mu4c_20le
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 44,614
Something is brewing behind the scenes.And yet apparently it was just the comments that has made Garnacho like these tweets.
Something is brewing behind the scenes.And yet apparently it was just the comments that has made Garnacho like these tweets.
I dont get why he doesnt make use of his squad and adapt his tactics and approach to the opposition we are facing.Why he is insisting on certain players is beyond me. It makes zero sense, and the same goes for his formation
I'm not the one who has condescendingly argued for ETH all season.You just continue shit stirring bud
What are you waffling about?I'm not the one who has condescendingly argued for ETH all season.
Maybe, maybe not.Something is brewing behind the scenes.
You've been consistently smug and condescending in this thread to others, refusing to acknowledge criticism. Don't play coy.What are you waffling about?
FFS
Whatever you think of Ten Hag it’s unedifying to see a manager turned on by a player who he’s supported and nurtured at the first instance of any sort of criticism.
It speaks very poorly of his character.
What on earth has that got to do with my criticism of Garnacho?You've been consistently smug and condescending in this thread to others, refusing to acknowledge criticism. Don't play coy.
Indeed, a good manager can make a team greater than the sum of it's parts. What we're seeing here is the opposite, Ten Hag's lucky we have talented players that keep bailing us out.
We defend like we're playing all out attack and attack like we're playing with 10 men behind the ball. I don't think I've ever seen a team like this before, our 'plan' is the worst of both worlds
It'll be the same crap going on that we've seen numerous times over the past decade.Something is brewing behind the scenes.
And the formation males no sense since the first day. Not benching certain players just shows that he is not a top managerI dont get why he doesnt make use of his squad and adapt his tactics and approach to the opposition we are facing.
Example, todays game, we are away to bournemouth. Why not start with a midfield 3 of Fernandes, Eriksen and Amrabat. Keep possession, take the sting out of the game. Instead he plays a "legs have gone" casemiro and over uses Mainoo which cant be good for the boy (fergie always said you had to manage the minutes of young players to avoid fatigue and burnout).
Garnacho is another one who is over used.
As a manager he seems so clueless and stuck in his ways.
fecking hellLast 7 games
I pointed out you are as bad as you say Garnacho is.What on earth has that got to do with my criticism of Garnacho?
I assume you also defended Sancho
If he can't face the truth, he can leave for good
Although that is true.If he can't face the truth, he can leave for good
Yeah, because I remember everything everyone has ever posted. Why are you acting like I should have all your posts memorised
Never assume, it makes an ass out of U and ME.
I wanted Sancho out for ages, and never bought the mental health narrative that caftards came up with.
That just shows you don't read anything properly on this forum.
Yep. Massive alarm bells from that game.The first game of the season the signs were there. Wolves cut through our midfield, and 8 months later we're still repeating the same mistakes. He's so stubborn.
Who knows what was said in private though.We do have a cup final to play for, especially if Chelsea beat City. I would hope the players still stay on board for that at least.
It's pretty much over if he's lost Garnacho now. Can't believe Garnacho would lose it over those quotes though- there's barely anything there from what i recall of the interview. He just said the right side wasn't working in shape or discipline.
A nice example of being clueless and proud.Looks like it's gone under your radar that he was a loan signing
Had the new owner been around for a while, there would have been no excuse. But under the circumstances, I can understand why he didn't want to rush to any sort of change within weeks of his arrival.Give us an example of how keeping a shit manager and missing out on the CL money is better for us in the long term
And ever since...Yep. Massive alarm bells from that game.
Quite possibly, after the 4-3 loss to Copenhagen is when we should have pulled the trigger.If he was sacked in November like he should've been, we'd have gotten top 4.
A disgrace that this clown has been given more leeway than our own club legend Ole.
fecking weak mentality fraud. Imagine if this guy was your boss.
It’s overThe comments were absolutely nothing. He needs to wind his neck in the little cnut
The members of staff who left already had designated replacements and their departure probably didn't have huge effect. Replacing the manager is far bigger, especially if you're planning to base your work on several people (Ashworth, etc) but none of them are around yet.That's not a good argument. All this could be done at the same time. It is far easier to get a manager in. The fact that SJR is on record saying we need a champions league finish this season for FFP is making them look worse. If you aren't willing to change results to get champions league don't say stuff like that in public. If he really wanted that finish he'd have sacked ETH like he did a few other members of staff at carrington.
Yes you have Which is fair, because at some point manager needs to take responsibility, but whatever we think about Erik, this bunch of players are the worst and many of them have been trash under multiple managers so they are first to get the blame. There is a reason we rarely are able to sell our players for any reasonable money, if at all. Nobody wants them because they are pretty much hugely overpaid garbageTo be quite honest, how can you not bottle it when having 20 odd shots against each game with a gameplan that's not making sense?
feck! I've gone full ETH out haven't I?
Of for feck's sake. Be mad at Ten Hag all you want, but how can you defend this bunch of miserable players (most of them, at least)How did the team bottle it? ETH sets them up to fail every week. If it weren't for the players we'd be below 10th.
Sadly the tens of millions he cost us at that point in lost revenue meant we couldn't afford it.Quite possibly, after the 4-3 loss to Copenhagen is when we should have pulled the trigger.
Even so, the specific comments he was reacting to were so mild.Who knows what was said in private though.
Again, INEOS should not be going around saying champions league is a prioity and then stick with a manager like ETH. Either sort the manager out at the same time or write the season off. Neither of which they have done.The members of staff who left already had designated replacements and their departure probably didn't have huge effect. Replacing the manager is far bigger, especially if you're planning to base your work on several people (Ashworth, etc) but none of them are around yet.
It's very easy to a supporter to call for the manager's head. It's a little different when you're actually the one reponsible for it, and for dealing with the consequences.
So an even worse manager?He is going to finish the season below 60 points.
Get Potter in immediately, so he can get the rest of the campaign to know the team and to start implementing changes.
feck me what a depressing post from start to finishHe is going to finish the season below 60 points.
Get Potter in immediately, so he can get the rest of the campaign to know the team and to start implementing changes.
Potter, haha.He is going to finish the season below 60 points.
Get Potter in immediately, so he can get the rest of the campaign to know the team and to start implementing changes.