One Night Only
Prison Bitch #24604
Get production / construction back up and running basically.
Retail staying closed till next phase?
Retail staying closed till next phase?
Jingoism in the absence of substance. If we're still getting 4k infections a day and that's just the ones we know about, that ride downhill may be with no brakes and blindfolded.Language indicative of this government and the British exceptionalism.
That graph was an absolute nonsense. The idea it’s going to be a smooth ride down to step 3 is ridiculous. Steps 1 and 2 will ensure we will see spikes and reverting back to previous phases.
It’s what I was hoping for yes, strange we could possibly go to the pub before going to family.No, which is what I think people were hoping to hear. Still lockdown outside of household family I believe.
"Now boswas johnstones is dribbling"Felt weird watching that speech on Sky Sports news. Kept waiting for Paul Merson to provide analysis
The NYT article describes the question as "unsettled" and the Nature article outlines a number of different papers that present different perspectives from different fields so I share the scepticism about any one finding. I think the only reasonable position to take from the information available is that we can't say for certain that economic recessions = more deaths.Yes. And not just is it more valuable than life, it is beyond human agency. If it wasn't, you could decide that the population needs x amount of food and other essentials and y amount of consumer goods and tailor production and distribution to match that for the duration of this pandemic, while slowing down o stopping other work.
I've seen that paper before but I'm a little skpetical about this since the great depression death rate (due to things like starvation) did climb up but apparently wasn't recorded properly. of course, that was a prolonged collapse over years.
And from your article:
There is clearly some number of months beyond which a shutdown does more harm than good, but I think we're not close to it yet, and better planning could help extend it.
I guess if you can both bump into each other at park and sit two meters apart ?Didn’t say anything about visiting family did he?
I have had couple of emails through over the weekend advising to continue working from home for the time being but yeah I can imagine some employers are itching to get going. Just hoping they have made it safe for everyone.Feels very rushed employers will force staff back
Of course it will and they know that. The strategy has always been herd immunity.I feel like this will make things worse.
I feel he hasn't really changed anything to be honest.I feel like this will make things worse.
It got them elected. If it aint broke....Jingoism in the absence of substance. If we're still getting 4k infections a day and that's just the ones we know about, that ride downhill may be with no brakes and blindfolded.
Yep mine is itching to get people back he keeps sending video messages and is chomping at the bit to have people back, I'm currently wfh but can see people being forced back into the officeI guess if you can both bump into each other at park and sit two meters apart ?
I have had couple of emails through over the weekend advising to continue working from home for the time being but yeah I can imagine some employers are itching to get going. Just hoping they have made it safe for everyone.
Oh i absolutely agree that we should not just "get on with it", so like i said i agree with the rest of you post.The above comes from professors at my medical school and doctors in my family.
It's still a very novel disease. We dont even have a full grasping of its pathology.
Ofcourse the above may not be true but serves to highlight we still dont understand enough about the disease to just "get on with it"
Thats true, and i would like my children not to catch it also, but for now there is nothing that supports that children get anything else than a mild disease and so far nothing to point to that they get much complications in the future. That might change when we learn more of course, but so far the signs are "good" for children with Covid-19.For now. But life's a lot longer than the last 3 months, and we don't know what the long term implications are of ever having this disease even if you get through the initial infection without any/many symptoms.
If I had children, I definitely would prefer they were in the percentage of people that never caught this at any point irrespective of their current risk profile. Same for my family and friends.
Prolixity is a nice word, thanks for expanding my vocab!Johnson's prolixity is sure second to none in politics.
Garden centres were one of the first things to reopen in other countries, too.I don't get it either tbh, they're hardly essential, but the two nearest me are almost completely outdoors tbf.
Same here.I feel he hasn't really changed anything to be honest.
Thing is, you can work from home so keep doing that, if you have been WFH for this long, it's obviously working. Employers who now force WFH workers back are going to be liable if anyone in the office becomes sick.Yep mine is itching to get people back he keeps sending video messages and is chomping at the bit to have people back, I'm currently wfh but can see people being forced back into the office
That was bloody funny!I cannot believe Beth Rigby just said you can “go swimming in an outdoor pond” from Wednesday
Unless productivity has dropped for you guys I don't why you would want people back in the office, WFH will be the way forward for so many of us so he / she needs to adapt with the times.Yep mine is itching to get people back he keeps sending video messages and is chomping at the bit to have people back, I'm currently wfh but can see people being forced back into the office
Indeed they should be. If I get forced in I'll try my best to argue it and say I've got the set up now and the advice is to wfh if you canThing is, you can work from home so keep doing that, if you have been WFH for this long, it's obviously working. Employers who now force WFH workers back are going to be liable if anyone in the office becomes sick.
Apparently people miss the "office banter" I dont. Not a reason to get people back yet imo or at least give them the option and get back just those furloughedUnless productivity has dropped for you guys I don't why you would want people back in the office, WFH will be the way forward for so many of us so he / she needs to adapt with the times.
Always seems like a control thing to me. Our managers have been fair they told us to WFH the week before the govt did and said they will review this at the end of May as the latest stance. Still you know deep down they want us back in as soon as it is realistic.Unless productivity has dropped for you guys I don't why you would want people back in the office, WFH will be the way forward for so many of us so he / she needs to adapt with the times.
Yes and that will be the problem. Reciepe for disaster. Not very clear at all. I assume it’s stay as you are and only your own immediate family you live with and not anyone else.Didn’t say anything about visiting family did he?
Was full of gems like this. Pure waffle.“When we began, we hadn’t seen anything like this before” eh? What about China?
So people could go to work with questionable hygiene colleagues but not see family...Yes and that will be the problem. Reciepe for disaster. Not very clear at all. I assume it’s stay as you are and only your own immediate family you live with and not anyone else.
I've been reading Evelyn Waugh- he's great for learning new words!Prolixity is a nice word, thanks for expanding my vocab!
My 5 and 4-year-old kids have been stuck indoors for more than a month. On the rare occasions that they do go out they wear masks. They constantly wash hands. For a long time I've believed that young kids developed their immune systems by being exposed to germs. Is this true? And if so, won't that mean mankind is raising a generation of immune-compromised kids?
I'm of course exaggerating here. But if this super hygienic life goes on for a few years then this could become a thing, no?
dirt is good!Yes it's true. Kids needs to play with dirt, dirty dogs, etc, to develope a strong immune system.
Those germphobic parents that keep everything ultra super clean, are doing a disservice to their kids immunological system.
It’s a communications failure.So people could go to work with questionable hygiene colleagues but not see family...