SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,306
"People need to stop coming to shows and say test test as we simply do not have enough reagents to make enough tests".

Well, it's nice that someone is finally telling it like it is, at least.
Grim but the truth.

Funny as well when the newsanchor asked him what we coould do to prevent another peak and he kind of laughed and said there is nothing you can do. Another peak is a certainty.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,011
Out of curiosity, what information did they give us that we didn't already know? We know we're not going to see a sudden drop in cases or deaths and it's a marathon not a sprint. We know its too early for lockdown measures to be released/lessened. We know a vaccine isn't coming overnight. What exactly was the new information? For me, it was nothing but repeating the general information.
When Whitty spoke on Wednesday, it was the first time anyone at the briefings had made clear that strong social distancing measures would be in place all year. Too much of the media coverage and political briefings leave hope that we might get a relatively normal summer and at one of these reviews, Johnson, Raab or Hancock will announce life can return to normal.

As much as many of us who are well read on the subject feel that it is obvious that 2020 will be a year hopefully like no other, on Monday I had a more senior member of staff in my NHS team wanting us managers to begin discussing plans on our phased returned to the office and another more senior colleague who couldn't bring herself to read a Guardian article on the briefing, as she found the concept too upsetting. Most of the country is in denial or oblivious to the fact that anyone who can work remotely will likely do so for most, if not all, of 2020 and the winter months of 2021, and that we won't be watching United at Old Trafford in that time either.
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,305
Supports
Aston Villa
When Whitty spoke on Wednesday, it was the first time anyone at the briefings had made clear that strong social distancing measures would be in place all year. Too much of the media coverage and political briefings leave hope that we might get a relatively normal summer and at one of these reviews, Johnson, Raab or Hancock will announce life can return to normal.

As much as many of us who are well read on the subject feel that it is obvious that 2020 will be a year hopefully like no other, on Monday I had a more senior member of staff in my NHS team wanting us managers to begin discussing plans on our phased returned to the office and another more senior colleague who couldn't bring herself to read a Guardian article on the briefing, as she found the concept too upsetting. Most of the country is in denial or oblivious to the fact that anyone who can work remotely will likely do so for most, if not all, of 2020 and the winter months of 2021, and that we won't be watching United at Old Trafford in that time either.
The one today on testing was good although again I don't see much point in showing the graphs everyday now people have got into the lockdown habit.

Have to say though really this press conference announcing better roll out of testing should've been happening 2-3 weeks ago.

Journalists bar some good ones from the local news just keep on asking the same questions about when lockdown is ending.
 

Hound Dog

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
3,213
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Supports
Whoever I bet on
The guy from the netflix documentary Pandemic was saying he had an anti-body drug that could work. If you google it. It wont be available for a while though. Jacob Glanville is his name.

edit: https://www.irishmirror.ie/tv/netflix-pandemic-doctor-believes-hes-21799761
I think that we need to stop doing this to ourselves. So many coulds, mays maybes etc while not many genuinely unexpected things have happened for a month plus... Things have pretty much been going as predicted - slow and depressing.

I haven't slept for more than four hours in two+ weeks. I am not sure how I manage to stay functional, given that I manage a team of 10 software engineers and have two small kids (2-year-old and 2-month-old). I am shattered each evening, but then start reading news, hoping to breakthroughs, get upset, somehow manage to fall asleep around 4-5 AM, wake up around 7 and repeat. And in all this time, despite trying to twist stats and researches in any way possible, I am yet to find anything to suggest that the end game in not this lasting until well into the next year and the majority of us getting infected.

I might at least help myself by not following all the news, but I cannot stop myself.

At least I still have those Oxford guys who hope for a September vaccine to hold onto.
 
Last edited:

Balljy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
3,337
The mortality rate once on a ventilator from the initial tracking in NYC during March and very early April was 86% . That's basically a death sentence if it got to ventilator stage.

