Carlsen19
Don't listen to my lies RE: Lineups
- Joined
- May 15, 2011
- Messages
- 5,338
That was a good watch. I wouldn't mind a pint with the Everton fan.
What on earth are you talking about? There’s not a metric in the universe where Utd have spent more than City.I enjoyed that. Every fan was sound, except for Ty, but I think that is exactly why he was invited.
Carra's point on United's spending was right, and made in relation to what Gary said. I don't know why some here feel offended. While City have splurged obscenely overall, when you compare players positionally United have spent more.
Again nothing wrong in that if that wins you the title or UCL. Chelsea do it. Even LFC did with Van Dijk and Alisson.
Neville was defending Kane, and the United fan raised a decent point. Your gentlemen's aggrement counts for diddly squat.
Keane often makes good point, when he is not trying to be the hard man devoid of joy, which is how I usually see him on matchdays.
Him revealing about his love (soft corner) for Spurs was a nice surprise.
McKola getting abuse for simply asking questions. Some of you are weird.
Carra’s point on United has to apply on Liverpool because Liverpool also did the same thing and now have squad that every position with big value fees of player. That means Carra shouldn’t say Liverpool won’t be challenging this season in that video.
I think the issue about Carra’s point is that he is not applying the logic on Liverpool this season. It means inconsistent point.
What on earth are you talking about? There’s not a metric in the universe where Utd have spent more than City.
It was a simple point, which says more about United's recruitment. You have overpaid on some players.
Maybe you have learned a thing or two, considering you have paid lesser than market value for Varan
Dear me. English is not my first language and even I was able to get Carra's point.
He didn't say United spent the most. City have done that by a distance.
His point was that positonally United players were bought for higher amount than City.
For example Pogba was costlier than say Gundogan, or Maguire was costlier than Dias, etc.
You can see that his point somewhat makes sense.
It doesn’t make any sense. They have a defence of 400m odd. They can buy and buy to get it right. That’s the difference. Thats the difference between first and second.The second episode was sound too.
I have been watching Tofee TV for Benitez, and the Everton bloke was decent and so was the Newcastle female fan.
The question about racism seemed forced. It's an important topic, but that was clearly forced.
The point was players at most positions with bigger/higher value when Man Utd is compared with City.
As for us, baring Van Dijk, Alisson and Fabinho, most of our signings were bought for thirties. You could push Keita but he isn't a starter.
The rest, well, Trent (HG), Robbo(8 mil, though we sold Kevin Stewart to Hull for 8 at the same time), Matip (free), Gomez (3.5), Thiago and Hendo (20each), Milner (free), Curtis (HG).
I would still agree that we should compete for the league.
It was a simple point, which says more about United's recruitment. You have overpaid on some players.
Maybe you have learned a thing or two, considering you have paid lesser than market value for Varane and Sancho.
Dear me. English is not my first language and even I was able to get Carra's point.
He didn't say United spent the most. City have done that by a distance.
His point was that positonally United players were bought for higher amount than City.
For example Pogba was costlier than say Gundogan, or Maguire was costlier than Dias, etc.
You can see that his point somewhat makes sense.
Some fans on here just won't accept we've splurged a silly amount of cash because they think players like ADM, Depay, Sanchez etc don't count as they didn't work out. Carra's point is fair and I don't know any United fans who don't accept with the fact that we have made a huge amount of high profile signings and that has continued under Ole.Dear me. English is not my first language and even I was able to get Carra's point.
He didn't say United spent the most. City have done that by a distance.
His point was that positonally United players were bought for higher amount than City.
For example Pogba was costlier than say Gundogan, or Maguire was costlier than Dias, etc.
You can see that his point somewhat makes sense.
That was a good watch. I wouldn't mind a pint with the Everton fan.
This! That's why I hate people comparing United's spend vs City, Chelsea, PSG's spend. They can take risks all they want because they know they can fix it next window by buying another player. We just can't take that risk and need to prioritize. They don't. There's a reason we still don't have a proper DM and didn't have a proper RW for years. Whereas Stones has one bad season, they buy Laporte and whatever the other center back was, and then Laporte gets injured/coming back from injury and they buy Dias, and lets not even talk about their left backs.It doesn’t make any sense. They have a defence of 400m odd. They can buy and buy to get it right. That’s the difference. Thats the difference between first and second.
He didn't say United spent the most. City have done that by a distance.
His point was that positonally United players were bought for higher amount than City.
For example Pogba was costlier than say Gundogan, or Maguire was costlier than Dias, etc.
You can see that his point somewhat makes sense.
This piss-weak meme of "the media is biased against my club/its players” needs to die. It's so fecking stupid.
A cretin.
Part 2 is now up
Carragher was a bit out of order to the City fan.
Ty...nonsense as always.
I think Ty embarrassed himself even more than last time.
It was interesting seeing those two Geordies sitting there quietly in the background. The next episode of this is probably going to focus mostly on them.
When he brings up invincibles I wish someone would say they ain't even the best Arsenal team in PL history.Scholes - when talking about Rooney wanting to leave.
Ty is like that kid - We beat them and they beat you, so we are better than you.... what a bloody idiot.
He’s a little too ridiculous, I get he’s acting for the cameras etc, but considering how grounded the other fans have been he does stand out. He’s fine in small doses but the man has the lack of self awareness most assume Liverpool fans have. At least there’s a substantial history to draw from.When he brings up invincibles I wish someone would say they ain't even the best Arsenal team in PL history.
I would be genuinely curious to his reaction, would he finally cross that line and slate an element of his club (the non invincible title sides)?
Carragher was a bit out of order to the City fan.
Ty...nonsense as always.
Ty is like 40 something right? Does he have children?
Imagine if Ty is your father and you have to watch him do this online.