The Greatest Footballer of All Time

Ekkie Thump

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
3,902
Supports
Leeds United
While I definitely rate Maradona, I am not sure I would call a side that has Argentina's consensus two greatest defenders of all time in Passarella and Ruggeri and midfield/attackers that include Bochini, Burruchaga and Valdano as a "meh" side. Maradona didn't even score in the 3-2 final over Germany. Also don't underrate the other two of Ma-Gi-Ca and Carnevale made some big contributions as well.
He had a decent assist to write home about. You're right though, it does get my goat how other player's efforts are often needlessly sidelined in order to further elevate an individual.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,276
Messi for me, but I was too young to watch Maradona, Pele, Di Stefano, etc.
 

shamans

Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
18,226
Location
Constantly at the STD clinic.
Anyone who has CR7 better than Messi , let alone the goat, really does watch a different game to me.

Messi scores almost as many goals, creates goals for himself as opposed to being a flat track, on a plate, bully.

Seriously, i sincerely, wouldn't have CR7 in my top 10.


These days CR7 is just a better version of RVN, no shame in that but you wouldn't compare him to Messi just like you wouldn't compare RVN to Henry.
Okay but you think Cristiano Ronaldo is an on plate flat track bully so no one can take you seriously either.
 

RooneyLegend

New Member
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
12,963
Someone mentioned Keane as being greater than Charlton. I agree. But this is the problem of comparing players from different generations. Is it even realistic?
How is it humanly possible to agree with a statement like that?
 

Ecstatic

Cutie patootie!
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
13,787
Supports
PsG
TIME TO INTRODUCE SOME QUOTES ABOUT MARADONA

“Maradona; when he was on form, there was almost no way of stopping him.” — Franco Baresi

“He was dangerous, he used to score against us often. We had to be very well organised; put pressure on him, doubling up, tripling up even to limit his talents. Because if it was one-on-one, you’d lose.” — Franco Baresi

“The number one: one of the best players in football history. He demonstrated with both Argentina and Napoli that a genius always wins. He could even play alone and win.” — Franco Baresi
“Maradona and Di Stéfano were the two greatest Argentinian players. Different, but the greatest. Maradona had more talent. Alfredo was just everywhere [on the pitch] at once,”

“Messi is the best in the world today but he lacks the personality of Diego. Maradona could play anywhere. It Italy [during Maradona’s era] they did not play beautiful football. It may be a bit better now but Italian football is very difficult, possession is hard to maintain. Yet, Maradona had the edge in Italy and in Spain. Nobody could stop Maradona.”

"We once played against him with Milan and totally dominated. Then Diego got the ball, shook off two players and set up Careca, who scored the 1-0 for them. I have never seen someone who was so decisive.”

Arrigo Sacchi
“Maradona is the best opponent I’ve ever played against in my career.” — Paolo Maldini

“The greatest player I’ve ever seen, way ahead of everyone else, including [Michel] Platini, [Karl-Heinz] Rummenigge and the rest. Maradona was a cut above.” — Paolo Maldini
“The best player there has ever been, better than Pele. I watched him closely in Italy every week and he was at a different level to everyone else. Some of the things he did were unbelievable. He could control the ball without looking, which meant if the pass was on, he would take it.” — Ruud Gullit
“A genius, a real artist, one of the greatest players in the world. He could win a match on his own. On his own.” — Sir Bobby Robson
“When Diego came to Argentinos Juniors for trials, I was really struck by his talent and couldn’t believe he was only eight years old. In fact, we asked him for his ID card so we could check it, but he told us he didn’t have ferit on him. We were sure he was having us on because, although he had the physique of a child, he played like an adult. When we discovered he’d been telling us the truth, we decided to devote ourselves purely to him.” —
Francisco Cornejo, youth coach at Argentinos Juniors who discovered Maradona
“It’s very difficult to be Maradona. The pressure he lives under, no one in the history of football has had to go through that.” — Jorge Valdano
“Diego is someone many people want to imitate – a controversial figure, both loved and loathed, and someone who provokes huge debate, especially in Argentina. In Mexico (in 1986), we had to stop him from training, otherwise he would have been at it day and night. Bilardo wouldn’t let him, as he said the altitude would take too much out of him. So the only conflict we had with Diego at that World Cup was with him wanting to do extra training.” — Jorge Valdano
“Some say Pele was the greatest player of all time, but not me. Maradona will always be the greatest. He won World Cup in 1986, narrowly lost in the final in 1990 and then in 1994 maybe would have won it again had he not been banned. The crucial difference with Pele is that Maradona wasn’t surrounded by great players; he had to carry the team himself. If you took Maradona out of Argentina they would not win the World Cup, but I think Brazil without Pele would still have won.” — Eric Cantona
“Diego Maradona was the best by far. [ . . . ] for me he is the greatest player of all time.” — Rudi Voller
“Even if I played for a million years, I’d never come close to Maradona. Not that I’d want to anyway. He’s the greatest there’s ever been.” — Lionel Messi
“Diego certainly had this peculiarity that he never complained about a tackle or a bad foul against him.” — Ciro Ferrara

