Despite it being silly given the context, I find it odd that the term is just accepted as being accepted there, to be honest. Just because it's the done thing there doesn't mean it's A ok does it?
That is what I think too. Sometime it is better to just let it go.Prepare to be disappointed then. In life you learn when to fight a battle and when not to, you have to see the bigger picture.
I think if lessons are to be learned then anything written will have to be vetted first.Most of em seem to leave the pics to a social media manager, but a lot of their stories seem to be their own.
Jose is not in charge. So I doubt that.This will backfire on LFC-FA as it will galvanise our squad into "us against the world" mentality and drive us towards winning the league.
I think what you are trying to say is - JACKPOT!
The Villa-game he wouldnt have started
The City-game he wouldnt have started
The Watford-game - we wont need him anyway
Villa, City and WatfordAt the moment, he misses Man City, Watford, Burnley right? If the City game is postponed, he'll miss the game at Anfield.
How is this a 3 game ban whilst B Silva was a 1 game ban?
I doubt if the squad will view this as an injustice.Jose is not in charge. So I doubt that.
Having said that, we must show our anger by smashing Villa
He can play Villa tomorrow as we have until the 4th to respond I thought? If we respond today does that mean he misses tomorrow?Villa, City and Watford
If City game gets postponed, then Burnley.
Ah I missed the Burnley game being slotted in. Bet Klopp is calling for a 2 week circuit break alreadywell we can afford one of them to get called off, but it doesn't leave much wriggle room.
Cavani was charged with "improper conduct bringing game into disrepute" and "aggravated breach for implying colour/race/ethnic origin" while Silva was charged with "bringing game into disrepute" onlyHow is this a 3 game ban whilst B Silva was a 1 game ban?
Well if it helps to win our games, then it should.I doubt if the squad will view this as an injustice.
Didn't United already say we have accepted it?He can play Villa tomorrow as we have until the 4th to respond I thought? If we respond today does that mean he misses tomorrow?
I was under the assumption the ban is effective from the 4th in this case.
What are you talking about? I'm sure the FA board are a culturally sensitive and diverse group...Foreigner uses word in friendly way on social media in his own language that is apparently culturally acceptable where he is from...I mean I can see why it’s an issue and that you would want to dissuade players from using such words but dishing out fines/bans with no thought of context is just a recipe for disaster further down the line.
Not sure, but probably the same reason why victims can't get a player like Mings sentenced behind bars from what he does on a football pitch.This will sound stupid but how FA can ban you for something which you did in your private time?
It seems to be a mix these days. Some posts are clearly from the players, and some are from a PR or marketing management team. A lot of Bruno's stuff seems authentic, for example.Most of em seem to leave the pics to a social media manager, but a lot of their stories seem to be their own.
If City game will not be postponedSo he's out the next league, league up, and FA cup matches only, and should be available for Pool yes ?
I too am not surprised by the ruling but we can argue if a nation of English speakers misinterpret Latin Spanish words, should you be punished? Interpretation "conveys meaning of the spoken word from one language to another"No surprise the rules are clear and this was always going to be the outcome.
We know it wasn't intended as anything racially but it's how it is interpreted here and we can't argue.
This will sound stupid but how FA can ban you for something which you did in your private time?
What are you talking about? I'm sure the FA board are a culturally sensitive and diverse group...
The most hilarious ban was Rooney and Scholes ban.Feck off, the whole FA are a bunch of jokers! This reminds me of the time Rooney was punished for swearing in front of a camera during a goal celebration, don't remember what game it was exactly.
Perfect timing as usual, Ighalo is out of the door and we have no back-up striker.
No surprise the rules are clear and this was always going to be the outcome.
We know it wasn't intended as anything racially but it's how it is interpreted here and we can't argue.
I too am not surprised by the ruling but we can argue if a nation of English speakers interpret Latin Spanish words. Interpretation "conveys meaning of the spoken word from one language to another"
If we spoke our own form of Spanish e.g. Castellano and the Latin American words were interpreted different then fine, but we are not Spanish speakers here so how are we interpreting Latin American languages wrongly? Is it possible that English speakers don't actually understand how Spanish works?
Despite what you think of the ban, they waited until he was fit to apply it. Feels like the time they banned Rooney for swearing all over again