Westminster Politics

Don't Kill Bill

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
5,675
Smores said:
I'll repeat what I've said to others but you're taking a narrow view of the issue, the OBR is quite clear in it's reports that the cost of delaying net zero impacts future finances negatively and that undermines our ability to control debt. Why you lot keep ignoring this is beyond me.

Like everyone our R-G is bad right now such is the change in the global economy and interest rates. However the economic risks require mitigation and they don't disappear because of politically driven fiscal management. The IMF and OBR are predicting a better R-G and increased slack in economies, 28 billion a year is nothing in that context (see increased defence spending) and supports the growth part of the R-G measure.

We need to spend wisely if we're to limit (not stop) debt growth and that starts with measures that have the best long term outcomes for public finances.
Click to expand...

In one sense it does not really matter if it is good idea or not. It does not matter if the return on investment is there. It does not matter if the human cost of not doing it is huge.

If you are borrowing the money to do it all that matters is if the people you are borrowing from will or will not lend you the money and how much they charge you for it. Not because that is right but because that is the very unfair way that the world works. Without that backing you can't get passed the first step.

I am concerned that the UK does not have the economic altitude to pull off a huge borrow to grow maneuver. The markets can do the math and see the problems just like I do. They don't have to invest in the UK and unless they are confident in the govt plans they will invest elsewhere. Coming into office with a long list of expensive commitments, knocks that confidence and that might be all it takes. Confidence in the Labour party was destroyed by Corbyn and will take time in office to build back.

(that is on those who voted him in as leader, not me who warned he couldn't win an election to save his life or keep the PLP together)

A future Labour govt will be under enormous pressure to borrow and spend. 28 billion per year isn't nothing and insulating homes might not be the best opportunity or place to spend that amount even for environmental impact. Grid storage to offset peak demand and utilize fully the intermittent renewable sources we already have for instance. might become a better way to spend the money if its available, as technologies are moving very quickly forward in that regard.

I have never voted Tory.

PS. to those who think we should borrow the money needed, put a number on it for me will you, not just the green deal but the total amount above current govt plans you would borrow to invest in the ideas you are putting forward.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,722
Don't Kill Bill said:
To add more to the list of doom.

Ironically lets start with the last attempt to insulate buildings, where we somehow managed to put flammable material on high rise buildings and now we will have to take it off and put new non-flammable material on those buildings.

Or we could mention the rotting concrete problem, which means we can't use buildings because the roof could collapse and kill everyone in them.

Which leads me nicely to the bankrupt councils issue. I wonder how we are going to keep local govt going given the long running and now critical debt problems.

I'll add the post office crisis here in the firm belief that whatever Fujitsu say we are potentially on the hook here as well.
Click to expand...
All true, but many on here want Starmer to pretend none of this exists, and 'bet the farm' on things that won't show any real improvement for another twenty years at least. Not sure all the young people emerging from schools, colleges and Universities in the mean time will mind waiting that long. There has to be a balance between dealing with the present and investing for the future and Starmer knows that and until he has seen what the real size of the problems he will inherit are, he is limiting expectations.
 

Flying high

Full Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2015
Messages
1,745
Drainy said:
If you are talking fiscal policy, they are literally being driven by financial realities, as has been explained probably a dozen times in the thread.

They have said they want to spend more on public services when the economy allows it. The Tories don't believe in providing public services. That's the vote.
Click to expand...
No I'm not talking about purely fiscal policy, though it certainly is a factor. Labour have barely been an opposition for the last 5 years. They regularly refuse to say that they'll reverse the ridiculous tory policies, often going as far as to say that they won't reverse them. They are literally about as right wing as the tories have been for the last 40 years. And we've all seen how disastrous that's been.

What we need is major change. A complete rebalancing of the economy and an end to the scapegoating of minority groups. Massive investment into training and education. Radical new housing strategies. etc etc etc.

And it's got little to do with what can be afforded. The debt is growing nearly every year as it is. But that money simply gets given to massive multi-nationals, fossil fuel companies like BP, and consultancy firms who simply cream off the profits while services go down the drain.

I do believe that labour would be slightly less likely to broker those deals on the back of promises for future seats on the board of said companies, but really, only slightly. I don't for one minute think that this lot are going to put the regular people first, as Corbyn or any other actual leftist would do, or plan for a better future for the next generations.