“He was very acrobatic. Maybe it was his height, but he was able to move in small spaces and still do some spectacular stuff.” — Ciro Ferrara

“I’ve seen him play with the outside of his foot, instep, inner part of his foot, the backheel, the rabona, the bicycle kick. I’ve seen him do everything, every possible play imaginable, even the tunnel between the other player’s legs.” — Ciro Ferrara
“His movement off the ball was incredible. I’ve never seen anyone with better movement. He positioned himself in such a way, it would make it really easy to play alongside him. I’d like to have played with him, and I’m sure he would then have scored 2000 goals, because I would’ve given him the ball every time.” — Zico

“I was very lucky to be his team-mate and get to play with him as well as watch him train every day. The things he did! He was and will always be unique. Off the pitch, I always liked his simplicity. He was Maradona, yet with the team, he seemed just like an ordinary lad like the rest of us. He didn’t behave at all like a football star.” — Gianfranco Zola

“I want to salute Diego Maradona because for me he has been, and always will be, football.” — Francesco Totti
 

Ecstatic

Cutie patootie!
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
13,787
Supports
PsG
TIME TO INTRODUCE SOME QUOTES ABOUT PELE

The greatest goal I ever scored was a one-two with Celeste – we named him Edson Arantes do Nascimento.”

Dondinho, Pele’s father

"I told myself before the game, 'he's made of skin and bones just like everyone else'. But I was wrong.”
Tarcisio Burgnich, the Italy defender who marked Pele in the Mexico 1970 Final

My name is Ronald Reagan, I’m the President of the United States of America. But you don’t need to introduce yourself, because everyone knows who Pele is.”
Ronald Reagan

“The difficulty, the extraordinary, is not to score 1,000 goals like Pele – it’s to score one goal like Pele.”
Carlos Drummond de Andrade, Brazilian poet

“The greatest player in history was Di Stefano. I refuse to classify Pele as a player. He was above that.”
Ferenc Puskas

“In some countries they wanted to touch him, in some they wanted to kiss him. In others they even kissed the ground he walked on. I thought it was beautiful, just beautiful.”
Clodoaldo

“After the fifth goal, even I wanted to cheer for him.”
Sigge Parling of Sweden on a 5-2 defeat by Brazil in the 1958 FIFA World Cup Final

“I arrived hoping to stop a great man, but I went away convinced I had been undone by someone who was not born on the same planet as the rest of us.”
Costa Pereira on Benfica’s 5-2 loss to Santos in the 1962 Intercontinental Cup in Lisbon

"Pele was the greatest – he was simply flawless. And off the pitch he is always smiling and upbeat. You never see him bad-tempered. He loves being Pele.”
Tostao

“When I saw Pele play, it made me feel I should hang up my boots.”
Just Fontaine

“Pele was so focused on winning the Trophy. It was like he knew it was his destiny. He was like a child waiting for Santa Claus.”
Mario Americo, Brazil’s masseur, on Mexico 1970

“Pele was one of the few who contradicted my theory: instead of 15 minutes of fame, he will have 15 centuries.”
Andy Warhol

“You may be right. But you know nothing about football and I’ve seen Pele play.”
Vicente Feola to the psychologist who said Pele was too immature to play at Sweden 1958

“Pele was the only footballer who surpassed the boundaries of logic.”
Johan Cruyff

“His great secret was improvisation. Those things he did were in one moment. He had an extraordinary perception of the game.”
Carlos Alberto Torres

“I sometimes feel as though football was invented for this magical player.”
Sir Bobby Charlton

"Pele played football for 22 years, and in that time he did more to promote world friendship and fraternity than any other ambassador anywhere.”
J.B. Pinheiro, the Brazilian ambassador to the United Nations

Malcolm Allison: “How do you spell Pele?”
Pat Crerand: “Easy: G-O-D.”
British television commentators during Mexico 1970
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,104
Location
Moscow
The greatest goal I ever scored was a one-two with Celeste – we named him Edson Arantes do Nascimento.”

