devilish
Juventus fan who used to support United
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2002
- Messages
- 61,939
Dortmund are massively overrated in here
I haven't been following the thread extensively but please dont tell me Spurs fans are trying to compare their victory against Dortmund with our defeat to PSG?Dortmund are massively overrated in here
If you mean are people trying to say Dortmund are as good as PSG then no, nobody is doing that.I haven't been following the thread extensively but please dont tell me Spurs fans are trying to compare their victory against Dortmund with our defeat to PSG?
Name them.Lowkey a good few bitter trolls in this thread.
Merely asserting something is crap without proof is very dumb.What a load of crap.
Huh? What an actual load of crap. Elite clubs are elite because they already have that potential. Hence they demand every manager to actualise it every season. They dont have to develop it. They are not SpursWhen it comes to the league or CL, you need to have or develop the potential to win before you can go on actualise that potential and actually win.
You are verugood at being a fundamentally unserious person at times. United has both the money and the pulling power to easily get into position of being capable of winning the league and UCL in just the next 6 months. Provided they recruit the right manager.Currently, United don't even have much potential to win the league or CL (so far behind the curve is your club), yet here's you banging on with unwarranted arrogance about "winning is the priority not potential to win".
You are the one with serious delusions mate. The type that makes you imagine elite clubs suddenly become small due to a period of turmoil that halts their winning. Its like attempting to paint Spurs as the same as a Liverpool, because it hasnt lifted a league title since 1990.Still, I suppose your delusions helps you to keep up the pretence that United are still in some 'elite' bracket alongside the likes of Barca and Real Madrid.
Great. Because United doesn't meed him either regardless......Pochettino isn't going to United regardless...
Yawnbut I sincerely hope United do appoint (yet again) some "proven winner" as manager in the summer …. because it'll likely mean one less rival for Spurs to bother about.
Not @roonster09Name them.
It should be blatantly obvious United dont give a rats behind where a Spurs finish in the league. A Mourinho was counted as not good enough for finishing miles behind Man City in second. If they cared about Spurs. He'd still be in the job foe he'd have bee supported in the summer window for 'trumping spurs'.....United are an elite club in terms of history and income, but have not been an elite club in terms of football for the last half decade and counting …. because elite football clubs do not finish outside the top 4 in their own domestic league more often then not.
Your claim that Spurs are not rivals to United falls flat given the league table in the majority of seasons since Fergie retired.
a) Nobody is trying to 'shame' Ole, stop exaggerating/making things up. People have said it's a bad result but that he's still clearly done a fantastic job.Spurs fans trying to shame Ole in this thread for losing to PSG of all teams, when Ole was forced to use Mata and Sanchez
What about when Spurs lost 2-0 to Crystal Palace
And why should you? We're not rival clubs. I can't say I really care where United finish either, certainly I'd prefer you get fourth over Chelsea or Arsenal.It should be blatantly obvious United dont give a rats behind where a Spurs finish in the league. A Mourinho was counted as not good enough for finishing miles behind Man City in second. If they cared about Spurs. He'd still be in the job foe he'd have bee supported in the summer window for 'trumping spurs'.....
Teach that to Glaston. He thinks Spurs are suddenly our rivalsAnd why should you? We're not rival clubs......
Except we weren't, and choosing to do so can probably be seen as an error by Ole.Squishy McTroll is on slating Ole for losing to PSG when we were forced to play Mata and Sanchez who are squad players
I'd love to see Poch that Squishy never shuts up about get some use out of these two players. They would look rubbish at Spurs and shatter Poch's whole low value image.
Slating us for losing to PSG when you're not even in the FA cup anymore and we are.
Slating us for losing when we use players that aren't first choice, when Spurs have lost a lot of games recently with their dross such as Nkoudou that Poch has left to dilapidate instead of keeping them sharp
Jesus wept we spent almost 3 times as much on Fellaini when Eriksen was available.... DepressingIf he was always such an amazing player and hasn't improved further that much under Poch, then how come he cost Spurs only £11m in the same summer that Bale was sold for £85m, Ozil for £42.4m, Willian for £30m and Fellaini for £27.5m?
Come on lad, ridiculous to suggest that.Even when I prove squishy wrong he comes back with his infinite posts.
Face it squishy I said above why your club has no history and why it's a disaster if Utd lose to Chelsea but fine if Spurs lose to Crystal Palace
That's why you shouldn't be on here criticizing anything to do with United because your club is a joke with no history where failure is acceptable but failure isn't acceptable here
Btw GlastonSpur Eriksen cost 11 million before Poch was even at Spurs and you use this to say Poch elevated Eriksen to a 100 million player, you're delusional.
Maddison is rubbish compared to Eriksen and Poch is chasing him for 50 million
Even when I prove squishy wrong he comes back with his infinite posts.
