Television Game of Thrones (TV) • The watch has ended

Kapardin

New Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
9,917
Location
Chennai, India
I think I just realised what's going to happen. It's almost obvious when you think about it

Dany dies, duh. And so does Jon snow. End of the targaryen line.
And with it, the end of having a king of the iron throne, given how much blood has been spilled over it, and the fact that King's landing is basically destroyed anyway.
They go back to the old model of seven Kings/Queens for the seven Kingdoms.
Full circle of the targaryen cycle, who only came to westeros due to prophecy in the first place and which has now been fulfilled.
Jon was resurrected, no way he would die.

But I think you are half-right. Jon will kill Greyworm, Arya will kill Dany and probably Jon will use Drogon to burn away the iron throne as it is the symbol of bloodshed. Then he will split the seven Kingdoms with Sansa being Queen of the North and perhaps go North of the Wall to live with Tormund and the free folk.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,793
Location
india
Exactly. This was basically character assassination.

Jaime & Cersei's underwhelming ending still annoys me more though.
Still can't believe the ending they gave Jaime and Cersei. Just do anticlimactic and boring.

Euron's final words still crack me up though :lol:
 

RochaRoja

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
1,567
When someone hires an assassin to kill you and your brother only a few weeks previously I think even the person most addicted to a toxic relationship must give up on someone at that point. Even Tyrion just forgets the fact that she wanted him dead a few weeks ago and hired an assassin to do the deed. It's just :houllier:
That shitty Bronn scene never should’ve been part of the show.

He would’ve been better utilized being part of King’s Landing for the seige and probably dying or even dying at Winterfell protecting Tyrion against the army of the dead.
 

RochaRoja

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
1,567
Still can't believe the ending they gave Jaime and Cersei. Just do anticlimactic and boring.

Euron's final words still crack me up though :lol:
Anti-climactic deaths are quite typical early season GOT to be fair. It’s only in more recent seasons that the obsession with characters being killed by their nemesis or lovers has come about.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,793
Location
india
Anti-climactic deaths are quite typical early season GOT to be fair. It’s only in more recent seasons that the obsession with characters being killed by their nemesis or lovers has come about.
This was strange in the sense that it was both too safe and ideal for the characters and lacking any real impact. Maybe Dany will slip off a mountain cliff in first 5 minutes of the next episode. Don't think it's necessary to drag out the deaths as some ceremonial event but there should be some sting to it
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,609
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
Jon was resurrected, no way he would die.

But I think you are half-right. Jon will kill Greyworm, Arya will kill Dany and probably Jon will use Drogon to burn away the iron throne as it is the symbol of bloodshed. Then he will split the seven Kingdoms with Sansa being Queen of the North and perhaps go North of the Wall to live with Tormund and the free folk.
in a sense he's already dead from the resurrection. Look at how beric describes life after being resurrected. Grmm recently referred to him as being basically a kind of "fire wight".

He was brought back because the red god needed targaryens to defeat the Others. Job done, no more divine direction and help for either targaryen and the new world order won't have a place for them either. The Seven are taking back their kingdoms.

Also, Jon isn't smart enough to to think outside the box to come up with something like this. It'll be tyrions idea and his cerebral nature is what gets to have a lasting impact on the seven Kingdoms
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,174
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
That shitty Bronn scene never should’ve been part of the show.

He would’ve been better utilized being part of King’s Landing for the seige and probably dying or even dying at Winterfell protecting Tyrion against the army of the dead.
There are plenty of scenes in those 5 episodes we could have done without. All the scenes including fat Sam for starters, the Bronn scenes, the Brienne scenes.
All utterly pointless
 

Kapardin

New Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
9,917
Location
Chennai, India
That shitty Bronn scene never should’ve been part of the show.

He would’ve been better utilized being part of King’s Landing for the seige and probably dying or even dying at Winterfell protecting Tyrion against the army of the dead.
They just wanted Bronn to get a scene as they didn't know what to do with him. So what to do but chuck in some nude chicks and a dialogue with his best mates, the Lannister brothers. I expect he will make an appearance in the final episode.

I thought it was pretty dumb that Yara had no hand in Euron's death anyway. Another wasted character, like Bronn.
 

Andy_Cole

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
7,977
Location
Manchester
To be fair this episode was the lowest rated in Rotten Tomatoes history for the show. Widely panned by critics. Hardly just the caf being overly negative. The one before wasn't received much better either. The episode was certainly a spectacle but the disappointment in the writing is well justified.
I think lowest rated as so many fans were heartbroken that Dany turned evil.
 