Dondinho, Pele’s father
Possibly the worst football-related quote ever?
 

Sonny1972

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
2,858
Location
i knew i was nuts when the squirrels started stari
According to Pele, Best was best. That should be good enough but it was close between them, both football geniuses.

Maradona, Cryuff, Messi and Ronnie have/had the skills but Pele and Best had that little bit extra that was truly jaw-dropping.

According to Pele, Best was best. That should be good enough but it was close between them, both football geniuses. That doesnt mean anything . Elvis once said Roy Orbison had a better voice then him .
 

IFC 1905

New Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
2,727
Location
Buenos Aires, ARG
I think the GOAT tier has 4 players: Pele, Maradona, Di Stefano, Messi.


The best player I've ever seen is Messi. For me he's the most complete attacking player ever. He has a ridiculous level at passing, dribbling, finishing. He's the best in the world in each one of those aspects. If aliens came and I had to explain them how to be good in football I'd show them a Messi video. I just think there's never been a player who takes the best decisions at football like him. He plays as if he was watching from the stands. When he was younger he tried to do it on his own, but now he uses his ability to find his teammates.

Just watching this at 2:45



He does it so efortlessly. It's a great play and would be the highlight of a good midfielder, but for Messi that's like a,b,c stuff.




This being said, the other situation comes around: If I had to pick one player to defend humanity or my life or something, that would be Diego Armando Maradona. He trully was a God amongst men. His left foot has to be the most talented ever in football's history. He could do whatever he wanted with it. It impresses me more than Ronaldinho or anyone else. He was strong, quick and determined. His vision was almost as good as Messi's and he could put the ball where he wanted. But above all of that, he has this aura, this supernatural thing with him. Those images where he's focusing during the anthems and looks serious...gives me goosebumps.









So for me Messi is the best, and Diego is the greatest. I honestly can't understand how someone can post "Cristiano Ronaldo" in this kind of threads when you've got people like Pele and Maradona around. Cristiano is one of the best goalscorers ever, but as a player he can't even touch Di Stefano who is Real Madrid himself.
 

Kinsella

Copy & Paste Merchant
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
2,846
^ Well put.

Certainly chimes with my own thoughts on the debate.
 

Deleted member 101472

Guest
Just watched a video with the greatest goals of Maradona , Messi and Pele. If it was a battle of beautiful goals pele would be nowhere near , and I'm torn between who's are better between the other two.
 

NYC

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
353
I noticed in most sports, especially physical ones.

The level of physicality or threshold allowed has dropped across the board, so comparing someone from a different era is futile imo. Also, in regards to superteams, money, etc.

Messi could be your favorite and the best. However, I would bet that your future children would not agree with you when that time comes.
 

MounchesterUtd

New Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
2,059
I don't understand the 'Messi has no charisma' argument. If he had Zlatan's charisma, but all his stats and achievements are the same as it is now, will it really be that different?
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,977
Cristiano Ronaldo


and this will be my only post in this thread, will not get dragged into another argument about Luiz v Cristiano or you-know-who.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,104
Location
Moscow
I don't understand the 'Messi has no charisma' argument. If he had Zlatan's charisma, but all his stats and achievements are the same as it is now, will it really be that different?
People mean that if he had Maradona's (well, or Zlatan's) charisma, he would've performed even better in the crucial games that he lost - be it with Argentine in any one of their finals or with Barca against Chelsea or Bayern, for example.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,802
Has to be Messi man. I can't imagine anyone being better than him in the history of football.
 

montpelier

Full Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
10,637
If anything I think goals seem easier to come by for the very best players these days than previously unless you go a long way back in time.

Organisation of defences might have improved but there is much less violence & the pitches & ball are a lot better for the attacker to work with. Nobody was scoring 50/60 a season consecutively back in the day unless their team was ludicrously superior at the domestic level. Muller at Bayern? Pele at Santos? anybody else?
 

