g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,458
Location
left wing
I don’t know if I have ever trusted any of the prime movers in this, but I do wonder what happened to the supposed super secret bidders involved?
The secret bidders were last seen riding unicorns on their way to Narnia.
 

Amarsdd

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
3,299
That’s it the rumours of SJR £3bn for 51% were not true it’s $3bn which is is about £2.5bn slightly more than the £4.8bn for 100% offered from SJ but he has guaranteed higher share prices when he buys them out in the future however, and right now his proof of funds are surprisingly more solid than Qatar as far as the Raine Group are concerned, he’s been incredibly creative with his bid and the new one of keeping all 6 Glazers with a small piece of the future pie, while his Ineos company would invest is probably very attractive to them, they are already stay away owners, So SJR becomes the face of the club and they continue to take dividends while Good Old Jim pays the debts and invests money, yep that’s not going to happen especially if he only owns 33% of the club. This is why a lot of the UK media coverage is absolute tripe!
@Woziak I understand all the stuff you're explaining in your last post. But I have all this time been asking about the bolded phrase above i.e. "he only owns 33% of the club.". I think its a typo but if there's something behind this then maybe some source or some thinking behind it?
I'm just asking cause you seem to know what you're talking about from the financial pov, and as you're seen in here sorta financial expert, I'm sure that number will be taken as "reported" in a few pages and then as a fact after like 30-40 pages (I've seen that happen in this thread a few times). You should probably correct it if it is a typo or provide how you came to that 33% number.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
35,200
Probably what's happening. The Glazers want an auction. Ratclliffe and Qatar seemingly want to pay less than the asking price. Both Ratcliffe and Qatar are fully aware of the clubs present financial situation and it's a strong possibility that they are trying to make the Glazers cave in.
That's the trouble they aren't going to cave,like I said Jassim has to accept the price or walk away and bring embarrassment to his nation for losing to a brit business man
 

Loon

:lol:
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
9,238
Location
No-Mark
It's in the media's interest to put out contradictory stuff. Drives clicks.

Until there is an official announcement from Raine/Club etc then I don't really believe anything at this stage. Think it's been proven that nobody knows much as you've said.
Do you think Raine will bother announcing anyone other than the winners? I don’t even think I trust either Ratcliffe or Jassim to be honest!

I guess we’ll see if the winner (if there is one and the Glazers don’t stay) will make good and actually take the club forward.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,272
Location
La-La-Land
If you thought they couldn't piss you off more... they ruin our transfer window and potentially our next season's plans
 

Voteon

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 29, 2023
Messages
53
They are.
They hold the asset both parties want and they know they're good for top dollar. This is the riling dictatorship of an oil rich state and Britain's 2nd most richest person we are talking here, not to mention, various hedge funds.

If it all goes belly-up for the Glazers, they'll just run the club to its last buck, or sell it for scrap. Which will hurt the Glazers , just not fatally. They have plenty of other assets, after all.

As of now, Qatar are waiting out Ratcliffe as it's contingent on the siblings. If there's an in, Qatar can rely on their latest bid. If not, well, they can bid more or back out and claim 'Glazer intransigence' to cover the 'embarrassment'.

The Glazers have plenty of options and are loaded up to the hilt, no matter how this plays. The club is on sale because of the attendant debt. No other reason.

They'll come out of this okay.
 

Messier1994

The Swedish Rumble
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,368
So...is the 92 backed by the Qatar government or are they just not that loaded? @Messier1994 has me confused.
These people are professional business people, but to a large extent, the country is run as a clan. Sheik Jassim's ("SJ") dad -- Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber ("HBJ") -- has 15 children with his two wifes. HBJ is the former PM of Qatar. HBJ's grandfather, was the brother of the funding father of Qatar. The founding father himself had 56 kids and most of the emirs has huge families even today. It is said that the "royal family" of Qatar currently has 200 male individuals in official positions, SJ probably count among them. The 200 number seem low to me, but it’s hard to find info. It must be underlined that SJ in any event have held very prominent positions within Qatar, so he has a high stature for sure.

HBJ's personell wealth is estimated to be 1.1bn (Forbes). HBJ haven't handed over 6-7bn to his son SJ, nor have SJ made that type of money in different positions for the Qatar Islamic Bank (QIB). The Emir of Qatar is said to have a personal wealth of 2bn.

