Should it be "Poo-Lee-Sich"? That what I've been saying.The Pulisick pronunciation is bad enough but "Matt-yo" Kovačić annoys me equally.
Should it be "Poo-Lee-Sich"? That what I've been saying.The Pulisick pronunciation is bad enough but "Matt-yo" Kovačić annoys me equally.
Even more Chelsea if you call him Chopper GilmourYou's have a kid called Billy Gilmour? that sounds so 70's and so Chelsea.
That's true. I mean, Henderson, wijnaldum and the like don't exactly scream creative quality, does it.Liverpool have nobody in their midfield even close to the quality of Pogba.
Of course Klopp realize this, it’s some of his trade marks but does he want to? That’s a different question. We know Pep would not change the philosophy...The way this Chelsea team plays, they will cause trouble to any team playing a high line. You have to give credit to Ole on Sunday in the second hald to change our system to drop back and counter against them. Lets see how Klopp deals with it. Lets see if he has the tactical nous to realize this.
The lack of signing the 2 midfielders was diabolical.It's just the midfield and right wing, man. If we had just got a right winger and 2 midfielders, we wouldn't have been under siege from chelsea in the first half. Mctominay can't hold the midfield alone when Periera and Lingard are just not pulling their weight.
But that is how you pronounce the latter name though, and they probably call Pulisic that because he's American and they don't tend to stick with literal pronunciations.The Pulisick pronunciation is bad enough but "Matt-yo" Kovačić annoys me equally.
But it wouldn't be the caf without fickleness!I think after everyone plays 10 or so games, we'll have a good picture of what the season could look like. Too many of us are obsessed with drawing conclusions this early
Forgot they were on the pitch for the first 30 minutes. But as Ole says, we're a work in progress. and how good Chelsea look tonight won't change the fact that they were shit in defence and we took advantage with our pace. We won 4-0 and they can rue their missed chances but that's football.It's just the midfield and right wing, man. If we had just got a right winger and 2 midfielders, we wouldn't have been under siege from chelsea in the first half. Mctominay can't hold the midfield alone when Periera and Lingard are just not pulling their weight.
It makes sense, it means we have actually a manager and a team that is able to hurt even the best teams, like Chelsea...Did you mean maybe it WAS lucky? Otherwise this makes no sense...
Yeah - they're pronouncing it Americanized.Should it be "Poo-Lee-Sich"? That what I've been saying.
From a Sunday maybe, not the recent one.Is this post from 5pm on Sunday? But yeah, pleasing so far.
I thought chelsea signed him just to sell more shirts.USA! USA!
I think.
I'll send a Whatsapp to Frank now, cheers.From a Sunday maybe, not the recent one.
You should stop hitting the woodwork though, that would be my advice.
Welcome to the fickle world of the matchday threadTeams don't finish on 97 points & win a European Cup and only play well six times over a season. That's a ridiculously silly think to say.
That's the rule.Why did the lineswoman let the play run on for so long for that disallowed Pulisic goal? He seemed pretty far offside and he carried the ball a mile, checked back & stuck it in the net before offside was called?
I probably to it myself from time to time tbf.Welcome to the fickle world of the matchday thread
That's how the man himself pronounces it.The Pulisick pronunciation is bad enough but "Matt-yo" Kovačić annoys me equally.
It really wouldn'tBut it wouldn't be the caf without fickleness!
You and Us bothI probably to it myself from time to time tbf.
We're going to regret not signing a midfielder.
Pulišić (-shitch). Though to be fair he wasn't born in Croatia and the name has been Americanised. Just sounds stupid to me. In Germany no one called him - sick (no pun intended).Should it be "Poo-Lee-Sich"? That what I've been saying.
They are very good side.People went way over the top about Chelsea on Sunday. I like how Lampard's got them playing so far. Very good to watch.
I am personally hoping for gomes to be given a chance. That guy is great.Forgot they were on the pitch for the first 30 minutes. But as Ole says, we're a work in progress. and how good Chelsea look tonight won't change the fact that they were shit in defence and we took advantage with our pace. We won 4-0 and they can rue their missed chances but that's football.
Hopefully we'll learn that we can't concede as much possession in midfield and win games.
No, it's not. Mateo has three syllables, not two.But that is how you pronounce the latter name though
Ohhhh okay yeah I get it nowIt makes sense, it means we have actually a manager and a team that is able to hurt even the best teams, like Chelsea...
We started the 17-18 season with Klavan, Lovren and Matip as our CB's and were stuck like that until we signed Van Dijk in January.Looking at Liverpools defence - they have so little depth. Why did they get rid of Lovren? if they get a couple of injuries they could really struggle.
Yes. In the first half.Did Kepa ever saved a shot?
That makes no sense.Did Kepa ever saved a shot?