pseudo_canadian
Full Member
Can anyone confirm this?
Yup, I just checked instagram. It's real.
Can anyone confirm this?
Can anyone confirm this?
Can anyone confirm this?
Who says we're offering £400k?Are people happy with the prospect of paying him 400k a week? He is a good player but he is not worth that or close to it.
Well it is like a 20 million transfer fee every year we will be paying him.It's football mate. It's sickening to think of people earning £10k a week, so it's all just numbers at the end of the day that gets sillier.
I get much more worried at transfer fees, when you think what that money could do in real life important things.
Did he tell him to go to Chelsea?Jesus is coming back faster after meeting Pep's voodoo doctor.
That's not how it works stop being a tart lol.Well it is like a 20 million transfer fee every year we will be paying him.
Pogba will be in the office first thing monday looking parity, Lingard will be looking 200k a week.
José's comments today suggests we are in for him though.It happened. But this just seemed too obvious to me, like his agent is trying to use us to push forward the City deal.
Thats exactly how it works and you know it petThat's not how it works stop being a tart lol.
Well it is like a 20 million transfer fee every year we will be paying him.
Pogba will be in the office first thing monday looking parity, Lingard will be looking 200k a week.
I'm not paying it.Are people happy with the prospect of paying him 400k a week? He is a good player but he is not worth that or close to it.
I remember when people in 2011-12 said Chelsea weren't winning a CL anytime soon.
yes... I imagine his ego ( and his agent) are happy with him being the second best player at the club.I don't think Pogba will be asking for more, he's already on ridiculous money
will you chip in a bit at least??I'm not paying it.
Yeah, for sure. I saw that he followed those accounts so completely disregarded the story, but today has changed my mind for sure.José's comments today suggests we are in for him though.
If that happened the club would fold every time we signed a player. Once his contract ends yes they can use it as collateral to renegotiate sure, but not just because they've given a new player more.Thats exactly how it works and you know it pet
We can't moan about not signing great players and then moan when we do sign great players on high wages.Are people happy with the prospect of paying him 400k a week? He is a good player but he is not worth that or close to it.
I must admit I chuckled at the Arsenal fan saying when will we win the CL or not.Or Liverpool. Or plenty of teams in knock out competitions. Heck, who on earth thought that Porto would win it.
The only thing I can say with certainty is that Arsenal will not be winning the Champions League any time soon.
Can anyone confirm this?
Not every player but the very top players might have more influence I suggest.If that happened the club would fold every time we signed a player. Once his contract ends yes they can use it as collateral to renegotiate sure, but not just because they've given a new player more.
Anyway yes he will be worth it. A finished product amongst our rough diamonds.
Or he could have a clause in his contract where he gets matched up to the highest earner at the club.yes... I imagine his ego ( and his agent) are happy with him being the second best player at the club.
YrsAre people happy with the prospect of paying him 400k a week? He is a good player but he is not worth that or close to it.
Yup, I just checked instagram. It's real.
He did the same thing on twitter (followed United and a bunch of other United related accounts but on twitter) in 2014 during the Vidal saga.
Think that's from a fake instagram. Alexis Sanchez is following a "ferfelicevich", but his account is private. The account from that screenshot is "fernandofelicevich_", neither Sanchez nor Vidal are following it.It happened. But this just seemed too obvious to me, like his agent is trying to use us to push forward the City deal.
Can anyone confirm this?
We are tracking his agent's activity? Muppetry at its finest
I do. I've still got a MUTV subscription for a kick off and pay sky and BT.will you chip in a bit at least??
Travel agent is more important so we can start tracking his flight.This following his agent stuff is just embarrassing lads, why waste your time with something so pointless? Someone find his dog food supplier, they must know something.
I'm not personally paying it, so I'll say yes.Are people happy with the prospect of paying him 400k a week? He is a good player but he is not worth that or close to it.
The money doesn’t disappear. It stays in the economy. It’s not like an either-or between investing in good or burning it.It's football mate. It's sickening to think of people earning £10k a week, so it's all just numbers at the end of the day that gets sillier.
I get much more worried at transfer fees, when you think what that money could do in real life important things.
Is that based on anything, or just pure conjecture?Or he could have a clause in his contract where he gets matched up to the highest earner at the club.
Do you think that his agent spends his 5 million in the COOP?The money doesn’t disappear. It stays in the economy. It’s not like an either-or between investing in good or burning it.
Working for the NHS, I see no greater example of money regularly being pissed up the wall.
Yeah sounds it. The twitter account is genuine but he pulled the same stunt four years ago. Means nothing.Think that's from a fake instagram. Alexis Sanchez is following a "ferfelicevich", but his account is private. The account from that screenshot is "fernandofelicevich_", neither Sanchez nor Vidal are following it.
This is what Di Marzio has been reporting all along. City had a deal with the player. Then United came in and offered him more. Now United have a deal with the player, and city don'tSimilarly, it's pretty certain that Sanchez's wage requests will have gone up, especially with us trying to muscle in.
Nice work comrade!!I do. I've still got a MUTV subscription for a kick off and pay sky and BT.
Sorry if this has been discussed before, but can someone tell how Sanchez was under Pep at Barca? Because my vague impression is that he didn't exactly set the world alight over there (hence why he got sold to Arsenal while a lesser player in Pedro took his place) and that his best moments came after Pep left.
And that’s exactly what Pep wants. Alexis has an extremely high workrate. At one point he had the most ball recoveries in the final 3rd in Europe and that is what Pep wants. Winning the ball in the oppositions 3rd whilst pressing them and leaving them with absolutely no get out balls other than punting it long back to his defence. Bernardo Silva last year had the most ball recoveries in the final 3rd in Europe, hence why he has been brought in, he wants players that have the workrate to get him the ball back and then have the technical ability to punish teams. Alexis has all of that. I’d imagine if Alexis ends up at City then Aguero will be the one he replaces as he does more of what Pep wants. Also Alexis did well playing for Pep as a 9 and on the right he was scoring plenty and effecting games.Wasn't that Messi? Sanchez is more maverick than your ideal Pep player who would be more metronomic (?). It's one reason why Sanchez didn't thrive at Barcelona. He's more aggressive in his play style.