So if labour want my vote, they've got the rest of this year to change their narrative.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,351
Location
bin
Sweet Square said:
Click to expand...
I wonder if more people are aware of the U-turn than the original pledge because the news of the U-turn has been plastered everywhere as if it's the first U-turn a political party has ever made? For example, I'm certainly seeing you post about it more than any actual Tory U-turn that they've commited when in actual power.
 

Frosty

Logical and sensible but turns women gay
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
17,281
Location
Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango!
Cash-strapped local authorities across the UK took out massive 50-year loans at soaring rates of interest in the aftermath of Liz Truss’s catastrophic mini-budget, according to official figures that reveal more about the long-term cost to the public of her 49 days in office.

Figures from the government’s Debt Management Office show that after the budget on 23 September, 2022, announced by Truss’s chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng, 24 50-year loans of between £590,000 and £40m were taken out by councils at interest rates of up to 4.77 %, over the rest of that year.

https://www.theguardian.com/society...take-out-massive-loans-at-high-interest-rates
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,891
Supports
A Free Palestine
Frosty said:
The Greens lost an employment tribunal bought by Shahrar Ali, who was removed as a spokesperson for his 'gender critical' views: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68250071.

Expect them to become a more hostile space for the trans community going forward.

At the moment I am just not going to vote.
Click to expand...
Sweet Square said:
Thanks. I had no idea about this. A depressing read
Click to expand...
Let’s just be clear - this is what he wrote:

He wrote: 'A woman is commonly defined as an adult human female and, genetically, typified by two XX chromosomes. These facts are not in dispute nor should they be in any political party.

'We campaign for the rights of women and girls to be treated equally on the basis of the protected characteristic of biological sex, as enshrined in the Equality Act 2010.'

He also added that gender and biological sex are two separate qualities, so it’s hardly controversial what he said. It’s another depressing step into this culture war, that only really exists online.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,403
Location
Birmingham
How can it be justified that you pay a higher rate of tax for money you work for than capital gains?
The whole system is rigged to favour the wealthy.
 

Bert_

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,551
Location
Manchester
Don't Kill Bill said:
In one sense it does not really matter if it is good idea or not. It does not matter if the return on investment is there. It does not matter if the human cost of not doing it is huge.

If you are borrowing the money to do it all that matters is if the people you are borrowing from will or will not lend you the money and how much they charge you for it. Not because that is right but because that is the very unfair way that the world works. Without that backing you can't get passed the first step.

I am concerned that the UK does not have the economic altitude to pull off a huge borrow to grow maneuver. The markets can do the math and see the problems just like I do. They don't have to invest in the UK and unless they are confident in the govt plans they will invest elsewhere. Coming into office with a long list of expensive commitments, knocks that confidence and that might be all it takes. Confidence in the Labour party was destroyed by Corbyn and will take time in office to build back.

(that is on those who voted him in as leader, not me who warned he couldn't win an election to save his life or keep the PLP together)

A future Labour govt will be under enormous pressure to borrow and spend. 28 billion per year isn't nothing and insulating homes might not be the best opportunity or place to spend that amount even for environmental impact. Grid storage to offset peak demand and utilize fully the intermittent renewable sources we already have for instance. might become a better way to spend the money if its available, as technologies are moving very quickly forward in that regard.

I have never voted Tory.

PS. to those who think we should borrow the money needed, put a number on it for me will you, not just the green deal but the total amount above current govt plans you would borrow to invest in the ideas you are putting forward.
Click to expand...
Ideally, we would have borrowed during the historically low interest rates we saw 2010-2020. If the communist czech spy hamas supporter won in 2017, then we might have actually taken advantage of that, albeit later than we should have.
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,458
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
Adisa said:
How can it be justified that you pay a higher rate of tax for money you work for than capital gains?
The whole system is rigged to favour the wealthy.
Click to expand...
Capital Gains Tax is lower than income tax for both basic and higher rate taxpayers. Many countries don't have this tax at all.