Synco

Lucio's #1 Fan
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
6,503
If anything I think goals seem easier to come by for the very best players these days than previously unless you go a long way back in time.

Organisation of defences might have improved but there is much less violence & the pitches & ball are a lot better for the attacker to work with. Nobody was scoring 50/60 a season consecutively back in the day unless their team was ludicrously superior at the domestic level. Muller at Bayern? Pele at Santos? anybody else?
It's important to keep in mind that players have played less matches per season in earlier decades. So the appropriate statistic is goal/game ratio.

Several of the greats surpassed Messi's and Ronaldo's achievements in that category, both in league and international football.

Di Stéfano was roughly on par (as an all-purpose attacking midfielder), Puskas, Müller and Eusébio were better (sometimes significantly). There are probably some more, but these were the obvious ones I could think of.

On the other hand, there are so many factors that make these comparisons over 50-60 years extremely difficult. So the best method of evaluation I can think of is to compare the exploits of these players with those of their contemporaries. In that way we can get a rough idea of how far ahead each of them was in comparison with a normal pro player under the same conditions. Then you can compare that over the generations.

That method has its flaws too (and it's only measuring goals), but it's the best I can come up with.
 

Synco

Lucio's #1 Fan
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
6,503
Stats according to wikipedia (games / goals / ratio):


-------------------------Domestic & European/S. Am.------International

Di Stéfano------------665 / 484 (0,73)-------------------------41 / 29 (0,71)

Puskas----------------Hungary: 358 / 374 (1,04)-------------89 / 84 (0,94)
-------------------------Spain:----262 / 242 (0,92)

Eusébio---------------Europe: 440 / 473 (1,08)------ --------64 / 41 (0,64)

Müller------- ----------Europe: 605 / 564 (0,93)----- ---------62 / 68 (1,10)

C. Ronaldo---- -------671 / 487 (0,73)------------------------133 / 61 (0,46)

Messi------- ----------535 / 456 (0,85)-------------------------114 / 56 (0,49)


I have not included the games in lower leagues, African and North American football
 
Last edited:

Sammyjunn

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
10,299
Location
In Smalling's pocket (as every other person)
What is the difference? Serious question.
Greatest puts imo more emphasis on the fact if a player won the CL, World Cup, Euro Cup, defined a new way of footballer, but that doesnt neccesarily make you a better footballer imo. People see C.Ronaldo as a greater footballer because he has won the Euro's, but it's be nonsense to think that has made him any better.
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,752
Greatest puts imo more emphasis on the fact if a player won the CL, World Cup, Euro Cup, defined a new way of footballer, but that doesnt neccesarily make you a better footballer imo. People see C.Ronaldo as a greater footballer because he has won the Euro's, but it's be nonsense to think that has made him any better.
Then surely someone like Xavi is the GOAT.....
 

Sammyjunn

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
10,299
Location
In Smalling's pocket (as every other person)
Then surely someone like Xavi is the GOAT.....
Putting more emphasis on something doesnt mean that the person with the most trophies is goat. Xavi didnt come close to the individual levels others reached, which also remains to be a big factor for such titles. Best of all time is in my opinion, solely the individual footballing abilities and the individual achievements (which of course arent completely individual as it's still a team game). Let me say the highest rated on FIFA for example, GOAT has many more factora like trophies, context of the era, charisma and fuss around the player etc.
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,752
Xavi is not a decisive player. Iniesta could be there though
he is not if you think you can only win the game by scoring or assisting...scoring a goal is just the final act.

Putting more emphasis on something doesnt mean that the person with the most trophies is goat. Xavi didnt come close to the individual levels others reached, which also remains to be a big factor for such titles. Best of all time is in my opinion, solely the individual footballing abilities and the individual achievements (which of course arent completely individual as it's still a team game). Let me say the highest rated on FIFA for example, GOAT has many more factora like trophies, context of the era, charisma and fuss around the player etc.
I didnt meant only on trophy cabinet....he is one of the best midfielders of all time, key component of one of the greatest teams in history and one of the best national teams in history, changed football in a way etc.
Dont get me wrong, he is not in my top 5 but till today i thought GOAT means the best.
 

