Robertd0803
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2014
- Messages
- 7,318
Why was it 10 points as well by.the way? How did they settle on that?
Those clubs should be lawering up right now.Toothless. They should be given enough points to be guaranteed relegation at the very least. When they cheated 3 clubs went down and their cheating might have been the difference in them staying up - who was it? Burnley, Watford, Norwich? Plus they have had 3 years in the prem because of it
I'd love it if the glamour of the Prem was gradually eroded over the next decade with endless point deductions and legal cases involving the runaway winners of the last decade, and the money started ebbing away too. Feck it.
Saudi superleague 2.0 will take all the big clubs sooner or later.
I mean, 6 of you already tried to feck off to the superleague and only got fined 22m in total so why not!
Those clubs should be lawering up right now.
Because your club indulged the Phil Neville stepover phenomena. We ourselves got away with indulging it for a while but, as you can see, it's caught up with us, too.Begs the question, why have we been made an example of and not others?
Ha. fecking hell I’m thick.2 points.
It’ll be a mess. Doubt they’ll want money over their loss of their PL place.Oh yeah, no doubt there will be a massive compensation battle.
Would be a less stressful period I’m sure and force some stability. Todd would go crazy having to shut his chequebook for a window![]()
Those clubs should be lawyering up right now.
If it can be appealed I'd be surprised if it isn't reduced to 6ish points. 10 just seems far too excessive for one breach of rules, considering since that breach we have had our finances and transfer business monitored strictly by the PL in an effort to comply and conduct in good faith. No doubt we deserve punishment but the punishment feels a bit excessive for the crime.
We could still be out of the relegation zone with a win in the next game. It's lucky we started to pick up form recently and aren't languishing at the bottom.
Very very interested to see how other procedures go now.
Why would they approach it from the arbitrary nature of points docked now and not purely from the angle of a cheating entity impacting on everything that happened during their campaign with them?If you finished within a point of Everton then one could argue that the £19.5M unallowable delta across 3 seasons resulted in them skipping the jump ahead of you.
If you finished 10 points behind, lawyers will take your money but good luck arguing that in court.
@TheReligion Don't think this is bad news for us. Think we will just try and expedite the process and get a points deduction in this season. We aren't challenging this year and top 4 seems a stretch so might as well take our punishment asap.
What about 115 charges FC then?
Exactly.The three teams who came up this year are so shit, Everton would probably need to be docked at least 20 points to actually go down. Good timing for them.
Of course City and Chelsea won't even get a 'punishment' like this for doing orders of magnitude worse. It's possible Chelsea get hit with something now that they have (relatively) normal owners, but the government won't allow a club owned by a fecking nation state that we do big business with to actually be held accountable.
It would be interesting to hear from PL officials what is taking them so long to punish City on 115 charges. But on Everton's case it was like super sonic speed.
If Everton is deducted 10 points we should multiple it with X-115 times = 1150 points. This is equivalent to approximately City need to spend at least 10 years in 2nd or 3rd tier English football. That's about right!
Couldnt have happened in a better season with all 3 promoted clubs looking out of their depth. Theyre only 2 points from safety.
The great injustice of all of this type of stuff is when you look had who has been affected by what the league has determined to be cheating. Leicester are in the championship now. City stole titles. The sport is terribly undermined
It would be interesting to hear from PL officials what is taking them so long to punish City on 115 charges. But on Everton's case it was like super sonic speed.
If Everton is deducted 10 points we should multiple it with X-115 times for city = 1150 points. This is equivalent to approximately City need to spend at least 10 years in 2nd or 3rd tier English football. That's about right!
Thats them relegated
It would be interesting to hear from PL officials what is taking them so long to punish City on 115 charges. But on Everton's case it was like super sonic speed.
If Everton is deducted 10 points we should multiple it with X-115 times for city = 1150 points. This is equivalent to approximately City need to spend at least 10 years in 2nd or 3rd tier English football. That's about right!
Because you don’t have oil overlords as owner.Begs the question, why have we been made an example of and not others?
It would be interesting to hear from PL officials what is taking them so long to punish City on 115 charges. But on Everton's case it was like super sonic speed.
If Everton is deducted 10 points we should multiple it with X-115 times for city = 1150 points. This is equivalent to approximately City need to spend at least 10 years in 2nd or 3rd tier English football. That's about right!
Wrote yesterday in the Chelsea-related thread I think it's possible the club are already anticipating some kind of transfer / registration ban and that may have played a part in being so willing to spend heavily in the short term for both immediate first teamers as well as promising youngsters to be developed elsewhere.
With the amount of transfers we've done in the last year or so I honestly don't see a huge need to continue the heavy spending with or without a ban. Our squad building is currently more or less 'finished' and right now the best course of action is to just be patient and see who cuts it at the required level and who doesn't, without interrupting the flow too much with big changes to the squad. We've got some really promising young players in the first team already and then there's also the development group (Angelo, Casadei, Santos, Washington, Hutchinson, Kendry etc.) where we could eventually end up getting further reinforcements if some players in the squad start looking like they could need replacing and few of the loanees have performed well enough to be considered for a role.
If the club were offered a choice between a points deduction or a transfer ban as potential punishment for breaking the rules, I'd pick the latter any time. And seeing as how the current owners have self-reported most of the dodgy stuff already and are co-operating with the investigation instead of just flat out denying everything it's very much a possibility they could be able to have some input in what the potential punishment could end up being.