LARulz
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
- Messages
- 18,199
I would assume any of these contacts have some sort of wage increase attached depending on certain criteriaAre we trying to tie him down to an 8 year deal that's 34K a week?
I would assume any of these contacts have some sort of wage increase attached depending on certain criteriaAre we trying to tie him down to an 8 year deal that's 34K a week?
Are we trying to tie him down to an 8 year deal that's 34K a week?
Aye, I thought so, just wondering whether a youth signing his first deal would fancy an 8 year contract rather than signing for 3 years and having the room to explode into a superstar to then sign a mega deal.I would assume any of these contacts have some sort of wage increase attached depending on certain criteria
A bit of an overreaction he is getting plenty of game time but ETH was reluctant to send on an 18 year old in such a big game. Garnacho will get a lot of minutes between now and the end of the season.Would think twice about signing a new contract if I was him.
We're going to sign a big name striker eventually, and Rashford is always going to play.
So he'll be competing with 150 million worth of Sancho and Antony who the club (and manager particularly for the latter) will be desperate to shoehorn in as a success.
Coming on in the 92nd minute today despite being our best attacking player other than Rashford this season, is a disgrace.
Despite the same kid coming on against the champions and assisting the winning goal just last weekend.A bit of an overreaction he is getting plenty of game time but ETH was reluctant to send on an 18 year old in such a big game. Garnacho will get a lot of minutes between now and the end of the season.
Thankfully he's not a drama queen.Decisions like this is why he won't sign a contract.
I'm not suggesting he was right to not bring him on my point is this one game isn't a reflection on ETH won't use him during the seasonDespite the same kid coming on against the champions and assisting the winning goal just last weekend.
It’s precisely because this was such a big game that Garnacho should have been subbed on much earlier. Arsenal‘s back line was there for the taking.A bit of an overreaction he is getting plenty of game time but ETH was reluctant to send on an 18 year old in such a big game. Garnacho will get a lot of minutes between now and the end of the season.
That high line was there for the taking.It’s precisely because this was such a big game that Garnacho should have been subbed on much earlier. Arsenal‘s back line was there for the taking.
The most important thing is winning games mateCalm down chaps. He’s a kid and playing a fair bit. More important right now is that he develops well and has his head on right.
A club where he is getting regular playing time at the age of 18???Would think twice about signing a new contract if I was him.
We're going to sign a big name striker eventually, and Rashford is always going to play.
So he'll be competing with 150 million worth of Sancho and Antony who the club (and manager particularly for the latter) will be desperate to shoehorn in as a success.
Coming on in the 92nd minute today despite being our best attacking player other than Rashford this season, is a disgrace.
Why?Defo missed training
He didn't. Him not coming on earlier than he did is inexplicable.Why?
What a silly thing to sayWould think twice about signing a new contract if I was him.
We're going to sign a big name striker eventually, and Rashford is always going to play.
So he'll be competing with 150 million worth of Sancho and Antony who the club (and manager particularly for the latter) will be desperate to shoehorn in as a success.
Coming on in the 92nd minute today despite being our best attacking player other than Rashford this season, is a disgrace.
He didn't. Him not coming on earlier than he did is inexplicable.
Would think twice about signing a new contract if I was him.
We're going to sign a big name striker eventually, and Rashford is always going to play.
So he'll be competing with 150 million worth of Sancho and Antony who the club (and manager particularly for the latter) will be desperate to shoehorn in as a success.
Coming on in the 92nd minute today despite being our best attacking player other than Rashford this season, is a disgrace.
What a beautiful post.Would think twice about signing a new contract if I was him.
We're going to sign a big name striker eventually, and Rashford is always going to play.
So he'll be competing with 150 million worth of Sancho and Antony who the club (and manager particularly for the latter) will be desperate to shoehorn in as a success.
Coming on in the 92nd minute today despite being our best attacking player other than Rashford this season, is a disgrace.
Definitely this Antony is going to be ETH's Maguire isn't he, the litmus test for all this talk about "you don't play if you aren't playing well" and it doesn't look good so far, basically played every available minute.So he'll be competing with 150 million worth of Sancho and Antony who the club (and manager particularly for the latter) will be desperate to shoehorn in as a success.
Coming on in the 92nd minute today despite being our best attacking player other than Rashford this season, is a disgrace.
He didn't play against City and I'm sure he hasn't play all the available minutes so don't go over the top like that. Questioning ETH already cause he didn't sub Garnacho earlier. A 18 years of old player who's been getting regular football.Definitely this Antony is going to be ETH's Maguire isn't he, the litmus test for all this talk about "you don't play if you aren't playing well" and it doesn't look good so far, basically played every available minute.
I know the squad is waifer thin but yeah Garnacho on that late chasing a goal is... wow. Pellestri has shown enough to be given a chance as well.
It really was. ETH was clearly happy with the draw, as all of us would have been, and I won't even go so far as to suggest that we could have gone for it come what may, but by setting up so deep and having no outlet to support Rashford we handed Arsenal the gavel and the rest is history.That high line was there for the taking.
Ten hag said he wanted weghorst to stay to defend corners.Something doesn't add up about him being introduced so late - clearly we were crying out for his pace as an out ball/on the break. Hope there isn't an ongoing issue with getting him to sign a new contract as you'd think the club would have wanted that sorted by now.
He is 18 years old!Would think twice about signing a new contract if I was him.
We're going to sign a big name striker eventually, and Rashford is always going to play.
So he'll be competing with 150 million worth of Sancho and Antony who the club (and manager particularly for the latter) will be desperate to shoehorn in as a success.
Coming on in the 92nd minute today despite being our best attacking player other than Rashford this season, is a disgrace.
I thought Eriksen was the obvious change. He looked knackered and we had Bruno on the wing who could have been moved centrally.Ten hag said he wanted weghorst to stay to defend corners.
Seems a pretty defensive mindset.
Think Aurier got the better of him physically a few times, then was doubled up a few more times. A learning experience for him I think.Rare for Garnacho to be on the pitch for 30 mins yet contribute nothing. Camera angle made it difficult to tell if it was Garnacho's touches being less than perfect, or if the passes he received weren't ideal. Perhaps the player marking him did a better job than most of his direct opponents to date.