The UK is already a very high tax country and people want higher taxes still? Tax policy is also pretty confused in that there are some tax efficient ways to save for retirement, eg pension and ISAs, but outside that, eg crypto or property, you get taxed shitloads on the already taxed income you invest.
Bear in mind UK state pension is one of the lowest in Europe and the cost of living among the highest.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,998
Jippy said:
Capital Gains Tax is lower than income tax for both basic and higher rate taxpayers. Many countries don't have this tax at all.

The UK is already a very high tax country and people want higher taxes still? Tax policy is also pretty confused in that there are some tax efficient ways to save for retirement, eg pension and ISAs, but outside that, eg crypto or property, you get taxed shitloads on the already taxed income you invest.
Bear in mind UK state pension is one of the lowest in Europe and the cost of living among the highest.
Click to expand...
If your investments were taxed more then your pension income would be able to be taxed less...
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,998
Jippy said:
Yep and ISAs too, but stuff like crypto and property is ineligible for both.
Click to expand...
Good. Crypto is garbage and property shouldn't be able to be amassed by one person easily so that everyone gets a chance to own some. Capitalism only works if everyone can get at least a small share of the capital.
 

Bert_

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,551
Location
Manchester
Income is income. Should all be taxed the same no matter how it's been acquired.

Such an obvious loophole that can easily be closed. It's taboo to even question it though.
 

Eplel

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2016
Messages
1,942
Bert_ said:
Such an obvious loophole that can easily be closed. It's taboo to even question it though.
Click to expand...

The funny part is that the plutoctrats' excuse for this is that it encourages investments (same exact excuse they use for tax breaks and tax avoidance)
 

4bars

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
5,004
Supports
Barcelona
TwoSheds said:
Good. Crypto is garbage and property shouldn't be able to be amassed by one person easily so that everyone gets a chance to own some. Capitalism only works if everyone can get at least a small share of the capital.
Click to expand...
That is not capitalism. That is communism lite. Capitalism is what is currently happening
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,998
4bars said:
That is not capitalism. That is communism lite. Capitalism is what is currently happening
Click to expand...
Not really, regulating capitalism doesn't mean it's not capitalism. I didn't say everybody gets given a small share of the capital (although that's how universal basic income works), I said everybody can have a share. There's no point working if you can't improve your lot by doing so.
 

4bars

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
5,004
Supports
Barcelona
TwoSheds said:
Not really, regulating capitalism doesn't mean it's not capitalism. I didn't say everybody gets given a small share of the capital (although that's how universal basic income works), I said everybody can have a share. There's no point working if you can't improve your lot by doing so.
Click to expand...
A very simplistic way to put it is that capitalism regulates itself through the invisible hand of the market. Any regulation goes against capitalism But pure ideologies like capitalism or communism will never work due to the flawed human nature that is why they never existed a pure form of it and only mix models can thrive. Where capitalism is flawed, government has to intervene like with health care, studies, justice, military and others. the same as socialism/communism with state inefficiencies.

What you are asking, small share of the capital, which I disagree because it should be a bit more than small share of capital, is interventionism so not capitalism. And yes, I agree with you, amassing an stupid amount of capital of any form should be regulated by the government. But the governments are in cahoots with capitalists so it will never happen
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,998
4bars said:
A very simplistic way to put it is that capitalism regulates itself through the invisible hand of the market. Any regulation goes against capitalism But pure ideologies like capitalism or communism will never work due to the flawed human nature that is why they never existed a pure form of it and only mix models can thrive. Where capitalism is flawed, government has to intervene like with health care, studies, justice, military and others. the same as socialism/communism with state inefficiencies.

What you are asking, small share of the capital, which I disagree because it should be a bit more than small share of capital, is interventionism so not capitalism. And yes, I agree with you, amassing an stupid amount of capital of any form should be regulated by the government. But the governments are in cahoots with capitalists so it will never happen
Click to expand...
Capitalism as you describe it is a mathematically unstable market system that essentially funnels all the resources to "the top", leaving everything else with nothing. So no, the invisible hand of the market doesn't regulate things. It requires intervention or there can be no consumers and so even "the top" becomes worthless. The most obvious form of intervention is redistribution of wealth through taxation and there has been no capitalist system ever that denied taxation was needed. You have to be an entirely uneducated extreme libertarian to think that. Other regulations on industry and society are also needed though, and social housing or free healthcare should be seen as no different in terms of necessity to a stable capitalist economy and society than any other form of intervention (product safety regulations, environmental regulations, policing, transport investment, education etc.)
 

