Everton deducted 10 points for PSR breach (reduced to 6) | Deducted further 2 points for second breach

Ayoba

Poster of Noncense.
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
8,676
Breach of sustainability?? Were they not green enough with their carbon emissions?
 

MegadrivePerson

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2022
Messages
1,621
Apparently our arguments basically boil down to stadium loans. We have notoriously cut down our spending and have sold quite high in recent years (Richy, Gordon, Iwobi etc.)
Stadium loans shouldn't be an issue though as Infrastructure spend doesn't count towards breaching the rules?
 

the_cliff

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
5,716
Everton need to go the City route and drown the PL in paperwork and refuse to cooperate. They're taking the piss.
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,918
Meanwhile every journalist and media outlet in the country continue to wet themselves about City and De Bruyne. Its just utterly farcical that a team who is about to coast to a 4th title in a row has 115 charges hanging over them for this long, when the longer it goes on the less likely any punishment is.

Just look at newcastle this window. Or us. If we could cheat and manipulate our accounts to bring in a 50 or 60 million pound player then life would be much easier. Then do that over and over and over again. The more you see how co-operating affects teams, the more it seems they should be stripped of titles.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
31,607
Supports
Everton
Stadium loans shouldn't be an issue though as Infrastructure spend doesn't count towards breaching the rules?
But both clubs have equipped themselves for the prospect, preparing mitigation that they believe should dismiss charges if they are referred to an independent commission later today.

Both clubs maintain they are within limits but, in Everton’s case, it would be stadium costs rather than player trading that would be the root cause of any potential overspend, as it had been the period in which the club has already been punished.
So says the telegraph...
 

cpleigh

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 4, 2022
Messages
14
Supports
Everton
The club statement is implying that it is 21-22 accounts again causing the problem and not 22-23, so not a NEW breach, merely the previous one still being in the same 3-year cycle. Being charged twice and potentially punished twice for the same offence, whilst having an appeal on the original charge.

How can that be correct?
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
31,607
Supports
Everton
The club statement is implying that it is 21-22 accounts again causing the problem and not 22-23, so not a NEW breach, merely the previous one still being in the same 3-year cycle. Being charged twice and potentially punished twice for the same offence, whilst having an appeal on the original charge.

How can that be correct?
It's all a mess that should really be sorted in house and not during a fecking season.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
They charged Everton twice in months, yet they can't even charge City in years?
 

Irrational.

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
33,002
Location
LVG's notebook
They charged Everton twice in months, yet they can't even charge City in years?
Anything to keep kicking the can down the road, procrastinate and allow City to win more silverware and avoid disturbing the oil barons. It’s pathetic.

Meanwhile, “smaller” clubs are charged and punished overnight.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,148
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Anything to keep kicking the can down the road, procrastinate and allow City to win more silverware and avoid disturbing the oil barons. It’s pathetic.

Meanwhile, “smaller” clubs are charged and punished overnight.
:lol: The feck are you talking about? How quick do you think it is to prove over 100 charges when a club refuse to accept them? A weekend? A bank holiday weekend maybe?
 

jeff gurr

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2018
Messages
1,304
Location
Canada
Supports
Leicester City
A 10 point deduction would relegate Forest which would be really unfair on Nuno Espirito Santo considering he has done nothing wrong.
I'm quite certain that he knew all about this when he signed up & probably had a pay out clause inserted.. He will do just fine. !!
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,689
Location
Manc
I can only assume City haven’t broken any FFP in the last 3 seasons?

Also Chelsea have only gone loopy in the last 18 months so their comeuppance isn’t due yet?

You have to draw a line in the sand somewhere, if Everton are the guinea pigs then it’s bad luck.

But I hope the second round of charges is a fine or only a few points, and no one gets relegated for FFP reasons.
 

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,738
Stadium loans shouldn't be an issue though as Infrastructure spend doesn't count towards breaching the rules?
Interest payments on the loans is the issue and they can’t be capitalised so doubt they class as infrastructure
 

G82

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 15, 2024
Messages
7
Supports
Liverpool
I can only assume City haven’t broken any FFP in the last 3 seasons?

Also Chelsea have only gone loopy in the last 18 months so their comeuppance isn’t due yet?

You have to draw a line in the sand somewhere, if Everton are the guinea pigs then it’s bad luck.

But I hope the second round of charges is a fine or only a few points, and no one gets relegated for FFP reasons.

City may not have broken FFP in the last 3 seasons with their “official” accounts, but I no doubt expect they would have with their “real” unfluffed accounts.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Not sure where the victim complex is coming from, sounds like they were constantly at it. I hope relegated teams take action after this as well
 

Forest Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2022
Messages
1,050
Supports
Nottingham Forest
So in order to comply with “Profit and Sustainability“ rules we should have accepted a £30M bid in June for Johnson and not the £47m we got in August!! Irony just doesn’t cover it.
 

OleGunnar20

Full Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
2,248
Everytime he appears i turn off mate, i can`t deal :lol:
Wait a minute, are you trying to say Kaveh whathischops isn't the definitive voice on all happenings in the modern football landscape? That he might just be talking shite and making half of this stuff up?!

God forbid.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,606
Location
Manchester
So in order to comply with “Profit and Sustainability“ rules we should have accepted a £30M bid in June for Johnson and not the £47m we got in August!! Irony just doesn’t cover it.
I did warn you about this.

The PL are after you and Everton.