GhastlyHun

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
12,851
Location
Bavaria
Supports
Bayern München
After reviewing the bells scene, I don't even think she's going mad. It's all about the rule through love or fear thing she says to Jon. So for some reason westeros people will never love her.
(Which doesn't make a lot of sense, since the common folk surely have a lot of sympathy for the Targaryen rule, who on the whole have brought long phases of stability and prosperity to the realm, and even the mad king's madness was mostly constricted to killing his advisors and councillors. The only hints of interaction between the people and her as a queen we have seen were in the north, but the northerners are little accepting of anything from the outside, so their reaction is not a good measure of the realm as a whole. So as with most things in this abbreviated last season, we only have a line of dialogue to establish that people do not love her.)
In the same conversation with Jon, she makes the conscious decision to establish her rule by fear. When the battle is won, she is waiting for the bells in tears, because she has decided to commit horrors to instill fear as a basis for her rule, and she is aware of the monstrosity of the action.
Either way, the way it has been portrayed in the show is unsatisfactory as they simply didn't spend enough time to prove the necessity for rule through fear.
 

oneniltothearsenal

Caf's Milton Friedman and Arse Aficionado
Scout
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
11,186
Supports
Brazil, Arsenal,LA Aztecs
After reviewing the bells scene, I don't even think she's going mad. It's all about the rule through love or fear thing she says to Jon. So for some reason westeros people will never love her.
(Which doesn't make a lot of sense, since the common folk surely have a lot of sympathy for the Targaryen rule, who on the whole have brought long phases of stability and prosperity to the realm, and even the mad king's madness was mostly constricted to killing his advisors and councillors. The only hints of interaction between the people and her as a queen we have seen were in the north, but the northerners are little accepting of anything from the outside, so their reaction is not a good measure of the realm as a whole. So as with most things in this abbreviated last season, we only have a line of dialogue to establish that people do not love her.)
In the same conversation with Jon, she makes the conscious decision to establish her rule by fear. When the battle is won, she is waiting for the bells in tears, because she has decided to commit horrors to instill fear as a basis for her rule, and she is aware of the monstrosity of the action.
Either way, the way it has been portrayed in the show is unsatisfactory as they simply didn't spend enough time to prove the necessity for rule through fear.
It makes a lot of sense. Aerys was feared and hated by the peasants for years at the end of his reign because its implied he would kill anyone on his whims and paranoia. No one living would have any memory of the last stable, good Targaryen King (which would have been Aegon the Unlikely). Most people would probably have the fond nostalgia for the peace years of Robert Baratheon. Mad King would be mostly an evil, scary legend to spook your kids with for decades. Plus everyone was scared of the legends of Aegon the Conqueror burning people in castles. So to the common folk, Daeny is simply a scary foreigner with dragons.
 

RochaRoja

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
1,567
They just wanted Bronn to get a scene as they didn't know what to do with him. So what to do but chuck in some nude chicks and a dialogue with his best mates, the Lannister brothers. I expect he will make an appearance in the final episode.

I thought it was pretty dumb that Yara had no hand in Euron's death anyway. Another wasted character, like Bronn.
Euron was just a mistake who should never have been part of the show in the first place. Same with the Sand Snakes.

Imagine if all the time wasted on their scenes throughout the show had instead been used to further build the main plots so we didn’t have the war against the white walkers and the war against Cersei crammed into one season.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
That shitty Bronn scene never should’ve been part of the show.

He would’ve been better utilized being part of King’s Landing for the seige and probably dying or even dying at Winterfell protecting Tyrion against the army of the dead.
Bronn has spin off written all over him. 'Jon and Bronn do Westeros' or 'Dude, where's my Dragon?!'
 

Drifter

American
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
68,365
Both writers have been rewarded with being involved in the next Star War movie.
 

GhastlyHun

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
12,851
Location
Bavaria
Supports
Bayern München
It makes a lot of sense. Aerys was feared and hated by the peasants for years at the end of his reign because its implied he would kill anyone on his whims and paranoia. No one living would have any memory of the last stable, good Targaryen King (which would have been Aegon the Unlikely). Most people would probably have the fond nostalgia for the peace years of Robert Baratheon. Mad King would be mostly an evil, scary legend to spook your kids with for decades. Plus everyone was scared of the legends of Aegon the Conqueror burning people in castles. So to the common folk, Daeny is simply a scary foreigner with dragons.
You have 3 centuries of Targaryen rule with long times of peace before that. And as I said, the mad king's rule per se did not bring war to the kingdom, so for the common people all was still well until the rebellion. Taking Robert's rebellion, rule, and the Stark-Lannister aftermath together, we have ~20 years without a Targaryen king of which only 10 went without major acts of war. There are lots of people alive who remember stability under Targaryen rule, and on top of that the stories that are handed down from one generation to the other.
 