hodgey123

Full Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
400
Adisa said:
How can it be justified that you pay a higher rate of tax for money you work for than capital gains?
The whole system is rigged to favour the wealthy.
Click to expand...
I work in tax and have been bleating on about this (in this thread as well) for ages. The Tories are never going to raise CGT as a lot of them pay it, as they are rich (see Rishi Sunak's 2022/23 UK tax return). One of the first things I would do if I was in power would be to equalise the rates.
 

pacifictheme

Full Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2013
Messages
7,755
Mr Pigeon said:
I wonder if more people are aware of the U-turn than the original pledge because the news of the U-turn has been plastered everywhere as if it's the first U-turn a political party has ever made? For example, I'm certainly seeing you post about it more than any actual Tory U-turn that they've commited when in actual power.
Click to expand...
Yeah it feels like this u turn has been a bigger deal than just about every u turn the party in actual power have made. Both the BBC and guardian had live feeds on it.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,756
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
hodgey123 said:
I work in tax and have been bleating on about this (in this thread as well) for ages. The Tories are never going to raise CGT as a lot of them pay it, as they are rich (see Rishi Sunak's 2022/23 UK tax return). One of the first things I would do if I was in power would be to equalise the rates.
Click to expand...
Oh no you can’t do that! All the rich people will leave the county or use elaborate schemes to avoid paying it because they don’t currently do exactly that.
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,891
Supports
A Free Palestine
Our tax laws are not fit for purpose and archaic. We need a wealth tax and that can remove the need for some of these other taxes.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,859
Not that I watched that, or ever plan to, but generally Sunak comes across as one of the least inspiring and charismatic politicians I have ever seen. He is someone that should be kept away from public speaking as much as possible
 

Vernon Philander

Full Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
900
Cloud7 said:
Not that I watched that, or ever plan to, but generally Sunak comes across as one of the least inspiring and charismatic politicians I have ever seen. He is someone that should be kept away from public speaking as much as possible
Click to expand...
He comes across every bit a Goldman Sachs technocrat. That’s his heritage I suppose but why the Tories think that would be popular with the Red Wall, I have no clue
 

That'sHernandez

Ominously close to getting banned
Joined
Oct 30, 2010
Messages
24,574
Vernon Philander said:
He comes across every bit a Goldman Sachs technocrat. That’s his heritage I suppose but why the Tories think that would be popular with the Red Wall, I have no clue
Click to expand...
Who else do they have? Penny Mordaunt is the one who ran against him and she sounds posh as well. They don’t have anyone left who can actually appeal to people because they’re all either tinpot fascists or out of touch millionaires incapable of showing human emotion
 

That'sHernandez

Ominously close to getting banned
Joined
Oct 30, 2010
Messages
24,574
TheGame said:
Click to expand...
The guy is spouting misinformation and looks like he’s seconds from snapping and climbing over people to lamp Sunak. If it weren’t on GB News you could almost have a bit of sympathy for Sunak here, I’m not sure how he’s supposed to deal with that, particularly considering the guy doesn’t even ask a question
 

Murder on Zidane's Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
28,692
That'sHernandez said:
Who else do they have? Penny Mordaunt is the one who ran against him and she sounds posh as well. They don’t have anyone left who can actually appeal to people because they’re all either tinpot fascists or out of touch millionaires incapable of showing human emotion
Click to expand...
Well, that's the Tory party. A cabal of horrible f*cks
 

rimaldo

All about the essence
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
41,040
Supports
arse
horsechoker said:
No that's the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
Click to expand...
i wouldn’t be so sure. as a scotch, his benefit money from westminster would enable him to go on up to 17 foreign holidays per year. it could just be a tan. a tan that us hard working englishmen have had to pay for.
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,444
Location
The stable
rimaldo said:
i wouldn’t be so sure. as a scotch, his benefit money from westminster would enable him to go on up to 17 foreign holidays per year. it could just be a tan. a tan that us hard working englishmen have had to pay for.
Click to expand...
How do you explain the hair? HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THE HAIR

and what about the coke addiction? Oh no wait, that makes sense
 
You must log in or register to reply here.