Conor McGregor vs Floyd Mayweather | Again?

WackyWengerWorld

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
1,935
Supports
Arsenal
He couldn't have vacated the 135 British lightweight title and moved to 140 and got ranked domestically? ok

Stephen Smith did that who Vanzie beat.
Getting ranked doesn't get you fights. Witter was mandatory for Hatton's British Title, so Hatton dumped it to pick up the WBU, which didn't have any mandatories. Hatton was happy to fight Smith but he wouldn't go anywhere near Vanzie. It's not like football where you enter a league and your guaranteed opposition. The opposition picks and choose who they want to fight. It boils down to 'too much risk, for too little money'.
 

The Bloody-Nine

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
6,213
Hatton had a huge fanbase from singing blue moon to City fans long before he beat anyone who was half decent. Black fighters generally find it harder to build a fanbase. Vanzie was British champion and still went to hometowns of nobody fighters with fanbases. Witter was a world champion and didn't have much of a fanbase.

Vanzie went 1-1 with Witter in the amateurs anyway so you can't say Witter was more talented, he wasn't.
Sure you can. Witter won a world title. Vanzie never progressed beyond domestic level.

Amateur fights aren't really relevant. Joshua lost to Whyte as an amateur.
 

WackyWengerWorld

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
1,935
Supports
Arsenal
Sure you can. Witter won a world title. Vanzie never progressed beyond domestic level.

Amateur fights aren't really relevant. Joshua lost to Whyte as an amateur.
Mainly because he didn't get the opportunities, but we're going round in circles now

Charles Burley never won a world title, many considered him to be as good as Sugar Ray, who in turn avoided him, even turning down career high money not to fight him. Many historians consider him to be Pound for Pound top 10 of all time and superior to Floyd Mayweather Jr. But that's another topic......
 

G-manc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
954
Getting ranked doesn't get you fights. Witter was mandatory for Hatton's British Title, so Hatton dumped it to pick up the WBU, which didn't have any mandatories. Hatton was happy to fight Smith but he wouldn't go anywhere near Vanzie. It's not like football where you enter a league and your guaranteed opposition. The opposition picks and choose who they want to fight. It boils down to 'too much risk, for too little money'.
Smith had fought at 140 a number of times when he fought Hatton - Vanzie was still fighting nobodies at 135.

You can't honestly believe he wouldn't have had a better chance of forcing a fight with either Hatton or Witter by campaigning in the same division. It was a shallow division too - Witter won the vacant title by beating Alan Bosworth who trained himself in his garden.
 

WackyWengerWorld

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
1,935
Supports
Arsenal
Smith had fought at 140 a number of times when he fought Hatton - Vanzie was still fighting nobodies at 135.

You can't honestly believe he wouldn't have had a better chance of forcing a fight with either Hatton or Witter by campaigning in the same division. It was a shallow division too - Witter won the vacant title by beating Alan Bosworth who trained himself in his garden.
You don't seem to understand or want to accept that Hatton fought Smith and all the other crap he faced because he knew Vanzie could beat him and Smith couldn't.

Despite the quality of the match up there wasn't money in Witter-Vanzie, but no way would Witter have taken it without getting paid highly.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
Honestly, I'm not wumming, and I'm always open to reasonable debate. But Ricky hatton is without a doubt the most overrated of the bunch when it comes to hyped up U.K. Fighters.

His technique was below average and his jab (as mocked by mayweather many times on the 24/7 build up show) was disgustingly bad for a professional boxer.
Hatton benefited more from media hype than anyone I can remember. The man he beat for the WBU light welterweight belt was Tony Pep, a man who wouldn't make a top 5000 list of boxing champions at any weight class. As the new champion, he was extremely well matched for his next half a dozen fights and knocked people out/forced stoppages with ease but the calibre of opponent was laughable. He kept winning, and when the opponents got a little better in quality he started winning decisions (one of them pretty suspect IIRC) then he got a couple of extremely easy fights that he knew he could force a stoppage. With that, they built up the kosta fight and you'd have been forgiven for thinking tszyu was the second coming of sugar ray Robinson. The fact is he was past it, and should have retired after he beat zab judah. Anyone who watched kosta two fights before hatton knew that he was gone as far as being competitive against a younger hungrier fighter went.

Hattons skills were exposed so badly against mayweather that I'd refer to it as the fight to watch if you want to understand the term "taking someone to school". Pacquiao knocked him out with absolute ease.

Anyone who holds world titles, it's hard to refer to them as a mediocre boxer, but in hattons case it's absolutely true. A warrior, an excellent heart and amazing fan a base but as a pure boxer he was just really really bad.
Excellent post.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
I tried to make it to Manchester for the Kostya fight, and I'm pretty sure Hatton was the underdog with the bookies at the time. You should try watching some of Hatton's early fights. The mauling approach only really took root from the Kostya fight onwards.

