Why would Mkhi sway Arsenal even a little bit? If anything it would probably just anger them to be offered him.
According to Transfermarkt, he's played 119 games on the right wing and 104 on the left in his career. He only started playing on the left more with Arsenal (where he's barely played on the right).I would like to see the percentage between games he starts left/centrally/right, I am pretty sure the right percentage will be pretty bloody low.
The more I think about, the more I realise how much of an Arsenal player Mhikitaryan is...
Let's see if Liverpool try to leapfrog both Manchester's. That Coutinho money is there...
They would still need to satisfy his wage demands. Plus, as it stands, United and City are more attractive due to the former having won trophies in the recent past and the latter being Champions elect.
According to Transfermarkt, he's played 119 games on the right wing and 104 on the left in his career. He only started playing on the left more with Arsenal (where he's barely played on the right).
The more I think about, the more I realise how much of an Arsenal player Mhikitaryan is...
This isn't happening.
I'm going to shop for some new jeans and watch Home and Away. Expect Sanchez to have signed for City when I'm done.
You mean the money they spent most of on Keita and VVD?Let's see if Liverpool try to leapfrog both Manchester's. That Coutinho money is there...
According to Transfermarkt, he's played 119 games on the right wing and 104 on the left in his career. He only started playing on the left more with Arsenal (where he's barely played on the right).
Arse fans not happy with our (fictional?) interest
But they'd prefer him to go and strengthen City?
https://talksport.com/football/alex...lief-news-apparent-manchester-united-interest
Because we have no real rivalry with City and never have had any like we do (or in the past) with Spurs or United. As an Arsenal fan I'd rather he went to City than United or Spurs. As an example, RVP to United dug into me more than Adebayor/Nasri to City did. Not even a comparison.
I mean I'd rather he not go anywhere to be fair but you know what I mean. But I think this is just a tactic from his agent to hurry City up. We don't really need Mkhi, we already have too many pretty midfielders, we need someone like Kante.
This isn't happening.
I'm going to shop for some new jeans and watch Home and Away. Expect Sanchez to have signed for City when I'm done.
How's Alf these days?
Fecking hell, it still runs?!
He's surely dead by now?
Didn't include the RM and LM appearances actually, so it's 120 to 107.That's very surprising, where did u get that info on Transfermarkt?
The legend is 73 years old and still working as far as I know!
I would agree, except you are losing Ozil as well and Mkhi should replace him better than any of your other current options.Because we have no real rivalry with City and never have had any like we do (or in the past) with Spurs or United. As an Arsenal fan I'd rather he went to City than United or Spurs. As an example, RVP to United dug into me more than Adebayor/Nasri to City did. Not even a comparison.
I mean I'd rather he not go anywhere to be fair but you know what I mean. But I think this is just a tactic from his agent to hurry City up. We don't really need Mkhi, we already have too many pretty midfielders, we need someone like Kante.
How's Alf these days?
He's surely dead by now?
I must say I always thought that a rivalry would develop between Arsenal & City, because even though we bought your best player at the time... they got half a team off you.
I would agree, except you are losing Ozil as well and Mkhi should replace him better than any of your other current options.
And why is that? Gary Neville and Nicky Butt would've had a terrible attitude if they were playing under Wenger in that Arsenal team.Good player, terrible attitude. Not sure I want here.
How's Alf these days?
Blimey. He looked 73 when I first started watching it on TV2 about 15 years ago
You could play Miki in the Kante role. He'd be utter fecking shite but I'm sure Wenger would try. Ye need a Coquelin replacement after allBecause we have no real rivalry with City and never have had any like we do (or in the past) with Spurs or United. As an Arsenal fan I'd rather he went to City than United or Spurs. As an example, RVP to United dug into me more than Adebayor/Nasri to City did. Not even a comparison.
I mean I'd rather he not go anywhere to be fair but you know what I mean. But I think this is just a tactic from his agent to hurry City up. We don't really need Mkhi, we already have too many pretty midfielders, we need someone like Kante.
And why is that? Gary Neville and Nicky Butt would've had a terrible attitude if they were playing under Wenger in that Arsenal team.
You could play Miki in the Kante role. He'd be utter fecking shite but I'm sure Wenger would try. Ye need a Coquelin replacement after all
He's amazingly brilliant and has immense mental strength™ - please buy him.That's fair enough, to be honest I have not seen Mkhi much. I know he was cracking in Football Manager.
He has a great mentality.Good player, terrible attitude. Not sure I want here.
Tbf, him joining Pep was always not a deciding factor for me, as he didn't have a great season under him, especially in CL. Them being nailed on to win more and trying to get him for ages could be.
But, don't think it's that impossible all things considered.