Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The New low (I.) Q. Republicans and Ted Cruz
- Thread starter langster
- Start date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Wouldn't incest lovers want to have a family?
She is right, porn sites are filled with "incest" stuff even if it's all pretend. In my opinion it's driven by men who have become increasingly isolated and have issues connecting with women that they turn to someone who in theory would love them unconditionally.
It's all rather sad and I don't wanna see that shit on the homepage of porn sites.
You only say that because your sisters are ugly.
Ok Neymar
I'm afraid to google that reference.
I feel like if you take the incest part out of that, you've got the common conservative argument against pornography.
If you apply that argument to the whole of pornography then it's rather weak due to the broad range of stuff out there.
Porno is probably an easy target for cons to blame for the death of the nuclear family and not the fact that wages have stagnated and buying a house is out of reach for many people.
If the algorithm is showing you tits and ass then it’s for a reason mate.
These things always remind of a portuguese football pundit years ago who was on an anti-benfica rant and for some reason he talked about their website. At the time they still used google ads on the site, and the guy said the site was so shitty it was full of hemorrhoids medicine ads.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I think I watched that Flintstones episode.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
FFS!
They will try to justify anything, support and defend their lot no matter what they do and twist it round on the Dems just for good measure.
This is just unbelievable.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Daddy's money Gaetz him out of another pickle.
Feck the double standards protecting the rich.
He should have his Johnson cut off for what he did, House of the Dragon style.
I read somewhere he claimed to not have switched the GWOT-EM medal for the Afghanistan campaign medal (ACM) as he separated before 2005 when the ACM was authorized for wear. But the CBS link below states he did not receive a GWOT-EM which all personnel deployed to the Middle East AOR would have on file. Even those on covert missions would prove to the A1 (HR/personnel people) that they did serve in a specific country or the AOR itself, usually by showing a paid-out classified travel voucher with locations, and the Air Force would be able to acknowledge if he did serve within the borders of Afghanistan or in the ME AOR, whether "classified" or not. There would be some type of designation on record especially for campaign medals and future VA requirements. I'm fairly certain a retired/separated member can request to swap out a medal for an individual campaign medal thought it could take a few months to clear through personnel channels (he's had nearly 20 years to do such).
It is true that air crews would likely have an order sending them to a location with variations authorized and in some deployments may have a data-masking on the CED order. But each member would still be required to file a classified voucher with actual locations annotated and these vouchers can be viewed by any finance technician and personnelist without requiring above a secret clearance (need to know purpose), and such would/should be annotated on the member's record. If he did enter Afghanistan, he most likely deployed to Bagram and/or Kandahar if working as some type of logistics specialist or loadmaster type, and those locations were not classified that I'm aware but may have been back in the early war years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghanistan_Campaign_Medal
His website mentions nothing of service in Afghanistan only "to the Middle East." Surely, it would mention Afghanistan... https://jrmajewski4congress.com/about/
Reading this I question his entire service and he was denied reenlistment in 2003. https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/...or-u-s-house-misrepresented-military-service/
He's also been sketchy on his finance disclosures and seems to send out tweets for attention.
https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...finances-after-ignoring-disclosure-law-2022-8
It is true that air crews would likely have an order sending them to a location with variations authorized and in some deployments may have a data-masking on the CED order. But each member would still be required to file a classified voucher with actual locations annotated and these vouchers can be viewed by any finance technician and personnelist without requiring above a secret clearance (need to know purpose), and such would/should be annotated on the member's record. If he did enter Afghanistan, he most likely deployed to Bagram and/or Kandahar if working as some type of logistics specialist or loadmaster type, and those locations were not classified that I'm aware but may have been back in the early war years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghanistan_Campaign_Medal
His website mentions nothing of service in Afghanistan only "to the Middle East." Surely, it would mention Afghanistan... https://jrmajewski4congress.com/about/
Reading this I question his entire service and he was denied reenlistment in 2003. https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/...or-u-s-house-misrepresented-military-service/
He's also been sketchy on his finance disclosures and seems to send out tweets for attention.
https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...finances-after-ignoring-disclosure-law-2022-8
Last edited:
Said it in another thread, valor thieves are a particularly despicable type of cnut.
As someone with 4 purple hearts and 2 medals of honor I agree.
I have none of these.
The one document appears to be a medical clearance memo for a TDY/deployment but does not have a date nor does it prove he went anywhere. I could easily write "classified" in a faked memo and also my order can be rescinded/revoked due to cancelled travel. Seeing as he has a TDY order to Korea where is his data-masked/classified deployment order to a Middle East location? Surely he can provide that as he has the Korea document. Or has he conveniently lost the deployment order?
He's also listed as an E-2 (Amn) on that clearance memo and if he's an E-3 (A1C) on the Korea order this would place the clearance memo before April 2001, and we all know not a single military member was going to Afghanistan at that time. Only US personnel that I know of going into those locations back then were CIA paramilitary types. Although, he could have been demoted after April 2001 but highly doubt he's deploying if demoted, he'd have been on a UIF control roster for a while and possibly tied up in UCMJ process.
My guess is he is outright lying about all of it or he knows the deployment order has Qatar and not classified. Troops were going to Qatar before the war. He may have went to a classified location back in 2000 or 2001, lots of people travel to classified locations. There were troops going to Soto Cano back in the late 90s on classified orders, for example.