Slevs

likes to play with penises
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
28,427
Location
Boyo
It’s not just a show about tits and dragons is it? It was a well written fantastic show at the start. Now it has become a parody of what it once was, but it was once a good show.
Okay, but you won't be fined if you stop watching it cause you don't like it anymore.

I get it, it was better before, now it is worse, still 1 episode left. Is it that hard to watch it without having medieval battle veterans talking about military tactics or why the ballistas hit 1 dragon instantly but missed the other with all their shots?

I haven't watched the walking dead but I heard the writing went to shit after a few seasons and everyone stopped watching it because it was shit. Why can't it be the same for this series?

It's obvious, the writers ran out of source material (the books), fecked up massively, and now we have this. It's not good that it has happened but constantly complaining week in week out about an already shot TV show will not change its ending or anything.

This isn't really aimed at you Wumminator but you just happened to quote me giving me a platform for a reply. I don't like the fact that I have to trawl through 10 pages of hate posts to find a theory about what might happen.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,239
Location
Tool shed
Euron was just a mistake who should never have been part of the show in the first place. Same with the Sand Snakes.

Imagine if all the time wasted on their scenes throughout the show had instead been used to further build the main plots so we didn’t have the war against the white walkers and the war against Cersei crammed into one season.
Euron was a brilliant character in the books. They just totally fecked him up in the show. Didn't bother to flesh him out at all and made him the most stereotypical villain imaginable. I know the actor wasn't great either but I do feel bad for him because he had zilch to work with. People can talk about not having source material as a reason for the writers ballsing things up but they left out a hell of a lot of the best source material, or changed it for the worse, too.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,174
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Jon was resurrected, no way he would die.

But I think you are half-right. Jon will kill Greyworm, Arya will kill Dany and probably Jon will use Drogon to burn away the iron throne as it is the symbol of bloodshed. Then he will split the seven Kingdoms with Sansa being Queen of the North and perhaps go North of the Wall to live with Tormund and the free folk.
Drogon has to die too, the end of dragons and the end of magic
 

Kapardin

New Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
9,917
Location
Chennai, India
Both writers have been rewarded with being involved in the next Star War movie.
That's their level. Star Wars movies don't actually have real depth in characters, they are more a rehash of the old movies. These guys write some great cinematic set-pieces but struggle with characters who have depth, so Star Wars falling in the former category should be fine with them.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,136
Location
Centreback
It’s not just a show about tits and dragons is it? It was a well written fantastic show at the start. Now it has become a parody of what it once was, but it was once a good show.
Course it is. Things have focused down to the finale and lacking source material for the later season they have done a decent job.

And it isn't like the books are great literature. Fun and convoluted but Tolkein it ain't.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,652
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
Okay, but you won't be fined if you stop watching it cause you don't like it anymore.

I get it, it was better before, now it is worse, still 1 episode left. Is it that hard to watch it without having medieval battle veterans talking about military tactics or why the ballistas hit 1 dragon instantly but missed the other with all their shots?

I haven't watched the walking dead but I heard the writing went to shit after a few seasons and everyone stopped watching it because it was shit. Why can't it be the same for this series?

It's obvious, the writers ran out of source material (the books), fecked up massively, and now we have this. It's not good that it has happened but constantly complaining week in week out about an already shot TV show will not change its ending or anything.

This isn't really aimed at you Wumminator but you just happened to quote me giving me a platform for a reply. I don't like the fact that I have to trawl through 10 pages of hate posts to find a theory about what might happen.
This is exactly the thing. It's not their story. They have to finish someone else's story. That's pretty much impossible. They're not George R.R. Martin and they were never going to catch the EXACT same feeling that guy did.

I also doubt it was their decision to only make 6 more episodes. And to be fair, there's no way you can smoothly cram so much stuff into 6 episodes without making it feel rushed.

Also I like Danaerys with bags under her eyes and disheveled hair. She can light me on fire any time.
 

Redlambs

Creator of the Caftards comics
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
42,263
Location
Officially the best poker player on RAWK.
Okay, but you won't be fined if you stop watching it cause you don't like it anymore.

I get it, it was better before, now it is worse, still 1 episode left. Is it that hard to watch it without having medieval battle veterans talking about military tactics or why the ballistas hit 1 dragon instantly but missed the other with all their shots?

I haven't watched the walking dead but I heard the writing went to shit after a few seasons and everyone stopped watching it because it was shit. Why can't it be the same for this series?