Edit - the study doesn't include patients who were still in hospital at the end date, so the survival rates would be higher overall, but still that's shocking.

https://arstechnica.com/science/202...utcomes-of-covid-19-patients-in-ny-hospitals/
 
Last edited:

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,861
Location
Krakow
There must be something in the water in all Balkan countries when it comes to this. The number of people who look rational but believe in all types of conspiracies is really huge. No surprise that the first article I saw about Bill Gates and COVID-19 came from Croatia.
Poland as well and Eastern countries in general I think. I’ve known several flat earthers here. All thought I was a complete moron for believing NASA. Apparently being a flat earther proves you have your own brain and can think independently.
 

Hound Dog

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
3,213
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Supports
Whoever I bet on
Poland as well and Eastern countries in general I think. I’ve known several flat earthers here. All thought I was a complete moron for believing NASA. Apparently being a flat earther proves you have your own brain and can think independently.
This I still have not encountered in real life.

What's their background? Are you sure they sre not just claiming to believe it in order to stand out?
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,861
Location
Krakow
This I still have not encountered in real life.

What's their background? Are you sure they sre not just claiming to believe it in order to stand out?
One is a guy I worked with, data scientist at my previous company. Not exactly a thick person otherwise. Another is a guy from my university, he always got easily excited about different things. He was going to be a billionaire one day because he purchased DasCoin. He believes every single conspiracy theory out there without exception. Others have been people I knew briefly, mostly through other people.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,741
Location
London
Poland as well and Eastern countries in general I think. I’ve known several flat earthers here. All thought I was a complete moron for believing NASA. Apparently being a flat earther proves you have your own brain and can think independently.
Yep, remember you mentioning that your brother is anti-vaxer too.

It could be a problem of the education system (like @Hound Dog mentioned), that people are taught more to memorize rather than develop critical thinking. And then with people who are not very educated (or are wrongly educated *), add social media there, and no surprise to see the number of people who believe in conspirative theories.

* I mean, I had to memorize entire poetry when I was in the school. The most annoying thing ever and absolutely despised that. While at the same time, the biology teacher skipped the part on sexual organs cause he was uncomfortable speaking about that. He did the evolution part, at least. I guess in Serbia and Poland the education system should be quite better than in Kosovo, but the basis is probably the same (as in most ex-communist countries). Obedience and memorization instead of critical thinking.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,149
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Generational divide
One approach that has been discussed by policymakers, and proposed by researchers such as those at Warwick University, involves a youth-first policy allowing for younger worker in their 20s and 30s who no longer live with their parents to return to work first.
While younger groups are not impervious to Covid-19, they are regarded as the most resilient. Such an approach has led some to joke there could even be a maximum drinking age in the bars that might open at the same time.
@Grinner

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...distancing-mean-for-uk?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
 

jymufc20

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
3,584
Location
planet earth

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,156
Location
Centreback
Australia is inching close to elimination with only a handful of new cases yesterday depite testing being ramped up even further.

The NRL is due to start again behind closed doors in a months time. Schools never closed, but most kids stayed home unless their parents were essential workers, and are now planning a phased return to the classroom. Most shops didn't close but pubs and restaurants will remain closed or take away only for some time. And until the rest of the world gets to a much better place our borders are going to have to remain locked down. Inter-state restrictions may be able to be lifted sooner though.
 

RK

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
16,103
Location
Attacking Midfield
I reckon that's bunk.

Fag-packet calculation of population future life expectancy for Italy death profile:

Age/deaths/future life
0-9/2/77.8
10-19/0/68.4
20-29/7/58.6
30-39/47/48.8
40-49/197/39.2
50-59/842/29.9
60-69/2515/21.2
70-79/6747/13.5
80-89/9171/7.3
90+/3056/3

Weighted average is c11 years. It's implausible that the future life expectancy of a Covid-19 victim isn't a lot lower.

