Yes. Greenwood. I know he's a striker but he will likely play majority of his minutes from the right for the next season or two in my opinion.Presume you’re talking about Greenwood here, he won’t be playing on the wing for much longer. He’s a striker.
Bayern already asked months ago (pre-pandemic) for both Havertz and Werner to wait for them until summer 2021.Yeah, I can see why they'd go after him this season. Next season, Bayern would go after him if he were still at Leverkusen.
Interestingly, one can say the same about Havertz with regards to Mount.
Why cant we work on multiple transfers at the same time? It seems we always put our eggs in one basket and have to scramble near the end of the window to get anything done. Results in panic buying and paying over the odds.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Because we don't know how much we'll have to spend to get Sancho (upfront, like)?Why cant we work on multiple transfers at the same time? It seems we always put our eggs in one basket and have to scramble near the end of the window to get anything done. Results in panic buying and paying over the odds.
all good, I was in a cafe with a friend. Plus you were walking on the opposite side of the street.I wouldn't have been offended had you said hello, I might not have recognised you though.
Be careful @Sassy Colinall good, I was in a cafe with a friend. Plus you were walking on the opposite side of the street.
It goes on to specify right after the 2 other player roles we want to get in after Sancho, there's nothing saying no outgoing.Because we don't know how much we'll have to spend to get Sancho (upfront, like)?
Still, "all transfer business" seems to include outgoing transfer, which would be stupid.
I suppose it's dumb wording because it's recycled Mirror content. On to the next one.It goes on to specify right after the 2 other player roles we want to get in after Sancho, there's nothing saying no outgoing.
It's dumb wording, but pretty certain they mean all incoming.
he’d be the perfect depth to have for a couple of seasons if we can’t get Sancho over the line. The issue is the assumption I’ve made that he’d be happy to rotate. If he demands to be a starter in nearly every game, it’s a non starter because you aren’t dropping Rashford and Martial at this key time in our long term development. But, we need 4 quality options for the front three positions as a bare minimum, and if at 35, he is happy to accept that he’d be rotating, he’d be such an excellent signing. He could easily play 30-35 games a season for us. Let us keep easing Greenwood in.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
he’d be the perfect depth to have for a couple of seasons if we can’t get Sancho over the line. The issue is the assumption I’ve made that he’d be happy to rotate. If he demands to be a starter in nearly every game, it’s a non starter because you aren’t dropping Rashford and Martial at this key time in our long term development. But, we need 4 quality options for the front three positions as a bare minimum, and if at 35, he is happy to accept that he’d be rotating, he’d be such an excellent signing. He could easily play 30-35 games a season for us. Let us keep easing Greenwood in.
preference is undoubtedly Sancho though. Can cover both wings, and no 10. Young, and fits the profile of what we are building.
Im guessing whatever we pay for Sancho if we ever get him effects the other dealsWhy cant we work on multiple transfers at the same time? It seems we always put our eggs in one basket and have to scramble near the end of the window to get anything done. Results in panic buying and paying over the odds.
Are they not blacklisted on here?Daily Express.
Is there really any point of posing tweet that doesn't really tell what the context of the article?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It outlines the context quite clearly? Speculation on replacing Matic long term and backups to the Sancho deal if it falls through (Douglas Costa included).Is there really any point of posing tweet that doesn't really tell what the context of the article?
I mean it sounds like he's just promoting the situation as BvB want it to be seen in the media. The mail are obviously lapping it up and putting an even more negative spin on it, because they're a fecking rag not worthy to wipe my arse with.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Same guy where quotes came from yesterday. Is he full of it?
That's the topic of the article not the summarise of what's inside the article. We've already heard Douglas Costa being mentioned in yesterday's article.It outlines the context quite clearly? Speculation on replacing Matic long term and backups to the Sancho deal if it falls through (Douglas Costa included).
That is the article that was being quoted yesterday.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Same guy where quotes came from yesterday. Is he full of it?