I've seen responses to his tweet asking to show his DD 214. The DD 214 should annotate campaign medals earned though sometimes errors/missed actions occur, usually the member requests a corrected 214 as those campaign services carry lot of weight in the Fed/State civil service world and within VA services. At least one responder posted his redacted 214 bearing campaigns and asked for JR to show his.
Looking at the Korea order the funding is a DOD (97) line of accounting and not a USAF line (57) and has pers tempo code C - unit training - and is the typical old school DD 1610 travel order, definitely not a deployment or contingency of any sort and thus doubt he'd receive any special action for it, but I could be incorrect based on duration/other qualification met. He also appears to be an additional traveler to a lead traveler, notice the rank differece at the top - that's another traveler but group travel like this does exist. There is no ESP coding to further separates costs associated to contingencies and non-contingencies established by JCS. It has ROUTINE as type but would have a separate designator if a legit deployment to Korea, like CED or SPECIAL MISSION TRAVEL, something along those lines but usually on a CED A-series order not a 1610 - though 1610 deployment orders do exist.
And I doubt he further deployed into Afghanistan from Korea - if that's his claim/next claim - as that order is dated in April 2001 and no U.S. servicemen set foot into Afghanistan before late October 2001 - and those were special operators and aviation units only. Regular Air Force types didn't arrive in country until like December at the earliest I think and it was extremely rare for AF personnel to deploy beyond 180 days back then (if further travel from Korea to Afghanistan), with exceptions of course like CCT, PJ, SERE, OSI, intel types, and a few others.
He's also listed as an E-2 (Amn) on that clearance memo and if he's an E-3 (A1C) on the Korea order this would place the clearance memo before April 2001, and we all know not a single military member was going to Afghanistan at that time. Only US personnel that I know of going into those locations back then were CIA paramilitary types. Although, he could have been demoted after April 2001 but highly doubt he's deploying if demoted, he'd have been on a UIF control roster for a while and possibly tied up in UCMJ process.
My guess is he is outright lying about all of it or he knows the deployment order has Qatar and not classified. Troops were going to Qatar before the war. He may have went to a classified location back in 2000 or 2001, lots of people travel to classified locations. There were troops going to Soto Cano back in the late 90s on classified orders, for example.
I've seen responses to his tweet asking to show his DD 214. The DD 214 should annotate campaign medals earned though sometimes errors/missed actions occur, usually the member requests a corrected 214 as those campaign services carry lot of weight in the Fed/State civil service world and within VA services. At least one responder posted his redacted 214 bearing campaigns and asked for JR to show his.
Looking at the Korea order the funding is a DOD (97) line of accounting and not a USAF line (57) and has pers tempo code C - unit training - and is the typical old school DD 1610 travel order, definitely not a deployment or contingency of any sort and thus doubt he'd receive any special action for it, but I could be incorrect based on duration/other qualification met. He also appears to be an additional traveler to a lead traveler, notice the rank differece at the top - that's another traveler but group travel like this does exist. There is no ESP coding to further separates costs associated to contingencies and non-contingencies established by JCS. It has ROUTINE as type but would have a separate designator if a legit deployment to Korea, like CED or SPECIAL MISSION TRAVEL, something along those lines but usually on a CED A-series order not a 1610 - though 1610 deployment orders do exist.
And I doubt he further deployed into Afghanistan from Korea - if that's his claim/next claim - as that order is dated in April 2001 and no U.S. servicemen set foot into Afghanistan before late October 2001 - and those were special operators and aviation units only. Regular Air Force types didn't arrive in country until like December at the earliest I think and it was extremely rare for AF personnel to deploy beyond 180 days back then (if further travel from Korea to Afghanistan), with exceptions of course like CCT, PJ, SERE, OSI, intel types, and a few others.
Last edited:
Reminds me of this
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Me too.Cannot confirm if legit but two persons have posted JR's DD214 below his tweet - Fred Wellman (questionable version) and Brian Slodysko (looks very legit). He separated as an E-2 which means he got in some trouble as he should have been an E-4 no later than three years in service. The 214 has no annotation of deployment service nor did he earn a good conduct medal, another indication he fecked up. Brian posted the member-4 copy which had 2X reentry code annotated - not considered for reenlistment. Of course, JR found his CJR memo that arrives 9-12 months before date of separation and is an automatic distro if nothing on file at the time. This leads me to believe he got busted in rank thereabouts and his commander recommended non-selection for reenlistment inside the final six months of obligated service.
JR is full of shit and trying to play the public for fools.
For PII reasons I will not post the 214 in this thread - both failed to cover the birth-date (huge PII foul).
JR is full of shit and trying to play the public for fools.
For PII reasons I will not post the 214 in this thread - both failed to cover the birth-date (huge PII foul).
What's 'PII?'
Personally Identifiable Information
Its against policy for Government employees of any kind to post it online.
Thanks.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He's only upset because the majority of his own party thinks it is a crazy idea. Impeach him for what exactly.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The grift is to fundraise off of Twitter troll manufactured drama.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The tough part for us liberals is figuring out how to one up ourselves next.
I'm thinking we kill the children, then bring them back from the dead each day at school.
I'm thinking we kill the children, then bring them back from the dead each day at school.
This is surely the only place this movement can go, only way you beat crazy (to the MAGA dollar) is more crazy.