Listar
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 1,147
You cannot think of it from our viewpoint. You have to think of it from the jury viewpoint. It is assumed that the jury knows nothing about the case. So when Amber casually drops Moss name in there implying Depp has previous cases of DV of course depps team is more than happy they can debunk and once again shows that Ambers words are not trustworthy. Not to mention to also allow Moss to drop in a few good personality mention of Depp in there.Can someone explain why Deppos team celebrated the mention of Moss, when realistically it didn't offer anything at all to the trial?
I'm confused why they were so happy about it?
Don’t forget the jury are human and they can judge however they want based on whatever stuff they heard. It’s not a black and white thing but more about who can woo the jury more wins the case. Or in this case maybe offend the jury less will win