AP88
New Member
Rashford and Martial were better under Van Gaal....if he’d been allowed to continue his work with them they’d both be at least considered equal to Sane and Sterling, plus I feel Shaw would have been mentally and physically rehabilitated under LVG, rather than humiliated - there’s three potentially great United players for a decade. So the question is, was two thirds of Liverpool’s 2001 Micky mouse treble worth losing two years of proper development for some of the best young talents in Europe under Jose?Am sorry but I disagree.
Sane and Sterling are not better than Rashford and Martial, the difference is that they play in positive team whoose first aim is to attack like any top team should. So naturally their productivity and confidence to do things will be better, coupled with the fact that they have great support.
I dont like to make comparisons but if Pep was in charge of those young players he will make them better than they are curently showing.
Is not everything that is about quality, we have no imagination in our attacking play at all.
Even Lingard looked more useful under the previous manager, and I also think Lukaku is being subdued by Mourinho’s primitive attacking plan.