IFC 1905

New Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
2,727
Location
Buenos Aires, ARG
he is not if you think you can only win the game by scoring or assisting...scoring a goal is just the final act.



I didnt meant only on trophy cabinet....he is one of the best midfielders of all time, key component of one of the greatest teams in history and one of the best national teams in history, changed football in a way etc.
Dont get me wrong, he is not in my top 5 but till today i thought GOAT means the best.

With your thought there would not be a better player, as the keeper is as important as a striker.

We're talking about individuals with enough skill to break defenses on their own and To generate a goal out of nothing.
 

Sammyjunn

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
10,299
Location
In Smalling's pocket (as every other person)
he is not if you think you can only win the game by scoring or assisting...scoring a goal is just the final act.



I didnt meant only on trophy cabinet....he is one of the best midfielders of all time, key component of one of the greatest teams in history and one of the best national teams in history, changed football in a way etc.
Dont get me wrong, he is not in my top 5 but till today i thought GOAT means the best.
I agree to be honest with Xavi, although attackers get far more recognition than midfielders. Things like hype, popularity play big parts in titles like GOAT, the criteria isnt really clear. It's weird to think that the nominees for GOAT are all attackers except for Beckenbauer, but is Beckenbauer such a better defender than Xavi is a midfielder? You could question that, does Beckenbauer have a bigger name and popularity in football, I think so. That's why I prefer to keep best and greatest apart, best for me is Messi undisputedly. While Pele is greatest because of all the stuff next to just his qualities.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,104
Location
Moscow
If anything I think goals seem easier to come by for the very best players these days than previously unless you go a long way back in time.

Organisation of defences might have improved but there is much less violence & the pitches & ball are a lot better for the attacker to work with. Nobody was scoring 50/60 a season consecutively back in the day unless their team was ludicrously superior at the domestic level. Muller at Bayern? Pele at Santos? anybody else?
Bican scored 832 goals in 427 games for Slavia Praha (537/358 in the league), but he played in the ridiculous era, same as some Brazilians or Dean etc.
Puskas scored 358 in 349 in the Hungarian league
Seeler scored 49 goals in 33 league + league play-off games in one season (and has a >1 gpg ratio in a few other seasons)
Kocsis scored 56 goals in 40 games in 1954 (league + World Cup)

etc.

They rarely had 40-50 games per season though (accounted for in the stats, at least), but they maintained a higher gpg than Messi or Ronaldo do today for a few years
 

2ndTouch

Full Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2015
Messages
2,644
Supports
Bayern München
When he went on Madrid, they had just won UCL, but they were never able to reach a final after they got him (and only managed a league title). Same about Barca, Milano, PSV when he finished below Real, Inter and Ajax.

For someone who gets mentioned many times in these debates, it is a really shit record. And also winning a single European Golden Boot on his career, despite the fact that he played No.9 during all the time in Europe and never had to go against Messi/Ronaldo deserves negative points in my book.
Not sure if it's fair to blame him for the shortcomings of his teams or his injuries. For example, he scored 34 in 37 during his one year stay at Barca, and scored the winning goal in the Cup Winners Final against PSG with the great George Weah. Still, Real won the championship, because they had a way better team than Barca at the time, which was pretty much a Ronaldo show.
His first season at Inter was great, too, but Juve was considered the best team in the world at this time(same goes for the legendary Ajax of LVG during his PSV stint, btw), featuring players like Zidane, Davids, Del Piero, Inzaghi, Deschamps and Ferrara. No shame in losing to that team. After that, his injuries started to hamper his career. When he joined Real, not only he was past his peak, but so were all the other Galacticos like Zidane, Beckham and Figo, who hit their prime between '98 and '02.
Anyone who has actually seen him play from 96-98 should be able to understand why his name gets dropped in here. He just was *that* amazing, definitely the most spectacular player since Maradona, and I'd argue unmatched to this very day.
His portugese namesake deserves huge respect for his consistency and efficiency, but he never made a game a jaw dropping one man show like Luis could on his hayday. Messi comes closer, and again is to be commended for his achievements, but like Pele he pretty much spent his whole career in a team of world class players around him.
Yes, it's a shame we can't see what a '97 Ronaldo could do in todays Barca or Real(or for my Bayern, I can dream), because I think our contemporary superstars would have someone to look up to.