Scott McTominay image 39

Scott McTominay Scotland flag

2019-20 Performances


View full 2019-20 profile

6.0 Season Average Rating
Appearances
37
Goals
5
Assists
1
Yellow cards
4
Status
Not open for further replies.

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,755
Location
india
Wasn't good. Chelsea completely dominated us in midfield.

He's a good squad option though given his physciality, strong mentality and decision making.
 

jackal&hyde

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
4,220
He started shaky like most of the team but grew in to the game. Should play every week and i'm sure he'll have many more good games then bad.

This is one player that has won me over in the last year or so. Great attitude to.
 

SoCross

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
3,571
Thought he was good in the 2nd half. Glad Ole is keeping faith in him; he’s the future, not Matic.

But he certainly can learn a few things from the Serb, mainly positioning.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,980
Occasional good play shouldn't hide the fact that those two, as supposedly helping the midfield, were missing for large chunk of the game. For instance, Lingard only had 26 passes during 85 min. on the field, with Pereira was even worse (15 passes in 73 min.). That is unacceptable number for midfielders. Their numbers are comparable to Rashford and Martial, both forwards, combined (21+28 passes).

In contrast, Scott had 46 passes, with Pogba 62. Both were also did the pressing, and in Pogba case, the creative force and bringing the ball forward also.
They were playing as forwards though. What am I missing?
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,837
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
I am a big fan of McTominay but thought he was left a little exposed at times in midfield with Pogba.

I do think its going to be a big challenge for Ole to find an effective way of getting the best out of whoever plays at the base of the midfield because yesterday the gaps where far too big at times
 

Carl S Bridge

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
107
I don't understand how you believe he will be another Carrick? He's got a quite completely different repertoire of skills. He's more like Fletcher in my opinion
I really dont understand where these opinions come from... not a world beater? He is 22 and developing into a fantastic young player. He can break up play and is starting to show he can control it too. If he keeps developing at the same pace we have another Carrick on our hands (though with more tenacity). So the whole "not a world beater but grafts" thing is just fecking bizaare.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

NoLogo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
19,883
Location
I can't remember why I joined this war.
I am a big fan of McTominay but thought he was left a little exposed at times in midfield with Pogba.

I do think its going to be a big challenge for Ole to find an effective way of getting the best out of whoever plays at the base of the midfield because yesterday the gaps where far too big at times
Honestly I think McTom is better when playing in a more attacking role, box to box so to speak, as a DM I think he lacks a bit of sense for being in the right position and anticipating opponent moves faster. Carrick needs to tutor the lad, maybe he can teach him a bit about that.
 

Rocksy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2016
Messages
1,347
Supports
Blackburn Rovers
Pogba had great moments yesterday but playing next to him must be really difficult. I think there needs to be someone more physical than Pereira in there to balance things out. Was Fred dropped yesterday?
 

Ace of Spades

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
5,224
They were playing as forwards though. What am I missing?
Nothing, you don't want your attacking players to drop too deep, and both McTominay and Pogba turned over possession a bit too much, and that is an area to improve. Pogba has a tendency to do that at times, but that was very uncharacteristic of McTominay.

Also important to remember that Chelsea have one of the best midfield in the league, both in quantity and quality in depth.
 

Ace of Spades

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
5,224
Pogba had great moments yesterday but playing next to him must be really difficult. I think there needs to be someone more physical than Pereira in there to balance things out. Was Fred dropped yesterday?
Fred did not have a full pre-season, joined late so is behind these guys in terms of being ready.
 

Krits

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
1,660
Location
Mumbai
Wasn’t very good first half. But second half was decent. I still have faith in him. The entire team were like a deer in headlights at the start. I have to put that down to the coaching staff, though I guess they might not have been sure exactly what tactics Lampard would use?

Pogba-Mctominay is the way to go for now. If Fred can live up to his potential, move Pogba forward.
 