Edit - reading further, it seems they calculate the normal age/gender-adjusted future life as 14 for men, but 13 taking into account underlying health conditions with the same penetration rate as the victims. The future life expectancy will be lower for the set of people that have underlying health conditions to the extent that getting covid-19 would prove fatal.
Yeah good point. Even if they've correctly modelled the specific average of each long-term condition (LTC), there's still a distribution to the severity of each specific LTC. It is logical that COVID-19 deaths are sampling from the tail of these distributions. I'm not sure it's even possible to control for that, broadly-speaking.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,156
Location
Centreback
I reckon that's bunk.

Fag-packet calculation of population future life expectancy for Italy death profile:

Age/deaths/future life
0-9/2/77.8
10-19/0/68.4
20-29/7/58.6
30-39/47/48.8
40-49/197/39.2
50-59/842/29.9
60-69/2515/21.2
70-79/6747/13.5
80-89/9171/7.3
90+/3056/3

Weighted average is c11 years. It's implausible that the future life expectancy of a Covid-19 victim isn't a lot lower.

Edit - reading further, it seems they calculate the normal age/gender-adjusted future life as 14 for men, but 13 taking into account underlying health conditions with the same penetration rate as the victims. The future life expectancy will be lower for the set of people that have underlying health conditions to the extent that getting covid-19 would prove fatal.
Any way you calculate it the vague notion that "Oh well most of them would have died very soon anyway" is rubbish. We are trying calculate how many years are lost, not how many days or weeks, as seems to be the mindset of those who think the old aren't giving up much by taking one for the team (or whatever the mindset is).
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,412
Supports
Chelsea
Just saw a woman in UK getting a shot of a vaccine as human trials begin.
How long will it take from here for a vaccine to be ready assuming all goes well?
One of the women actually working closely with the work says she's confident maybe around September.

I won't get my hopes up as a lot can go wrong but she wouldn't give that type of timeline if she wasn't relitevely confident, especially with the public actively searching for a scapegoat.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,156
Location
Centreback
Didn't think you were being serious to be honest. Not sure if you still are. I can't speak for evaporation, but regarding dispersion, the main challenge is that the droplets don't really always behave is obvious ways. There are many challenges. Warning, the spoilers below are lengthy and will probably make you want to sleep.

Only open this if you really, really want to read a little about droplet dispersion:
In some of the discussions I've mentioned above and also in some of these articles, they say statements such as "small droplets disperse easily" and "large droplets settle quickly". This is acceptable because broadly speaking it is true and it is okay for a wider audience not involved in the field. The devil is in the detail though. The reality is that it is much more complicated then this when the air is moving quite quickly (turbulent motion). You can't really say these statements anymore in this case because how the droplets disperse now additionally now depends on characteristics of the moving air. Or more specifically velocity fluctuations (momentum) imparted (transferred) to the droplets by the air.

Typically if the air is turbulent, the best way to describe this is as a superposition (an addition of sorts) of lots of different air movements, all of different shapes and sizes, all on top of one another. Think of it like a forest with trees (large scales), flowers (small scales) plants (medium scales) all on top of each other. It is a bit like that but the key difference is that the scales in the fluid are all entangled with eachother. One way to describe the large scales is called the "integral scale". Broadly speaking it measures very large distance air motion. If you are in a room, it will describe the characteristics of really large air motion which spans the entire room. But within this room, within the large scale air motion, don't forget we also have tiny air motions. These tiny, small motions we call "Kolmogorov scales".

The reason these two scales (Integral and Kolmogorov) are important is because they influence greatly how droplets disperse. We use a non-dimensional number (like how biologists use this R number) to describe, qualitatively how droplets move. This is called the Stokes number. It is a measure of how much intertia, i.e. resistance, that the droplet has to any momentum which is imparted onto it. Effectively it is calculated by a characteristic of the droplet divided by a characteristic of the gas. But unfortunately, we don't really know what is the best scale of the gas to use, is it either the Integral scale or the Kolmogorov scale. Whilst there is some agreement as to how to characterise the droplet, it is made complicated because sprays and clouds of droplets have different sizes, so ideally we want a single number describing the entire cloud, and not a number describing just one droplet in the cloud.

