You are missing the point badly here.
My criticisms of Ole came in the context of him being appointed PERMANENT manager. I would never have argued for RR to be made PERMANENT manager, therefore the comparison you are making is false. If Ralf had been made permanent and I hadn't held him to account for the same things that I did with Ole then THAT would have been hypocritical but you are comparing apples with oranges once again.
As I keep having to point out, the crux of my argument about RR is that he was given a confused remit, and my belief is that he was caught between doing the job of a pure caretaker (like Ole), and working towards his wider remit of modernising the club - two things that are sometimes at odds with each other. Ole didn't have that confusion, and his goals for the season were therefore clearer - again in my opinion. Ergo, I would use different measures to assess their performance. A pure caretaker I would expect to come in, improve morale, put an arm around players, not make wholesale changes and steady the ship so that a new man comes in with a clean slate and a happy dressing room.We know that RR was given this dual role which was supposed to change to a consultancy role at the end of the season, but in his first presser he even talked about how he might recommend that he stays on as manager, so it it obviously was not clear to him what would happen at the end of the season. Therefore, again in my fecking opinion, he started to make more fundamental changes midway through the season (e.g. changing to a pressing style, calling out underperforming players, and speaking out about the state of the club) that were likely to result in a less successful season in the short term, but which - in his mind - were probably necessary steps towards a creating a better club in the longer term. Nowhere have I argued that he was on the right track, or would have been a success, I'm just pointing out some context, and this is why I personally would judge him using different metrics to Ole who was brought in with a different, more simple, remit. This is my personal opinion, and you are, of course, welcome to disagree, but you are way off beam with this attempt to paint me as a hypocrite.
At this point you seem to have lost all sense of reason. Just because you want there to be a reason - to help justify the absolute horseshit that you have typing this afternoon - doesn't mean that there is one. 