game on his own.
......
Agree there. The Scotland manager Craig Brown had identified Cafu as the key piece in Brazil's gameplan and pulled a striker (Durie) back to mark him. And Rivaldo was central throughout, particularly in the Denmark game, scoring twice, as Brazil couldn't live with the Laudrup brothers, Michael pulling the strings and Brian running havoc. His partnership with Ronaldo was also fundamental to Brazil's success as the assist in the Holland semi showed.Although he was the superstar, in retrospect, Rivaldo and Cafu were as important as him in that World Cup. It's a blunt mistake when some people claim that team was Ronaldo and other 10. They got broken mentally more because of their concern about their teammate's health than relying too much on Ronaldo's individuality to solve out a game on his own.
Let's be fair: Cesar Sampaio did a great World Cup. I can understand, due to the fact he's off the European radar screen, people tend to undermine his importance for the team but he played his role very well.