Queen Elizabeth II | 1926-2022 | Rest in Peace

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,121
I agree. No matter what you think of monarchy, she was quite an inoffensive person really and carried herself with a certain dignity.
Same for me. Without being a fan of the institution that is the British Monarchy, I always appreciated the dignity from the person.

I swear that I cannot imagine the ton of pressure under which the next monarch will find himself. If you think that being a successor to Sir Alex Ferguson was tough for any of the managers who came after, oh boy, that has nothing on what the next king will go through.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
If anything, she left the world without much pain and not being dependent on others to live her life. Her supporters should celebrate the life she lived than her passing.
 

mitChley

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
2,553
Location
Sheffield
I agree. No matter what you think of monarchy, she was quite an inoffensive person really and carried herself with a certain dignity.
I personally considering protecting sex offenders to be quite offensive, but each to their own
 

4bars

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
4,923
Supports
Barcelona
It takes a lot of effort and skill for her to have been so apolitical. There is a lot of projection going on where people regardless of political persuasion and views can see her as a surrogate mother or grandmother for the nation. Even die hard Republicans would not criticise her directly over the past 10 or 15 years.
Die hard republicans don't care of her apolitical behavior that it only served their own survival ( As someone would accept the royals meddling in politics)

Die hard republicans care, among other things, that no one should have the birth right to be in a government institution symbolic power place and have the right over money through taxes, nobiliary titles, corruption, impunity and live on properties plundered along the centuries. It doesn't make sense
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,138
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
He will be incandescent. Throwing things across the room. "Why couldn't she have died a few weeks earlier!" One of the greatest photo ops in history, missed.

I'm sure he'll still get invited to St Paul's.
No no he said he was going to slink off to some island somewhere and never be seen again. He wouldn't lie to us, would he?
 

Donaldo

Caf Vigilante
Joined
May 19, 2003
Messages
18,228
Location
Goes it so.
Supports
Arsenal
You “now is the time to end the monarchy” folks know that King Charles III is already king, right?
I suppose the sentiment is for a nation in the 21st century to wake up finally now that the last relic of their past is gone.
 

Globule

signature/tagline creator extraordinaire
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
4,760
New PM and Monarch in the same week. If the rule of three's apply, then what do we need to expect before the end of the week.
You're forgetting new Chelsea manager.
 

Zarlak

my face causes global warming
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
45,407
Location
Truth like rain don't give a feck who it falls on.
Die hard republicans don't care of her apolitical behavior that it only served their own survival ( As someone would accept the royals meddling in politics)

Die hard republicans care, among other things, that no one should have the birth right to be in a government institution symbolic power place and have the right over money through taxes, nobiliary titles, corruption, impunity and live on properties plundered along the centuries. It doesn't make sense
When was the last time you met a die hard republican? The very notion of this gives them the biggest erection you've ever seen.
 

Lecland07

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2021
Messages
2,835
I suppose the sentiment is for a nation in the 21st century to wake up finally now that the last relic of their past is gone.
And what? Spend loads of money to have elections every four years for a position that has no power? Spend loads of money on a referendum on removing the monarchy? Then, after all that, ending up with William as King/Head-of-State because he is the most popular option. Just seems a completely stupid idea. No money will be saved with removing the monarchy, either, as the vast majority is spent on staff and maintenance for the properties.
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
Ok. So the Queen is finally gone, and good riddance, don't you think it's time to get rid of the fecking monarchy? What is this, the Middle Ages?
I think its time to get rid of democracy with the way its gone down the shitter.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,928
Location
France
These kind of comments are so out of place. Millions if not billions of people show and have to show these traits on a daily basis from struggling positions. She isn't the one making that comment so she isn't the target of my point but she exemplifies nothing, the millions of people who wake up every morning not knowing if they will be able to work enough to earn food for their family and themselves and still go about their day with a smile on their face those people are many, too many.