Wing Attack Plan R
Full Member
Chat shit get banged.
He gets insane amount of residues every year from Pirates and I would assume 21 Jump Street. So long as he doesn't spend absurdly big, he'll never have money problems. And even if he does, he can always roll back on his spending. From what I heard, many of his financial difficulties came because of Amber.Once you lose 650m...
That's without mentioning all the possible he has made in various businesses tbh, unless he was with his money, he won't ever run outHe gets insane amount of residues every year from Pirates and I would assume 21 Jump Street. So long as he doesn't spend absurdly big, he'll never have money problems. And even if he does, he can always roll back on his spending. From what I heard, many of his financial difficulties came because of Amber.
I suppose that’s a good way of looking at it. Behaviour that seems inconceivably awful to me unfortunately doesn’t mean it’s beyond the scope of another person.It's because you are normal and sane. She clearly isn't and it can be hard to comprehend why she did what she did.
I hadn't heard of the subreddit up until 10 days/ 2 weeks ago when one of the threads was "Hot" on my Reddit app so I wouldn't want to slander them but it seems like they would consider those women to be "Depp Super Fans" or influenced by the "Pro Depp Social Media Campaign".Are none of those women feminists also, capable of their own logical thoughts but just sheeple and only those within r/deuxmoi have correct and caring opinions?
Or that they must have internalised DeppsogynyI hadn't heard of the subreddit up until 10 days/ 2 weeks ago when one of the threads was "Hot" on my Reddit app so I wouldn't want to slander them but it seems like they would consider those women to be "Depp Super Fans" or influenced by the "Pro Depp Social Media Campaign".
What an insulting premise towards women that would be. Spend decades campaigning for women to be taken seriously only to disregard them as incapable of their own thoughts if they don't agree with you.I hadn't heard of the subreddit up until 10 days/ 2 weeks ago when one of the threads was "Hot" on my Reddit app so I wouldn't want to slander them but it seems like they would consider those women to be "Depp Super Fans" or influenced by the "Pro Depp Social Media Campaign".
Only followed it on social media, so maybe that isn't reflective but Heard seems to have done a remarkable job turning women against her throughout this trial.Jury was 5 men and 2 women! How did Heard's lawyers let that happen?
Kind of.Or that they must have internalised Deppsogyny
In response to thisWhat an insulting premise towards women that would be. Spend decades campaigning for women to be taken seriously only to disregard them as capable of their own thoughts if they don't agree with you.
ive been bounching between terrified of her and fascinated at the same time. The amount of setups planned, the crap evidence, barefaced lying on the spot with the whole world watching without a flinch, to the over acting. Her best bet is plead insanityI couldn’t agree more.
Absolute nutter who probably needs a suspended sentence/ prison time. Its that serious.
Well when Shamans finds a pin and pops himself out of that bubble, I'm sure he can update us on the goings on in there.Kind of.
In response to this
"All of the jury was men?"
The most upvoted comment was this:
"It doesn't matter when misogyny is internalized. When women take a stance against other women that accuses another man, that women gets attention from men."
I'm sure there are plenty of Misogynistic tweets and horrible things being said on the Pro Depp side (and that they will be published here soon) on various platforms but it's interesting to see what was being said before it went private.
It's been said earlier that women fair better with male jurors in these type of cases. It might be counter intuitive but studies have shown that women can be less likely to empathise with female victims for some reason.Only followed it on social media, so maybe that isn't reflective but Heard seems to have done a remarkable job turning women against her throughout this trial.
I think most women smell her bullshit from a mile away.It's been said earlier that women fair better with male jurors in these type of cases. It might be counter intuitive but studies have shown that women can be less likely to empathise with female victims for some reason.
Maybe they just don't believe her.It's been said earlier that women fair better with male jurors in these type of cases. It might be counter intuitive but studies have shown that women can be less likely to empathise with female victims for some reason.
Oh she absolutely wasn't believable at all. Sorry, I suppose my point was more towards the post you replied to which expressed surprise that there were more men than women on the jury, rather than yours.Maybe they just don't believe her.
