You mean in the same way that patting each other on the back about how reasonable and logical you are, as opposed to the Ole ****, does?
I like how you just shovel all the blame for why this thread is a shitshow over on the posters that support Ole, ignoring the absolute rancid piss that gets sprayed all over this thread when we have a poor start to a game.
But here, a few quotes. These are only ones I've responded to, because those were the only ones I could be arsed to find. I've anonymised them, but you're free to google them to confirm their veracity.
(said during our last league game against West Ham)
(said when Sheffield equalized after 90 minutes at Bramall Lane last season)
(not as bad as the other two, I'll admit, but none the less an example of a poster believing us losing is a good thing if it means Ole get's the sack)
Fair play for actually providing quotes. That's all I'm asking. I'm not questioning whether those posts exist because I know they do, it's just that people will have you believe that everyone who doesn't think Ole is the man to take us forward actually wants the
club to fail. Now, your selection is obviously based on what you've responded to, but in a forum that has 40,000 members and you being the only one providing quotes (from last season, no less) indicates that it's a pretty small minority.
In any case, this is a place to post your opinion and if you feel that the club will be better off in the short to medium to long term if the manager's replaced, it's hardly an indicator that someone should support another club or is a horrible person.
With regards to your other point, there's no doubt that people (myself included) are entrenched in the Ole out camp as well. I do realise that I look at this game and come to the conclusion that the game was won by Bruno's brilliance. I do realise that I look at McTominay passing the ball backwards in the first half and draw the conclusion that Ole doesn't make him pass it forward (until Bruno comes in) and use it as a stick to beat him with. However, you can disagree on all of these things without resorting to name calling. It's not about being logical or anything, it's about the fact that I don't think it's reasonable for anyone to be called a "sad pathetic cnut" for posting an opinion on a board that has an explicit rule saying "criticise the post, not the poster". I mean, we're not resorting to name-calling despite obviously being of different opinions, are we?