When the Stokes number is really small, we can then say, qualitatively, "small droplets disperse easily". This is the reason why we can do Particle Image Velocimetry, a technique used to measure either gas velocity or droplet velocity. You cannot measure size. Think of this like small dust grains moving with the wind.

When the Stokes number is very large, we can say "droplets settle quickly", or better still, they follow ballistic trajectories. This simply means they just basically ignore much of the surrounding air motion. Think of this like a cricket ball moving through a very light wind.

However, when the Stokes number ~ 1, the droplets behave in a strange way. They begin to form clusters in the flow. This is the same as clustering you get in machine learning. In essence, you get regions in the air flow where there are many droplets (clusters) and region in the air flow where there are few (voids). It is called "preferential concentration" in my field. Unfortunately we don't know the mechanisms as to why this occur though some have been proposed. The relevant point here is that there is experimental and simulation evidence to suggest that when the droplets form clusters, their settling velocity, i.e. how quickly the droplets settle, is enhanced! It could be that these droplets, when they get close together, just form a "super" droplet of sorts. I have no idea what the consequences of this effect are for evaporation. This preferential concentration effect is known to also enhance collisions, at least from what we can understand in CFD (computational fluid dynamics) simulations and its influence on the formation of rain in clouds is hotly debated.

So if you know the Stokes number, you can, at least qualitiatively, have some indication on how the droplets disperse. So what Stokes numbers do you have? If the air is very strong, the Kolmogorov scales get smaller. So if you study the dispersion of the droplets using those scales, you could in theory say all the droplets disperse easily.The majority of papers I've read use Kolmogorov scales rather than integral. But again I stress, it is very difficult to first, produce this Stokes number and secondly to try and get a representative Stokes number of the entire spray or cloud.

Unfortuately, if the droplets have initially a large moving velocity, another parameter must be considered as well. This is called the "settling parameter" although I don't see many authors use it at all. The need to use settling parameter is important because a large amount of energy or momentum is transferred to the droplets during sneezing/coughing. Therefore, at least initially, these droplets may ignore all the surrounding air simply because they are moving so quickly, they don't really have time to react to any of the motion. When the settling parameter, described in this way, is unity, the settling velocity of the droplets is enhanced as well! This is called the "crossing trajectories effect" and was described in part in the 1950's I believe. When the velocity of the droplet decays to a situation where they become well correlated with the air motion, you don't really need the settling parameter anymore because it is a function of the Stokes number in this case. Note that a lot of professors believe you only really need the Stokes number, so my understanding here is somewhat limited.

Again note that the settling parameter and Stokes number only give a qualitative indication of what happens. They can't tell you exactly where the droplets will go, just give an indication of roughly how they will disperse. To track exactly where the droplets go requires experiments or simulations.

There has been a lot of work in engineering in studies of particles or droplets in "simple idealised turbulence" i.e. turbulence you typically only get in laboratory, but less fundamental studies in turbulent flows you encounter in nature and engineering. However, a lot of work comes from combustion, studying spray ignition in engines and how the spray behaves in that flow environment but this isn't my field. A lot of simulations have been carried out in cloud physics as I mentioned above. The problem is that whilst we want to believe all turbulent flows are the same, there is some belief that they are not. So a flow in the pipe must be treated differently to the flow of air in your room etc. We just don't know if turbulent flows have any universal properties which are true for all engineering and natural applications. So just because when you sneeze in a room the droplets behave one way, it may be different if you sneeze outdoors where the air motion is different.