Face it squishy I said above why your club has no history and why it's a disaster if Utd lose to Chelsea but fine if Spurs lose to Crystal Palace
That's why you shouldn't be on here criticizing anything to do with United because your club is a joke with no history where failure is acceptable but failure isn't acceptable here
Btw GlastonSpur Eriksen cost 11 million before Poch was even at Spurs and you use this to say Poch elevated Eriksen to a 100 million player, you're delusional.
Maddison is rubbish compared to Eriksen and Poch is chasing him for 50 million
Having seen a lot of Llorente in recent weeks I would say the comparisons between him, Mata and Sanchez are closer than you think. No idea about the other two you mentioned thougha) Nobody is trying to 'shame' Ole, stop exaggerating/making things up. People have said it's a bad result but that he's still clearly done a fantastic job.
b) Being 'forced' to use Mata and Sanchez (With Lukaku also available) is hardly the same as having to use Nkoudou, Skipp and Llorente is it? I get that these players are underperforming but it seems there is an attempt to act like the subs Ole has are pub players.
c) Our result to Crystal Palace was shit. Nobody was happy and whilst the sheer number of injuries provided context, it still wasn't acceptable to be 2-0 down in the first half and to have defended like we did.
It seems like you're intent on making it Spurs fans vs United and I don't understand why. I get Glaston might aim to wind up United fans sometimes, but nobody else is here trying to rub salt in wounds, just trying to have a genuine discussion about Ole & Poch.
I don't know if there's a huge rebuild needed at United, but you're certainly overrating a good few of our players.I'd be saying that it was one poor result and not enough to undo a lot of good work, which is what I have said repeatedly about Ole. If we put in a performance like that at home in a big European game I don't care how long the manager has been there, it's unacceptable. 1 shot on target? No. That should never happen at your own ground. Has Ole had enough time to fully leave his mark on the side? No, but he's had enough time for the team not to be as poor as that. But it's only one game and it's his first loss .. so really it isn't a big deal, is it?
I think the 'we lost because of two injuries' thing would carry more weight if you had looked at all threatening in the first half, but you didn't. For me the game didn't really shift that much from the first to the second half, about 30 minutes in I was saying that I thought PSG looked the bigger threat in behind and that United would get frustrated. I think the injuries are a bit of a convenient excuse for what always looked to be a poor performance, it's especially poor when you consider they were missing two of their best players. Yes though, they are better than you, and losing to them is no embarrassment .. it's just the performance was limp and lacking in any fight, which is never good enough for United.
Ok, a 'perfect side for counter attacking' is an exaggeration, but overall I don't think you have too bad a side and the lack of talent in the side has been overplayed. You've got arguably the best goalie in the world, international level defenders who all cost a pretty price, you're weak at fullback for sure but in midfield the likes of Herrera, Pogba, Matic, Fred etc offer decent balance and some genuine world class talent. Martial, Lingard, Rashford, Mata, Sanchez are hardly poor attacking options, are they? It's pretty clear Mourinho was doing a shit job and United do have some excellent players, now after one loss people are saying there's some huge rebuild job needed? You could do with 2-3 players coming in, but so could most sides. He's hardly working with scraps, the injuries against PSG hurt you but maybe move Lukaku central and Rashford out wide? You keep some pace in the side, you offer a different kind of threat in the middle. We know Lukaku can be an effective threat for other teams, he is for Belgium and he was for Everton and even United last season.
I've seen plenty of United fans push the argument that it's all down to Mourinho and you have a very good squad which would be challenging for the league had Ole been here since the start. Either they believe Ole is some management genius on par with Ferguson, or they think you genuinely have an excellent squad, until it doesn't suit the narrative.
I also don't get why people think this is bad. What do you want him to do, go full on Gary Neville in the presser about spurs being spineless useless cnuts?If we lose to Chelsea in the FA cup it'll be a disaster
Spurs are a small club with no history so they can lose to Crystal Palace in the FA cup and their fans won't say anything and Poch will pretend his club is amazing
This is why Spurs fans shouldn't be on here criticizing Ole and telling us how to run our club
This side is good enough to beat most premier league teams most weeks, so I'd guess that if Ole was here from the start we'd be closer to first than we are now, but tbe champions league is a different beast, and coming up against Di Maria, Mbappe and the likes of Draxler etc was always going to expose the still very present issues with our squad.
The idea of the forums narrative changing after the loss is an amusing one to me, since most of us United fans struggle to come to the same conclusions so often, how can we even have a coherent narrative?
I kind of agree, but honestly I think PSG are better than Tottenham. When we played you we had plenty of chances like you did, we weren't afforded that luxury against PSGThe PSG team you came up against was good, but nothing special or beyond PL quality. The likes of Draxler and Di Maria are good players, but you played and beat us at Wembley (albeit with a lot of fortune ) and we boast the likes of Eriksen, Kane, Son etc. With Cavani/Neymar added to the team, then you're looking at a proper beast, but otherwise I thought they were tidy in midfield, very resolute in defence but not particularly impressive going forward.