Regardless, no one would argue that Hatton was a technical wizard. But he was effective at what he did. He was also, ironically, hurt by his own fans during the Mayweather fight. They booed the US anthem andJoe Cortez, being an unprofessional asshole, penalised at him at every possible juncture as a result.
Don't me fecking laugh. Absolutely ho one was culpable for Hatton's defeat than himself.

He had good 5 rounds and then he decided to be billy big bollox...
 

IhabX7

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
6,009
Yeah the Rabbit punches were getting a bit annoying. Conor had to fight his MMA instincts to not go further.
There were a couple of times when Floyd turned his back to Conor and for a split second it looked like Conor is gonna lift and slam him.
 

WackyWengerWorld

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
1,935
Supports
Arsenal
Okay....

His losses to Armah, Stewart and Ramanau? Robberies too?
The fact you didn't know about 2 of the biggest robberies in British boxing history should probably stop you from speaking on something you haven't got a clue about. The Stewart bout could of gone either way but it was a 4 rounder on short notice. Should of got the verdict over Armah too but closer than the Earl fight. Vanzie was beating Romanov who caught him with a brutal straight right, another fighter who could of been a world champ if managed right.

Anyway why do you Hatton nutthuggers think he beat who was that great anyway? He beat a past it Tyszu with a shoulder injury and that's it pretty much. 'Viscious Maussa' couldn't even hit the speedball twice in a row FFS, Urango was coming off a gift decision against some bang average Aussie, Collazo was banged out by some nobody and really deserved to beat Hatton anyway if Rickies Mam and Dad weren't 2 of the judges.
 

G-manc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
954
You don't seem to understand or want to accept that Hatton fought Smith and all the other crap he faced because he knew Vanzie could beat him and Smith couldn't.

Despite the quality of the match up there wasn't money in Witter-Vanzie, but no way would Witter have taken it without getting paid highly.
I would never deny that Hatton fought some dross opposition - especially during his WBU reign but to suggest he ducked/avoided Bobby Vanzie who apart from never competing at the same weight beat absolutely nobody of note is absurd.

If you think he's was a better fighter then that's fine but i'm struggling to see why you think he would even be in the equation.
 

The Bloody-Nine

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
6,213
The fact you didn't know about 2 of the biggest robberies in British boxing history should probably stop you from speaking on something you haven't got a clue about. The Stewart bout could of gone either way but it was a 4 rounder on short notice. Should of got the verdict over Armah too but closer than the Earl fight. Vanzie was beating Romanov who caught him with a brutal straight right, another fighter who could of been a world champ if managed right.
I 'haven't got a clue'. From a guy who is seriously arguing that a domestic level journey man beats Hatton. Beautiful.

Anyway why do you Hatton nutthuggers think he beat who was that great anyway? He beat a past it Tyszu with a shoulder injury and that's it pretty much. 'Viscious Maussa' couldn't even hit the speedball twice in a row FFS, Urango was coming off a gift decision against some bang average Aussie, Collazo was banged out by some nobody and really deserved to beat Hatton anyway if Rickies Mam and Dad weren't 2 of the judges.
And I'm a 'Hatton nuthugger' because I think he'd beat the shit out of Vanzie. :lol:
 

The Bloody-Nine

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
6,213
I would never deny that Hatton fought some dross opposition - especially during his WBU reign but to suggest he ducked/avoided Bobby Vanzie who apart from never competing at the same weight beat absolutely nobody of note is absurd.

If you think he's was a better fighter then that's fine but i'm struggling to see why you think he would even be in the equation.
I imagine he's related. This whole discussion is bizarre.
 

WackyWengerWorld

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
1,935
Supports
Arsenal
I would never deny that Hatton fought some dross opposition - especially during his WBU reign but to suggest he ducked/avoided Bobby Vanzie who apart from never competing at the same weight beat absolutely nobody of note is absurd.

If you think he's was a better fighter then that's fine but i'm struggling to see why you think he would even be in the equation.
I'm unsure why you think the British Light Welterweight Champ vs British Lightweight isn't a very very good fight on paper?

It's pretty simple, Hatton was very carefully managed, anyone who was a threat was avoided. Mayweather wanted Hatton at his first fight at 140 and Hatton turned it down. Hatton turned down fights with:

Mayweather
Judah
Corley
Harris
Cotto
Vanzie
Witter
Oh he didn't even want any of Emaual Augustus either

Hatton avoided talented black fighters like the plague while hanging out with his racist mate Bernard Manning.

He even removed his mandatory position in order not to fight them. Before he eventually signed for the big money fight against an inactive Tyszu for career high money
 

WackyWengerWorld

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
1,935
Supports
Arsenal
I 'haven't got a clue'. From a guy who is seriously arguing that a domestic level journey man beats Hatton. Beautiful.

And I'm a 'Hatton nuthugger' because I think he'd beat the shit out of Vanzie. :lol:
Care to remind me of 'Vanzie got beat by Earl' in one of the biggest robberies in British boxing history again?