So how is an investment like this done? By all accounts, important business decisions is still handled in the old fashion "clan way'. This is an important business decision for Qatar, it totals 1-2 percent of the Royal Family's total wealth, of which a great deal is tied up in real estate and infrastructure. So as a non-typical investment -- its even larger. So what does the clan way mean? Formally, you ask for permission, ultimately given by the Empir. In practice, you prepare a business plan, the business plan is given to competent advisors, its reviewed, and advise is whispered in the ear of the Emir or persons appointed to speak on his behalf. As with any business plan, its not black or white. A lot comes down to personell influence and trust. So where is the money coming from? Will QI. -- with its 450bn portfolio -- transfer the funds to 9-2? This is an important aspect. If you get the go-ahead from the clan -- any and all members of the clan can be expected to ship in if you are a part of the family/clan and if so, you do what you are told.

There are numerous sources confirming this. When its investigated if some entity is separated from the state, the conclusion is that even if there are legal barriers, in practice you cannot talk about separation in that sense. The country, the royal family and its individual members are really one thing.

HBJ has spoken about the takeover, he said: "some of my sons like this, they always discuss it with me. They’re pushing hard. This isn’t my speciality. Let me put it like this: I am an investor. If it will one day be a good investment, I will think about it. I will not look at it as something you do just as an advertisement.

So we know that 9-2's bid for the club pays less money to the Glazers than Ineos bid does. Why is that? Why don't they up their bid? I would say that it must be one of the following reasons:
(a) SJ don't think the club is worth more than he has bid.
(b) SJ is willing to bid higher, but is waiting as a negotiation tactic.
(c) SJ has been given a green light to make a bid, but not an unlimited budget.

I don’t buy “(b)”, it’s too late and he isn’t even close. Talk about Ineos’ — an 80bn turnover company, with the previous interest in Chelsea, it’s investments in F1 — bid isn’t legit and that 9-2 doesn’t want to bid against itself is of course nonsense. It would have been one thing if it was 9-2 and Zilliacus, but come on, Ineos is of course a credible bidder.

So you have (a) or (c). But if it was (a) — why hasn’t the Glazers appointed Ineos the preferred bidder?

I am just guessing, but I would bet at it being (c) and that SJ has been working to increase his budget. But that is just speculation.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,705
Location
Cooper Station
They hold the asset both parties want and they know they're good for top dollar. This is the riling dictatorship of an oil rich state and Britain's 2nd most richest person we are talking here, not to mention, various hedge funds.

If it all goes belly-up for the Glazers, they'll just run the club to its last buck, or sell it for scrap. Which will hurt the Glazers , just not fatally. They have plenty of other assets, after all.

As of now, Qatar are waiting out Ratcliffe as it's contingent on the siblings. If there's an in, Qatar can rely on their latest bid. If not, well, they can bid more or back out and claim 'Glazer intransigence' to cover the 'embarrassment'.

The Glazers have plenty of options and are loaded up to the hilt, no matter how this plays. The club is on sale because of the attendant debt. No other reason.

They'll come out of this okay.
Not worth 6 billion they dont.

These are one-time offers. They won't get them again. If they don't sell the value decreases and the club probably goes bankrupt in a few years without a lot of investment.
 

Woziak

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
3,809
@Woziak I understand all the stuff you're explaining in your last post. But I have all this time been asking about the bolded phrase above i.e. "he only owns 33% of the club.". I think its a typo but if there's something behind this then maybe some source or some thinking behind it?
I'm just asking cause you seem to know what you're talking about from the financial pov, and as you're seen in here sorta financial expert, I'm sure that number will be taken as "reported" in a few pages and then as a fact after like 30-40 pages (I've seen that happen in this thread a few times). You should probably correct it if it is a typo or provide how you came to that 33% number.
The new rumour which I can not deny or confirm because it makes no senses is that he would buy 33-36% controlling B shares from all 6 Glazers leaving them with the remaining 36-34% B voting shares to cash out in the future meaning all 6 siblings would stay, again there has been no detail on this just an article in the times explaining that all 6 Glazers might stay and yes it’s a very real scenario but more likely SJR has controlling 35-36% majority he would still need two of the Glazers to agree with him to make a decision, if this happens the share price will plummet and we may see a hostile takeover from SJR or SJ. I keep saying the SJR 50.01%, 35/36% is the absolute worst case scenario for the club apart from the 6 Glazers all staying.

