Smug, patronising tory cnut getting verbally bodied just warms the cockles of your heart.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Thanks everyone for clarifying on this pointthat would be illegal and passengers would be uninsured whereas striking is legal.
The look on the cnuts face when Mick brings up RPI and he tries to work what how runs per inning has to do with trains.
My point was questioning a poster when he said train drivers deserve a pay hike , nothing about who was actually striking. And shouldn't the drivers be out supporting their brothers and sisters anyway? They may have different unions but a little solidarity goes a long way.I know it's been over 24 hours, but has anyone pointed out to you that train drivers aren't actually the ones striking?
Yeah I agree. By saying they are both the one day each year I was being sarcastic.That and any other day of the year you like can be the one day each year you can remember them. Conveniently you can also remember them from any location as well which means you don't need to get on a train.
I like this guy.Smug, patronising tory cnut getting verbally bodied just warms the cockles of your heart.
They most likely will be soon.My point was questioning a poster when he said train drivers deserve a pay hike , nothing about who was actually striking. And shouldn't the drivers be out supporting their brothers and sisters anyway? They may have different unions but a little solidarity goes a long way.
How do you know they're not?My point was questioning a poster when he said train drivers deserve a pay hike , nothing about who was actually striking. And shouldn't the drivers be out supporting their brothers and sisters anyway? They may have different unions but a little solidarity goes a long way.
Sticks to his brief well doesn't he? I saw him interviewed on BBC news 24 about a month ago and thought then he would shine in this dispute.I’d vote for Mick Lynch tomorrow.
I love that they keep referencing the miners strikes thinking people haven't learned better in the interim and there weren't multiple investigations showing the police and government were total scumbags.Sticks to his brief well doesn't he? I saw him interviewed on BBC news 24 about a month ago and thought then he would shine in this dispute.
Tories think this is the same labour dispute as the 1970's, they are in for a real shock. They are being handed their backsides one after the other.
All true, but I was thinking more of the idea of union excess which prevailed at the time and underpinned the Thatcherite attack. That perception doesn't exist now and it is going to backfire on them if they keep trying to pretend it does.I love that they keep referencing the miners strikes thinking people haven't learned better in the interim and there weren't multiple investigations showing the police and government were total scumbags.
I genuinely think they'll try to ride it out, the Tories aren't smart. If the volume of passengers were at 2019 volumes we would see much quicker discussions around the table. The fact most have resorted to WFH probably gives them some view that public fallout isn't that significant.If they are smart they pay up and get him off the airwaves as he is killing them.
While i hope they do pay up, I dont think he's unique and i'm sure the teachers, nurses etc will have someone competent enough to run rings around this tory government.All true, but I was thinking more of the idea of union excess which prevailed at the time and underpinned the Thatcherite attack. That perception doesn't exist now and it is going to backfire on them if they keep trying to pretend it does.
If they are smart they pay up and get him off the airwaves as he is killing them.
At the very least, he’s given those other unions a play sheet to follow that the tories don’t know what to do in response. Making it easier for them to run rings around them.While i hope they do pay up, I dont think he's unique and i'm sure the teachers, nurses etc will have someone competent enough to run rings around this tory government.
It's a fine balance. The RMT have a terrible reputation for holding the public to ransom, more than any other union, so they don't have too many opportunities to strike before the public turn on them. They were despised in London under Bob Crow.All true, but I was thinking more of the idea of union excess which prevailed at the time and underpinned the Thatcherite attack. That perception doesn't exist now and it is going to backfire on them if they keep trying to pretend it does.
If they are smart they pay up and get him off the airwaves as he is killing them.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
A spectre is haunting Britain — the spectre of Scargill.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They will try that. No doubt.I genuinely think they'll try to ride it out, the Tories aren't smart. If the volume of passengers were at 2019 volumes we would see much quicker discussions around the table. The fact most have resorted to WFH probably gives them some view that public fallout isn't that significant.
Too right, BA cut their pay by 10% during the pandemic and hasn't reinstated it.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
His point here is a really fair one. I am a regular train user for my commute to work in London. My ticket fare has, in the last 10 years, risen at a considerable rate. Not only have they used RPI, which itself is not what is typically considered in salary rises, they have added % on this too, typically.
That's not really true. The TOCs make 2-3% profit, which isn't much and plenty of them do lose money and subsequently lose the franchise.His point here is a really fair one. I am a regular train user for my commute to work in London. My ticket fare has, in the last 10 years, risen at a considerable rate. Not only have they used RPI, which itself is not what is typically considered in salary rises, they have added % on this too, typically.
