Who decided to sign Van De Beek?

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,399
What makes his transfer even worse for me is that, if we decided to fork out an extra £20m (Diallo and Pellistri ended up costing us over £20m together so we had the money), we probably could've had Grealish before his asking price skyrocketed.
Honest question: did Graelish want to join us, or was he always holding out for when City would buy him? Because, if Graelish was OK joining us and we passed on him for DvB, we are the dumbest club that ever existed, at least our recruiting is.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,399
I wonder if he’s seriously now regretting the move here when he could be playing week in week out with Ajax if he had stayed there. I also wonder what promises Ole had made and sold to him prior to his move here. Yes he’s now at a bigger club and probably earning thrice the wages but it’s not looking good for his playing career right now and then losing his spot in the national team as a result
I doubt he would have had any problem joining other rich clubs. He wouldn't still be in Ajax. From what I understand Van der Sar helped us get him and asked us to not ruin him. Looks like we are ruining him so Edwin should be quite pissed at us.
 

sugar_kane

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
3,527
The whole "Dream Like Donny" shite from Ajax with about ten different goodbye features when he left for United felt fairly cringeworthy at the team and seems even worse with hindsight.

I do actually feel bad for him, but I maintain that if he proving himself on the training ground then he would be featuring more. Ole wants to win and if he thinks Van de Beek will increase the likelihood of that he will play him, he's not leaving Donny out because of some evil grudge.
 

Inigo Montoya

Leave Wayne Rooney alone!!
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
38,543
The whole "Dream Like Donny" shite from Ajax with about ten different goodbye features when he left for United felt fairly cringeworthy at the team and seems even worse with hindsight.

I do actually feel bad for him, but I maintain that if he proving himself on the training ground then he would be featuring more. Ole wants to win and if he thinks Van de Beek will increase the likelihood of that he will play him, he's not leaving Donny out because of some evil grudge.
I tend to agree with this. I also feel they have no idea where to play him. We have two players in Bruno and Pogba who he isn’t going to displace for starters
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,150
Location
Canada
I tend to agree with this. I also feel they have no idea where to play him. We have two players in Bruno and Pogba who he isn’t going to displace for starters
I genuinely think we signed him with a view that Pogba was leaving, if not last summer then this summer. Covid obviously stopped him from leaving last year to Juve IMO, and then this summer PSG were the only real option and they ended up signing Messi. So Pogba has stayed yet again. Van de Beek is a very different player of course, but I think it terms of squad building terms, Ole essentially replaced Pogba from our midfield 3 with Bruno's signing (Pogba was out most of that season with strong noise he would leave, until covid happened). So then Ole tried him deeper a bit and then put him on the left to get some creativity on the wings as we can't use 2 inside forwards on the wings. Van de Beek was likely to be used as a depth player while he adapted and I assume the view was he'd play in a 3 with Bruno ahead of a DM. But now Pogba has stayed again and we bought Sancho to be the creator on the wings. Which means Pogba will likely be used more often as part of a midfield 3, which essentially means there is 0 chance and to be honest, 0 reason for Van de Beek to get meaningful minutes past just resting others if Pogba and Bruno are fit.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,150
Location
Canada
Honest question: did Graelish want to join us, or was he always holding out for when City would buy him? Because, if Graelish was OK joining us and we passed on him for DvB, we are the dumbest club that ever existed, at least our recruiting is.
I think we passed on Grealish when we signed Bruno and after that we essentially were looking for squad player caliber players, which was VdB with a view he could probably be a starting #8 before too long. Grealish is a pure #10 or left winger who would've demanded a starting role, which we pretty clearly weren't actually going for given we have Bruno and Rashford.
 

Inigo Montoya

Leave Wayne Rooney alone!!
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
38,543
I genuinely think we signed him with a view that Pogba was leaving, if not last summer then this summer. Covid obviously stopped him from leaving last year to Juve IMO, and then this summer PSG were the only real option and they ended up signing Messi. So Pogba has stayed yet again. Van de Beek is a very different player of course, but I think it terms of squad building terms, Ole essentially replaced Pogba from our midfield 3 with Bruno's signing (Pogba was out most of that season with strong noise he would leave, until covid happened). So then Ole tried him deeper a bit and then put him on the left to get some creativity on the wings as we can't use 2 inside forwards on the wings. Van de Beek was likely to be used as a depth player while he adapted and I assume the view was he'd play in a 3 with Bruno ahead of a DM. But now Pogba has stayed again and we bought Sancho to be the creator on the wings. Which means Pogba will likely be used more often as part of a midfield 3, which essentially means there is 0 chance and to be honest, 0 reason for Van de Beek to get meaningful minutes past just resting others if Pogba and Bruno are fit.
At the end of last season against Wolves he was quality but I just wonder if he’s gone the way of Memphis and now Martial where the expectations are too great for him
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,150
Location
Canada
At the end of last season against Wolves he was quality but I just wonder if he’s gone the way of Memphis and now Martial where the expectations are too great for him
I wouldn't put too much stock in that game, it was a dead rubber. I think it was just a bad signing. He didn't really show that much in the Dutch league to suggest he could come to United and be a completely different player. He's one of those where he has a good touch, is of a good size and can occasionally play a decent enough pass where you think "if they put it all together, they can be something". I'd say the bigger part of being a top midfielder is the mental aspect, knowing where to move, where to sit, how to open yourself up to receive the ball and get on the ball constantly and how to consistently dictate the game. Van De Beek never showed that ability. He's not a player who ever dominates the touches or is a playmaker, he's just a link up player. He's not a player who can progress the play well through carrying or dribbling, and he's not some sort of beast with his work rate or pressing either. I just think it was a signing where we thought he'd be a lot better than he actually is, and so Ole doesn't feel the need to play him much.