Bestietom

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
8,021
Location
Ireland
Prone to a few mistakes , but improving the more games he gets. Still some gaping holes in midfield and need a deep lying playmaker. We will get caught out here with better teams.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,707
Location
Krakow
I've said this before but I think his ceiling is much lower than some of here expect. He will never be a world class midfielder, that's just not his level of potential, which doesn't mean he's useless either. He shouldn't be relied on as a permanent starter in our team but is good enough to be called upon every now and again, and start 25+ games a season without huge drop in quality from whoever we sign to play ahead of him. We should have addressed this issue in the transfer window but we didn't, so we are probably now stuck with McTominay as a starter until the end of season. I'm not overly concerned about that, but I am also pretty sure he will be scrutinized by our fans and media due to his inconsistent performances.
 

Scholsey2004

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
3,600
Looks very much like an Eric Dier type player. Great screen for the defence but probably won't contribute a great deal to possession. If he could improve in that area he'd be really top drawer. Either way he's rapidly becoming a fixture in the side which is great to see.
 

Icemav

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
1,697
I don't understand how you believe he will be another Carrick? He's got a quite completely different repertoire of skills. He's more like Fletcher in my opinion
Because I see him developing his distrubution and starting to change the tempo of play. If he keeps improving this facet as he is displaying clearly, and also his defensive reading of the game then I feel we will have very mature well rounded midfielder in 2-3 seasons more in the Carrick mould. At 22 he has a high ceiling.

Actually I dont see anything style wise in his game that reminds me of Fletcher. I actually think he will prove to be a much more complete football.
 
Last edited:

SambaBoy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
4,225
His touch and ability to retain possession in tight spaces was poor yesterday.
 

Mcking

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
6,015
Location
Nigeria
Occasional good play shouldn't hide the fact that those two, as supposedly helping the midfield, were missing for large chunk of the game. For instance, Lingard only had 26 passes during 85 min. on the field, with Pereira was even worse (15 passes in 73 min.). That is unacceptable number for midfielders. Their numbers are comparable to Rashford and Martial, both forwards, combined (21+28 passes).

In contrast, Scott had 46 passes, with Pogba 62. Both were also did the pressing, and in Pogba case, the creative force and bringing the ball forward also.
Lingard and Pereira played in attacking midfield.
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,894
Location
Wales
Didn't have his best games but still played well enough - which is indicative of how far he's come.

Will be a mainstay here for years.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,815
Because I see him developing his distrubution and starting to change the tempo of play. If he keeps improving this facet as he is displaying clearly, and also his defensive reading of the game then I feel we will have very mature well rounded midfielder in 2-3 seasons more in the Carrick mould. At 22 he has a high ceiling.

Actually I dont see anything style wise in his game that reminds me of Fletcher. I actually think he will prove to be a much more complete football.
About the only thing he has in common with Carrick is that they're both tall. I don't think he'll ever have Carrick's passing range.

I agree with @Sarni above, his ceiling is probably not as high as some, including yourself, expect. You even took issue with someone saying he's "not a world beater" which is the least controversial opinion ever about McTominay. A world beater in midfield would be someone like Iniesta, not McTominay.
 

Irrational.

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
32,925
Location
LVG's notebook
He's going to be a leader on the pitch. He was rallying the players in the huddle after every goal. He lives and breathes Manchester United. He may be limited but he more than makes up for it with his attitude and giving everything on the pitch.
 

JoaquinJoaquin

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
8,600
He was OK. He really needs to improve his positioning if he is going to play the DM role for us in the future. There was times Chelsea were just running through us, which as a DM you cannot allow.
 

Icemav

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
1,697
About the only thing he has in common with Carrick is that they're both tall. I don't think he'll ever have Carrick's passing range.

