At Silverstone Lewis had already backed out on that first lap, when Lewis was committed down the inside max could have avoided. The key point is this: Max has not once done a single thing to avoid hitting Lewis this season, Lewis has had to do so probably 6 or 7 times.You might have had a point except at Silverstone Lewis did what Max did today. Both made a move with a low chance of success which caused a crash. Today Max could have pulled out to avoid the crash, at Silverstone it was Lewis. Then everyone was praising Lewis for "holding his ground", strange how nobody is praising Max now that the tables have turned. Imagine if Max could have carried on and Lewis hadn't. There would have been riots
Exactly this. There are many examples of this.At Silverstone Lewis had already backed out on that first lap, when Lewis was committed down the inside max could have avoided. The key point is this: Max has not once done a single thing to avoid hitting Lewis this season, Lewis has had to do so probably 6 or 7 times.
What do you mean this year? This is Lewis his entire career.Both Max and Lewis are cry babies. They have both been so annoying this year. Always whining and complaining.
The tone of that tweet is very in keeping with this thread. They can't possibly just not have seen or been mistaken, THEY'RE LYING TO YOUR FACE!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yeah true but I’ve been following F1 more closely this year so I see it more often.What do you mean this year? This is Lewis his entire career.
Libel and slander!The tone of that tweet is very in keeping with this thread. They can't possibly just not have seen or been mistaken, THEY'RE LYING TO YOUR FACE!
It is. They've been hyping him up and proclaiming he's a future world champion and the one who'll break all the age record for being the youngest winner/pole winner/ champion and just encouraging him to be as reckless as possible.I think red bull are making it worse for Verstappen too. They keep feeding his ego and making him seem never in the wrong. They don’t come out and say it’s a mistake and they constantly make him think the other person is in the wrong.
Just look at his most recent post, even after being given a penalty for the incident he still says he’s not given space
the stupid thing is he literally never gives anybody space when fighting, so ironic.
Love much reciprocated coming from someone who lived in Oosterhout, not too far from Eindhoven I guess. Still remember the PSV of '86We love you too!
That's not the point is it, low speed in F1 is still quicker than the speed limit on the motorways. He caused an accident that could have cost someone their life.From Max's perspective it absolutely is a very low speed crash.
His helmet is bolted into a HANS, he cannot turn and see what's going on at the rear of his car. It's completely impossible for him to know how close Lewis came to having a tyre squash him.
Any objective person would look at how his car bounced up off a sausage curb and figure out pretty easily that it obviously wasn't on purpose, and any suggestion it was says a lot more about the person suggesting it frankly. You can argue about risk vs reward and giving space and bailing out, but the move was a perfectly valid thing to try, which was also the universal opinion of the team principles asked about it including Toto.That's not the point is it, low speed in F1 is still quicker than the speed limit on the motorways. He caused an accident that could have cost someone their life.
The fact you've got a former F1 champion question whether he might have done it on purpose (be it "payback" or to stop someone scoring points), plus getting a grid penalty from the FIA says to me Max was completely in the wrong.
Not so sure about that because Lando was just holding station and had previously said that Riccardo was too slow.Ricciardo had it under control. Can't see how Max would have got past him even with a good stop. Lando wouldn't have finished 2nd though most likely.
Except Max and Red Bull raised hell about Lewis not backing out in Silverstone. Max knows he should've backed out at the first corner in Monza, it's incredibly tight, you have to go over the curbs unless you've won the corner beforehand.For those that think Max is a bit aggressive and not seeing the bigger picture (pulling out of that move) you surely have to appreciate he’s only 23 going for his first title against one of the best drivers and teams of the modern generation. Hamilton has pulled out of moves but that’s his experience and probably why he’s hanging on in the championship.
He walked away in anger and true sulk without any regard for his opponent I thought, wasn’t nice to see even if people are providing stills of him glancing over at Lewis, it seemed to me he walked away without a care, amplified by his radio message straight after the incident.Now the dust has settled and the FIA have pronounced against Max, I am still left with an uncomfortable feeling about his general behaviour toward his rival and other drivers.
Yes he may have thought that Lewis was not badly injured.
And thought that because Lewis was trying to reverse his car from under the RB that it was ok to just walk away.
But he could not have known that Lewis was trying to reverse to get the RB off his head.
How much better would it have been for him to just stop and check that everything was ok.
It is in these type of situations that a persons true character comes out.
That's a ridiculous argument though. His car wheel hit Lewis on the head regardless of whether it felt dangerous to Max or not. That's like saying if I run over an old woman at 70mph I felt perfectly safe so it's fine.Any objective person would look at how his car bounced up off a sausage curb and figure out pretty easily that it obviously wasn't on purpose, and any suggestion it was says a lot more about the person suggesting it frankly. You can argue about risk vs reward and giving space and bailing out, but the move was a perfectly valid thing to try, which was also the universal opinion of the team principles asked about it including Toto.