With Memphis, I don't think it was an expectation thing either. When I watch Memphis now I'm still not that impressed. He's turned into a smarter player and makes better decisions, and has a good shot on him, but he was never much of a explosive winger. I still don't think he's a player who's good enough for a top team. The tier below the top teams is where I'd put him. Spurs, Arsenal, etc. Barca getting him is just a further marker into how they are poorly run IMO.

Martial on the other hand, I think never kicked on mentally. Didn't have the drive or hunger to take the next step. He showed all the ability in the world at the start, but then somewhere along the way just became quieter as a player. His control isn't as good as it used to be, he looks much slower, and he looks weaker. 19/20 he had a good season but I still think he didn't show the same level of raw ability that he did at the start.
 

Bobski

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
10,041
Deli Ali is still the comparison for Donny, but with much less aggression. Not the type of player who you build around or change the shape of the team to accommodate, not really a midfielder or an attacking creator.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,952
I wouldn't put too much stock in that game, it was a dead rubber. I think it was just a bad signing. He didn't really show that much in the Dutch league to suggest he could come to United and be a completely different player. He's one of those where he has a good touch, is of a good size and can occasionally play a decent enough pass where you think "if they put it all together, they can be something". I'd say the bigger part of being a top midfielder is the mental aspect, knowing where to move, where to sit, how to open yourself up to receive the ball and get on the ball constantly and how to consistently dictate the game. Van De Beek never showed that ability. He's not a player who ever dominates the touches or is a playmaker, he's just a link up player. He's not a player who can progress the play well through carrying or dribbling, and he's not some sort of beast with his work rate or pressing either. I just think it was a signing where we thought he'd be a lot better than he actually is, and so Ole doesn't feel the need to play him much.

With Memphis, I don't think it was an expectation thing either. When I watch Memphis now I'm still not that impressed. He's turned into a smarter player and makes better decisions, and has a good shot on him, but he was never much of a explosive winger. I still don't think he's a player who's good enough for a top team. The tier below the top teams is where I'd put him. Spurs, Arsenal, etc. Barca getting him is just a further marker into how they are poorly run IMO.

Martial on the other hand, I think never kicked on mentally. Didn't have the drive or hunger to take the next step. He showed all the ability in the world at the start, but then somewhere along the way just became quieter as a player. His control isn't as good as it used to be, he looks much slower, and he looks weaker. 19/20 he had a good season but I still think he didn't show the same level of raw ability that he did at the start.
Well if that's the case we need to find a taker
 

RedStarUnited

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
8,148
Behave. How is there any comparison?

Amad is a teenager and was purchased with an eye for the future. He had little exposure to top tier football, he had only played 37 minutes of Serie A football across 4 appearances for Atalanta (basically 4 x 10 minute cameos) when we bought him.
You expected a player that didn't have a single start for Atalanta, to come at Manchester United mid-season and start getting starts in a new league and country?

VDB came here at 23 after having won a title with Ajax and reaching a CL semi-final. All that as starter. It's silly to compare.
I expected us not to bother buying him and use those funds for other positions we badly need sorting.

We needed and still need a starting midfielder.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,150
Location
Canada
Well if that's the case we need to find a taker
I mean yeah for sure. I don't see the point in him being anything other than a squad player ever. You look at our squad build up and it's pretty clear with our back 4 and our front 4. We have Bruno as a 10 now and long term. We have Sancho/Rashford/Greenwood on the wings now, but are crying out for a Haaland type a bit (but have Cavani now). It's pretty straightforward that we'll need a #9 if Greenwood doesn't make that position his own. Amad is a big potential guy for the wings/#10 too. With that front 4, we need a midfield 2 behind that can both provide a really strong defensive base to cover for the natural attack minded tendencies of Sancho and Rashford (and lack of defensive work from them), along with having quality deep playmaking. Players who aren't afraid to get on the ball, can handle being pressed and can play the ball around. Thiago honestly would've been perfect for us back there, or Jorginho, or Verratti, to be able to sit next to someone like Fabinho. Van de Beek has never been a player that actively wants to dominate the ball. He's not a #8 for a team like United, and especially isn't a #10 for a team like United. Best thing for both would be to just move on, as I really don't see what he'll ever provide past being an occasional rotation player with no purpose other than to rest a starter.
 

