MERGED: Rooney signs new contract!

Rednails

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2005
Messages
1,734
Location
Lancashire
The Rooney family has clearly earned that 300k, so they can do with it however they want. Should they just stop spending money depending on the economy?
They should be more discreet. Its OK being extravagant when the economy is doing well but in the present climate people do not want to see it. And as for 'Hello' magazine being involved. Uggh -who wants to see pictures of Croxteth lager louts puking in the swimming pool?
 

mjs020294

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
16,820
Rooney gets near £16 a minute.

How does that sound ?
That is just his base salary, which would be dwarfed by his total earnings. United are giving him about 90k for image rights, and the players pool at United usually pays them around one million a year.

So just from United he will be receiving:

14 million a year
1.16 million a month
269k a week
27 quid a minute

That is still less than half of his total income after his personnel endorsements and spin offs are added.

* In dollars he will probably earn between $45-50 million a year
 

Zarlak

my face causes global warming
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
45,409
Location
Truth like rain don't give a feck who it falls on.
You're not going to make any friends with that opinion but from a cold economic standpoint I'm inclined to agree with you.
It's how it is, I'm not that rich at all but if I lost my job tomorrow and heard that Rooney was having a 2,000,000 birthday bash it wouldn't make a difference to me. He brings that money into Manchester United and he gets paid it back. You are entitled to spend your money that you earn.

You get paid a proportion of what your company earns because of your work, that's how wages work, if you make your company more, you get paid more. If your company makes little money, you get paid little money.

Comparing someone whose company makes say £10,000,000 a year and pays its staff little to someone whose company makes £200,000,000+ a year and pays its staff considerably higher makes no sense at all. It's why we have the stupid outrage in the papers that X person gets a top paid of salary of X amount and that could pay for 567,000 more nurses or teachers. There is no link towards what the rich earn as a direct result of them and their performance/work and what somebody else earns who works in a smaller job who can't afford to pay more.

I doubt many people who earn 20,000 a year would feel guilty about going shopping in Tesco because somebody who earns 5,000 a year can't afford to do it themselves. The attitude would be, 'I work hard for my money and I deserve it and to spend it.' Why should someone who earns more do any different?

I have no right to be angry to Rooney for splashing the cash just because I can't afford to do the same. He has a talent I don't and gets paid well for it. He's entitled to spend his money.

Sometimes you need the cold approach to see the bottom line because that's what matters. Otherwise it becomes silly and blown out of proportions.
 

Zarlak

my face causes global warming
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
45,409
Location
Truth like rain don't give a feck who it falls on.
They should be more discreet. Its OK being extravagant when the economy is doing well but in the present climate people do not want to see it. And as for 'Hello' magazine being involved. Uggh -who wants to see pictures of Croxteth lager louts puking in the swimming pool?
People do want to see it, that's why it sells so well in 'Hello' magazine.

If they don't want to, they don't have to read it. Its because people do actually want to see it that it is shoved in our faces for people to then complain about.
 

EricaNo7

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
23,724
Location
more right wing than andrei kanchelskis
not sure to post this or not but here goes:
just had to speak to plus net bout my bb connection - the chap there told me ( after he'd noticed my cantona pw ) that his friend who's a sky cameraman in this area said city had been certain they were signing rooney and all their recent business had been conducted in private cars or something.
anyway the upshot was that apparently city had agreed terms and everything with rooney , until SAF intervened . Apparently city are livid!
 

mjs020294

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
16,820
not sure to post this or not but here goes:
just had to speak to plus net bout my bb connection - the chap there told me ( after he'd noticed my cantona pw ) that his friend who's a sky cameraman in this area said city had been certain they were signing rooney and all their recent business had been conducted in private cars or something.
anyway the upshot was that apparently city had agreed terms and everything with rooney , until SAF intervened . Apparently city are livid!
:lol:
 

olesmyhero

Emmy Moses
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Messages
23,968
Location
4000+ miles west of old trafford
not sure to post this or not but here goes:
just had to speak to plus net bout my bb connection - the chap there told me ( after he'd noticed my cantona pw ) that his friend who's a sky cameraman in this area said city had been certain they were signing rooney and all their recent business had been conducted in private cars or something.
anyway the upshot was that apparently city had agreed terms and everything with rooney , until SAF intervened . Apparently city are livid!
So City talked to Rooney directly, without going to the club. Agree terms without talking to the club. Tapping up, no?
 

mjs020294

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
16,820
I can remember when it was reported United gave Robson a 100k a year contract. People were disgusted at a footballer earning 2k a week.
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
87,608
This thread feels like a giant ball that just rolls around picking up stuff on the way, ending in one big congealed mess.
 

mjs020294

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
16,820
So City talked to Rooney directly, without going to the club. Agree terms without talking to the club. Tapping up, no?
Yep I am sure the authorities are furiously interviewing all Sky Cameramen as we type.
 

EricaNo7

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
23,724
Location
more right wing than andrei kanchelskis
Well obviously you have to take it with a huge pinch of salt, but if true....
of course - i know i'm gullible but .....!

he asked for my password and laughed when i said cantona, so i said, well i;m not having rooney!
so he said, but you've signed him for 5 years and i told him that i couldn't feel the same way about the little sh*t again - which is when he told me about his friend.
So who knows? but if it's true, he's an even bigger twat than I thought!
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,114
Location
Austria
Moving with the times im afraid, if you cant pay top dollar you aint getting the top players, fact of life in the modern game.
Thing is, he's just not worth that money (that's my opinion anyway). But hey ho at least he stays with us.
 

Allforone

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
11,614
Location
United could spend £85million on David De Gea, Phi
Thing is, he's just not worth that money (that's my opinion anyway). But hey ho at least he stays with us.
Of course hes not worth it, who is? no ones worth that sort of money, makes not a jot of difference though does it, thats the world we live in, thats modern day football, you either pay it or you don't compete im afraid thats the harsh reality, top players want top whack, its disgusting the lengths they go to get it but fact is if there's someone else out there willing to pay it then you find yourself in a situation of having to as i said move with the times.
 

Zarlak

my face causes global warming
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
45,409
Location
Truth like rain don't give a feck who it falls on.
Thing is, he's just not worth that money (that's my opinion anyway). But hey ho at least he stays with us.
Thing is, how do you decide what 'worth' is?

If you bring in the money to your business so that your business may pay you well then yes you are worth it.

If you generate the income, you get paid the money for doing so. That's all there is to it. If you generate your business 50,000,000,000 in the next year, you're worth a damn sight more to them than whatever you are paid now.

'Worth' is only relevant to the amount of money the business makes by having you employed. You are paid for that. Therefore yes he is worth it, as is any player who generates the income generated in order to give you that pay rise. We aren't paying him what we can't afford, we are paying him what we can afford because of what he and the other squad players have generated for the club.