I just read this, I haven’t fact checked it:
Rivals fans saying we overpaid for Højlund
Liverpool FC: Signed Darwin Nunez for £85M, scored 9 league goals in English Premier League last season, same as Højlund did in Serie A in less starts.
Chelsea Football Club: Signed a Ukrainian kpop with 12 career goals star for £100M, it is almost August and he has zero goals this year.
Arsenal: Spent £50M on Gabriel Jesus who scored just 11 league goals last season, 2 more than Højlund.
Only City and Tottenham can boast of having the better centre forward, which will change in the near future cus I believe in Højlund's potential.
Erik has gotten his man and watch him do wonders with him.
Darwin’s fee was £64m after scoring 26 in 28 games.
Chelsea have signed Jackson and Nkunku both for significantly less in the same window that Utd has purchased Hojlund.
A PL proven ready to go Jesus for 50m is incredibly good business and one really shouldn’t presume that Højlund for £65m + will end up being a better signing.
Regarding ‘only City and Spurs being able to say they have a better CF’ -
Newcastle - Wilson (and Isak)
Chelsea - Nkunku and Jackson (and Broja)
Arse - Jesus and Nketiah
Liverpool - Gakpo? Nunez possibly
Brighton - Ferguson / Juao Pedro
Brentford - Toney
It’s entirely possible that actually all these are currently better CFs than Højlund.
Seems very early to make claims like that.
Especially when I almost guarantee that in the next breath after declaring him better than Jesus, Wilson, Nunez, Gakpo etc - you’ll be declaring him a ‘20 year old kid’ who we shouldn’t expect more than a handful of goals from.