What fans need to understand is the club is haemorrhaging cash and do to are Buccaneers. The Glazers as a family owe over $1.4bn on both clubs and Banks will start to reel in existing debt to mitigate their risks to financial closure like Credit Suisse Recently.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,554
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Don't think it indicates that. We have a budget for the summer either way and are using it to get the first couple of players in. What happens after depends on the ownership.
I agree with this. I think given the protracted nature of this process the transfer window is entirely independent and is just the club and staff doing their best this summer.
 

Woziak

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
3,809
Who knows but the financials of the club are dire. They don't have a choice. They can delay but they need to secure massive investment or a sale.
Exactly I don’t think the fans really know the true extent of the seriousness of the current debt position for the club, they have to sell!
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,705
Location
Cooper Station
Exactly I don’t think the fans really know the true extent of the seriousness of the current debt position for the club, they have to sell!
They definitely don't mate. We are borderline insolvent. The club has been putting day-to-day expenses on the credit card.
 

Spoony

The People's President
Joined
Oct 27, 2001
Messages
63,237
Location
Leve Palestina.
These people are professional business people, but to a large extent, the country is run as a clan. Sheik Jassim's ("SJ") dad -- Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber ("HBJ") -- has 15 children with his two wifes. HBJ is the former PM of Qatar. HBJ's grandfather, was the brother of the funding father of Qatar. The founding father himself had 56 kids and most of the emirs has huge families even today. It is said that the "royal family" of Qatar currently has 200 male individuals in official positions, SJ probably count among them. The 200 number seem low to me, but it’s hard to find info. It must be underlined that SJ in any event have held very prominent positions within Qatar, so he has a high stature for sure.

HBJ's personell wealth is estimated to be 1.1bn (Forbes). HBJ haven't handed over 6-7bn to his son SJ, nor have SJ made that type of money in different positions for the Qatar Islamic Bank (QIB). The Emir of Qatar is said to have a personal wealth of 2bn.

So how is an investment like this done? By all accounts, important business decisions is still handled in the old fashion "clan way'. This is an important business decision for Qatar, it totals 1-2 percent of the Royal Family's total wealth, of which a great deal is tied up in real estate and infrastructure. So as a non-typical investment -- its even larger. So what does the clan way mean? Formally, you ask for permission, ultimately given by the Empir. In practice, you prepare a business plan, the business plan is given to competent advisors, its reviewed, and advise is whispered in the ear of the Emir or persons appointed to speak on his behalf. As with any business plan, its not black or white. A lot comes down to personell influence and trust. So where is the money coming from? Will QI. -- with its 450bn portfolio -- transfer the funds to 9-2? This is an important aspect. If you get the go-ahead from the clan -- you can be expected to ship in if you are a part of the family/clan and it so, you do what you are told.

There are numerous sources confirming this. When its investigated if some entity is separated from the state, the conclusion is that even if there are legal barriers, in practice you cannot talk about separation in that sense. The country, the royal family and its individual members are really one thing

HBJ has spoken about the takeover, he said: "some of my sons like this, they always discuss it with me. They’re pushing hard. This isn’t my speciality. Let me put it like this: I am an investor. If it will one day be a good investment, I will think about it. I will not look at it as something you do just as an advertisement.

So we know that 9-2's bid for the club pays less money to the Glazers than Ineos bid does. Why is that? Why don't they up their bid? I would say that it must be one of the following reasons:
(a) SJ don't think the club is worth more than he has bid.
(b) SJ is willing to bid higher, but is waiting as a negotiation tactic.
(c) SJ has been given a green light to make a bid, but not an unlimited budget.

I don’t buy “(b)”, it’s too late and he isn’t even close. Talk about Ineos — an 80bn turnover company, with the previous interest in Chelsea, it’s investments in F1 — bid isn’t legit and that 9-2 doesn’t want to bid against itself is of course nonsense. It would have been one thing if it was 9-2 and Zilliacus…

So you have (a) and (c). But if it was (a) — why hasn’t the Glazers appointed Ineos the preferred bidder?

I am just guessing, but I would bet at it being (c) and that SJ has been working to increase his budget. But that is just speculation.
So it’s not a state bid but that doesn't mean the state won't get involved in future?
 