In a low interest low inflation environment, train fares have increased at rates far beyond that.
And all it’s done is line the pockets of the operators. People will get frustrated by the strikes, but it’ll be a big mistake for the operators and government to think that would necessarily outweigh the hatred some of us have for how fares have changed in real terms.
you don't generally support unions at all do you? asking because you seem to hate RMT more than the rest.It's a fine balance. The RMT have a terrible reputation for holding the public to ransom, more than any other union, so they don't have too many opportunities to strike before the public turn on them. They were despised in London under Bob Crow.
The government know that and I think are purposely baiting them into more and more militant actions, which they're all too happy to do.
Your right to. Probably a miserable experience but your protecting the future of the service.The last 3 days my commute has been 5-6 hours each day. Pretty brutal. Support the rail workers though.
I'm supportive of unions generally, but I hate hypocrites and the RMT are still one of the worst for me personally. Openly supported and pushed for Brexit knowing that it impacts workers pay & conditions long term, and despite openly criticising BP and the oil sector in February for the profits they're making, has £1.2m of shares in both BP and Shell. Lynch is a bit of a meme at the moment with the interviews, clear and succinct in his points however it's pretty easy to bounce back against some of the Tory drones. However I do laugh when he talks about relating to the working class when he's on a six figure salary, a champagne socialist if ever I saw one!you don't generally support unions at all do you? asking because you seem to hate RMT more than the rest.
lynch has been great imo. he's set an example for other union leaders to follow.
Can't be on as big a wedge as the people he's negotiating with...I'm supportive of unions generally, but I hate hypocrites and the RMT are still one of the worst for me personally. Openly supported and pushed for Brexit knowing that it impacts workers pay & conditions long term, and despite openly criticising BP and the oil sector in February for the profits they're making, has £1.2m of shares in both BP and Shell. Lynch is a bit of a meme at the moment with the interviews, clear and succinct in his points however it's pretty easy to bounce back against some of the Tory drones. However I do laugh when he talks about relating to the working class when he's on a six figure salary, a champagne socialist if ever I saw one!
Exactly. It’s only 3 days (maybe 4 tomorrow), I will have forgotten about it in a couple of weeks.Your right to. Probably a miserable experience but your protecting the future of the service.
Even if that’s the case, it still seems to be that in its present format, it is the consumer and the employee who is suffering the most at the expense of the government and the train operators.That's not really true. The TOCs make 2-3% profit, which isn't much and plenty of them do lose money and subsequently lose the franchise.
The big earners are the train manufacturers and the government, who take a shed load out on franchise payments. However overall nobody gets rich running railways, I'm not sure there is a network in the world that is genuinely profitable. They all require government investment and subsidies. The real reason fares are so high is the relative low level of subsidies compared to the rest of Europe.
Very true, but I don't think they're pretending to be something that they're not.Can't be on as big a wedge as the people he's negotiating with...
Is he? Why you can't be a socialist and earn a good wage?Very true, but I don't think they're pretending to be something that they're not.
isn't the point of a union in a modern capitalist country that it has to play by the rules set up to keep workers down? so they'll have investments in companies they ideologically disagree with because they need to put their money somewhere to see returns on their investment for the sake of the union. and there will be people earning relatively large salaries because large unions require their heads and spokespeople to be highly competent across a broad range of tasks. i'd say lynch and others in similar positions are worth their six figure salary more than just about every mp currently in parliament. as for brexit, many union types and traditional socialist types generally supported leaving the EU for decades. their reason for leaving was due to migrant labour bringing down the value of domestic labour which is the oldest trick in the capitalist playbook. there were certain kinds of brexit which might have made sense to union figures but few of them will have voted for it if they thought that this was the best they could get. but brexit is largely a sidepoint in all this. the primary point is working class people demanding better working conditions after many years of being shafted by government cuts to the public sector.I'm supportive of unions generally, but I hate hypocrites and the RMT are still one of the worst for me personally. Openly supported and pushed for Brexit knowing that it impacts workers pay & conditions long term, and despite openly criticising BP and the oil sector in February for the profits they're making, has £1.2m of shares in both BP and Shell. Lynch is a bit of a meme at the moment with the interviews, clear and succinct in his points however it's pretty easy to bounce back against some of the Tory drones. However I do laugh when he talks about relating to the working class when he's on a six figure salary, a champagne socialist if ever I saw one!