SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,312
Location
The stable
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,902
Location
Somewhere out there
I believe, like @11101 has expressed earlier, we need to be locked until we know exactly what to do.
Which is why you and I will always differ in this. I absolutely respect your point and I understand why you feel that way especially with the incredible job that you do.
For me though I will class countries that flatten the curve whilst managing to keep on with society as well as possible as “successful”, as I believe you cannot stay locked down long term. Within very little time it would begin to cause complete anarchy.
 

Hound Dog

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
3,211
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Supports
Whoever I bet on

I don't know if it's economically viable but there's no other choice. Having millions of people die is not a solution either.
There are thousands of jobs that will not exist for those 2 years though so it's certainly very difficult but it's not like we are presented with a choice here. There's absolutely no way in hell that you can allow people back into stadiums and concerts and not have a massive outbreak again.
The problem is that it is difficult to claim that many will not die of measures if they go on for two years. One month of lockdown in in most places, the economy is already crashing... What will happen in a year? Suicide, homelessness, increased heart problems due to stress and staying indoors, etc.

What you are writing about (2 year + ) is a solution ideal from a point of view taking only the virus into account, but there are other factors to consider. Many other factors.

However, I maintain that, if the vaccine does not arrive by the end of the year, it will not matter all that much, as most people will get sick anyway, with lockdowns being untenable for more than a couple of months.
 

massi83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
2,596
Around 450 nursing home deaths here Pogue, almost all in Stockholm.

And as I said earlier even countries that had a lockdown have got it into the nursing homes because people who are locked down are still getting this. IItaly is proof of that when five weeks after lockdown they are still getting 4000 cases a day. So lockdown doesn’t completely stop cases which means without it being completely stopped people who work in nursing homes will still get this and bring it into nursing homes.

Declaring Sweden getting it into an insane amount of Stockholm nursing homes as a “win” for lockdown seems really strange.

And whilst I don’t think this is true for Sweden’s neighboring countries, there have been lots and lots of reports of nursing care home deaths missing from other countries statistics.
35-50% of deaths in Finland are from nursing homes, so quite similar. It isn't the explanation you think it is.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,236
Location
Blitztown
You're overlooking one massive factor here...mortgages.

Banks will not be competing for business. That's not what happens when liquidity dries up and defaults rise, aka a recession. They consolidate loan portfolios and stop lending. Even now as governments are effectively underwriting all debt, banks are still reluctant to lend. It doesn't matter if the housing market crashes 50% the vast majority would still need a mortgage, and that's going to become harder to get, with higher deposit requirements and higher interest rates.


Boomers hit earning age in the 1960s. WW2 was a memory by then and the economy experienced unprecedented and until today unmatched growth, with fairly consistent 4-5%+ annual GDP increases until the 1990s.
‘You’re overlooking one factor here’....

No. I’m applying broad strokes.

- Potential New forms of lending, or greater appetite for different instruments

- Huge sectors (insurance, financial services, etc) giving up bloated office spaces as they’ve just realised people will work from home quite responsibly
- The repurposing of those spaces
- A huge reduction in house prices
- A large amount of housing stock becoming available

So much will happen. Most of it unknown. Holding Pity parties because we have it tough is ridiculous.

You’ve also told me that the boomer generation had forgotten the war in 15 years, at the same time people here are rolling the last GFC into Covid as a double whammy, a 12 year gap.

Change is driven by doers. Not complainers. There are successful paths through challenging time’s and energy spent moving in that direction is more helpful than ‘The Boomers got to buy a house in exchange for doubling the amount of household hours worked, they were so lucky’

* Example : My friends family are already discussing ways to combine existing mortgages into a single entity and aggregate the risk across them all.
 
Last edited:

Ekkie Thump

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
3,892
Supports
Leeds United
with all the oddities around timing of death rate figures, what is the key day this week? looking at just today it looks like we're in the process of levelling off but i know some figures on some days aren't always the most accurate.
Tomorrow will probably be telling one way or the other. We've just had a bank holiday weekend and weekends tend to have a drop in deaths reported which are then filled in as the next week progresses. We might have 3 days worth of under reporting to fill in.
 

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
Tomorrow will probably be telling one way or the other. We've just had a bank holiday weekend and weekends tend to have a drop in deaths reported which are then filled in as the next week progresses. We might have 3 days worth of under reporting to fill in.
Yeah I can see tomorrow and Thursday being very, very bad sadly. Followed by a decline for a few days, and then the same next week - but I do think that within 1-2 weeks from now, the 'Peaks' will be getting noticeably smaller.
 

