A lot more dangerous than a two footed tackle.
A lot more dangerous than a two footed tackle.
Even caveman Holt is better than CarrollYou are right. Lambert > Carroll. I would have Lambert in my side over Carroll. And no thinks there is anything there. He was never that good to begin with and you cant expect him to develop into a world class just because he cost £35m. And playing in all these teams that play long ball will not help to become a good player technically. All he can and will do is win headers for long ball teams.
Won a few headers against players 6 inches shorter than him. Elbowed a few people and generally showed no technical ability in possession. Barnstorming English performance.I really can't understand what he did to deserve being made MoM.
Nope.I think he gets a shove from Vidic though (for the De Gea challenge), which causes him to lose control.
While that may be true (and I'm not convinced), he still gets bumped by Vidic.Nope.
He looks directly at de gea, he doesnt even bother to pretend he's going for the ball.
It was a red.
It should be at least a 3 game retro ban.
"A player is guilty of serious foul play if he uses excessive force or brutality against an opponent when challenging for the ball when it is in play.
The awkward cnut was nowhere near the flight of the ball, regardless of Dave's punch. He's at least a foot and a half from connecting with it, yet he charges in so clumsily like that. Incredible that he didn't receive at least a caution for it.
Come on, Eboue. He's fecking nowhere near it.He wasn't far from where it was going. Remember he was knocked off course by Vidic too.
Nowhere near it because 1) he was pushed midair and 2) De Gea got to it firstCome on, Eboue. He's fecking nowhere near it.
Horrible excuse for a challenge.
Did he use excessive force or not?Nowhere near it because 1) he was pushed midair and 2) De Gea got to it first
Not a good challenge and probably worthy of a yellow, but not nearly as bad as you guys are making out.
I'm not getting drawn into legalistic pedantry. There's no way it should be a red.Did he use excessive force or not?
If Premier League referees actually applied the rules of football he would have half the impact in a game that he does.No talent is correct but not a striker I imagine we would enjoy playing against every weekl
1) He wasn't getting there anyway. The trajectory of the ball alone proves that.Nowhere near it because 1) he was pushed midair and 2) De Gea got to it first
Not a good challenge and probably worthy of a yellow, but not nearly as bad as you guys are making out.
So how people feel about an incident is more important than the rules?I'm not getting drawn into legalistic pedantry. There's no way it should be a red.
Sure he does - he offers hope to people of all ages that irregardless of skill or fine motor control you too can make millionsHe actually got MoM?
In no league other than this would that disgusting performance be praised. He offers nothing whatsoever to the game of football.
I think we agree.1) He wasn't getting there anyway. The trajectory of the ball alone proves that.
2) He did, and got clobbered by that oaf for his troubles.
I'm not suggesting he should have received a red card for it, but he should have at least received a booking. When you compare this challenge to what he was actually booked for, it shows how crazy the decision was.
It's called a judgment call.So how people feel about an incident is more important than the rules?
"A player is guilty of serious foul play if he uses excessive force or brutality against an opponent when challenging for the ball when it is in play.
A tackle that endangers the safety of an opponent must be sanctioned as serious foul play.
A player who is guilty of serious foul play should be sent off."
I think your judgement may be off.It's called a judgment call.
were intentions relevant when Shawcross broke Ramsey's leg? All he was trying to do was clear the ball up field after a loose touch left him out of position.Maybe it is. The way I see it is that he was going for the ball and as he jumped he got knocked off course by Vidic and went into De Gea. There's no intent, in my opinion, but the recklessness of it is deserves a yellow.
I've never had the seething anger that other Arsenal supporters had, so maybe try another example?were intentions relevant when Shawcross broke Ramsey's leg? All he was trying to do was clear the ball up field after a loose touch left him out of position.
I agree with you, I think it's been blown out of proportion. He could hardly have stopped himself once he was in the air and Vidic's nudge certainly helped send him into De Gea.Maybe it is. The way I see it is that he was going for the ball and as he jumped he got knocked off course by Vidic and went into De Gea. There's no intent, in my opinion, but the recklessness of it is deserves a yellow.
If you accept that the Shawcross red was wrong, then fine I'll leave you to your opinion.I've never had the seething anger that other Arsenal supporters had, so maybe try another example?