Woodward (old thread)

Should Studward remain as CE of Manchester United?

  • No - he should be sacked also.

    Votes: 40 22.6%
  • Yes - he should stay.

    Votes: 137 77.4%

  • Total voters
    177
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

friendlytramp

More full of crap than a curry house toilet
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
4,036
Location
J Stand
I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt and say this time next week we'll be singing his praises when we have di Maria, Vidal, Benatia, Blind and Rojo, in the bag...
 

ravi2

Full Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
9,044
Location
Canada
I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt and say this time next week we'll be singing his praises when we have di Maria, Vidal, Benatia, Blind and Rojo, in the bag...
I feel exactly the same way, by this time next week the mood in here will be distinctly different... I trust in LVG.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
No matter what happens, this has been another failure from Woodward & Co. Period.
I agree. Deals should have been done beforehand. Get the players in as soon as possible and let them have preseason with the rest of the team. This bullshit about waiting until the last minute is ridiculous.
 

Al-T

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
1,071
If people are pissed off with Woodward, then it's his own fault.

He was the one that said "watch this space".

He was the one that said " What resonates is an elite player that the manager wants who is going to be a star for Manchester United".

Given this, it is hardly surprising if people feel he has fostered a climate of expectation and, yes, learned the lessons of last year.

The transfers of Shaw and Herrera were clearly well in train before LVG arrived. I cannot believe that LVG thought that releasing Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra and Buttner without replacements in the pipeline was a good idea. Similarly, I can't believe LVG needed to physically see Smalling/Jones/Evans/Rafael to realise that they are all injury prone and that they are not Manchester United quality (I'll moderate that by saying Rafael is but is never around for long enough to prove it). Or that the midfield desperately needs reinforcement. Has he not spoken to Giggs during the summer?

He was never likely to come right out and say that what he had to work with is substandard but I'd bet a fair whack he has told Woodward that in private and made it clear what he believes he needs. Maybe Moyes did the same.

So at the moment, Woodward can't be surprised if people treat what he says as platitudinous guff. Time for actions and not empty words.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
I don't know how anyone can have any faith in him to be honest. He may be great at negotiating sponsorship deals but his transfer dealings have been nothing short of diabolical.

He made a mess of the three transfers he did manage to do. The Fellaini and Herrara transfers were particularly woeful in the way that they were dealt with. They needed an ex-chairman to ensure the Mata deal went through.

I have absolutely no faith at all. Apart from making money for the owners through sponsorship and talking big in the press, what the hell has he done all summer?
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
I don't know how anyone can have any faith in him to be honest. He may be great at negotiating sponsorship deals but his transfer dealings have been nothing short of diabolical.

He made a mess of the three transfers he did manage to do. The Fellaini and Herrara transfers were particularly woeful in the way that they were dealt with. They needed an ex-chairman to ensure the Mata deal went through.

I have absolutely no faith at all. Apart from making money for the owners through sponsorship and talking big in the press, what the hell has he done all summer?
Have they?

No one knows what went down on deadline day last year, but everyone does know that Bilbao are a tremendously difficult club to deal with. When we actually went in for Hererra it got done within the day, Bayern's Martinez deal dragged far longer than the comparative deal for Herrera. Mata, too was a clearly a difficult deal for a player that we pulled off easily and Shaw (and Fellaini too, but people ignore it because he was/is shite) was done by doing what most people cry out for us to do which is 'paying the fecking money'.

Which is what makes everything so baffling, when we have signed players they've by no means been easy deals. Yet we can't seem to conclude a relatively straight forward signing.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
Have they?

No one knows what went down on deadline day last year, but everyone does know that Bilbao are a tremendously difficult club to deal with. When we actually went in for Hererra it got done within the day, Bayern's Martinez deal dragged far longer than the comparative deal for Herrera. Mata, too was a clearly a difficult deal for a player that we pulled off easily and Shaw (and Fellaini too, but people ignore it because he was/is shite) was done by doing what most people cry out for us to do which is 'paying the fecking money'.

Which is what makes everything so baffling, when we have signed players they've by no means been easy deals. Yet we can't seem to conclude a relatively straight forward signing.
Fellaini was signed in the last few minutes of deadline day, at a cost of about 4 million more than his buyout clause was a couple of weeks before that. I'm sorry, but that is just plain stupid.