Ekkie Thump

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
3,892
Supports
Leeds United
This site is interesting.

Makes predictions re peak/duration of deaths/resources demand for various countries based on the data collected to date.
It's fecking terrible. 2 days worth of data caused it to drop its mean prediction for UK from 66k down to 37k. Its prior prediction now lies above its current upper confidence interval. It took Belgium 4 days to breach its prediction for where they'd be on August 4th, Italy will breach its upper confidence interval within 2 days.

One problem with it seems to be that it demands the data follow a bell curve. This is something that's just not being observed in reality.
 

nimic

something nice
Scout
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
31,418
Location
And I'm all out of bubblegum.
This site is interesting.

Makes predictions re peak/duration of deaths/resources demand for various countries based on the data collected to date.
Interesting site, though weirdly very wrong about Norway's ICU capacity, which makes it seem like there's already a shortage and going to be even more of one. In reality we've currently got 73 people in ICU, and it's been very slowly falling for a couple of weeks. It's the same story with corona-hospitalizations in general. Things could still change drastically, of course, but at the very least it's not a clear pattern of (exponential) growth.
 

Arruda

Love is in the air, everywhere I look around
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
12,584
Location
Azores
Supports
Porto
Within very little time it would begin to cause complete anarchy.
Nonsense. It may lead to some levels of oppression, not anarchy. Certainly not in countries with modern police forces and armed forces.

Most people will be afraid to join any forming riot. The few that don't care will be dealt with.
 

nimic

something nice
Scout
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
31,418
Location
And I'm all out of bubblegum.
@massi83

What’s your explanation for the extremely low death numbers in Gothenburg and Malmo then, why are they not so different to Helsinki?:confused:
According to google, Västra Götalands län alone has practically the same amount of deaths as Finland. It's clearly not a disaster like Stockholm, but the Swedish numbers are still higher than neighbouring countries even accounting for that.
 

Arruda

Love is in the air, everywhere I look around
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
12,584
Location
Azores
Supports
Porto
Have a read of the scenario you've just described. Does that scenario scare you, and is that a future you would want to be a part of? The army killing protesters in the streets. In other words, an ultraviolent police state.
I described nothing of that sort. That's your own imagination. I'm talking about the military doing police work, because police are already stretched and will need far more rotation than usual due to quarantines.

And, if western societies ever reach an extreme boiling point, it will most likely be responded to with oppression, not anarchy.

And I wish nothing of the sort. It just may have to be done. In my island Police is stretched thin imposing sanitary barriers between areas (fragmenting the island, which seems to be an effective strategy). One particular area was having problems due to low literacy and social problems. At the time we considered activating armed forces to help police in that area. It wasn't necessary in the end, aa people slowly got around to the need of staying home.

This has been done countless times, asking the army to help with fires and other natural disasters. Nothing strange about it.
 
Last edited:

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
Arruda was though, not you.

And I’m not putting them aside, they are an extremely important part of the figures of course And some thing that needs to be considered a mass failure in the countries they get hit hardest there.

Something that is not surprising and what is completely forgotten here when people try to discuss Sweden strategy is that Gothenburg which has a population similar to Dublin Lisbon Copenhagen Oslo has a very low death rate.

Why is that the case if the Swedish strategy is so wrong? Is it not just the case that more populated cities like Stockholm end up more fecked because they were already on the ”pretty fecked” path once Italy kicked off.

Or can anyone explain to me why Gothenburg, a city of 590,000 has had it so well considering Sweden’s non lockdown strategy is so poor?

Put it this way man. There's definitely some posters on here, nobody I'm specifically thinking of, but still, who WANT Sweden to fail.

Because if Sweden succeeds they've been talking shit for weeks and it'll make them wonder what exactly we've all been doing indoors for weeks on end. Now, don't get me wrong, I am not saying Sweden are going to succeed here - I hope to feck you do. But there are definitely people who want Sweden to fail and suffer 'like the rest of us'.
 

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
I described nothing of that sort. That's your own imagination. I'm talking about the military doing police work, because police are already stretched and will need far more rotation than usual due to quarantines.

And, if western societies ever reach an extreme boiling point, it will most likely be responded to with oppression, not anarchy.

Sounds lovely, boss.
 

