Yeah, I agree. For now just keep the draft going until the three players are picked. Maybe include Zouma (88) and Goretzka (88) on loan to bring it up to 5. Yeah, loan deals aren't same as permanent deals but it'll make the draft more interesting I guess.
Gaming The SM RedCafe League
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
Sorry guys I don't understand what's going on.
Yep, it doesn't change anything other than ensuring that every club can participate regardless of their cash situation which is the case with an open free for all. I said that because stain felt this is unfair. Personally, I'm all for letting smaller clubs get first dibs to improve overall standard of the league.
As far as agreeing to something is concerned, it's the same as bigger clubs agreeing to this format. Not everyone will be be perfectly happy with every way chosen as there's always going to be someone that loses out.
A Club is now manager less which means players can be bought from them. To help the overall quality of the league, it's been decided that the lower clubs(by squad value) will get first dibs on who they want. So it's a draft format with lowest squad value clubs first. If you want a player, mention who you want and you will be able to buy him for max cash. If you don't want one, say that you're skipping.Sorry guys I don't understand what's going on.
Indeed. Besides, my players are for sale as long as the valuation is... generous. So it's not like big clubs still don't have a chance of signing players from me. Sell high, reinvest, thats the Hereford way.
So any player at face value from Sheffield Wednesday?
Max cash, not face value. Think it's FV x 2.
What timing 
2x value doesn't make sense to me. If the goal is to give smaller teams preference, it's been scuppered by that rule and ban on player exchange.
Max value (FV x 2), and Sheffield United
I think the idea is to maximize cash to Sheffield United in case when someone wants to takeover the club in future
It is not perfact, and we can still improve it in next draft (if any), but this time round, only 3 players are available, so it is not too bad
Skip. I need to focus on getting QPR relegated.
In that case would like Alexander Isak.
OK, well I'll wait until the West Ham draft. But for that draft it should be FV, 1.5XFV, 2XFV etc. You could factor the price with a .25 or .5 increase on FV relative to each 100m of a squad's value. So someone with 150m of squad value pays FV, 200m 1.5FV, 300m+ 2xFV. Obviously a very rough outline but that's how I'd do it to benefit the smaller teams.
West Ham manager is still active
I meant based on squad value, not that i'd get to bid anyway ffs.
OK, thought he was awol. Still, I think that's a good idea for future drafts if the function of drafts is to allow smaller clubs first preference. Having first preference on something you can't afford doesn't really work.
I was just joking, just in case that wasn't clear
Must be nice.
I (west ham) am here, and I do play still, even if I don't talk that much.
Poor Turnip
How, after the start to the season I've had, I'm in the top four I have no idea.
Always nice to beat Forest.
Always nice to beat Forest.
Time's up for Bury
Barnsley decides to skip
And after review current squad value, draft order is changed to: Cardiff City, AFC Bournemouth, Birmingham City
1. Morecambe - n/a
2. Hereford FC - Senna Miangue
3. Leeds United - Alexander Isak
4. Bury - n/a
5. Barnsley - n/a
6. Cardiff City -
Barnsley decides to skip
And after review current squad value, draft order is changed to: Cardiff City, AFC Bournemouth, Birmingham City
1. Morecambe - n/a
2. Hereford FC - Senna Miangue
3. Leeds United - Alexander Isak
4. Bury - n/a
5. Barnsley - n/a
6. Cardiff City -
1. Morecambe - n/a
2. Hereford FC - Senna Miangue