In fairness, what they had was a quality defence and tactical gameplan, and I do think that's where Ole came a bit unstuck. The counter attack wasn't functioning (even before injuries) because PSG were exceptionally well organised and Tuchel had obviously done his homework, with a lot of credit also needing to go to Marquinhos/Silva who did a proper job on you. What PSG did best was shut Pogba out of the game, something we failed to do against you and paid the price with the world class ball to Rashford.
That's the way I see the game. I don't view it as PSG being a bridge too far for Ole/United in terms of the quality they have, I simply see it as Tuchel doing very well with the injuries he faced and setting up his side superbly, and Ole perhaps not expecting PSG to play the way they did. The injuries obviously didn't help, and whilst you can argue Ole should have reacted better to them, it's hard to be too critical because he had a very limited amount of time to change the way you wanted to play. Personally I do think shifting Rashford out wide and bringing in Lukaku was a better option than both Mata/Sanchez, but there's no guarantee it would have worked any better.
Anyway, this is in danger of becoming a thread about Ole .. which it isn't! Though it's rather predictable that it would end up as him vs Pochettino with United fans weighing the two options up.
I kind of agree, but honestly I think PSG are better than Tottenham. When we played you we had plenty of chances like you did, we weren't afforded that luxury against PSG
Di Maria, Mbappe, Draxler isn't the best attack in the world don't get me wrong, but it's certainly enough to leave our leaky defence unstuck.
The way PSG set up was simply to choke us in possession whilst being rock solid in defence, once martial and Lingard came off we couldn't really get going and as much as Pogba was chased and marked, it was a big opportunity for him to step up which he failed to do.
As for this not being a thread about Ole, all threads should be about Ole, because he's great.
I do think the Poch-Ole comparisons are pointless though.
Poch has been at Tottenham for years and has done a good job by improving your side to what it is today
Ole has had about 12? Matches at United, God knows how he'd do with 2/3 years and plenty of opportunity to improve the squad.
I do hope we take a chance on him though, as I'd imagine you do too.
Yeah I don't think PSG are a special side, but with all due respect I don't see Spurs as a special side either. You're a really good side, which is why it was great for us to be able to beat you so early in Ole's time as manager.I don't think PSG without Cavani & Neymar are a better team than a full strength Spurs. I'm biased (obviously) but I really don't, I saw them against Napoli and Liverpool and I wasn't impressed in any of those games aside from one in Paris vs Liverpool, but even then they didn't blow me away. Against you I thought they were pragmatic and well drilled and Tuchel impressed me, but I didn't see a special side.
Against us I think in the first half we were very poor/tactically we got it wrong by not playing Sanchez to match up against the pace of Rashford, and also afforded Pogba too much space. The second half we blew you away in terms of keeping the ball and creating chances but simply couldn't find the net, but we paid for our mistakes in the first half and that's football. PSG and Tuchel put in what I would describe as a mature performance, they weren't exceptional or creating that many chances, but they did the basics very well and were tactically superb.
And yeah the Poch/Ole comparisons are weird because really, we haven't seen enough of Ole have we? We've seen him go on an excellent run but it's still such a short period of time. Really we won't be able to judge until he has at least a full season in the league with all the pressures that come with being the actual (as opposed to caretaker) manager of a side like United. I do like him though, he says the right things and for a manager at United to have the fans & squad on his side isn't something to be sniffed at. Tactically I think he will still have a lot to learn (just like Poch did and still does) but it's whether the club will be patient with him or not.
My worry is similar to yours in that the board might be too trigger happy if we aren't challenging right away next season. It's a worry I'd have if Poch was to join the club, since he doesn't strike me as the type that would want to come in, sign experienced, short term players and challenge right away; something that didn't work with Van Gaal or Mourinho anyways.
Why compare a manager who has managed the same team for eons to one who came in a few months to a disaster site.a) Nobody is trying to 'shame' Ole, stop exaggerating/making things up. People have said it's a bad result but that he's still clearly done a fantastic job.
b) Being 'forced' to use Mata and Sanchez (With Lukaku also available) is hardly the same as having to use Nkoudou, Skipp and Llorente is it? I get that these players are underperforming but it seems there is an attempt to act like the subs Ole has are pub players.
c) Our result to Crystal Palace was shit. Nobody was happy and whilst the sheer number of injuries provided context, it still wasn't acceptable to be 2-0 down in the first half and to have defended like we did.
It seems like you're intent on making it Spurs fans vs United and I don't understand why. I get Glaston might aim to wind up United fans sometimes, but nobody else is here trying to rub salt in wounds, just trying to have a genuine discussion about Ole & Poch.