The point is that the crash would not have felt like it endangered Lewis' life from Max's perspective, regardless of him bouncing up onto another car. He contributed (along with Lewis) to causing an accident much like Lewis contributed to putting Max's life in far more danger at Silverstone. And I'm not sure why the need for histrionics about 'causing accidents that endanger life'? So what? It's F1. Every tiny error and every risky manoeuvre by every driver falls into that bracket.
both could have done something to avoid the contact. Either punish both or none.Easy in hindsight but Max should have just cut the chicane and got on the slipstream
It's pointless to even discuss this guy anymore, i've never seen such blind ignorance and obvious stupidity with some of the posts i see online defending him, it's definitely the new generation of fans i see it from most and mirrors what you see with football twitter at times.Didn't want to post yesterday to let things cool down.
So now cool and calm:
Another Crashstappen divebomb masterclass. Kinda annoying how everyone is looking past it because they want someone else to win for once. I really wish there was a Nelson Pique around for this kid.
Lando, leclerc and others will be just as aggressive with max when they have cars to match the RB. Max is making a rod for his own back. His sense of entitlement needs to be calmed down by RB, but it won't.Leclerc was the first to really push back against Max's aggression and I think in fairness he's adapted his driving because of it. Should those two end up in future world championship battles they will collide a lot. Hamilton has met the aggression with his own, something he really did remove from his driving style but if that's the game you have to meet fire with fire.
Well that's it, he's gained the reputation and the blue print to beat him on level ground is to just match his aggression.Lando, leclerc and others will be just as aggressive with max when they have cars to match the RB. Max is making a rod for his own back. His sense of entitlement needs to be calmed down by RB, but it won't.
Yesterday was the first day I really though Verstappen is not going to live up to his potential. Partly, this is related to RB management, Silverstone put a marker down on how aggressive driving is treated and yesterday Verstappen suffered. I personally thought it was a racing incident and would rather it was treated as such, even though Hamilton was penalized at Silverstone because I'd rather see strong competitive racing get back to normal. But RB created this monster with the over the top actions.Lando, leclerc and others will be just as aggressive with max when they have cars to match the RB. Max is making a rod for his own back. His sense of entitlement needs to be calmed down by RB, but it won't.
Several times. Difference was I think pretty much every time ended up in Seb spinning out and no consequence to Lewis. Seb was an absolute master at being a rag doll in wheel to wheel incidents at Ferrari.How many times did lewis and vettel collide when seb was at ferrari? Just saying....
I don’t think this is right unfortunately. As I’ve said a few times in this thread, my personal view is it’s a racing incident with no punishment. But this is near enough identical to what happened In Silverstone - which I also thought was a racing incident but the stewards decided to penalise Lewis. Once they set that precedent it was correct to penalise Max here.both could have done something to avoid the contact. Either punish both or none.
This biggest car crash is right here.
I think though it is important to remember Max is relatively young. Hamilton was also quite rash as a young driver although he had much better management by McLaren. I do wonder if how RB enable him will stall his development in the longe run, but I do also expect that in time Max will naturally himself realise that that winning each battle in the race is not what wins a world championship.Yesterday was the first day I really though Verstappen is not going to live up to his potential. Partly, this is related to RB management, Silverstone put a marker down on how aggressive driving is treated and yesterday Verstappen suffered. I personally thought it was a racing incident and would rather it was treated as such, even though Hamilton was penalized at Silverstone because I'd rather see strong competitive racing get back to normal. But RB created this monster with the over the top actions.
Anyway, when I finally watched the race, I can see Verstappen was going to crash out. I will give him the benefit of the doubt and say he didn't choose Hamilton to take out. But after that pit stop, the red mist descended, and a crash seemed inevitable. For all his potential, Verstappen mat be the one preventing him being a multiple WDC, not Hamilton, Leclerc etc. It's very possible he wins this year, but I have serious doubt now that he will. For all the folks whining about Hamilton on the radio, that was some teenage tantrum Verstappen threw out there. He needs stronger leadership and a firm hand right now and he isn't getting it.
I don’t think he deserves a free pass. I think the conversation about his development as a driver and how we think it’ll trend, VS whether he should continue to be punished as he makes mistakes as he learns (which he should) are two different things. I don’t think there’s any suggestion he should be treated differently because he is younger.Max is young and he will mature but he doesn't get a free pass on age or experience for me, he's competed in 133 races at the top level since 2015.