If Gill and Ferguson were involved in the Mata deal as has been widely reported, then I doubt Woodward had too much input into that deal.

Let's be fair, the Herrara deal took a year to complete. They could have just paid the buyout clause last year.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Fellaini was signed in the last few minutes of deadline day, at a cost of about 4 million more than his buyout clause was a couple of weeks before that. I'm sorry, but that is just plain stupid.

If Gill and Ferguson were involved in the Mata deal as has been widely reported, then I doubt Woodward had too much input into that deal.

Let's be fair, the Herrara deal took a year to complete. They could have just paid the buyout clause last year.
We know we got rinsed for Fellaini. We also know why we did, it was stupid but it was a panic because Moyes refused to go after a half way realistic signing. It was definitely a feck up, but I'm not sure Woodward deserves too much blame for it
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
We know we got rinsed for Fellaini. We also know why we did, it was stupid but it was a panic because Moyes refused to go after a half way realistic signing. It was definitely a feck up, but I'm not sure Woodward deserves too much blame for it
Well Moyes clearly had a lot to do with it. Ultimately it's the chairman who takes responsibility for the transfers though.
 

Sir A1ex

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2002
Messages
27,949
Location
Where the goals come from.
Already failed for a second summer in my book.
Even if we do somehow sign the players we need (we won't), why leave it this late? We are already dropping the points which could in theory cost us the league, and in reality might cost us European football.
 

Winrar

Full Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
12,827
Location
Maryland
We've "watched the space" but dithering about with transfers and failing to land players we need has already cost us 3 points in the league.

It certainly doesn't seem like there's issue with our funds becuase he was so confident about us having enough money to break the transfer record or some bull like that.
 

Moonwalker

Full Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
3,821
Regardless of what happens next, I think it's safe to say, to expect that he would learn it on the fly because he's a smart business person, was unrealistic.

I do think however, that his now celebrated statement wasn't just film-flam. No one does something like that on purpose. He was obviously convinced that something is going to happen. Whether that was overconfidence or hard luck, it's hard to say.
 
Last edited:

Rednotdead

New Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
4,875
Location
Tewkesbury
No matter who we buy now - if anyone - they will be seen as panic buys in reaction to the awful performance on Saturday. They won't be seen as part of a concise and planned squad development strategy.

We're great at making a rod for our own backs.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,001
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
I agree. Deals should have been done beforehand. Get the players in as soon as possible and let them have preseason with the rest of the team. This bullshit about waiting until the last minute is ridiculous.
It makes little sense to leave this late to get players, them not having any pre season with us will make it tough for them to hit their best levels rather quickly so even with the signing of players we won't enjoy their best form after a while.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,677
Location
india
It makes little sense to leave this late to get players, them not having any pre season with us will make it tough for them to hit their best levels rather quickly so even with the signing of players we won't enjoy their best form after a while.
Still, if we make good signings now it will help our season and prospects for top 4.

Also, as we saw with arsenal last year, signing a top player like ozil can give the club a huge lift. Although, I do think our fundamentals are currently weaker than theirs were, which is why it needs to be right players to give us balance rather than just a star.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,001
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Still, if we make good signings now it will help our season and prospects for top 4.

Also, as we saw with arsenal last year, signing a top player like ozil can give the club a huge lift. Although, I do think our fundamentals are currently weaker than theirs were, which is why it needs to be right players to give us balance rather than just a star.
I expect no "woah" signing in the remaining days and part of me also expects no signing at all. I've gone from optimistic to absolutely frustrated in a matter of a month.
 

Woodzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
14,743
Location
Cardiff
Not that we should care what Moyes has to say about his time here, but I only just read these comments...

"It's been well documented that we wanted Cesc Fabregas, Gareth Bale and Cristiano Ronaldo," said Moyes.

"There was talk of Ronaldo when I first arrived. We were close to getting a couple of major names.

"I'm not getting in a blame game here but things just didn't materialise.

Just a subtle hint that Woody fecked things up last year?
 

Woodzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
14,743
Location
Cardiff
Those were unrealistic targets. Isn't this part of the problem?
I wouldn't mind betting that there was willingness to come here by all 3 behind the scenes, especially as they were likely put in place by Fergie and Gill. We'll never know I suppose.
 

Sunny Jim

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
29,376
Location
Warsaw...that's too far away from Edinburgh...
Those were unrealistic targets. Isn't this part of the problem?

Not that we should care what Moyes has to say about his time here, but I only just read these comments...

"It's been well documented that we wanted Cesc Fabregas, Gareth Bale and Cristiano Ronaldo," said Moyes.

"There was talk of Ronaldo when I first arrived. We were close to getting a couple of major names.

"I'm not getting in a blame game here but things just didn't materialise.


I agree that Ronaldo (Once SAF left) was unattainable, Bale was Mardid bound and Fabregras...well we made idiotic bids for him (ta Woody).
But IMO Moyes was reffering to other player in the bold part.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Not that we should care what Moyes has to say about his time here, but I only just read these comments...

"It's been well documented that we wanted Cesc Fabregas, Gareth Bale and Cristiano Ronaldo," said Moyes.

"There was talk of Ronaldo when I first arrived. We were close to getting a couple of major names.

"I'm not getting in a blame game here but things just didn't materialise.

Just a subtle hint that Woody fecked things up last year?
"Hi Edward. Please sign Cristiano Ronaldo and Gareth Bale." Bish bosh.

Woodward was abysmal last summer, I'm sure of that. However, captain calamity was the one that vetoed moves for players like Strootman, Thiago and Garay - albeit I didn't want the latter - and we would be in much better shape had those deals gone through.
 

Kill 'em all

Pastor of Muppets
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
10,546
It's so easy to blame Woodward because he's the person we see as being responsible for transfers but his hands could be held by the board. He can't spend as much as he wants if the board tells him that he can't spend more than a specific amount on a specific player. I don't think this problem with transfers will ever be fixed unless the Glazers give up their executive positions in our club and leave the football side of things to football people. When you own the money you're working with you're more reluctant to make decisions which are risky and this reluctance increases with the size of the fee involved.
 

Sunny Jim

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
29,376
Location
Warsaw...that's too far away from Edinburgh...
It's so easy to blame Woodward because he's the person we see as being responsible for transfers but his hands could be held by the board. He can't spend as much as he wants if the board tells him that he can't spend more than a specific amount on a specific player. I don't think this problem with transfers will ever be fixed unless the Glazers give up their executive positions in our club and leave the football side of things to football people. When you own the money you're working with you're more reluctant to make decisions which are risky and this reluctance increases with the size of the fee involved.
watch this space. no fixed budget. we can break world record. stupid smile on slap worthy face.
 

soapythecat

Full Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Messages
3,780
Location
Glasgow resident these days.
It's so easy to blame Woodward because he's the person we see as being responsible for transfers but his hands could be held by the board. He can't spend as much as he wants if the board tells him that he can't spend more than a specific amount on a specific player. I don't think this problem with transfers will ever be fixed unless the Glazers give up their executive positions in our club and leave the football side of things to football people. When you own the money you're working with you're more reluctant to make decisions which are risky and this reluctance increases with the size of the fee involved.
This a thousand times over. It amazes me how much the Glazers get away with it on the Caf. I don't give a hoot how much they may of spent in transfers in the last few years, if we want to get back in the top 4, they are going to have to spend the same again. Other clubs are spending big and we need to. They are the problem here 100%
 

soapythecat

Full Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Messages
3,780
Location
Glasgow resident these days.
watch this space. no fixed budget. we can break world record. stupid smile on slap worthy face.
I can't remember when he came out with 'watch this space' quote, but was it by any chance when the club was trying to sell it's ST's? Woodward is clearly a very, very clever man - more so than many give him credit for on here - but those quotes earlier this year are just baffling unless he was just been canny and trying to drum up ST sales or hype the club before the kit deal.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,300
I can't remember when he came out with 'watch this space' quote, but was it by any chance when the club was trying to sell it's ST's? Woodward is clearly a very, very clever man - more so than many give him credit for on here - but those quotes earlier this year are just baffling unless he was just been canny and trying to drum up ST sales or hype the club before the kit deal.
Could be the kit deal but the STs were sold out a couple of weeks before that interview.
 

