Oldyella
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2014
- Messages
- 5,918
Doh! The whole dentist chair thing totally skipped my mind.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Doh! The whole dentist chair thing totally skipped my mind.
He was a massive piss head mate.What did Steve Bruce do?
Do you mean Rooney will become very fat?
Pretty much, yeah. Just fly off the handles a bitWhat did Steve Bruce do?
Do you mean Rooney will become very fat?
It's not a question of what I think or have done. You're advocating that it's safer to drive after smoking pot, than having a drink. Pot effects people differently, but as you only see things from your perspective, I can't help you either, aside saying there's reasons why people who are under the influence shouldn't drive.If you think drinking and smoking up are the same, I can't help you. People who have done both know the difference.
The people crucifying him without any facts or proof. A lot different from how you just tried to portray it and hence why people with pitchforks tend to go around in groups of collective ignorance.Yep, drink driving isnt bad. Its the people crucifying him for it that are.
Yeah I was just reading that. It's 24hrs it stays in your spit so basically the same as having alcohol in your system. You might not be drunk or stoned but there is enough trace in your body to do you. Still flawed but then like I said to someone else normally if I've been drinking or smoking the night before I just won't drive the next day as it's not worth losing my license.Sorry my bad, it's in your spit for several hours after smoking a joint. So roadside saliva test, would be all the evidence needed. As it doesn't pick up residue in the body from previous days.
He's been officially charged with a drink-driving offense, what more do you need?The people crucifying him without any facts or proof. A lot different from how you just tried to portray it and hence why people with pitchforks tend to go around in groups of collective ignorance.
If he is over the limit and just left the pub after 5 or 6 crucify him, once you have proof. You don't. No one does yet. Still however we have people calling him a moron for it and he should have the book thrown at him.
I haven't checked the papers since this morning but last I saw nothing said he had failed a breathalizer test.
Did you even read my post.He's been officially charged with a drink-driving offense, what more do you need?
Are you Busbybabe86?Are you his fecking lawyer or something?
You've been pulling some real Johnnie Cochran shit in this thread.
Sorry, didn't realise it was a personal discussion between the two of you. I'll let myself out thanks!Are you Busbybabe86?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Does that amount of alcohol produce a statistically significant increase in the likelihood of a driver having an accident, or is this just another example of liberal puritanism?I think it's an interesting case as circumstances should be taken into consideration. As @Andersons Dietician said, people drink 2-3 glasses of wine, get a proper night sleep and bang. Caught in the morning still have excess alchol in their blood.
No mercy for those drink more than 1 glass of wine/ beer for the meal and drive. One should have enough imagination to consider consequences and dangers.
Err, I hope you're not serious. This is some Trump-level logic.Does that amount of alcohol produce a statistically significant increase in the likelihood of a driver having an accident, or is this just another example of liberal puritanism?
If people are a danger to others they shouldn't be on the road, but we should base that determination on facts. Is there any real evidence that someone who's had a pint of beer in the last few hours is significantly more likely to crash his car?
I don't know the answer to that question by the way.
Sorry, didn't realise it was a personal discussion between the two of you. I'll let myself out thanks!
Before I go...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/09/01/wayne-rooney-arrested-suspicion-drink-driving/
He is guilty as charged.
Hope that clears it up for you. You know the key bit of since this morning when there was no proof of anything but still had people calling for his head without any proof.The people crucifying him without any facts or proof. A lot different from how you just tried to portray it and hence why people with pitchforks tend to go around in groups of collective ignorance.
If he is over the limit and just left the pub after 5 or 6 crucify him, once you have proof. You don't. No one does yet. Still however we have people calling him a moron for it and he should have the book thrown at him.
I haven't checked the papers since this morning but last I saw nothing said he had failed a breathalizer test.