3. Leeds United - Alexander Isak
4. Bury - n/a
5. Barnsley - n/a
6. Cardiff City - n/a
7. AFC Bournemouth -
@Dans
2. Hereford FC - Senna Miangue
3. Leeds United - Alexander Isak
4. Bury - n/a
5. Barnsley - n/a
6. Cardiff City - n/a
7. AFC Bournemouth -
@Dans
Apr'16
May'16
Jun '16
Jul '16
Aug '16
Sep '16
Oct'16 Youth Table
Position - Team - Points | Num of Players
May'16
Jun '16
Jul '16
Aug '16
Sep '16
Oct'16 Youth Table
Position - Team - Points | Num of Players
- Man Utd 50.4 | 15
- Darlington 49.4 | 18
- Arsenal 47.8 | 15
- Chelsea 40.7 | 17
- Forest 34.2 | 15
- Newcastle 32 | 13
- Everton 31.9 | 12
- Southend 27.5 | 12
- Blackburn 26.7 | 13
- Aston Villa 25.4 | 11
- Liverpool 19.8 | 6
- Ipswich 19 | 10
- Spurs 18.8 | 8
- Plymouth 18.3 | 9
- QPR 18.3 | 11
- Hereford 17.2 | 11
- Man City 16.1 | 6
- Southampton 13.8 | 5
- Bristol City 13.2 | 7
- Leeds United 10.1 | 4
- Norwich City 8.9 | 4
- Sunderland 8.6 | 4
- Reading 8.5 | 3
- West Ham 8.1 | 4
- Fulham 8.1 | 4
- Cardiff 6.6 | 5
- Derby 6.3 | 4
- Wolves 5.8 | 4
- Bournemouth 4 | 2
- MKD 3.9 | 2
- Stoke 2.5 | 2
- Morecambe 2.5 | 2
- Barnsley 1.5 | 1
- Bury 0 | 0
- Sheff Utd 0 | 0
- Birmingham 0 | 0
FFP Status (1 Oct 2016)
Div 1
Div 1
- Manchester United - 42/42
- Arsenal - 45/45
- West Ham United - 30/45
- Manchester City - 41/46
- Newcastle United - 47/47
- Sunderland - 35/48
- Aston Villa - 49/49
- Chelsea - 48/49
- Everton - 48/49
- Fulham - 47/49
- Norwich City - 46/49
- Nottingham Forest - 49/49
- Southampton - 39/49
- Tottenham Hotspur - 46/49
- Wolverhampton Wanderers - 49/49
- Darlington 1883 - 48/49
- Plymouth Argyle - 51/49
- Milton Keynes Dons - 39/51
- Birmingham City - 52/52
- Queens Park Rangers - 50/53
- Liverpool - 40/50
- Blackburn Rovers - 46/51
- Stoke City - 33/51
- Cardiff City - 40/53
- Derby County - 53/53
- Ipswich Town - 52/54
- Barnsley - 49/55
- Bristol City - 42/55
- Reading - 37/55
- AFC Bournemouth - 23/56
- Bury - 26/57
- Southend United - 56/57
- Leeds United - 39/54
- Hereford FC - 44/63
- Morecambe - 28/63
Player's rating review is back to normal
Youth table will be updated next month for those missed out
Youth table will be updated next month for those missed out
Thanks gs.
Can I bid on Isak now?
Yeah
Market value x 2 right?
I think so
1. Morecambe - n/a
2. Hereford FC - Senna Miangue
3. Leeds United - Alexander Isak
4. Bury - n/a
5. Barnsley - n/a
6. Cardiff City - n/a
7. AFC Bournemouth - n/a
8. Birmingham - n/a
9. Bristol City -
@harshad
2. Hereford FC - Senna Miangue
3. Leeds United - Alexander Isak
4. Bury - n/a
5. Barnsley - n/a
6. Cardiff City - n/a
7. AFC Bournemouth - n/a
8. Birmingham - n/a
9. Bristol City -
@harshad
Drew 2:2 but @Mciahel Goodman did lose a 2:0 lead in the process so not as bad as it could have been.
Memphis Depay available for face value to any team. He's 90 rated.
Memphis Depay available for face value to any team. He's 90 rated.
thanks to city not logging on in a week and leaving his cup team in
nice little dominant 3-0 win
nice little dominant 3-0 win
I'd have taken a mild defeat before the game so a draw is a bonus
Doing ok in Division 4. Looking promising!
Deal has been agreed for Memphis Depay. Was initially going to Newcastle but unfortunately @CrackersJr found out he'd be above FFP. Instead he's going to Aston Villa. Good luck.
1. Morecambe - n/a
2. Hereford FC - Senna Miangue
3. Leeds United - Alexander Isak
4. Bury - n/a
5. Barnsley - n/a
6. Cardiff City - n/a
7. AFC Bournemouth - n/a
8. Birmingham - n/a
9. Bristol City - n/a
10. Derby County - n/a
11. West Ham -
@Turnip
2. Hereford FC - Senna Miangue
3. Leeds United - Alexander Isak
4. Bury - n/a
5. Barnsley - n/a
6. Cardiff City - n/a
7. AFC Bournemouth - n/a
8. Birmingham - n/a
9. Bristol City - n/a
10. Derby County - n/a
11. West Ham -
@Turnip