It's obvious, the writers ran out of source material (the books), fecked up massively, and now we have this. It's not good that it has happened but constantly complaining week in week out about an already shot TV show will not change its ending or anything.

This isn't really aimed at you Wumminator but you just happened to quote me giving me a platform for a reply. I don't like the fact that I have to trawl through 10 pages of hate posts to find a theory about what might happen.
To be honest mate, there's not a whole lot of "hate" posting, that's way blown out of proportion. Most of us seem to have accepted it's not the same show and there's plenty of tongue in cheek stuff.

Of course you get a couple of people taking it way too seriously, but that goes for both extremes :lol:
 

Redlambs

Creator of the Caftards comics
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
42,263
Location
Officially the best poker player on RAWK.
This is exactly the thing. It's not their story. They have to finish someone else's story. That's pretty much impossible. They're not George R.R. Martin and they were never going to catch the EXACT same feeling that guy did.

I also doubt it was their decision to only make 6 more episodes. And to be fair, there's no way you can smoothly cram so much stuff into 6 episodes without making it feel rushed.

Also I like Danaerys with bags under her eyes and disheveled hair. She can light me on fire any time.
Agreed :drool:
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,239
Location
Tool shed
To be honest mate, there's not a whole lot of "hate" posting, that's way blown out of proportion. Most of us seem to have accepted it's noy the same sgow and there's plenty of tongue in cheek stuff.

Of course you get a couple of people taking it way too seriously, but that goes for both extremes :lol:
It's mostly those defending the show who are taking it too seriously though, which is the funny thing.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,136
Location
Centreback
The main faults are Martin's - the bitches be evil/mad - sane men be good thing is down to him. They could have dealt with Danyrs' descent into mad king contry a bit slower given how invested so many viewers seem to be but that is a fairly minor quibble.
 

Slevs

likes to play with penises
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
28,427
Location
Boyo
To be honest mate, there's not a whole lot of "hate" posting, that's way blown out of proportion. Most of us seem to have accepted it's not the same show and there's plenty of tongue in cheek stuff.

Of course you get a couple of people taking it way too seriously, but that goes for both extremes :lol:
I liked your horse theory! Made me spill me coffee!
 

GhastlyHun

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
12,851
Location
Bavaria
Supports
Bayern München
The main faults are Martin's - the bitches be evil/mad - sane men be good thing is down to him.
What :lol:
Have you read anything by Martin?
I'm not saying Daenerys won't turn destroyer in the books, it's possible, but you can be 1000% certain that the reason for it won't be 'bitches be mad'.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,295
People can talk about not having source material as a reason for the writers ballsing things up but they left out a hell of a lot of the best source material, or changed it for the worse, too.
This this this. They made a conscious decision to omit a load of interesting stuff and alter a load of other interesting stuff. Post season 4 they deliberately pandered to what they believed were fan expectations, not understanding that it was the show’s defiance of those expectations which made it so intriguing in the first place. The original material they introduced in the first four seasons proves that they can write well when they feel like it, so the only conclusion to be drawn is that they lost interest in the show after season 4.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,239
Location
Tool shed
Dunno why everyone is acting surprised. It's been foreshadowed that this season wasn't going to be very good since about season 5.
The "you want a good girl but you need a bad pussy" line was definitely a prophecy relating to Dany's insanely sudden descent from good girl to bad pussy. Genius writing.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,652
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
I preferred the show over the books I read honestly (read the first 3).

Now burn me at the stake.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,352
Location
bin
That's their level. Star Wars movies don't actually have real depth in characters, they are more a rehash of the old movies. These guys write some great cinematic set-pieces but struggle with characters who have depth, so Star Wars falling in the former category should be fine with them.
They're basing it on KOTOR, though aren't they? Imo the characters in that are incredibly rich and probably Disney's best chance at creating a character driven Star Wars trilogy, so you just know that they're going to feck them up.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,352
Location
bin
I preferred the show over the books I read honestly (read the first 3).

Now burn me at the stake.
They're a strange collection for sure. One minute they're incredibly adult themed, filled with beautiful flowing poetry, and the next minute Tyrion is doing front flip handstands off of mantle pieces and Patchface is shouting "ho ho ho, I knoooooowwww!"
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,939
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
It's mostly those defending the show who are taking it too seriously though, which is the funny thing.
The other end of the spectrum is equally as annoying - there seem to be people on here and Twitter who have decided that they hate the show now and will nitpick on every single small detail.

I can see why people are annoyed with the show, but basically you just gotta enjoy it for what it currently is and don't hate it for what it is anymore. If they want to go back to the initial intrigues and plotting of the first series, they should just grab the damn books because they're ten times better than what the show currently has to offer.