Devil may care
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2010
- Messages
- 35,976
My MOTM, he was relentless down his side, a T-800 RB.
Was just coming in to post this and he did it quite a bit. Hope he doesn't make a habit of it.One thing that frustrated me today was when he got to the edge of their box and just dwelled on the ball without really figuring out what to do and then it all boiled away.
You must miss that until recently, but every past United managers rated him for a reason: he's one of best at protecting the ball under pressure. He has best protective controlling first touch too. With him we always have that extra solidness even him playing as winger.There was one move in the last 10-20 minutes where Valencia trapped a ball and took it in his stride in one move before charging up the field and relieving the defence from the pressure it was under.
It was a fantastic piece of skill. A very underrated part of his game is how good his first touch is.
Didn't see the game today. Did he actually put any good crosses in the box today?
Yes and at least half of them were with his left foot.
The only RB in the world who gets judged on his crossing ability. For RB, his crossing is more than good enough.
That's just simply untrue.
All of our full backs are judged on what they bring to the team attacking wise as well as defensively. People criticize Shaw and Darmian for not contributing enough to the attack too.The only RB in the world who gets judged on his crossing ability. For RB, his crossing is more than good enough.
Which part?
All I see on here people having a go at his crossing.
Well both parts really, but I meant more the 'only full-back who gets judged for his crossing' part. I remember it used to be a huge bug bear with Evra, and at the same time Chelsea fans used to criticise Ashley Cole for it. Those two were probably the best in the world at that time. If they got criticised for it then everyone did.
All of our full backs are judged on what they bring to the team attacking wise as well as defensively. People criticize Shaw and Darmian for not contributing enough to the attack too.
The problem I have with Valencia is that he's a key part of our attacking game. We always seem to look for him. And for someone who is involved so heavily in so many of our attacks his end product really isn't good enough. You could say we shouldn't really rely on our RB so much in an attacking sense and I'd completely agree with that but the fact of the matter is that we do.
I don't want to replace Valencia, I just wish we played in a way that wasn't so reliant on him.Looking at this pragmatically, who would you bring in that would provide this end product and offer all the other traits that Valencia does?
I don't want to replace Valencia, I just wish we played in a way that wasn't so reliant on him.
Although Walker owns the right side for Spurs in a similar way to Valencia does for us and his end product is better. But we'd have no chance of getting him. Or we'd at least have to pay a ridiculous amount of money.
Looking at this pragmatically, who would you bring in that would provide this end product and offer all the other traits that Valencia does?
I don't want to replace Valencia, I just wish we played in a way that wasn't so reliant on him.
Although Walker owns the right side for Spurs in a similar way to Valencia does for us and his end product is better. But we'd have no chance of getting him. Or we'd at least have to pay a ridiculous amount of money.
Well both parts really, but I meant more the 'only full-back who gets judged for his crossing' part. I remember it used to be a huge bug bear with Evra, and at the same time Chelsea fans used to criticise Ashley Cole for it. Those two were probably the best in the world at that time. If they got criticised for it then everyone did.
Constant shuffle on LB spot also contributes a lot to that issue IMO.
Just get a right winger (Mkhi?) so that Valencia doesn't have to do two jobs.
All of our full backs are judged on what they bring to the team attacking wise as well as defensively. People criticize Shaw and Darmian for not contributing enough to the attack too.
The problem I have with Valencia is that he's a key part of our attacking game. We always seem to look for him. And for someone who is involved so heavily in so many of our attacks his end product really isn't good enough. You could say we shouldn't really rely on our RB so much in an attacking sense and I'd completely agree with that but the fact of the matter is that we do.
Absolutely, which is why I'd love to see Shaw get a run of games for us. Not a great crosser himself (not even a good one really) but to have pacy fullbacks on both side who aren't afraid to run past their winger would at least make us a lot less predictable.Constant shuffle on LB spot also contributes a lot to that issue IMO.
Yeah, they're the exact kind of crosses I'd love to see more of from us. Even if it can't reach one of our own players they're an absolute nightmare to try defend.Walker put in a great cross yesterday but his end product isn't that great either. Valencia could very much do with practising that sort of cross though, the whipped ball between defenders and keeper.
I agree with that. I'm not really criticizing Valencia here, I'm criticizing our tactics.He's a key part because we don't have a right winger. Not really his fault. He does his job very well. There's no better RB in world football.
Absolutely, which is why I'd love to see Shaw get a run of games for us. Not a great crosser himself (not even a good one really) but to have pacy fullbacks on both side who aren't afraid to run past their winger would at least make us a lot less predictable.
I agree with that. I'm not really criticizing Valencia here, I'm criticizing our tactics.
Oh criticism of crosses is completely fine. It's the people who judge him by just those moments that I find ridiculous. And Valencia is actually a better crosser than Evra ever was.
I have very little problems with his crossing give he's a RB. Hes also now moved on from smashing it at the shins to more loopy ones which always gives players a chance.
I think its a little bit about incredulity as well.
I think someone like Rado_N said the other day that Valencia had proved the doubters of his signing wrong, but I don't really agree.
He's become a very competent right-back, in a way that I would have said he didn't have in him less than two years ago, but ultimately he's playing there because he's no longer good enough to play as a winger.
When you think about it it is downright strange. We signed a player to play as a winger, he played very well there for about two seasons and put in threatening crosses regularly. For some reason he lost that ability, but - to his credit - managed to transition himself into a very good full-back and remain useful to the team. Yet, despite his path to full-back, the biggest weakness of his game is the thing that he was initially bought here to do! It's hard to get your head around.
It's unfair to Valencia, but the circumstances by which he became a full-back are always going to lead to people scratching their head and going: 'You used to be a winger, how are you so shit at this part of the game?!'
Now I know you lying. Anyone care to give an honest assessment?Yes and at least half of them were with his left foot.
Now I know you lying. Anyone care to give an honest assessment?
Seriously? He actually used his left? Don't think I've seen him do that in years.
I just dont understand how we leave him always all by himself on the right wing. He gets no support whatsoever, yesterday, only Herrera tried to help late in the game. And it seems he's our only real attacking plan, so much goes through him
Having a similar left back (Shaw hopefully) doing what Valencia can just gives the opposition so much more to think about. They don't have to think much about overlaps on the left as Blind and Darmian don't offer much in attack.