Penna

Kind Moderator (with a bit of a mean streak)
Staff
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
49,683
Location
Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est.
Thanks, but I think that still only shows how many cases, not the deaths. I can see Bergamo has 10.391 cases, but not death number.
This is talking about the month of March, it was published on 1 April:
What the official figures don’t say. They don’t say that in March 2020 more than 5.400 people have died in Bergamo province, 4.500 of which due to coronavirus. Six times more than the previous year. Of only 2.060 of them, the «official» certified deaths caused by Covid-19 in the local hospitals (data as at yesterday), we know everything: age, gender, pre-existing conditions. We do not know anything about the other 2.500. Many of them are old people, who died at home or in assisted residential homes. In spite of the unmistakable symptoms, as recorded by physicians and relatives, they were never tested for the disease. On their death certificate you can just read: interstitial pneumonia.
https://www.ecodibergamo.it/stories...s-in-one-month-in-the-province-of_1347414_11/
 

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,296
Isn't there some promising talk on the ebola drug. There certainly needs to be a sticky plaster for the summer months just to give us all a bit of respite so hopefully it remains effective when the treatment groups gets scaled up.
Yea Remdesivir. They found it improved people two thirds of the time.

There was no control group though so we dont know if that was pure luck.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,902
Location
Somewhere out there
Put it this way man. There's definitely some posters on here, nobody I'm specifically thinking of, but still, who WANT Sweden to fail.

Because if Sweden succeeds they've been talking shit for weeks and it'll make them wonder what exactly we've all been doing indoors for weeks on end. Now, don't get me wrong, I am not saying Sweden are going to succeed here - I hope to feck you do. But there are definitely people who want Sweden to fail and suffer 'like the rest of us'.
The narrative for some (not all) has certainly changed from “Sweden is the next Italy/Spain, they are fecked” to something a little more intangible so early into a pandemic.
And still no one can give me an answer as to why such big cities in Sweden like Gothenburg are doing so well if this strategy is so doomed to fail.
The optimist in me says that Gothenburg is a shining example that we can keep schools open, that we can maintain natural social distance and good hygiene, and that we can keep this curve extremely flat.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,312
I read that too where we were very close, especially to a SARs vaccine until it became not necessary any more. SARs had a very high mortality rate (I believe > 10%) so would have been considered ultra dangerous at the time.

One thing I can't get my head around with this though is the coronavirus strains which cause the common cold. There must be a ton of money sitting there where people would happily pay to vaccinate themselves from the 2 weeks of illness per year, but the companies don't seem interested. There surely can't be any reason that a vaccine is not possible for certain coronavirus strains?

The reasoning that it's because there's so many strains also seems weird as that is exactly what they do with flu every year by developing a new one to hit the newer strains.
With the common cold there are too many strains, 200 or more. They're always circulating and when you get one it doesn't really give you any immunity against it or any other strain. With Covid19 there are only a handful if that.

The flu has less strains to begin with, only 10 or 20 of them cause the majority of infections, and they don't all circulate at once.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,914
Location
France
The narrative for some (not all) has certainly changed from “Sweden is the next Italy/Spain, they are fecked” to something a little more intangible so early into a pandemic.
And still no one can give me an answer as to why such big cities in Sweden like Gothenburg are doing so well if this strategy is so doomed to fail.
The optimist in me says that Gothenburg is a shining example that we can keep schools open, that we can maintain natural social distance and good hygiene, and that we can keep this curve extremely flat.
I can't give you a definitive answer but Toulouse which is about the same size is doing as well. My guess is simply that both cities are far enough from the source of the epidemy(within each country) and luckily avoided regional clusters. A particularly weird thing is Montpellier, there is a cluster 20km away(Maugio-Lunel) but nothing in the city, somehow it didn't spread efficiently.

Edit: And I forgot to mention that Nice avoided a cluster too despite its proximity and links with northern Italy.
 

massi83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
2,596
The narrative for some (not all) has certainly changed from “Sweden is the next Italy/Spain, they are fecked” to something a little more intangible so early into a pandemic.
And still no one can give me an answer as to why such big cities in Sweden like Gothenburg are doing so well if this strategy is so doomed to fail.
The optimist in me says that Gothenburg is a shining example that we can keep schools open, that we can maintain natural social distance and good hygiene, and that we can keep this curve extremely flat.
Gothenburg's numbers are rising. Depends at what rate they continue to increase. But I do think it is possible to keep it at managable leves with schools and restaurants open. With things you mention and masks and better testing and tracing and mobile apps. But still unsure myself.