MadMike

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
11,622
Location
London
I expected us not to bother buying him and use those funds for other positions we badly need sorting.

We needed and still need a starting midfielder.
By that logic we shouldn't have signed C.Ronaldo when we got him. We didn't need him at the time, we had other holes to fill, but we took a punt on a very talented youngster who tormented us in a friendly. If Amad turns out to be a David Silva level player in 3-4 years and is worth north of £100m you won't be complaining. Sometimes when highly touted youngsters become available you have to pull the trigger. You can't just build for the present you have to build for the future too.

The problem in midfield is not linked to Amad or the money spend for him anyway. He's an u21 play who will likely go on loan. But for us to sign a midfielder it's probably required to offload one or two. We technically already have 5 central midfielders in the squad in Fred, McT, Matic, VdB and Pogba. That's 5 players for technically 2 positions. Even if Pogba plays on the left now when Rashford returns he might go back to the middle.

If we had offloaded VdB and Lingard we would have been in a position to get a CM/DM irrespective of Amad.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,570
Maybe if Ole uses him the board wont buy someone else?
If anything, I think it'd be more likely to make the board think "why would we fork out for another midfielder when you've not used the one we just bought for £40m? " Like José with Fred, and when he was moaning for another CB after signing Bailly and Lindelof already.

Honest question: did Graelish want to join us, or was he always holding out for when City would buy him? Because, if Graelish was OK joining us and we passed on him for DvB, we are the dumbest club that ever existed, at least our recruiting is.
I think he was there for the taking, yes.
I think we passed on Grealish when we signed Bruno and after that we essentially were looking for squad player caliber players, which was VdB with a view he could probably be a starting #8 before too long. Grealish is a pure #10 or left winger who would've demanded a starting role, which we pretty clearly weren't actually going for given we have Bruno and Rashford.
I agree that we passed (though Ole obviously still wanted him) but I think he could've played with both Rashford and Bruno. Honestly, I think it would've made for some great interchangeable football. When he played as a CM for Villa, he actually played deeper than McGinn who, like Bruno, would often go up to partner the CF in possession. I think having him, Bruno and Pogba as options would've been deadly. Plus, it may have helped in giving Rashford and Bruno the odd rest instead of running them into the ground.

Oh, well. Hopefully Sancho turns out to be that guy. I'm looking forward to seeing what this chap can do!
 

clarkydaz

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2013
Messages
13,462
Location
manchester
Honest question: did Graelish want to join us, or was he always holding out for when City would buy him? Because, if Graelish was OK joining us and we passed on him for DvB, we are the dumbest club that ever existed, at least our recruiting is.
i think it revolved around Villa staying up, so the price was skyhigh. if they got relegated, we probably would have got him at a cheaper price
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,952
i think it revolved around Villa staying up, so the price was skyhigh. if they got relegated, we probably would have got him at a cheaper price
Every time I see that Villa v Sheff Utd game it brings back horrible memories of what could have been but for faulty technology
 

Blood Mage

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
6,074
He wouldn't have made a difference yesterday, he's been bang average since he got here. Bizarre signing that needs investigating one day as it clearly wasn't Ole's call to sign him. Wasted funds that could have been used to bring in Neves or Bissouma this summer.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,952
He wouldn't have made a difference yesterday, he's been bang average since he got here. Bizarre signing that needs investigating one day as it clearly wasn't Ole's call to sign him.
Yeah keep that money for a DM last summer and just maybe we would have won Europa League and pushed City harder
 

RedStarUnited

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
8,148
By that logic we shouldn't have signed C.Ronaldo when we got him. We didn't need him at the time, we had other holes to fill, but we took a punt on a very talented youngster who tormented us in a friendly. If Amad turns out to be a David Silva level player in 3-4 years and is worth north of £100m you won't be complaining. Sometimes when highly touted youngsters become available you have to pull the trigger. You can't just build for the present you have to build for the future too.

The problem in midfield is not linked to Amad or the money spend for him anyway. He's an u21 play who will likely go on loan. But for us to sign a midfielder it's probably required to offload one or two. We technically already have 5 central midfielders in the squad in Fred, McT, Matic, VdB and Pogba. That's 5 players for technically 2 positions. Even if Pogba plays on the left now when Rashford returns he might go back to the middle.