Hatton is domestic level himself, he wasn't very good. His defense was shit, his jab was poor, he wasn't very quick. He had good stamina, was good at wrestling and throwing a load of leather with some decent body punches. He cherry picked old men, featherweights and slow men coming off losses. He didn't dare get in against the best boxers bar Tyszu who has shot to shit himself. We saw him got put in his place when he stepped in with the best.

Plenty of boxers could of beat Hatton, he wasn't very good, sorry to break it to you.
 

WackyWengerWorld

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
1,935
Supports
Arsenal
He avoided talented black fighters, yet fought a prime Mayweather. Jesus f*cking christ. Ignore time.
Yes, for a huge cashout paycheck after rejecting the fight 5 times, according to his carpet selling dad. He knew if fought Judah/Vanzie/Witter/Corley he could have lost that paycheck and copped a beating, hence why he ran for the hills

And what happened when he fought Mayweather? Right
 

Tom Van Persie

No relation
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
24,563
Ricky Hatton held onto that joke of a WBU belt for half his career. How the feck did they manage to sell him as a proper world champion? :lol: He didn't fight anyone near world level until Kostya Tszyu tbh.
 

The Bloody-Nine

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
6,213
Ricky Hatton held onto that joke of a WBU belt for half his career. How the feck did they manage to sell him as a proper world champion? :lol: He didn't fight anyone near world level until Kostya Tszyu tbh.
Despite beating the only other guy to beat Kostya prior to fighting him? :lol:
 

Inter Yer Nan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
6,380
Location
Los Angeles, CA (from UK)
Hatton wasn't the most skilled guy but he knew how to be effective with a limited skill set. He was underrated as far as ring IQ IMO he lost fights because he was outclassed. I do believe Tszyu was ripped off against him with the worst officiating imaginable but his tactics were usually decent for what skills he had. Great body puncher, high energy his problem was once he beat Tszyu he became a two fights a year fighter and his style and personal life didn't permit for that. He needed activity to keep him sharp and away from booze and pies.
 

G-manc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
954
Yes, for a huge cashout paycheck after rejecting the fight 5 times, according to his carpet selling dad. He knew if fought Judah/Vanzie/Witter/Corley he could have lost that paycheck and copped a beating, hence why he ran for the hills

And what happened when he fought Mayweather? Right
Are you Bobby Vanzie's dad or something? He sticks out like a sore thumb on that list of alleged ducked opponents.

Utterly bizarre.
 

Oggmonster

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
4,932
Location
Manchester
Aldo isn't a wealthy man. He's doing what he thinks he needs to do to get another fight with Conor. Mcgregor won't go near him again, he'd be giving him an undeserved payday.
How are you classing wealthy? He's worth millions...I don't think he's struggling financially I think he's just a bit bitter still
 

Inter Yer Nan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
6,380
Location
Los Angeles, CA (from UK)
I'm unsure why you think the British Light Welterweight Champ vs British Lightweight isn't a very very good fight on paper?

It's pretty simple, Hatton was very carefully managed, anyone who was a threat was avoided. Mayweather wanted Hatton at his first fight at 140 and Hatton turned it down. Hatton turned down fights with:

Mayweather
Judah
Corley
Harris
Cotto
Vanzie
Witter
Oh he didn't even want any of Emaual Augustus either

Hatton avoided talented black fighters like the plague while hanging out with his racist mate Bernard Manning.

He even removed his mandatory position in order not to fight them. Before he eventually signed for the big money fight against an inactive Tyszu for career high money
When was he offered Judah? Also, it was Vivian Harris that turned down a Hatton fight. He wanted too much money and fought Maussa instead and got himself KO'd there. Cotto was never really on the table either. Corley wasn't really also. Witter, I'd agree he seemed to want nothing to do with and Mayweather was just trying to cherry pick him coming up in weight.

Hatton fought largely poor opposition until he got a good IBF ranking and went the mandatory route and won some decent eliminators and then got the Tszyu fight. Tszyu was old and had been often injured but was coming off a sensational win against Mitchell. After that Hatton was always gearing for the mega match with Floyd but he really wasn't ducking anything between 2005 and 2007. Maussa had a belt, Collazo had a belt, Castillo was a good name, Urango was solid too and his mandatory.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,255
Location
Hollywood CA
I remember looking at Steve Farhood's score card in the ninth and thinking Conor was still in it. The official judges were a bit lopsided in their judging imo.

 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,961
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Floyd’s frames were nice,” McGregor said. “When he chose his shots and he smothers, he frames, and early on, when he was framing at me, I was trying to shock him and take his back. But midway through the fight when I had his back, the referee was just resetting us in the middle, and somewhere in the middle of all that, I was like ‘I’m using valuable energy here to get to this man’s back, and then we’re being reset to go again.’ So it kind of flustered me a little bit and he was able to capitalize on it.”
What the actual feck? Reads like a satirical piece.