I have no idea what went on behind closed doors. But some of her testimony was bonkers, blaming her own lawyers for holding back key evidence, claiming a multi million pledge is exactly the same thing as actually paying it, dragging Kate Moss into it?
I don't think it was ever about the money, or even winning for him. It was more about exposing her for what she is. He knew if he could make her look worse than him, he would get his career back and maybe stop hers like she had done to him.I don't think the money is of any importance to Depp, so it doesn't really matter.
I think Trump has shown that if you double down on your lie your fanbase will embrace it. Why? Because many people think that if they feel strong emotions then the statement must be true.That's outrageous but if she's truly deluded, it's to be expected.
Hearsay. What the trial has shown is that she has unloaded quite a bit of that.I'm glad he won
she is so obviously full of shit
All women secretly hate each other.It's been said earlier that women fair better with male jurors in these type of cases. It might be counter intuitive but studies have shown that women can be less likely to empathise with female victims for some reason.
Can't stand the right-wing extremists trying to hijack this and make it something it's not.
How? Innocent until proven guilty is for the courts, not society, and insofar as it's a principle for people to follow it doesn't mean to blindly follow what the court says, but that you should weigh up the evidence. This case is decided by balance of probabilities, which is the standard most people use except in situations where you want to be more cautius (if you're hiring a babysitter for your child you probably won't accept someone accused of pedophilia even if the chances of it being true are exceedingly low). It's possible, for instance, that the jury found it difficult to decide, landing on a 51-49 in Depp's favour. If that's the case, then someone who judges the case almost exactly the same could reasonably think that Depp is guilty. If you believe that someone is guilty then you'll treat them as guilty, that 7 people on a jury disagree won't change that. According to juries Al Capone is guilty of no more than tax fraud, but we know that's not true. OJ is, according to the legal principle of innocent until proven guilty, treated as innocent in the eyes of the law of murdering his wife. We know he did it, though, and it's not an injustice or against any fundamental principle to create Boardwalk Empire or to utter the famous phrase "OJ did it". We know that both of these people are murderers and that Capone was a mobster.I try and look at these things in the round. We all weren’t there and we don’t know what happened. Credibility is hugely important in these scenarios. And if what she’s saying happened it absolutely is horrific. But the issue is, if it did happen, one of the reasons she lost the case was because she lost her credibility. And you can put that down to bad vs good lawyers and maybe that was a factor. But it’s also because the reality also was that in the round of evidence, there just simply wasn’t anything to really cling to believe it happened; not least also because besides the evidence, she presented herself in a way that eroded trust in her. Which undoubtedly played a factor in the conclusion.
As for Depp, no one should be running around painting him as a saint. However, it’d also be an injustice to hold what she alleged now plays against him. Because it’s that conclusion that I think is against the fundamental principle of our justice systems.
That's not actually true is it? That wasn't the jury's decision.How? Innocent until proven guilty is for the courts, not society, and insofar as it's a principle for people to follow it doesn't mean to blindly follow what the court says, but that you should weigh up the evidence. This case is decided by balance of probabilities, which is the standard most people use except in situations where you want to be more cautius (if you're hiring a babysitter for your child you probably won't accept someone accused of pedophilia even if the chances of it being true are exceedingly low). It's possible, for instance, that the jury found it difficult to decide, landing on a 51-49 in Depp's favour. If that's the case, then someone who judges the case almost exactly the same could reasonably think that Depp is guilty. If you believe that someone is guilty then you'll treat them as guilty, that 7 people on a jury disagree won't change that. According to juries Al Capone is guilty of no more than tax fraud, but we know that's not true. OJ is, according to the legal principle of innocent until proven guilty, treated as innocent in the eyes of the law of murdering his wife. We know he did it, though, and it's not an injustice or against any fundamental principle to create Boardwalk Empire or to utter the famous phrase "OJ did it". We know that both of these people are murderers and that Capone was a mobster.
This is meant generally. If it's completely unreasonable to believe that Depp is guilty then you shouldn't believe that he's guilty, but not because of any legal decision.
10,000,000 : 2,000,000Odds on them getting back together?
Are the Pirates movies any good?
/r/Deuxmoi has private'd their sub , I want to see the salt.