Westminster Politics

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,442
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
Because he's not talking to you.
He's not directly, but he's still repelling me. I'll vote Labour because I can hold my nose re Starmer due to having an excellent constituency MP. It's very easy for me to not be arsed and abstain though, given I have to do a postal vote and may have a narrow window to do that.
 

Murder on Zidane's Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
28,668
He's not directly, but he's still repelling me. I'll vote Labour because I can hold my nose re Starmer due to having an excellent constituency MP. It's very easy for me to not be arsed and abstain though, given I have to do a postal vote and may have a narrow window to do that.
I agree but that's why he's saying this shit.

It's not for us who will vote Labour, it's for those who always vote Tory. A bigger majority, the easier government is.
 

That'sHernandez

Ominously close to getting banned
Joined
Oct 30, 2010
Messages
24,571
I was in A&E from 10 pm to 5 am with my daughter on Good Friday/Easter Saturday. When we finally got to go to the treatment area at about 3 am I was glad to have been sat in the waiting room for the rest of the time. When we were walking between the waiting room and the little mini-ward for kids in A&E it was just wall to wall with old people laying in beds in the corridors, because there wasn't the bed capacity in cubicles and on the wards. I was glad for my 6 year old daughter not to have to see that.

I don't understand how anyone can visit a hospital in this country these days and want to vote Tory in the next GE.
 

Murder on Zidane's Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
28,668




The latest political football which will be booted around.
 
Last edited:

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,173
Net zero is all bollocks anyway. We just buy carbon credits and keep pumping out the stuff. The CO2 panic and climate change, like racism, has become an industry lining the pockets of a few people that regularly appear on TV and radio. One will say we will all be dead in 30 years time, baked to death in the increasing heat caused by CO2. Another person says we are actually in a CO2 deficit as we've planted more trees and crops which need CO2 to grow. It's like these left wing muppets that come on tv and talk down our country whilst living in posh streets in bought with all the appearance money they get and donations from guilty millionaires. BTW, guess how much CO2 is actually in the atmosphere. 5%?, 10 %? It's actually 0.04% of the total atmosphere. If all they world stopped producing CO2 it wouldn't matter because it hangs around for about 300 years or longer. Methane, another greenhouse gas, only hangs around for 10 or 12 years but absorbs more hear, so we should be concentrating on stopping mammals farting to cool the earth. Oh, and dispersing clouds too.
A comfort blanket of gibberish.
 

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,501
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
I was in A&E from 10 pm to 5 am with my daughter on Good Friday/Easter Saturday. When we finally got to go to the treatment area at about 3 am I was glad to have been sat in the waiting room for the rest of the time. When we were walking between the waiting room and the little mini-ward for kids in A&E it was just wall to wall with old people laying in beds in the corridors, because there wasn't the bed capacity in cubicles and on the wards. I was glad for my 6 year old daughter not to have to see that.

I don't understand how anyone can visit a hospital in this country these days and want to vote Tory in the next GE.
How could anyone actually have voted for Brexit. Could well be the same people.
 

DanH

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2004
Messages
1,490
Location
armchair
I usually don't take what the person is saying, rather listen to the interview.
@Pogue Mahone posted in the Transgender rights thread and I thought it was useful. More in depth discussion on the subject should take place in the correct thread, but this may be useful as a summary of the report when looking at political reaction in this thread:

The tl;dr version:

Overview of key findings
  • There is no simple explanation for the increase in the numbers of predominantly young people and young adults who have a trans or gender diverse identity, but there is broad agreement that it is a result of a complex interplay between biological, psychological and social factors. This balance of factors will be different in each individual.
  • There are conflicting views about the clinical approach, with expectations of care at times being far from usual clinical practice. This has made some clinicians fearful of working with gender-questioning young people, despite their presentation being similar to many children and young people presenting to other NHS services.
  • An appraisal of international guidelines for care and treatment of children and young people with gender incongruence found that that no single guideline could be applied in its entirety to the NHS in England.
  • While a considerable amount of research has been published in this field, systematic evidence reviews demonstrated the poor quality of the published studies, meaning there is not a reliable evidence base upon which to make clinical decisions, or for children and their families to make informed choices.
  • The strengths and weaknesses of the evidence base on the care of children and young people are often misrepresented and overstated, both in scientific publications and social debate.
  • The controversy surrounding the use of medical treatments has taken focus away from what the individualised care and treatment is intended to achieve for individuals seeking support from NHS gender services.
  • The rationale for early puberty suppression remains unclear, with weak evidence regarding the impact on gender dysphoria, mental or psychosocial health. The effect on cognitive and psychosexual development remains unknown.
  • The use of masculinising / feminising hormones in those under the age of 18 also presents many unknowns, despite their longstanding use in the adult transgender population. The lack of long-term follow-up data on those commencing treatment at an earlier age means we have inadequate information about the range of outcomes for this group.
  • Clinicians are unable to determine with any certainty which children and young people will go on to have an enduring trans identity.
  • For most young people, a medical pathway will not be the best way to manage their gender-related distress. For those young people for whom a medical pathway is clinically indicated, it is not enough to provide this without also addressing wider mental health and/or psychosocially challenging problems.
  • Innovation is important if medicine is to move forward, but there must be a proportionate level of monitoring, oversight and regulation that does not stifle progress, while preventing creep of unproven approaches into clinical practice. Innovation must draw from and contribute to the evidence base.
Overview of Recommendations
The recommendations set out a different approach to healthcare, more closely aligned with usual NHS clinical practice that considers the young person holistically and not solely in terms of their gender-related distress. The central aim of assessment should be to help young people to thrive and achieve their life goals.

