Eric Bailly image 3

Eric Bailly Ivory Coast flag

2022-23 Performances


View full 2022-23 profile

Status
Not open for further replies.

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,077
Location
Canada
If nothing else, he makes the game exciting :lol: Capable of best defender in the world level and horrible within a minute
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
I'd have him over maguire.

Both commit a schoolboy mistake every game but bailly also produced moments of brilliance which maguire doesn't.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,507
I'd say it's the injuries. When he plays, I don't think he makes mistakes any more frequently than our other defenders.

Also because he's so proactive with his defending his errors might be more obvious, rather than defenders who passively do nothing. Hes a good defender. Just can't stay fit.
Oh yeah, certainly. I was not including injuries cos he obviously doesnt play when injured, was more talking about when hes on the pitch.
I do think he has some big game performances for us when he plays especially against better opposition. When hes playing maybe lesser teams he does at times get lax with his concentration. Hopefully with a competent manager that might change.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,201
Location
...
Couple sloppy moments. Still, has to play. Should be first choice if fit. Excellent 1v1 and can defend large spaces. Also very good on the ball. He’s actually so much better than the others at certain things he should absolutely be considered as a starter.
 

SmashedHombre

Memberus Anonymous & Legendus
Joined
Mar 29, 2004
Messages
31,851
Classic Bailly performance. He'd probably be great in a back 3 or with a DM willing to drop into the backline
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
Classic Bailly performance. He'd probably be great in a back 3 or with a DM willing to drop into the backline
He has been a total disaster whenever he played in back 3. It helps covering for the lack of pace, or ball winning ability, but it exposes lack positional awareness. And Bailly is the worst out of our lot. He's an all action front foot defender more suited in back 4.
 

El Jefe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
4,925
Couple sloppy moments. Still, has to play. Should be first choice if fit. Excellent 1v1 and can defend large spaces. Also very good on the ball. He’s actually so much better than the others at certain things he should absolutely be considered as a starter.
Well he won't be considered a starter, not even a little bit because he has a proven track record of being unreliable due to fitness and erractic play.

We're about to sign Martinez so I doubt he'll be here much longer.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,069
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Crazy the way his fans can dismiss a couple of absolutely catastrophic errors as somehow not a big deal, while we have dozens of posts slating our other centre backs over not being perfectly positioned to defend a counter.

Bailly has always been a wildly erratic performer. Which is the worst possible way to describe a footballer in his position. This has been evident in both pre-season games yet that somehow doesn’t matter because he’s made some marauding forward runs. Classic redcafe.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,201
Location
...
Well he won't be considered a starter, not even a little bit because he has a proven track record of being unreliable due to fitness and erractic play.

We're about to sign Martinez so I doubt he'll be here much longer.
You can’t not play a fit player because of fitness - and all of our centre halves are guilty of the latter.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,201
Location
...
Crazy the way his fans can dismiss a couple of absolutely catastrophic errors as somehow not a big deal, while we have dozens of posts slating our other centre backs over not being perfectly positioned.
Was only one ‘absolutely catastrophic error’, and one misplaced pass near the half way line.
 

RedEM10

Sweaty Foot Monster
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
1,654
Even including the sloppy things, for me he HAS to start ahead of Lindelof and Maguire. His reading and aggression is brilliant and works well if wanting to press high up the pitch.

EDIT - He needs to stay fit..........
 

Simonas2702

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 14, 2022
Messages
2
Personally hope he goes , hes a disaster. Signs of absolute world class defending and feckwittery in the same game. Makes me nervous whenever I see him on the pitch
 

HBFSTR00

Full Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Messages
745
Supports
Ten hag
Personally hope he goes , hes a disaster. Signs of absolute world class defending and feckwittery in the same game. Makes me nervous whenever I see him on the pitch
How does Maguire make you feel?
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
Every player makes mistakes. Bailly is simply a better player than both Maguire and Lindelof.
I don't think it's this black and white across all settings. However, Maguire and Lindelof seem to be less suitable for a highline, aggressive front foot defending, which is what ETH is implementing. Bailly may benefit from this.
 

Andersonson

Full Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
3,794
Location
Trondheim
Even including the sloppy things, for me he HAS to start ahead of Lindelof and Maguire. His reading and aggression is brilliant and works well if wanting to press high up the pitch.

EDIT - He needs to stay fit..........
Are you saying he reads the game well? That and positiniong is his worst trait. He constantly reads wrong, charges and luckily has pace to often recover. He is far from good enough
 

IhabX7

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
6,009
Are you saying he reads the game well? That and positiniong is his worst trait. He constantly reads wrong, charges and luckily has pace to often recover. He is far from good enough
You haven’t got a clue then.
 

RedEM10

Sweaty Foot Monster
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
1,654
Are you saying he reads the game well? That and positiniong is his worst trait. He constantly reads wrong, charges and luckily has pace to often recover. He is far from good enough
Did you watch the game today? Watch their goal. Two idiots who can't see what was happening. Then second half you see Bailly cutting quite a few out with ease. Same as the Liverpool game.

Anyone wanting to see lindelof and Maguire again needs their heads checked
 

Gandalf

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Messages
4,811
Location
Alabama but always Wales in my heart
Did you watch the game today? Watch their goal. Two idiots who can't see what was happening. Then second half you see Bailly cutting quite a few out with ease. Same as the Liverpool game.