Every club with the potential to finish in the top 4 - including the smaller number with the potential to challenge for the league title - is a rival (in other words a serious competitor) to every other club in that position … because 6 into 4 doesn't go and thus 2 clubs lose out each season.Teach that to Glaston. He thinks Spurs are suddenly our rivals
Yes, it does. For example, if in terms of league position you are close to and vying with one other club for the league title, and both clubs are way ahead of the chasing pack, then that other club is your rival for the title regardless of whether they are located 10 miles away or 400 miles away.League positions doesn't equate to one side being a rival to another
Every season the aim for Man Utd is to challenge for the league title, Spurs dont challenge for the league title ergo I dont view them as a rival. I dont start the season worrying about Spurs so the fact they finish ahead of Man Utd in a top 4 battle is of no more relevance to me than if Arsenal or Chelsea do. Having said that though now I can now see why you view Man Utd as a rival, so like I said cute.
I never said all rivalries are geographical, I said Spurs' are because the only sides who care about them are West Ham, Arsenal and Chelsea. Like United, Liverpool and City don't give a toss about Spurs. Our biggest rivals in the PL era once upon a time was Arsenal because they were the ones we were competing with for the title, we don't give a shit about them now even if we are both occupying the same kind of league positionsYes, it does. For example, if in terms of league position you are close to and vying with one other club for the league title, and both clubs are way ahead of the chasing pack, then that other club is your rival for the title regardless of whether they are located 10 miles away or 400 miles away.
Every season the aim for United is finish in the top 4 if they can (to secure CL football for the next season) - and then beyond that to challenge for the title if they can. This season, for example, United would bite your hand off for a top 4 finish and have no chance of challenging for the title.
It fools no-one to try and imply that United don't care about top 4 if they can't win the title. It's lofty pretentiousness. And it fools no-one to pretend that Spurs are not a rival competitor (along with 4 other clubs) for United for one of those top 4 places.
Cheers. There's been a significant internal shift at Spurs since the days of Juande Ramos, AVB and 'Arry. Every club has their timing, however Spurs have been able to sustain it at a high level under Poch's tenure so far.Agree with this, I never understand how can Levy keep players at club and extend their contracts on less wages (compared to current market)when some of them can get better contracts else where.
And also Spurs eye for good players is pretty decent and gettimg good money while selling players is also top notch
Only thing we are better at is we won a lot more than Spurs
As I've said, it fools no-one to pretend that United don't care about top 4 if they can't win the title. Top 4 means another shot at the CL and United want this as much as any other club.I never said all rivalries are geographical, I said Spurs' are because the only sides who care about them are West Ham, Arsenal and Chelsea. Like United, Liverpool and City don't give a toss about Spurs. Our biggest rivals in the PL era once upon a time was Arsenal because they were the ones we were competing with for the title, we don't give a shit about them now even if we are both occupying the same kind of league positions
And you talk about pretentiousness yet you're quite happy to talk about what Man Utd's aims are going into a season, let me fact check you, our aim is never to finish top 4, never has, never will. It's always to challenge for the title and anything less is irrelevant
Maybe one day Spurs will think the same, until that time though don't assume you know anything about the aims of clubs such as Man Utd
Utter bullshit. You are deliberately conflating competing for a position with rivalry. There may be 6-7 clubs capable of finshing in the top 4 in the EPL. But they are not all rivals. Not a chance in hellEvery club with the potential to finish in the top 4 - including the smaller number with the potential to challenge for the league title - is a rival (in other words a serious competitor) to every other club in that position … because 6 into 4 doesn't go and thus 2 clubs lose out each season.
Manchester United and Spurs do NOT have the same objectives as clubs. Quit this delusional nonsense.Rival: "a person or thing competing with another for the same objective or for superiority in the same field of activity."
I fail to see the relevance of geography to my stance.Being rivals is not confined to geographical proximity.
Dude, It hasnt been the case at any point in more than 2 decades. United's rivals are teams that have consistently from time to time managed winning things over them. Not teams that have finished as the others in the top 4.Nor are Spurs "suddenly" rivals to United (and Chelsea, City, Liverpool and Arsenal) - it's been the case for several years now.
And you talk about pretentiousness yet you're quite happy to talk about what Man Utd's aims are going into a season, let me fact check you, our aim is never to finish top 4, never has, never will. It's always to challenge for the title and anything less is irrelevant
Maybe one day Spurs will think the same, until that time though don't assume you know anything about the aims of clubs such as Man Utd
… You are deliberately conflating competing for a position with rivalry. ...
Rival: "a person or thing competing with another for the same objective or for superiority in the same field of activity."Manchester United and Spurs do NOT have the same objectives as clubs. Quit this delusional nonsense.
…