GlasgowCeltic
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2006
- Messages
- 5,479
Boothroyd’s definitely one of the worst managers in the football league over the last few decades, have no idea how he managed to blag his way to the Prem smashing it up to Marlon King
It’s worth considering that is still a team of premier league regulars near enough. The opposition sides are nowhere near the same level in terms of club sides. The Swiss side is mainly local based and their arguably best player can barely get a game for Saints. The England team is comfortably one of the strongest on paper in the tournament even with the players ‘missing’. They should be doing a lot better than they currently do. Even the Portugal side, you’d say that England team plays a higher level than most of them.Based on what? Looking at their starting lineup tonight it's fairly average.
Ramsdale (worst keeper in the PL)
Aarons
Tanganga
Wilmot
Kelly
Eze
Skipp
Gallagher
McNeil
Nketiah
Jones
Nothing there screams greatness to me.
But most of that generation of Portugal players won under 17's and 19´s Euros and reached another Final in the under 19`s against Spain with the generation of 2000. True England alson won the under 17 WC with the generation of 2000 but the great players from that generation are already on the main squad. And there's nothing wrong about that. But when you are going to play against a team where 80% of the starters have been playing together for 5 or 6 years at NT Level or Youth League level it makes the difference.Even the Portugal side, you’d say that England team plays a higher level than most of them.
Of course, it’s a strong Portugal side and they are probably favourites to win it. There’s no shame in losing to them, it was just in response to people downplaying the level of the England squad when in reality they all play a higher level than pretty much every squad in the tournament.But most of that generation of Portugal players won under 17's and 19´s Euros and reached another Final in the under 19`s against Spain with the generation of 2000. True England alson won the under 17 WC with the generation of 2000 but the great players from that generation are already on the main squad. And there's nothing wrong about that. But when you are going to play against a team where 80% of the starters have been playing together for 5 or 6 years at NT Level or Youth League level it makes the difference.
Decided to read up more about him, a promotion with Watford in 2006 and feck all after that. Missed the playoffs in league 1 with Colchester, got sacked by Coventry and had Northampton bottom of the football league before getting sacked.Boothroyd’s definitely one of the worst managers in the football league over the last few decades, have no idea how he managed to blag his way to the Prem smashing it up to Marlon King
They can lose to Italy. By the way the team who played the best football of the tournament was Denmark.Of course, it’s a strong Portugal side and they are probably favourites to win it.
Yes, but they lacked cohesion and mutual understanding on the pitch, it’s not only the clubs or the leagues where you play. I didn’t even bothered to check where the majority of the Danish players come from, but I suspect a lot of them don’t play on the best clubs in the world.There’s no shame in losing to them, it was just in response to people downplaying the level of the England squad when in reality they all play a higher level than pretty much every squad in the tournament.
Yes the 3 best players were Sancho, Foden and CHO, Brewster and Gibbs White were also interesting on that tournament. Anyway it’s not the end of the world if they keep producing players on a high level frequency playing in the best leagues in the world. So the most difficult thing, that is to produce players with quality for the main team has happened, regardless of under 21 titles.England’s only missing players from that u17 squad are Foden and Sancho I think. Sancho only played 1/2 games and went home after the groups if I remember
No, it’s the players! *runs away*England were sunk by a shockingly bad coach
(throws lasso and catches him. Drags him near to the tickling mob thats here.. )No, it’s the players! *runs away*
Given the FA have a penchant for hiring dull boring coaches over the years - see not picking Clough as manager decades ago and hiring Southgate - I would not be surprised to see Boothroyd become the senior coach once England inevitably collapse at the next tournament.Boothroyd’s definitely one of the worst managers in the football league over the last few decades, have no idea how he managed to blag his way to the Prem smashing it up to Marlon King
Given the FA have a penchant for hiring dull boring coaches over the years - see not picking Clough as manager decades ago and hiring Southgate - I would not be surprised to see Boothroyd become the senior coach once England inevitably collapse at the next tournament.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
No, there are no coaches out there better than Boothroyd.Do England have better options than Boothroyd though?