Woziak

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
3,809
They definitely don't mate. We are borderline insolvent. The club has been putting day-to-day expenses on the credit card.
Which means sell or fold if they fold, they will get a fraction of what’s offered now, a fraction. So they have to sell, they don’t have to sell to SJ they can sell to SJR quite easily as he’s apparently going to let them have the best of both worlds!
Trap being set !
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,705
Location
Cooper Station
Which means sell or fold if they fold, they will get a fraction of what’s offered now, a fraction. So they have to sell, they don’t have to sell to SJ they can sell to SJR quite easily as he’s apparently going to let them have the best of both worlds!
Trap being set !
It's essentially who blinks first at the moment in my opinion.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
I just had Alice Talks Football turn up in my Youtube recs. You people are doing terrible things that what the algorithms think of me.
 

pogbasformerbarber

Full Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2022
Messages
446
Everyone here has the patience of gnat...

The season is a few days ended. This is a massive deal with many moving parts. One in which you were seeing multiple rounds bids during the season, which is somewhat unique. Chill...

Nothing is going to change the bottom line. The Glazers have to sell. If you look at the finances the club cannot move forward without...essentially...a full sale. Anything else would be a financial disaster for the Glazers, and they are not stupid (just horrible people). I have posted about why many times.

I work in PE, bids and closings are massive undertakings that involve an incredible amount of challenges that will crop up just when you think you've settled everything. Buying a club like United is extremely complex.

It will happen...many here have to stop feeling like this is somehow a process in which the days matter. They don't, all that matters is the process and the need for this to happen. Could it impact our buying process, sure. But the new owners will obviously try to mitigate this issue as much as possible, making it a slight concern IMHO.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,554
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
The Glazers as a family owe over $1.4bn on both clubs and Banks will start to reel in existing debt to mitigate their risks to financial closure like Credit Suisse Recently.
This is really interesting, thanks for sharing. Interesting that they run the Buccs as poorly as they do United. Hopefully the banks come for them when they sell knowing they are good for the dollar!
 

Messier1994

The Swedish Rumble
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,368
I’m really struggling to understand your English with this rant, the simple truth is as follows;

1. The Glazers are yet to make their minds up.
2. They have direct communication with SJ and want £6 billion
3. SJR put and call bid is worth more but will take longer for them to receive the cash
4. They also own 4.3% of the remaining ‘A’ shares collectively which are clearly valued at an additional $200m by SJ
5. The reason why both parties have offered nearly $34 per share is to take control of the capital assets, Squad, Land TV contracts etc.

6. The reality is when you look at the huge debt the club owes to the bank and amortised transfers for these assets it reduces the overall value of the club because you are starting at - $1billion owed to banks and other football clubs!

When Chelsea was sold, the £1.5bn owed to Abrahamovic was written off by the outgoing owner so the incumbent owner was able to spend copious amounts of money on average football players!

7. The club is currently registered in the Cayman Islands for the benefit of the Glazers, should they be stupid enough to allow SJR to control 50.01%, he can easily move the clubs registration to Monaco where he currently lives, Gibraltar as a Uk resident or worse the UK. If he does this then any future draw down payments to the greedy goblins may incur Capital gains tax! This is a stumbling block and they want absolute assurances that registration will not change built into a hugely complexed contract already.

8. All parties are under strict NDA contracts and therefore don’t believe what you read in media, especially the Uk ones

9. The reality is both bids are much closer than fans and the media thinks but neither are anywhere near the £6 billion the Glazers want to sell all their shares now in an economy about to go into recession.
This reads a bit like you are saying that nobody knows anything except you, let me know if I misunderstand something, but when you see claims like that on an Internet forum, you won’t attribute much credibility to it…

BTW, since the Cayman Islands are majority friendly — if Ineos became the new majority owner — why the heck would they move it from the Caymans? ;) I think you were in a bit of a hurry writing that. The Cayman Islands are not “Glazer friendly”, it is majority owner friendly.

It is this part that is the give-away, it is just jIbberish:
There will be a value for the assets too in a total takeover valuation and therefore the Glazers will want a fee for that

This is why I think Raine have simply ignored SJ bid and tried to create a shadow bidding war with SJR being used as he can’t possibly buy 100% of the club unless he sells some of his assets.
You need to put more effort into it than this. It’s Ineos making the bid. SJR only has one asset, it’s Ineos. Is SJR selling Ineos to get money, to give to Ineos, so Ineos can afford buying the club? Good one!
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
Everyone here has the patience of gnat...

The season is a few days ended. This is a massive deal with many moving parts. One in which you were seeing multiple rounds bids during the season, which is somewhat unique. Chill...