I agree with @Sarni above, his ceiling is probably not as high as some, including yourself, expect. You even took issue with someone saying he's "not a world beater" which is the least controversial opinion ever about McTominay. A world beater in midfield would be someone like Iniesta, not McTominay.
Well I completely disagree. I think he is criminally underrated however its very early days for the young lad so I dont want to be pressured into big predictions. However I know what my gut instinct tells me.

The "not a world beater" comment is the type of stick thats he has been beaten with since breaking through to the 1st team. Its meant to degrade him as a player and potray him as a hard grafter and bit of a donkey. Iniesta? Legend of the game and multiple world cup and CL winner that plays a different position? .... totally and utterly irrelevant. The question is whether Scott will be CL calibre and go toe to toe with the best in Europe. Lets wait and see.
 

RedRover

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
8,951
I really dont understand where these opinions come from... not a world beater? He is 22 and developing into a fantastic young player. He can break up play and is starting to show he can control it too. If he keeps developing at the same pace we have another Carrick on our hands (though with more tenacity). So the whole "not a world beater but grafts" thing is just fecking bizaare.
He’s a decent player, works hard and is useful. He’s neat and tidy, looks solid but right now, in my opinion that’s it.

Perhaps he may improve significantly as a regular this season. I don’t necessarily see anything that makes me think he’ll be the player Carrick was.
 

Mcking

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
6,015
Location
Nigeria
I'd like to see our % possession with him in the team and without him. I feel the game largely passes by him and our midfield whenever he is on the pitch. He is definitely not as assertive as the likes of Pogba, Herrera, Matic, Fred, Mata and even Fellaini, and he struggles to get on the ball compared to the others. He does show sporadic bits of quality at times, but more often than not, he's relatively invisible and chasing shadows in midfield.
 

LiquidSnake

Full Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
95
Location
France
I feel like McTominay showed a lot of upside in pre-season and end of last season by being more "box to box". I think he really can offer a role in DM against lower table teams but I feel like he will be exposed in this role against any decent side... For now, I hope he can develop in this role.

To me, he's really a solid B2B midfielder for now. IMHO He will struggles in a DM role (a real anchoring role, not just doing the dirty work on just one player) and especially next to a guy like Pogba, which requires a great savyness.

I feel like he's trying to play a more calm role and then the game pass by him, while when he's more "front footed", he seems more confortable... Then again it would leave the midfield absolutely exposed.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,815
Well I completely disagree. I think he is criminally underrated however its very early days for the young lad so I dont want to be pressured into big predictions. However I know what my gut instinct tells me.

The "not a world beater" comment is the type of stick thats he has been beaten with since breaking through to the 1st team. Its meant to degrade him as a player and potray him as a hard grafter and bit of a donkey. Iniesta? Legend of the game and multiple world cup and CL winner that plays a different position? .... totally and utterly irrelevant. The question is whether Scott will be CL calibre and go toe to toe with the best in Europe. Lets wait and see.
It's really not, it's just meant to indicate that he's not a top tier talent. He's not ever going to be one of the best midfielders in the world. Like, say, I don't think Lindelöf is a "donkey" but he's definitely no world beater either.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
For all the criticism of Matic, I wish Scott was as good on the ball as him. If we could merge them we’d have a hell of a player. Matic has no fecking legs sadly, and Scott has that in abundance.

Overall the midfield trio wasn’t nearly good enough today for me. Pereira doesn’t do enough.​
I just dont understand what people see in Matic in the ball, certainly not since signing for us. Matic takes far too long to move it on, if often gets caught on it and it's not as if his passing range is something impressive. He regularly messes up simple passes.
 

Icemav

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
1,697
It's really not, it's just meant to indicate that he's not a top tier talent. He's not ever going to be one of the best midfielders in the world. Like, say, I don't think Lindelöf is a "donkey" but he's definitely no world beater either.
But why does it need to be said? It has been a constant since he came into the senior squad. The fact is that Mourinho who hates promoting youth gave 20yo Scott games and now Ole also highly rates him at 22. Yet he is constantly spoken of as a limited grafter by many of our fans. Yes he tries his arse off and fights, but I see him doing and attempting a huge lot more than what some are claiming. He is trying to develop into a highly athletic well rounded midfield who will impact big games. His progression is clear at 22, which is a baby in midfield terms.

