pauldyson1uk
Full Member
OH Behave , no cry babies in here today, the discussion has been pretty decent, well it wasI see the UK cry babies are still here!
OH Behave , no cry babies in here today, the discussion has been pretty decent, well it wasI see the UK cry babies are still here!
Yep, if you're not sure about something before it's implemented, then you must continue to be against it even after it's demonstrated to be a good thing. Because if there is one thing we don't have enough of in this world, it's people doubling down on wrong opinions.This is a very level-headed way to react to a driver changing their mind about something after it saves lives.
Surely it's a good thing he changed his mind after seeing it work? Or should he continue to think its bad?
There you go. Spells it out clearly.
I don't think the Norris / Le Clerc incident is the same. Don't think you can apply normal corner rules to a chicane either. Don't care too much because I'm not a big fan of either driver but I do reckon Verstappen is more to blame here.
You ok mate? finally accepting Max is a wreckless driver?I see the UK cry babies are still here!
That was funny.Loved that bit where Toto celebrates Bottas overtaking then realises he didn’t make it stick.
Damon Hill, former world championWhat's his name saying Max may of done it on purpose.
Same. I'd say today was 60-40 Max's fault.I had Silverstone as 60-40 Lewis deserved penalty.
plenty were against it at first, including Max and Seb all changed their minds, are they all pricks also !Hamilton in shock U-Turn - what a prick.
His Belgian connection + the fact that most F1 fans I know are tired of Lewis winning means that they want Max to win yeah. I don't particularly dislike him or anything but it's true that such incidents aren't isolated cases throughout his career, he needs to be a better decision-maker at times and realize that he's not racing alone, no one is gonna give him anything and that he might be playing with his opponent's safety sometims. Not saying Lewis is exempt from those things, but imo it seems like Max is more involved in stuff like that and that's just a pity.I thought every Belgium and Holland rally behind Max.
reckless? i wouldn’t call landing your car on someone’s head, then trying to accelerate off their head, then getting out of the car without even checking on that person’s head, reckless.You ok mate? finally accepting Max is a wreckless driver?
Correct.I think if max was going into anyone else he would have bailed but he benefited from taking out Lewis
Did he know though? Its not like the cars have rear camera or big mirrors to see where his rear end hit Hamilton car.reckless? i wouldn’t call landing your car on someone’s head, then trying to accelerate off their head, then getting out of the car without even checking on that person’s head, reckless.
So you suggest he thought his car was levitating?Did he know though? Its not like the cars have rear camera or big mirrors to see where his rear end hit Hamilton car.
of course he knew, what did he think his car was resting on so far up , his ego !Did he know though? Its not like the cars have rear camera or big mirrors to see where his rear end hit Hamilton car.
People were saying Max tried to kill Hamilton. That’s not a decent discussion.OH Behave , no cry babies in here today, the discussion has been pretty decent, well it was
Who said that?People were saying Max tried to kill Hamilton. That’s not a decent discussion.
I was working only thing I have seen is just reply of the crash.... I'm not suggesting anything, just asking a simple question.So you suggest he thought his car was levitating?
who said that ?People were saying Max tried to kill Hamilton. That’s not a decent discussion.
I don't think anybody said he tried to kill him. Damien Hill said he deliberately took him out and Jonny Herbert agreed with him and some on here agreed with that.People were saying Max tried to kill Hamilton. That’s not a decent discussion.
I don’t think it was on this forum I read it. Apologies. Tom van Persie did say he nearly killed him though which I wouldn’t class as decent discussion.I don't think anybody said he tried to kill him. Damien Hill said he deliberately took him out and Jonny Herbert agreed with him and some on here agreed with that.
Di Resta is off his rocker.This is fun with the Sky team strongly disagreeing. Damon vs Di Resta.
an observation and without the Halo it would be correct, so because of one comment , its not a decent discussionI don’t think it was on this forum I read it. Apologies. Tom van Persie did say he nearly killed him though which I wouldn’t class as decent discussion.
The car did impact his head. If it wasn't for the halo he might have been killed.I don’t think it was on this forum I read it. Apologies. Tom van Persie did say he nearly killed him though which I wouldn’t class as decent discussion.
Mate, you might as well just stop this bullshit. It’s transparent as feck, you’re simply just embarrassing yourself at this point. You prefer Max to Lewis. As do others in this thread. And as do others the other way around. It’s perfectly fine. There’s no need to fake objectivity.They both are. I'm not fan of neither of them.
Probably because he was stood right next to Lewis' car watching him try to reverse out.
As accidents go Silverstone was a massive crash. This was an awkward low speed crash. Trying to equate the two is absurd.
But that’s not Verstappen killing Hamilton though is it?an observation and without the Halo it would be correct, so because of one comment , its not a decent discussion
How is it not? Doesn't say anything about intent, guilt or blameBut that’s not Verstappen killing Hamilton though is it?
You wouldn't class an accurate statement as decent discussion? His tyres made contact with Lewis' head, that isn't far away from doing serious damage.I don’t think it was on this forum I read it. Apologies. Tom van Persie did say he nearly killed him though which I wouldn’t class as decent discussion.
Accept my opinion as fact or you're a fanboyNot opinions, objective facts.
Max was stood next to Lewis in his car trying to drive away. Fact. He can see he's fine. Fact. He didn't see his tyre hit Lewis' helmet. Fact.
In Silverstone Max went backwards into a wall at 180mph. Facht.
If you can't accept that these are objective facts then you're just another deluded fanboy.
Sorry which of those facts are not facts?Accept my opinion as fact or you're a fanboy
One a world champion, one a nobodyThis is fun with the Sky team strongly disagreeing. Damon vs Di Resta.
How is it not? Doesn't say anything about intent
Maybe it’s a translation thing then. Anyway thank god for the Halo.You wouldn't class an accurate statement as decent discussion? His tyres made contact with Lewis' head, that isn't far away from doing serious damage.
I am not normally a fan of Paul, but today he has been OK , to say he is a nobody is a tad harsh.One a world champion, one a nobody
Rafa is that you?Not opinions, objective facts.
Max was stood next to Lewis in his car trying to drive away. Fact. He can see he's fine. Fact. He didn't see his tyre hit Lewis' helmet. Fact.
In Silverstone Max went backwards into a wall at 180mph. Fact.
If you can't accept the above it's maybe a sign you're a bit of a deluded fanboy.