Not sure what you expect that sort of tweet to say then. It's linking to the article (sole purpose is to drive clicks to the article) so it's not going to spell out all the contents.That's the topic of the article not the summarise of what's inside the article. We've already heard Douglas Costa being mentioned in yesterday's article.
Come home Ronnie!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I don't moan about the tweet or the twitter account, I moaned to the poster who posted useless tweet. Can't read the article, tweet doesn't give any context of the article at all.Not sure what you expect that sort of tweet to say then. It's linking to the article (sole purpose is to drive clicks to the article) so it's not going to spell out all the contents.
He has very close ties to Sanchos camp. First to announce the deal to Dortmund from City, first to talk about our interest in Sancho and talks with him last summer, first to say Sancho wouldn't move to us without CL football, first to announce his contract extension after the move didn't materialise last summer.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Same guy where quotes came from yesterday. Is he full of it?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Thought he had gone to Roma?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Possibly, but I can see him getting regular minutes up front. We also have literally no depth there. As good as he is, you can't rely on a single 18/19 year old for a full season or two.Yes. Greenwood. I know he's a striker but he will likely play majority of his minutes from the right for the next season or two in my opinion.
After seeing his early Germany and Real Madrid performances, I thought he'd be a true footballing legend by now.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
2.5 months of the window to go. It’s not exactly panic stations is it?Why cant we work on multiple transfers at the same time? It seems we always put our eggs in one basket and have to scramble near the end of the window to get anything done. Results in panic buying and paying over the odds.
I always see this, it isn't quite panic stations but as fans we should be concerned.2.5 months of the window to go. It’s not exactly panic stations is it?
So what you are saying is that of all our rivals, only Chelsea have improved so far right? And they are sitting on a pile of money because of recent sales en transfer bans. Stop exaggerating.I always see this, it isn't quite panic stations but as fans we should be concerned.
City finished second, they sold Sane and decided they want to replace him instantly, got Torres deal done. Pep looked at his team and knew CB is his weakness and went and got a player.
Lampard was screaming for strikers since Jan, their attack needs more clinical players, Ziyech and Werner done.
Clear signs that we will not accept this season, the manager done well but we need more.
Manutd on the other hand, nothing.
It is a repetitive theme every summer. Other teams get their business done early. We have known we need a RW for years now, yet we still cannot get it done. Instead the club have fans believing that Covid has had a bigger effect on us than anyone else and we cannot sign players so Greenwood can do the job.
It is going to be a big mistake.
Chelsea have improved, yes.So what you are saying is that of all our rivals, only Chelsea have improved so far right? And they are sitting on a pile of money because of recent sales en transfer bans. Stop exaggerating.
PANIC STATIONS EVERYONEChelsea have improved, yes.
City have improved, 2 signed.
Liverpool have improved their squad depth by signing a LB cover
Spurs have improved, they were short in DM, signed a player.
the same squad we finished level points with have improved.
the squads we finished 20+ points behind have improved.
We are here saying patience... October is the deadline, which is 3 weeks into the season. If you think we have to over pay now, watch when the season starts and no one wants to sell players and we will be in big big trouble.
City have lost Sané and Silva, which is a major loss to them. Sané's a better player than the player they bought. Ake is nothing more than a backup player.Chelsea have improved, yes.
City have improved, 2 signed.
Liverpool have improved their squad depth by signing a LB cover
Spurs have improved, they were short in DM, signed a player.
the same squad we finished level points with have improved.
the squads we finished 20+ points behind have improved.
We are here saying patience... October is the deadline, which is 3 weeks into the season. If you think we have to over pay now, watch when the season starts and no one wants to sell players and we will be in big big trouble.
Sometimes I forget how many useless feet we have in our squad. I had almost forgotten Rojo existed.Rojo and JLingz like this.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Honestly that sounds like a "pay up" article. like, we could get more next summer but we'll take 120m now. Sounds more positive for us than it first seems.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date