Nothing is going to change the bottom line. The Glazers have to sell. If you look at the finances the club cannot move forward without...essentially...a full sale. Anything else would be a financial disaster for the Glazers, and they are not stupid (just horrible people). I have posted about why many times.

I work in PE, bids and closings are massive undertakings that involve an incredible amount of challenges that will crop up just when you think you've settled everything. Buying a club like United is extremely complex.

It will happen...many here have to stop feeling like this is somehow a process in which the days matter. They don't, all that matters is the process and the need for this to happen. Could it impact our buying process, sure. But the new owners will obviously try to mitigate this issue as much as possible, making it a slight concern IMHO.
Do you have a strong preference one way or the other? Cause I feel it's a lot easier to be chill if you think either bidder is good actually than for someone like myself who is gonna have hugely different reactions to any concrete news, depending on which direction it's taking us. It's really not fun waiting indefinitely to find out if I still have a football team I'm moderately comfortable supporting.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
35,200
Everyone here has the patience of gnat...

The season is a few days ended. This is a massive deal with many moving parts. One in which you were seeing multiple rounds bids during the season, which is somewhat unique. Chill...

Nothing is going to change the bottom line. The Glazers have to sell. If you look at the finances the club cannot move forward without...essentially...a full sale. Anything else would be a financial disaster for the Glazers, and they are not stupid (just horrible people). I have posted about why many times.

I work in PE, bids and closings are massive undertakings that involve an incredible amount of challenges that will crop up just when you think you've settled everything. Buying a club like United is extremely complex.

It will happen...many here have to stop feeling like this is somehow a process in which the days matter. They don't, all that matters is the process and the need for this to happen. Could it impact our buying process, sure. But the new owners will obviously try to mitigate this issue as much as possible, making it a slight concern IMHO.
Just feels like we have been fobbed off by many journos since it was first suggested about a sale last November
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
35,200
Do you have a strong preference one way or the other? Cause I feel it's a lot easier to be chill if you think either bidder is good actually than for someone like myself who is gonna have hugely different reactions to any concrete news, depending on which direction it's taking us. It's really not fun waiting indefinitely to find out if I still have a football team I'm moderately comfortable supporting.
I don't trust Ratcliffe IF he actually is considering keeping Joel & Avram let alone the horrific prospect of all 6 staying on
 

putzmcgee123

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 30, 2023
Messages
475
Everyone here has the patience of gnat...

The season is a few days ended. This is a massive deal with many moving parts. One in which you were seeing multiple rounds bids during the season, which is somewhat unique. Chill...

Nothing is going to change the bottom line. The Glazers have to sell. If you look at the finances the club cannot move forward without...essentially...a full sale. Anything else would be a financial disaster for the Glazers, and they are not stupid (just horrible people). I have posted about why many times.

I work in PE, bids and closings are massive undertakings that involve an incredible amount of challenges that will crop up just when you think you've settled everything. Buying a club like United is extremely complex.

It will happen...many here have to stop feeling like this is somehow a process in which the days matter. They don't, all that matters is the process and the need for this to happen. Could it impact our buying process, sure. But the new owners will obviously try to mitigate this issue as much as possible, making it a slight concern IMHO.
I do not really blame them. Most people and most supporters do not work in the industry and had their expectations set by absolute cretins in the press and on social media saying it will be done by Easter. On top of that, I personally have never seen anywhere near this much coverage of a sale process between the announcement of investment being sought and an actual agreement being announced. It is not like this is a hostile takeover approach. The press (and frequent use of them as a Raine mouthpiece) in this saga has come across as very unprofessional to me, but I guess the normal standards go out the window when it's a deal for a professional sports team, rather than something like a mining or tech company.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,627
Location
Salford
Everyone here has the patience of gnat...
It's been the best part of a year now, with no end in sight, and the latest reports are saying that nothing is close to happening... "Patience of a gnat"

They could have done this long ago if they weren't so greedy

Additionally, at least for the first few months there were timescales given and next steps, it seemed a genuine process. Now there's nothing. "Final" bids were made nearly 6 weeks ago
 

Member 101269

Guest
These people are professional business people, but to a large extent, the country is run as a clan. Sheik Jassim's ("SJ") dad -- Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber ("HBJ") -- has 15 children with his two wifes. HBJ is the former PM of Qatar. HBJ's grandfather, was the brother of the funding father of Qatar. The founding father himself had 56 kids and most of the emirs has huge families even today. It is said that the "royal family" of Qatar currently has 200 male individuals in official positions, SJ probably count among them. The 200 number seem low to me, but it’s hard to find info. It must be underlined that SJ in any event have held very prominent positions within Qatar, so he has a high stature for sure.