Mister_Stubbs

New Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
9,634
Location
6th
Ed must now do in two weeks what he has largely failed to do in two months. Don't expect miracles people.
 

Lowkey

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
3,249
Location
Behind You
Ed must now do in two weeks what he has largely failed to do in two months. Don't expect miracles people.
I would not have been too annoyed if we had actually managed to get rid of some of the deadwood from the club. Even that has not been achieved. Big promises, big let-downs. I would assume we want players out the door so players can come in. LvG does not like working with big squads.
 

Sad Chris

New Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Messages
1,641
If Ed seals the Vidal/Di Maria/Flavour-of-the-Month deal, he'll probably still only get stick for taking so long or overpaying, won't he? Poor Ed, it's a Lose-Lose-situation for you. Maybe that's the space he's talking about, there's just no love in Ed's space.
 

itso 7

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,840
Location
harare,zimbabwe
I wouldn't mind betting that there was willingness to come here by all 3 behind the scenes, especially as they were likely put in place by Fergie and Gill. We'll never know I suppose.
There may have been a willingness, some form of encouragement also but it doesn't discount the fact that big clubs have the capacity to keep their stars by offering them bigger wages etc. How many times have we kept Rooney, Evra, Rio and Vidic when it seemed to all intends and purposes that they were on their way out ? If we can hold on to our stars then rest assured so can Real and Barca. Two of those three were playing for such clubs. We lost Bale to Real and any other club, any other CEO can lose marquee signings to Real Madrid, aren't there the same circumstances under which City lost Isco ?
The problem lies in basing our strategy on wrestling players from teams that are bigger than or as big as us. The targets Moyes vetoed were gettable and he didn't have any back up plan when it, expectedly, all went went tits up.
 

Drummer

New Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
1,385
Location
Ireland
If Ed seals the Vidal/Di Maria/Flavour-of-the-Month deal, he'll probably still only get stick for taking so long or overpaying, won't he? Poor Ed, it's a Lose-Lose-situation for you. Maybe that's the space he's talking about, there's just no love in Ed's space.
Woodward has known for at least a month what LVG wanted to sign. The big question is has the delay been because he was trying to haggle down the price...

So yes, even if he makes two top class signings between now and sept 1st the question still has to be asked how competent he is at his job.....

The way he seems to spend ages negotiating deals has already cost the team. Even when we get new signings it might be Christmas before they start bedding in...
 

montpelier

Full Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
10,637
Not that we should care what Moyes has to say about his time here, but I only just read these comments...

"It's been well documented that we wanted Cesc Fabregas, Gareth Bale and Cristiano Ronaldo," said Moyes.

"There was talk of Ronaldo when I first arrived. We were close to getting a couple of major names.

"I'm not getting in a blame game here but things just didn't materialise.

Just a subtle hint that Woody fecked things up last year?
I'm starting to have imaginations about the sort of conversations Moyes & Woody were having this time last year and not in a good way. Hopefully, LVG isn't quite so gullible and is a bit more assertive. Woodward seems to live in a land of make believe.
 

Speak

Step up to my misogyny soapbox
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
6,347
He can't really do much if he hasn't got the money to spend.

"Why hasn't Woodward bid for Vidal, when it's clear he'd come here?"
Umm.. Maybe because he hasn't been given enough money to put in a proper bid.

The Glazers might as well give Woodward his old job back, save money on his current role, stop telling the fans they're willing to spend big, hope Van Gaal pulls a 'Fergie', and concentrate on bringing in more sponsorship deals.
At least we'd all be clear on where we stand.
 

Rednotdead

New Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
4,875
Location
Tewkesbury
If Ed seals the Vidal/Di Maria/Flavour-of-the-Month deal, he'll probably still only get stick for taking so long or overpaying, won't he? Poor Ed, it's a Lose-Lose-situation for you. Maybe that's the space he's talking about, there's just no love in Ed's space.
He'll only have done his job, nothing more. That's what he gets paid for.
 

FacerTheRed

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
692
Location
England
I think after that first game, i expect Van Gaal to speed up the process of getting rid of the deadwood soon and bringing in players (hopefully).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.