The reason why you need to be careful with CFD is that the methods used, RANS and LES don't simulate all the flow using the Navier Stokes (NS) equations of motion for fluid dynamics. Note that the NS equations are simply Newton's second law applied to moving fluids. RANS actually uses an averaged Navier stokes equation and this requires turbulence modelling - i.e. adhoc "best guess" methods - to fix the averaged equations so that they can be simulated. No one knows if the various turbulence models are valid but it is cheap to run and can give results which give "the overall picture" for air flows without droplets. LES does simulate some of the equations, but it cuts of at a certain point and simply models the rest - it claims beyond that point the flow behaves in a way described by a model. Guess where that model is - the Kolmogorov scales, so it isn't clear that you can use LES for problems with droplets because it isn't clear if the models really describe the Kolmogorov scales accurately or not. DNS (Direct Numerical Simulation) simulates all the details of the flow and is in theory the best simulation. But it has a very high computational cost. I'm not sure what they've done in the video, I am skeptical they managed to do DNS but you never know.

Even if you manage to get a DNS you still have to consider how you describe the small droplets. The majority of simulations just say the droplets are "points", so that they don't have an appreciable size. The majority of simulations ignore any "back influence" of the droplets on the air flow. So in other words, if the air flow causes droplets to move, the droplets themselves may change locally the air flow! There may also be collisions between droplets, irrespective of the clustering phenomenon I described above which are ignored and local flow distortions caused by the droplets. If you read the spoiler below, these collisions can lead to droplets of different sizes, which of course may be important. Finally, if the droplets are larger than the Kolmogorov scale air motions, their dynamics is different and there are very few simulations which look at these droplets - most focus on particles/droplets smaller than the Kolmogorov scale. Also note that if the particles or droplets have a density smaller than the density of the surrounding air, the dynamics are different as well.

You may ask why not carry out experiments and brute force our way through this. Laser experiments are quite difficult to carry out. The laser must be aligned with its internal/external optics. If a camera is used, it may need to be synced with the laser. 3D experiments in multiphase flows are exceedingly rare. Tracking individual droplets, in particular their collisions, is generally difficult. So whilst there are some good experiments, they are lagging behind considerably to where we need to be. Couple this with the issues with CFD and this is why particle/droplet dispersion in turbulence is a pretty tricky problem.

Note I've also ignored temperature affects, called thermophoresis and turbulence intensity (the air motion is stronger in one location than another) affects, called turbophoresis. I've not studied these effects but they can also influence particle/droplet dispersion. Note also I don't have a background in simulations, so some of that knowledge may be out of date. Note that for the benefit of this discussion, solid particles disperse in the same way as liquid droplets, with the exception of the discussion on collision outcomes.

Only open this if you really want to read about droplet collisions:
When a droplet collides with a solid surface, the amount of liquid content that remains on the surface depends on various properties. This includes properties of the droplet like its size and velocity, its surface tension and viscosity. Conditions of the surface include surface roughness, how wet it is, temperature etc. The surrounding gas also has an influence, including viscosity of the gas and temperature effects etc. As far as I understand it, the reason why droplets of oil move about in a hot pan is because when the droplet touches the surface, the oil in contact with the hot surface evaporates so quickly that it creates a protective layer, preventing the rest of the droplet from evaporating. This is called the "Leidenfrost effect".

So why is this important for the spread of viruses? If you exhale droplets through sneezing/coughing, those droplets may collide with a surface. In some cases, some of the liquid will break up from the surface and re-enter the air. We call this "secondary atomization" and the small droplets which re-enter the air are called "satellite" droplets. The liquid remaining on the surface will then remain there until it evaporates. I posted some images of these processes in the stickied thread. Note that a spray of droplets colliding on a surface may have different behaviour than individual droplets colliding on the same surface. This is because in a spray of droplets, as one droplet collides onto a surface, whilst its collision is still taking place, another droplet may collide in the same location, and this can change the outcome of original collision. It may be a similar issue with the cloud of droplets produced from sneezing/coughing.

