kouroux
45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
RVP's wasn't on the same level but it was very bad.
Anyone else thought that Torres should have scored in the second half rather than taking a touch?
Anyone else thought that Torres should have scored in the second half rather than taking a touch?
Anyone else thought that Torres should have scored in the second half rather than taking a touch?
Torres is the biggest mystery in the world of the football.
Or is this his useless twin or something?
He did get a caution though. Which means he now has more yellow cards for chelsea than he has goals.
Bet you don't miss him in this form
I miss the old Torres I suppose, the same way I miss the Fowler of old because we could really do with a top goalscorer up front. No hankering after the current Torres as he is now, nor any 'what could have been' or 'if only' really. It's pretty clear to me that player is well and truly gone. I am just chuffed we got money for him at prime value.
One of the ITKs over at RAWK reckoned Liverpool were amazed that Torres passed the CFC medical as, in their view, his legs (or knees...can't recall which) had 'gone'.
And spent it on Carroll
Seriously, I wonder what's the matter with him? Is it that he never got over the last injury? You just don't become a bad player overnight
And spent it on Carroll
One of the ITKs over at RAWK reckoned Liverpool were amazed that Torres passed the CFC medical as, in their view, his legs (or knees...can't recall which) had 'gone'.
Regardless, you still paid hilariously over the odds for him. The fee for Torres is irrelevant.Newcastle were driving the price. If we decided £35 million was too much for Carroll then Chelsea would never have given us £50 million for Torres, ad infinitum. Anyway that's old covered ground.
Carroll on current form and future potential is at least a £15million player which somebody would pay today if we sold him. So we've lost £20 million from that deal (i.e. 35m-15m). Which still puts us £30 million up from the Torres money.
Disclaimer: I think Andy's worth more but keeping it simple for the audience in here.
Newcastle were driving the price. If we decided £35 million was too much for Carroll then Chelsea would never have given us £50 million for Torres, ad infinitum. Anyway that's old covered ground.
Carroll on current form and future potential is at least a £15million player which somebody would pay today if we sold him. So we've lost £20 million from that deal (i.e. 35m-15m). Which still puts us £30 million up from the Torres money.
Disclaimer: I think Andy's worth more but keeping it simple for the audience in here.
Newcastle were driving the price. If we decided £35 million was too much for Carroll then Chelsea would never have given us £50 million for Torres, ad infinitum. Anyway that's old covered ground.
Carroll on current form and future potential is at least a £15million player which somebody would pay today if we sold him. So we've lost £20 million from that deal (i.e. 35m-15m). Which still puts us £30 million up from the Torres money.
Disclaimer: I think Andy's worth more but keeping it simple for the audience in here.
One of the ITKs over at RAWK reckoned Liverpool were amazed that Torres passed the CFC medical as, in their view, his legs (or knees...can't recall which) had 'gone'.
Newcastle were driving the price. If we decided £35 million was too much for Carroll then Chelsea would never have given us £50 million for Torres, ad infinitum. Anyway that's old covered ground.
Carroll on current form and future potential is at least a £15million player which somebody would pay today if we sold him. So we've lost £20 million from that deal (i.e. 35m-15m). Which still puts us £30 million up from the Torres money.
Disclaimer: I think Andy's worth more but keeping it simple for the audience in here.
which is utter bullshit because his movement is fine. He might not have that explosive pace, but he gets himself in positions to score.
If it were true, congrats to LFC for destroying yet another young footballers career by continually playing him injured and rushing him back. Owen sends his regards also.
Anyone else thought that Torres should have scored in the second half rather than taking a touch?
Torres went against the medical advice of the Liverpool staff when he rushed himself back from injury to make the world cup.
He still scored 22 goals in 32 games in the season leading up to the world cup so he had mojo before that.
Torres has no one to blame for his misery than himself.
The worst miss in Chelsea's eight year history.
Newcastle were driving the price. If we decided £35 million was too much for Carroll then Chelsea would never have given us £50 million for Torres, ad infinitum. Anyway that's old covered ground.
Carroll on current form and future potential is at least a £15million player which somebody would pay today if we sold him. So we've lost £20 million from that deal (i.e. 35m-15m). Which still puts us £30 million up from the Torres money.
Disclaimer: I think Andy's worth more but keeping it simple for the audience in here.