Influence can mean anything from drugs to lack of sleep. It's been proven that lack of sleep is just as dangerous and drinking and driving. All I said was its safer to smoke pot and drive than DD. Btw most of the people seem to agree with this, so no, its not my perspective.It's not a question of what I think or have done. You're advocating that it's safer to drive after smoking pot, than having a drink. Pot effects people differently, but as you only see things from your perspective, I can't help you either, aside saying there's reasons why people who are under the influence shouldn't drive.
Well there is proof now, lad. Any argument in his favour went out of the window the very moment he was charged.Hope that clears it up for you. You know the key bit of since this morning when there was no proof of anything but still had people calling for his head without any proof.
Decent contribution in a genuinely horrible thread.The flipside to this, is that if he cleaned himself up, got back into the zone and focused on winning some silverware for Everton, he could clearly still be a hell of a player for a few years, because if he's been drinking the last few years he's still managed to remain at a level most players never even reach.
Without meaning to sound too Rawkish... if you're reading this Wayne, sort yourself out and get back to the drug of winning football matches and being a fecking beast on the pitch, you're better than this mate.
Ok, that was Rawkish as feck, but I find this really sad. And after watching this guy's entire career, I want better for his story than this. And I still think he could turn it around.
Influence can mean anything from drugs to lack of sleep. It's been proven that lack of sleep is just as dangerous and drinking and driving. All I said was its safer to smoke pot and drive than DD. Btw most of the people seem to agree with this, so no, its not my perspective.
You're surely joking.Off topic, but in countries where weed is legal, is it legal to smoke and drive? I actually think it's even safer than driving sober cause I feel like I'm going at 100 when I'm actually going at 20.
On topic, drinking and driving alone is a bad thing. But for a professional footballer to do that is disgusting.
That is incredibly stupid. You think it is possible to be smoking pot and drive safely?Influence can mean anything from drugs to lack of sleep. It's been proven that lack of sleep is just as dangerous and drinking and driving. All I said was its safer to smoke pot and drive than DD. Btw most of the people seem to agree with this, so no, its not my perspective.
Well, some logic is better than none. Your reply doesn't have any logic at all.Err, I hope you're not serious. This is some Trump-level logic.
Anyone who's seriously asking for proof driving drunk as Rooney was in this case is not dangerous does not warrant serious discussion.Well, some logic is better than none. Your reply doesn't have any logic at all.
Yes.That is incredibly stupid. You think it is possible to be smoking pot and drive safely?
Safer to drive high from weed than drunk from alcohol, I'll give you that. I'm a long term smoker, and I personally would say smoking slows down my reflexes. Which IMO, makes it unsafe to drive.Yes.
She earns well enough herself. I'm sure she doesn't need his money.Unlikely. He's cheated on her with hookers and grannies and she's still there.
She ain't hopping off that gravy train until he retires and then divorce, 50% of everything.
it was her car....not even his. I'm not judging as it might be he was that pissed and he thought it was a nice gesture to drive a girl home who was more drunk than him - If the stories as of 30 minutes ago are true - but what tool worth £xm doesn't just pay for a taxi to take someone home rather than drive a car they're not insured is just crazy.Is it true there was a woman in his car?
I dunno. I'm one of those who can't even form a sentence when very stoned from a mix of paranoia and being completely out of it. Effects us all in different ways. I know people who do a bong before heading to work in office on a monday morning. I wouldn't make it past the front door if I tried that.Safer to drive high from weed than drunk from alcohol, I'll give you that. I'm a long term smoker, and I personally would say smoking slows down my reflexes. Which IMO, makes it unsafe to drive.
she earns a few £m mate, not the £20m wayne earns every year. no matter what you earn there's always more as we all knowShe earns well enough herself. I'm sure she doesn't need his money.
Bizarre case.it was her car....not even his. I'm not judging as it might be he was that pissed and he thought it was a nice gesture to drive a girl home who was more drunk than him - If the stories as of 30 minutes ago are true - but what tool worth £xm doesn't just pay for a taxi to take someone home rather than drive a car they're not insured is just crazy.