You can also get droplets colliding in mid-air. Again the outcome of the collision depends on various processes as well as some of the processes I described in the previous spoiler. In essence, when two droplets collide, you may get all their liquid forming into one larger droplet. This type of collision is called "coalesence". Alternatively you may get other collisions which lead to a larger droplet, but also some smaller droplets too. There are several collision outcomes which lead to this type of collision. There could be mid-air collisions, at least initially, when the cloud of droplets is produced from sneezing/coughing, because the droplets may move with different velocities due to their differences in size. Alternatively mid-air collisions may occur because the surrounding air around one droplet may differ to the surroinding air around another, leading to those droplets having a different droplet velocity and possibly leading to collision.

A word on nanofluids:
These are fluids with particles that are of the size of nanometer(s). According to colleagues I spoke to, they aren't well understood, but they were researching them to investigate their heat transfer properties. Supposedly for one type of nanoparticle at least, it significantly enhances how much heat can transfer through a liquid. I don't know anything about how nanoparticles move in a fluid, but Brownian motion will almost certainly be important here. Knowledge, at least in this part of nanofluids, remains limited. The reason I've mentioned them is in case the virus can be transmitted in nanosized droplets or whatever - I don't know.
What do you think of the advice about 1.5m or 2m spacing? Obviously there is still risk at those distances but how much do you think it reduces the risk? Is it appropriate advice?
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,156
Location
Centreback
Bill Gates - like God - works in mysterious ways.

Bill Gates: a pandemic is gonna happen in the next few years that is gonna kill more than 10 million people. Countries should invest in defending against microbes, not against missiles.
Nutters: You see, Bill Gates caused this pandemic. He even left clues about that.

Bill Gates: The Earth is overpopulated, and the main reason for this is because in countries where the child's mortality is high, people make too many kids (because by doing so they ensure that some of the kids survive). If we vaccinate everyone against polio, measles and other bad diseases, we will reduce the mortality in these countries, ensuring that so much pain never happens, while on the other hand ensure that the population does not go out of control and destroys Earth. The way to do this is to vaccinate everyone so people don't die from diseases, emancipate women so their role is not only to make kids, and ensure that everyone has a dignified and comfortable life. If we do this, Earth's population won't ever reach 11 billion, cause countries will reach some equilibrium (like Europe/US/China etc).
Nutters: Bill Gates want to vaccinate everyone so he puts a chip on us and then kills us and/or he sterilizes* us.

Bill Gates: I have enough money, so I can spend them (at a loss) making factories for vaccines, that at the moment we have a vaccine, we don't need to wait to build the factories, instead we can start immediately producing it.
Nutters: You see, it is his vaccine, the vaccine he developed.

* Pretty shitty plan, considering that even sterile people can have kids nowadays with the ADN technology. But I guess, he'll first use the chip to kill the doctors who give that service.
Nutters will nut.
 

nimic

something nice
Scout
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
31,539
Location
And I'm all out of bubblegum.
Sure, it is from Revelation 6. The rider of the white horse with the crown(Corona) and the bow the ancient Greek word (Toxon) can also mean a biological agent, or a virus. The opening ceremony of the 2012 Olympic games in London actually contains many clues to what is going on. There is a plan behind all of this. Go to youtube and search for "olympic games opening ceremony 2012" and take your pick from the results.
This is quite possible the single stupidest thing I've ever read on RedCafe. And I've seen a "climate change expert" who didn't realize he was reading a graph entirely backwards, and an alien abduction believer who thought that taking ketamine opened him to the truth.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,156
Location
Centreback
This is quite possible the single stupidest thing I've ever read on RedCafe. And I've seen a "climate change expert" who didn't realize he was reading a graph entirely backwards, and an alien abduction believer who thought that taking ketamine opened him to the truth.
We did once have a poster who believed that statues were drinking milk.
 