HBJ's personell wealth is estimated to be 1.1bn (Forbes). HBJ haven't handed over 6-7bn to his son SJ, nor have SJ made that type of money in different positions for the Qatar Islamic Bank (QIB). The Emir of Qatar is said to have a personal wealth of 2bn.

So how is an investment like this done? By all accounts, important business decisions is still handled in the old fashion "clan way'. This is an important business decision for Qatar, it totals 1-2 percent of the Royal Family's total wealth, of which a great deal is tied up in real estate and infrastructure. So as a non-typical investment -- its even larger. So what does the clan way mean? Formally, you ask for permission, ultimately given by the Empir. In practice, you prepare a business plan, the business plan is given to competent advisors, its reviewed, and advise is whispered in the ear of the Emir or persons appointed to speak on his behalf. As with any business plan, its not black or white. A lot comes down to personell influence and trust. So where is the money coming from? Will QI. -- with its 450bn portfolio -- transfer the funds to 9-2? This is an important aspect. If you get the go-ahead from the clan -- any and all members of the clan can be expected to ship in if you are a part of the family/clan and if so, you do what you are told.

There are numerous sources confirming this. When its investigated if some entity is separated from the state, the conclusion is that even if there are legal barriers, in practice you cannot talk about separation in that sense. The country, the royal family and its individual members are really one thing.

HBJ has spoken about the takeover, he said: "some of my sons like this, they always discuss it with me. They’re pushing hard. This isn’t my speciality. Let me put it like this: I am an investor. If it will one day be a good investment, I will think about it. I will not look at it as something you do just as an advertisement.

So we know that 9-2's bid for the club pays less money to the Glazers than Ineos bid does. Why is that? Why don't they up their bid? I would say that it must be one of the following reasons:
(a) SJ don't think the club is worth more than he has bid.
(b) SJ is willing to bid higher, but is waiting as a negotiation tactic.
(c) SJ has been given a green light to make a bid, but not an unlimited budget.

I don’t buy “(b)”, it’s too late and he isn’t even close. Talk about Ineos’ — an 80bn turnover company, with the previous interest in Chelsea, it’s investments in F1 — bid isn’t legit and that 9-2 doesn’t want to bid against itself is of course nonsense. It would have been one thing if it was 9-2 and Zilliacus, but come on, Ineos is of course a credible bidder.

So you have (a) or (c). But if it was (a) — why hasn’t the Glazers appointed Ineos the preferred bidder?

I am just guessing, but I would bet at it being (c) and that SJ has been working to increase his budget. But that is just speculation.
Adding:

HBJs valuation by Forbes is questionable: the guys has a 300/400m yacht, the most expensive property in central London and a big stake in Deutsche Bank. All of which probably adds to the 1.1b. For a guy renowned for investing, that doesn't look like a broad investment portfolio.

As for the family, the 1990s it was estimated there were 20,000 in the Al Thani house. SJ it probably well outside the 200 closest males. All of which undermines your arguments.

INEOS does not turn over 80b
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
35,200
It's been the best part of a year now, with no end in sight, and the latest reports are saying that nothing is close to happening... "Patience of a gnat"

They could have done this long ago if they weren't so greedy

Additionally, at least for the first few months there were timescales given and next steps, it seemed a genuine process. Now there's nothing. "Final" bids were made nearly 6 weeks ago
Precisely that's why there is frustration growing
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,082
Bit random but my Mrs and I started trying for a baby post the Glazers selling news (unrelated), and my baby looks on course to be born before the takeover is complete :lol:
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,627
Location
Salford
It's nearly crunch time now though
As it also was 3 months ago...

I get the hope thing, but let's be realistic. It's the Glazers. I'm sure we go into July no closer than we are now and I wouldn't even be surprised if they drag it out until the end of 2023

Bit random but my Mrs and I started trying for a baby post the Glazers selling news (unrelated), and my baby looks on course to be born before the takeover is complete :lol:
:lol: I was thinking that you really took that news well, before the bracketed part
 
Status
Not open for further replies.