I think the u21 job should go to a young up and coming coach rather than someone who had tumbled down the leagues in quick order to the point of being literally at the bottom of the whole structure. Is there any worse coach than one who in 6 years went from the Premier League to the bottom of League 2 as a manager?Do England have better options than Boothroyd though?
By comparison the German u21 coach, Stefan Kuntz:I think the u21 job should go to a young up and coming coach rather than someone who had tumbled down the leagues in quick order to the point of being literally at the bottom of the whole structure. Is there any worse coach than one who in 6 years went from the Premier League to the bottom of League 2 as a manager?
There are a number of young coaches that have been mooted to take over from Boothroyd that have interesting records in youth football. Personally I'd be more interested to see one of those take over than a lot of the names like Lampard and Wilder that are being thrown about. Jody Morris would be an interesting choice who has been highly successful at youth level.By comparison the German u21 coach, Stefan Kuntz:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
These jobs usually don't attract the best and brightest and England is probably not a country one would associate with young progressive coaches either.
We could at least use a manager that wants to play progressive, attacking football.By comparison the German u21 coach, Stefan Kuntz:
https://www.transfermarkt.com/stefan-kuntz/leistungsdatenLigenNational/trainer/134
These jobs usually don't attract the best and brightest and England is probably not a country one would associate with young progressive coaches either.
On Kuntz, you're looking at the next Bundestrainer so show some respectBy comparison the German u21 coach, Stefan Kuntz:
https://www.transfermarkt.com/stefan-kuntz/leistungsdatenLigenNational/trainer/134
These jobs usually don't attract the best and brightest and England is probably not a country one would associate with young progressive coaches either.
There is of course always the possibility of improvement, but two interesting English coaches in the PL doesn't necessarily mean that the 25th best coach (as in the best one who would be willing to take over a u21 team) in the country is the same.On Kuntz, you're looking at the next Bundestrainer so show some respect
On the bolded, this association (or lack of) might be becoming outdated and prejudiced at this point.
Don't become like Bela Rethy, who still casually drops the "kick and rush" line when talking about the PL, as if it weren't the league where all of Pep, Klopp, Tuchel, Bielsa, Ancelotti, Hasenhüttl, and Graham Potter practice their craft. Dean Smith beating Klopp 7-2 and things like that.
I don't know.There is of course always the possibility of improvement, but two interesting English coaches in the PL doesn't necessarily mean that the 25th best coach (as in the best one who would be willing to take over a u21 team) in the country is the same.
Didn't Southgate win the Toulon tournament which got him the England job.Well I mean, Southgate and Pearce didn't exactly do much better. Although Pearce actually made the finals once. Something Southgate clearly is reluctant to do ( )
Maybe it's the quality of coaches to a big extent.
Didn't Southgate win the Toulon tournament which got him the England job.
All other teams just could do their best and expect that France individual talents don't work as team, because if they click, it's going to be very difficult for any team to get a scrap at the game.France isnt nearly as good as I thought. Sure they're ahead, but we've had opportunities so far and our best players are either in the euro's squad or injured.
They are never as good as you expect them to be. Very much like the national team.France isnt nearly as good as I thought. Sure they're ahead, but we've had opportunities so far and our best players are either in the euro's squad or injured.
We miss 3 guys in comparison to the group stages. Gakpo (going to the euros) Lang (injured) and Brobbey (Injured). Im amazed we did as well as we have honestly. Though that's mostly because France manages to do feck all with all that talent.Holland's bench doesnt sound promising in cas you need to change the game. We have similar problems as you guys, I guess. We have a decent joker on Gonçalo Ramos, and that's about it.
Why did you think we were good? Our youth teams are always bad no matter who starts for them.France isnt nearly as good as I thought. Sure they're ahead, but we've had opportunities so far and our best players are either in the euro's squad or injured.
Look at your squad, so much talent. It's probably better than our senior squad on paper.Why did you think we were good? Our youth teams are always bad no matter who starts for them.
Your squad probably worths more in TransferMarket than a lot of ther teams combined.Why did you think we were good? Our youth teams are always bad no matter who starts for them.