  • Services must operate to the same standards as other services seeing children and young people with complex presentations and/or additional risk factors.
  • Expand capacity through a distributed service model, based in paediatric services and with stronger links between secondary and specialist services.
  • Children/ young people referred to NHS gender services must receive a holistic assessment of their needs to inform an individualised care plan. This should include screening for neurodevelopmental conditions, including autism spectrum disorder, and a mental health assessment.
  • Standard evidence based psychological and psychopharmacological treatment approaches should be used to support the management of the associated distress from gender incongruence and cooccurring conditions, including support for parents/carers and siblings as appropriate.
  • Services should establish a separate pathway for pre-pubertal children and their families. ensuring that they are prioritised for early discussion about how parents can best support their child in a balanced and non-judgemental way. When families/carers are making decisions about social transition of pre-pubertal children, services should ensure that they can be seen as early as possible by a clinical professional with relevant experience.
  • NHS England should ensure that each Regional Centre has a follow-through service for 17–25-year-olds; either by extending the range of the regional children and young people’s service or through linked services, to ensure continuity of care and support at a potentially vulnerable stage in their journey.  This will also allow clinical, and research follow up data to be collected.
  • There needs to be provision for people considering detransition, recognising that they may not wish to re-engage with the services whose care they were previously under.
  • A full programme of research should be established to look at the characteristics, interventions and outcomes of every young person presenting to the NHS gender services.
  • The puberty blocker trial previously announced by NHS England should be part of a programme of research which also evaluates outcomes of psychosocial interventions and masculinising/ feminising hormones.
  • The option to provide masculinising/feminising hormones from age 16 is available, but the Review recommends extreme caution. There should be a clear clinical rationale for providing hormones at this stage rather than waiting until an individual reaches 18. Every case considered for medical treatment should be discussed at a national Multi- Disciplinary Team (MDT).
  • Implications of private healthcare on any future requests to the NHS for treatment, monitoring and/or involvement in research, and the dispensing responsibilities of pharmacists of private prescriptions needs to be clearly communicated.
 

Murder on Zidane's Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
28,668
@Pogue Mahone posted in the Transgender rights thread and I thought it was useful. More in depth discussion on the subject should take place in the correct thread, but this may be useful as a summary of the report when looking at political reaction in this thread:
Read this (I cannot post on that thread) but Pogue posted and his comments I thought were fair.

Like the report, it's fair balanced but as this is such a fractious issue, it's just being used to scream and claim all sorts of nonsense.
 

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,824
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
Ah yes the last referendum went so well. This is Farage’s new grift it seems.

So Farage doesn't understand that the ECHR is not an EU institution.

He now wants the public to vote to cancel the Northern Ireland protocol and Windsor framework and all trade deals, especially the one with the EU and people would fall for this complete nonsense because he's a racist xenophobe. Come on you Brexiters, press the self-destruct button yet again.

When will someone lock this moron up?
 

4bars

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
4,928
Supports
Barcelona
So Farage doesn't understand that the ECHR is not an EU institution.

He now wants the public to vote to cancel the Northern Ireland protocol and Windsor framework and all trade deals, especially the one with the EU and people would fall for this complete nonsense because he's a racist xenophobe. Come on you Brexiters, press the self-destruct button yet again.

When will someone lock this moron up?
I don't know why you allow german citizens to get elected
 

Frosty

Logical and sensible but turns women gay
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
17,243
Location
Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango!
So Farage doesn't understand that the ECHR is not an EU institution.

He now wants the public to vote to cancel the Northern Ireland protocol and Windsor framework and all trade deals, especially the one with the EU and people would fall for this complete nonsense because he's a racist xenophobe. Come on you Brexiters, press the self-destruct button yet again.

When will someone lock this moron up?
Don't forget the peace process too.
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
19,263
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
Having worked in elections, postal voting in the UK is one of the most secure methods to vote by. There are numerous checks involved throughout the process. If Farage had any evidence, he would go to the authorities but he's talking bollocks.
 

That'sHernandez

Ominously close to getting banned
Joined
Oct 30, 2010
Messages
24,571
I'll be generous and assume you are referring to the commitments to trident otherwise you've missed the whole 'when resources allow' comment in your haste to get a dig in
"When resources allow" is subjective and could potentially mean the moment they get in and make cuts to benefits or something like that to facilitate it.
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,831
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
"When resources allow" is subjective and could potentially mean the moment they get in and make cuts to benefits or something like that to facilitate it.
It's also subjective and could mean by the end of parliament or never.

Again, they are saying that their plan to reduce spending on benefits is to fund the NHS and mental health services to support people into recovery because the numbers are too high because of austerity leading to delays in treatment.

They have to talk with firm rhetoric because they are Labour are don't get away with anything with the press we have.