If we had offloaded VdB and Lingard we would have been in a position to get a CM/DM irrespective of Amad.
What are you talking about? Our winger options in 2003 without Ronaldo were, Ryan Giggs and....Bellion?
 

Martialfc

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Messages
314
He’s better than Fred, I don’t get why we don’t play him in Fred’s position!
 

Varane around town

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2021
Messages
345
The only hope I have that we won't wast Van de Beek is that when Varane is starting that'll give Ole the confidence to play Van de Beek in the midfield with either McTominay, Fred or Matic next to him,

Can't say I'm optimistic.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
40 fecking million. We wasted that much for a player who doesn't even start and is not even used as super sub when we could actually use it to buy a midfielder that can improve/upgrade our XI.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Thing about the veto is it just means Solskjaer didn't turn down signing VDB (which we could have guessed anyway).

It doesn't tell us whether he was someone Solskjaer actively wanted or if (as LVG complained about) it was a case of signing someone some way down the list of options because they couldn't secure better targets and the alternative was either signing someone even less desirable or not making a signing at all.

In other words Ole not rejecting a signing isn't quite the same as it being a signing he wanted. But of course once that player is on the list of options and isn't vetoed then they can say it was Solskjaer's choice.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,399
I think we passed on Grealish when we signed Bruno and after that we essentially were looking for squad player caliber players, which was VdB with a view he could probably be a starting #8 before too long. Grealish is a pure #10 or left winger who would've demanded a starting role, which we pretty clearly weren't actually going for given we have Bruno and Rashford.
Thank you, that makes sense. And yeah, Bruno is 10x better than Grealish, so maybe we did ok if those were the choices, after all :)
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,238
Location
La-La-Land
He wouldn't have made a difference yesterday, he's been bang average since he got here. Bizarre signing that needs investigating one day as it clearly wasn't Ole's call to sign him. Wasted funds that could have been used to bring in Neves or Bissouma this summer.
Well, lets find out. I doubt he could have been much worse than Fred or Matic. Ole has no balls to try out something, its crazy
 

Ikon

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Messages
2,420
Bizarre signing that needs investigating one day as it clearly wasn't Ole's call to sign him. Wasted funds that could have been used to bring in Neves or Bissouma this summer.
Nothing about the signing of Donny makes any sense unless there was some money laundering or backhanders going on... :lol:
I think the same can be said of Fred too, what did he cost, £54Million, and did Mourinho want him..?:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,241
So that's it? Nothing more to say to pile up some pressure for his client's interests first and foremost? Ole may be able to sell that BS for now, but that is not going to fly. A player is not going to show anybody how far he can deliver the goods unless he plays long enough to build a solid opinion shared by almost everybody.

When Chelsea signed Kai Havertz, I'm sure the guy above the manager said that Havertz MUST play. It wasn't pretty at first, but Havertz came out good by piling up minutes. So I only wish Donny receives the same courtesy at the very least before people can make a definitive conclusion about him, especially when Matic and Fred have played more than enough minutes to warrant the currently angry conclusions on their respective cases from the fanbase.
 

Mr PG

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
1,514
I wouldn't put too much stock in that game, it was a dead rubber. I think it was just a bad signing. He didn't really show that much in the Dutch league to suggest he could come to United and be a completely different player. He's one of those where he has a good touch, is of a good size and can occasionally play a decent enough pass where you think "if they put it all together, they can be something". I'd say the bigger part of being a top midfielder is the mental aspect, knowing where to move, where to sit, how to open yourself up to receive the ball and get on the ball constantly and how to consistently dictate the game. Van De Beek never showed that ability. He's not a player who ever dominates the touches or is a playmaker, he's just a link up player. He's not a player who can progress the play well through carrying or dribbling, and he's not some sort of beast with his work rate or pressing either. I just think it was a signing where we thought he'd be a lot better than he actually is, and so Ole doesn't feel the need to play him much.

With Memphis, I don't think it was an expectation thing either. When I watch Memphis now I'm still not that impressed. He's turned into a smarter player and makes better decisions, and has a good shot on him, but he was never much of a explosive winger. I still don't think he's a player who's good enough for a top team. The tier below the top teams is where I'd put him. Spurs, Arsenal, etc. Barca getting him is just a further marker into how they are poorly run IMO.

Martial on the other hand, I think never kicked on mentally. Didn't have the drive or hunger to take the next step. He showed all the ability in the world at the start, but then somewhere along the way just became quieter as a player. His control isn't as good as it used to be, he looks much slower, and he looks weaker. 19/20 he had a good season but I still think he didn't show the same level of raw ability that he did at the start.
This is very accurate. Martial lacks the hunger of a player like Lukaku who even pushed to go to Italy to improve with Conte and looks where it’s gotten him