RK

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
16,103
Location
Attacking Midfield
Any way you calculate it the vague notion that "Oh well most of them would have died very soon anyway" is rubbish. We are trying calculate how many years are lost, not how many days or weeks, as seems to be the mindset of those who think the old aren't giving up much by taking one for the team (or whatever the mindset is).
I agree that we shouldn't be trying to downplay the number of years/lives lost, but it's important for decision-makers to assess the toll of the virus in comparison to alternative strategies. E.g. years lost to the lack of cancer diagnoses and treatments. Weak analysis could have consequences.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,156
Location
Centreback
I agree that we shouldn't be trying to downplay the number of years/lives lost, but it's important for decision-makers to assess the toll of the virus in comparison to alternative strategies. E.g. years lost to the lack of cancer diagnoses and treatments. Weak analysis could have consequences.
And the other consideration is that allowing the virus to run free reduces the capacity to do other medical procedures rather than increase it.

Australia is beginning elective surgery very soon as they have virtually eliminated the virus.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,741
Location
London
This is quite possible the single stupidest thing I've ever read on RedCafe. And I've seen a "climate change expert" who didn't realize he was reading a graph entirely backwards, and an alien abduction believer who thought that taking ketamine opened him to the truth.
You don't like the religious conspiracy-theorist end of world doom-mongering nutters? What is wrong with you?
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,156
Location
Centreback
Australia is inching close to elimination with only a handful of new cases yesterday depite testing being ramped up even further.

The NRL is due to start again behind closed doors in a months time. Schools never closed, but most kids stayed home unless their parents were essential workers, and are now planning a phased return to the classroom. Most shops didn't close but pubs and restaurants will remain closed or take away only for some time. And until the rest of the world gets to a much better place our borders are going to have to remain locked down. Inter-state restrictions may be able to be lifted sooner though.
That said things are still precarious as R is still only just below 1 in most states and above in 1. Partly because infections are so low (it is easier to lower R when you have a large number of infected and an R above 0 than it is with a very small number of infected and a R already below 1).

 

RK

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
16,103
Location
Attacking Midfield
And the other consideration is that allowing the virus to run free reduces the capacity to do other medical procedures rather than increase it.

Australia is beginning elective surgery very soon as they have virtually eliminated the virus.
Absolutely yeah, COVID-19 needs to be under some sort of control as priority. Down the line it's a balancing act.

I think we've been fortunate in Aus. My gut says the major factors have been inherent characteristics of the country/population rather than decision-making. But the response has been above-average compared to other countries. Agreed with what you said a couple of days ago about the gov feeling the need to step up after the bushfires.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,156
Location
Centreback
Absolutely yeah, COVID-19 needs to be under some sort of control as priority. Down the line it's a balancing act.

I think we've been fortunate in Aus. My gut says the major factors have been inherent characteristics of the country/population rather than decision-making. But the response has been above-average compared to other countries. Agreed with what you said a couple of days ago about the gov feeling the need to step up after the bushfires.
We do like a bit of authoritarianism despite protests to the contrary. How else can you explain Peter Dutton not being lynched on sight?
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,149
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
"Construction and manufacturing are likely to be at the forefront of a phased return that would be based on a traffic-light system, particularly given the pressure from Conservative MPs"

What are they talking about ? Construction and manufacturing never stopped.
Seriously?! They stopped in Ireland. Surely they stopped in the UK too? (with maybe a few exceptions)
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
if that happens then we may as well lift most of the restrictions. People will take the piss and have massive Gatherings and parties etc When “seeing” family.
A lot of people are doing that anyway. Next door to me have been regularly having family and friends round for barbecues and drinks, etc. Their English isn't great so possibly they've misunderstood the guidelines.
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
Just read they are testing nicotine patches on some sick in France. Because of the low number of smokers seen infected.
My dad never used to get colds (a corona virus) etc when's he smoked like a chimney but does since he quit, so this doesn't surprise me.