Suv666
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 9,101
Because we have bigger idiots in our board.Why are people taking this luckhurst idiot seriously?
Mata with 3 year deal.
Absolutely ridiculous.
Why are people taking this luckhurst idiot seriously?
Good planning.
Don't believe it. I like Mata but this would be bad business. A 1+1 year deal would be best, 2+1 maybe, but definitely not 3.
Every year Luckhurst winds Utd fans up. Got blocked by him last window for calling him a bs merchant. He's a joke.
Excellent. Thats our RW sorted for foreseeable future then. Onto the next one.
I hope there is white text somewhere.
Mata’s Blogging on the way to relegation will eerily resemble the band taking up their instruments on the deck of the Titanic as it went down.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/man-utd-brink-agreeing-new-16530267...with Mata likely to pen a one-year extension to prolong his spell at United.
https://en.as.com/en/2019/06/17/football/1560808654_242692.htmlThe Spanish international, whose deal was set to expire on June 30, has decided to extend his relationship with the Old Trafford outfit for one more season.
Mata’s Blogging on the way to relegation will eerily resemble the band taking up their instruments on the deck of the Titanic as it went down.
Good planning.
How would I know what? That we're not in for Rodri or that he won't flop?
Regarding Mata contract. What if he signes a 3-year deal with a wage reduction plan. Say 100k/week first year, 75k second year, 60k third year option? Or that it is more incentive based with lower fixed wage but more bonuses? Lets not assume the worst even though its Woody...
The next step from that would be to change the name of the Stadium.Rarely seen a more obviously wrong comment.
Yeah, didn’t read the article. But it does sound way outside our strategy of renewals, so i’d be surprised if that is true.He's getting 5 million a year for three years according to the "article". Wouldn't take anything as gospel but it's worrying we're giving a player we don't need a three-year deal.
If this is our strategy, why would we tell him?
That he won't flop, that he won't have the same trajectory as Fred. nobody knows and nobody can know.
The way they run their club is absolutely night and day compared with our lot. Ruthlessness and forward planning from top to bottom whilst we award mediocrity with new contracts
Because I've seen him play a lot, he's proven in one of the best leagues in the world, he's got all the tools to perform in City's system and he's still very young with potential to improve further.
Good strategy to just sit back and wait? Haha. I think it’s borderline mental that we haven’t signed even one midfielder yet considering Fellaini and Herrera are out and Pogba is likely on his way out.Think our first choice option hasn't made up his mind (my guess is Rabiot) . Once he decides we will calls on other targets like Ndombele or Le Colso or anyone else. As long as other clubs dont make a move, think we are just playing the wait game. Which makes sense to me.
Rumored players - Tielemans, Longstaff, Ndombele, Le Colso etc.
No other club has actually made any progress with these players anyway.
So, calm the feck down guys !
They are absolutely one of the best run footballing operations. Player recruitment, manager recruitment, wage structure...aces. If you're annoyed because football regulalators are lax in their enforcement of the weak financial rules...boo hoo. You're lost wallowing in things that make you feel better like they're a plastic club with no fans. They actually have highly competent people at the club.
Good strategy to just sit back and wait? Haha. I think it’s borderline mental that we haven’t signed even one midfielder yet considering Fellaini and Herrera are out and Pogba is likely on his way out.