Anyone wanting to see lindelof and Maguire again needs their heads checked
If you are blaming Lindelof for the goal you are just being reactive. The fault was with Shaw stranded miles out of position and making no effort to get back which forced Lindelof over to the left and as a result the not at all speedy Maguire was exposed. Easy to blame the CBs but bigger picture that goal was all about the woeful football intelligence and effort of Shaw.
 

Drz

Full Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
1,348
I'd have him over maguire.

Both commit a schoolboy mistake every game but bailly also produced moments of brilliance which maguire doesn't.
I kind of agree, Bailly is the better footballer of the two and more athletic.
He'd be supreme in a team captained by Roy Keane, or playing next to Stam.
 

Andersonson

Full Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
3,794
Location
Trondheim
Did you watch the game today? Watch their goal. Two idiots who can't see what was happening. Then second half you see Bailly cutting quite a few out with ease. Same as the Liverpool game.

Anyone wanting to see lindelof and Maguire again needs their heads checked
Where did you read me saying Lindelof/Maguire is a good pair?? Whatsboutism at it finest.

Either way, nothing you've said has changed the facts Bailly isnt good enough. Luckily we've signed a new CB.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,494
I kind of agree, Bailly is the better footballer of the two and more athletic.
He'd be supreme in a team captained by Roy Keane, or playing next to Stam.
Roy would have strangled him about 3 matches in because of his antics.
 

arthurka

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
18,744
Location
Rectum
His top level is absolutely lovely but his bottom level is absolutely in the gutter.
 

OleGunnar20

Full Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
2,201
Can see him play RB if we don't sign a new player there.
Probably a bit old to retrain now, but looking at his core strengths and weaknesses - I think he'd have been brilliant at RB.

For the 8 games a season he was fit to play it, of course. Always loved Eric's style of play, but if we get an offer surely he has to go this summer. Enough chances.
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,646
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
Crazy the way his fans can dismiss a couple of absolutely catastrophic errors as somehow not a big deal, while we have dozens of posts slating our other centre backs over not being perfectly positioned to defend a counter.

Bailly has always been a wildly erratic performer. Which is the worst possible way to describe a footballer in his position. This has been evident in both pre-season games yet that somehow doesn’t matter because he’s made some marauding forward runs. Classic redcafe.
Absolutely catastrophic but didn't lead to goals. Ok.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,201
Location
...
If he cuts out the Brain Fart moments - he’d be top class.
He needs consistent football to have a chance of doing that. And he needs consistent fitness to have a choice of doing that.
 

iHicksy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
1,849
Probably a bit old to retrain now, but looking at his core strengths and weaknesses - I think he'd have been brilliant at RB.

For the 8 games a season he was fit to play it, of course. Always loved Eric's style of play, but if we get an offer surely he has to go this summer. Enough chances.
He actually played at RB for us a few times after we signed him and he was absolutely fantastic there.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,201
Location
...
He actually played at RB for us a few times after we signed him and he was absolutely fantastic there.
He produced his worst ever performance at right back in Paris too. Definitely up there with the worst performances I’ve ever seen. He was hooked after about half an hour if I’m not mistaken.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,494
He actually played at RB for us a few times after we signed him and he was absolutely fantastic there.
Can't say I remember that but I do remember the last time he played at RB, which was an absolute disasterclass vs PSG and hasn't played there since.

And I used to think at one point he could have been a decent RB.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,201
Location
...
He’s just an obvious choice for everything that we hear about how we want to play. Not only that, but a number of the other options are also so obviously unsuited.

We want to play high. We want to pass and carry the ball out from the back. We want 1v1 centre halves. We want to play ‘proactive football’. It’s clear, if we are impartially selecting, that Bailly is most suited. It’s also blindingly obvious that Maguire and Lindelof are not particularly suited. Yet I feel we are going to do this long dance first, on the basis that we would prefer and it would be more convenient if Maguire was most suited. Why not just make the obvious call? I appreciate Bailly has a mistake in him, but Maguire’s season was littered with them. I can’t see any scenario where Maguire is ahead of Bailly if he cost us £40m. Even if he has had greater consistency in both form and fitness - he hasn’t shown any consistency in being the type of centre half that we want/need. Just seems like we will engage in politicking.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,764
He’s just an obvious choice for everything that we hear about how we want to play. Not only that, but a number of the other options are also so obviously unsuited.

We want to play high. We want to pass and carry the ball out from the back. We want 1v1 centre halves. We want to play ‘proactive football’. It’s clear, if we are impartially selecting, that Bailly is most suited. It’s also blindingly obvious that Maguire and Lindelof are not particularly suited. Yet I feel we are going to do this long dance first, on the basis that we would prefer and it would be more convenient if Maguire was most suited. Why not just make the obvious call? I appreciate Bailly has a mistake in him, but Maguire’s season was littered with them. I can’t see any scenario where Maguire is ahead of Bailly if he cost us £40m. Even if he has had greater consistency in both form and fitness - he hasn’t shown any consistency in being the type of centre half that we want/need. Just seems like we will engage in politicking.
I agree, the 2 goals he created in 2 friendlies I dont think anyone in our squad could have done that. He is very underrated on the ball, he has very good composure. He lacks long passing skill but more often that not, his passing is good.

The assist for Rashford goal was pure class.
 

Tavern in the town

New Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2022
Messages
1,532
We need to get rid. He’s very good but it’s just pointless speculating about “if Bailly could stay fit” because he won’t. Bin him and move on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.