Now clearly I will not change peoples minds.... just comparing him to Carrick in risqué in these parts. Lets waits and see.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,697
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Looked like he was learning his trade in a new position or discipline yesterday but still offered more than Matic and probably as much as Herrera would have. I really like this lad, hoping he can have a really good season and make that position his own, mainly so I don't have to see Matic again.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
What his performance yesterday demonstrated aptly is the need for physicality and mobility in defensive midfield. We simply can't afford to have any cart horses in there. He really needs to improve his positioning though and to work on receiving the ball on the half turn in midfield Its a good job our back 4 are as comfortable on the ball as they are as they often lacked a proper outlet.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,194
Location
...
I just dont understand what people see in Matic in the ball, certainly not since signing for us. Matic takes far too long to move it on, if often gets caught on it and it's not as if his passing range is something impressive. He regularly messes up simple passes.
Despite moving like a sloth, Matic is wonderfully composed on the ball. He’s never rushed (ironically :lol:) and can comfortably skip past a couple of men to beat the press if needed. I said in the summer, which naturally was strongly opposed which I get, but McTominay does not look after the ball well enough for me. He’s better when the game is more open, but when it becomes tighter and more compact, he becomes less reliable with his touch and ‘tika-taka’ for want of a better expression. He’s not really got that Matic shuffle yet either where he can pass the ball from one foot to another quickly and skip past two players.

Scott does have his strengths, and is useful, but is simply not a talented enough footballer to become this long-term automatic starter for me. If that happens it will be because we are just managing him, but we do need better on the ball to reach the top. He could never play in City’s midfield.
 

GDaly95

Says he's one of the best posters
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
6,280
Location
Wicklow, Ireland
Against AC Milan, he was dropping in between our defenders, turning and distributing the ball with ease. He looked really classy actually. Granted the pace of the game was far slower, but he looked so composed and sure of himself on the ball.

Really went out the window yesterday. Don't recall him taking the ball, turning and moving it forward once. Didn't see him show for the ball. Didn't see him drop in between defenders and take control. I hope he can find another level in these games.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
Despite moving like a sloth, Matic is wonderfully composed on the ball. He’s never rushed (ironically :lol:) and can comfortably skip past a couple of men to beat the press if needed. I said in the summer, which naturally was strongly opposed which I get, but McTominay does not look after the ball well enough for me. He’s better when the game is more open, but when it becomes tighter and more compact, he becomes less reliable with his touch and ‘tika-taka’ for want of a better expression. He’s not really got that Matic shuffle yet either where he can pass the ball from one foot to another quickly and skip past two players.

Scott does have his strengths, and is useful, but is simply not a talented enough footballer to become this long-term automatic starter for me. If that happens it will be because we are just managing him, but we do need better on the ball to reach the top. He could never play in City’s midfield.
He isn't though. If he was he wouldn't give the ball away repeatedly, he wouldn't be caught in the ball repeatedly. The dawdling on the ball we saw against Milan preseason isn't a one off. There's no assertiveness in his first touch, he doesn't try to play with a moving ball. It's far easier to look silky on the ball when you're stationary. Ask him to use his first touch to move into space and hit a pass and he can't do it.

That said I'm not a massive fan of Mctominay either, but for the moment he's showing he's infinitely better for us than Matic is. I'm hoping we can push Garner along and get him ready for next season. Now that is someone who knows how to use the ball.
 

FromTheBench

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
10,479
He works hard and gives legs in midfield is improving positionally and is a physical presence.

But he is limited on the ball.
 

Bwuk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
17,342
Not sure how people don’t see his obvious quality.

He’s a leader on the pitch too. It’s Fletcher mk2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.